/fa/ - Fashion

what do you guys think of the new Tudor Ranger?
>39mm
>COSC certified
>70h of PR
>2860€

>>17119978
old vs new

ngl I think it looks generic as fuck and as a very obvious Explorer cope.
Movement and clasp are good though.

>>17119983
I think it looks better on a nato strap

>>17119978

2 threads? just another opportunity to remind (You)

Any thoughts on these? The local watch shop near me has a few Seikos like pic related at a pretty good discount. I don't own any automatics yet.

>>17120001
based

hello is this my collection atm
i like it a lot

the one that gets the nice comments is the digital one

>>17119999
cool first auto yes why not?
if it has a glass back you can also talk about it to people (just don't be autistic, they won't even remember the convo 2h later)

Cope, if you must. I, for one, will not pay more than $100 for a watch.

>Vacheron Copestantin
>Copedemars Piguets
>Jaeger LeCope
>Copemega

>>17120009
>cool first auto yes why not?
Well I wondered if there was maybe an argument against I suppose.

>>17120040
they're respected for their price, and it comes from a respected brand, and they look nice, hf with it
how much do they sell them for

>>17120047
About $120 or so.

the only good looking Oris

>>17119997
Tudor should have named it Banger instead.

>>17120073
I like this one, the sleek angular case shape is just the right amount of modern.

>>17119980
>soul vs soulless

>>17120038
>Maurice Lacope
>Grand Seicope

>>17119980
Old was actually somewhat proportional, new is just pathetic.

>>17119978
>what Timex are you wearing? my little brother also has one
>what you mean this is a Swiss luxury piece?? haha stop messing with me
>haha how can it be a luxury watch when it looks just like my little brothers Timex haha

>>17120038
>Jaeger LeCope
That actually sounds better than the original. Also
>Seicope
>Copemega
>Copek Philippe
>Copeizen
>Copeio
>Copeor (Credor)
>Copeor (Tudor)
>A. Lange & Cöpe
>FP Cope

>>17120112
>FP Cope
*Coupe

>>17119998
heres the real chart big guy

Thinking about buying a rep. I don't have enough money to buy a gen panda daytona but I love this watch so fucking much. Should I do it??

>>17120112
>>A. Lange & Cöpe

>>17120117
Go for it, I've posted my rep from chazingtime a few times and nobody can tell it's a rep.

>>17120117
everybody will assume you're wearing a fake if you dont have a job which allows you to splurge 20k on a watch
if you want people to laugh at you, go ahead

>>17120115
>ralph lauren
>louis vuitton
lol

>>17120122
Cope and seethe.

>>17119978
I think I’m gonna get one, I think they nailed it honestly. I like it better than the modern Explorer.

>>17120122
>splurging 20k on a watch is unrealistic
Dude what? People spend more than that on various shit all the time, even nice phones cost about $2k these days. We're in a time of consumerism where nothing is weird anymore.

>>17120127
how am I wrong? nobody is retarded enough to believe a minimum wage mcdonalds worker runs around in a 20k watch

>>17119980
the '1' in 12 looks like shit. why it it longer than the 2? and also, 12 isn't even centered?

the numerals look so cheap in general. and the shitty size just makes it look like a generic microbrand watch

>>17120135
>assuming anon is working at mcdonalds
Man you're really huffing the copium today.

>>17120125
the chart is pretty meme worthy, but LVMH has poured a ton of money into their watch development recently. They won a few awards from the Grand Prix. Ralph Lauren also has had a relationship with Richemont group for their watches so there is alot of context that goes into why they were placed where they were.

>>17120139
yeah Im sure he is a doctor making 300k a year and thats why he wants to buy a fake watch instead of just getting a real one

>>17120143
Is this the infamous Rolex cope I see meme'd about so much? You sure are upset about someone buying a rep and making up a bunch of scenarios about his life over it.

>>17120129
I dunno anon.
It's a reissue of a previous Tudor model that was basically a cheaper alternative to the Explorer. It used to be 36mm but for some reasons it's 39mm now. But it's also vintage inspired.
Weird watch. I think they kinda messed up.

>>17120117
kek
The poorfag mentality is hilarious to me.
>I don't have the money to buy the most expensive and sought after Rolex, so I'll just buy a rep
Just save money and buy the real one? It's not that hard

>>17120147
he literally said he cant afford a real Daytona

>>17119978
>fake patina

unfathomably pathetic

>>17120156
And your're doing a lot of hyperbole about him working in McDonalds. Maybe he's some dude on 100k or 200k that doesn't want to drop 20k on the real thing when a rep is good enough, even experts are struggling with the difference these days.

>>17120148
>It used to be 36mm but for some reasons it's 39mm now
I think it's 39 because the Explorer is now 36 but used to be 39. Some people were complaining about Explorer being 36 and not 39 so now Tudor can scoop those people now.

>>17120155
>It's not that hard
How can you know that? Have you ever been poor?

>>17120165
>even experts are struggling with the difference these days..
That's a meme by the way. There are at least 5 very easy ways to spot a fake very easily with a naked eye
>ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX laser engraving on the rehaut, even on the most expensive fakes it looks always dirty
>crown on the clasp : the fakes always use a mold and it looks horrendous (pic related), while Rolex does laser engraving
>the crown at 6 o clock on the glass (if you can see it with a naked eye, it's fake ; if you can see it with your camera by zooming it's real)
>the hands, you have to be a bit trained for this one, but for some reasons fakes always have slightly messed up hands - they just can't get them right

>>17120180
I also forgot the feeling of the brushed steel. Same as the last one, you have to be a bit trained to spot a fake, but it's very obvious for anyone who has already handled a real one.

>>17120180
That doesn't explain why a few dealers sold fakes by mistake and got in really deep shit for it. If you're truly autistic then sure, you can see a difference. But showing it off to Johnson in accounting or your friends? They won't be able to tell at all.

>>17120143
I work in finance but I spend most of my money paying for a medical treatment for my sister to get better. I can pay for one but it's too expensive for me to spend when I need to spend money on something more important to me.

>>17120117
Why not get a hommage instead? I think it's less ethically grey

>>17120183
>But showing it off to Johnson in accounting or your friends? They won't be able to tell at all.
If they have never handled a real Rolex then sure, maybe, but it's dishonest.
Now show Johnson in accounting a genuine Daytona and a $1500 super replica, ask him which one is real, and I'll guarantee you he'll be right 100% of the time.

I own a 2021 Explorer and pic related is the best replica available on the market. When I look at the engraving on the rehaut and the shape of the hands, I'm just laughing.

>>17120165
>>17120186
if you just like the looks of a Daytona you can buy an hommage
the fact that you want a Rolex logo on it so bad is proof that you dont buy the watch for yourself but to trick other people

Do super reps use precious metals?

>new oyster supposedly costs 5500 bux
>second hand for over 10k

>>17120207
Yeah only certified chinesium

>>17120207
No, they use painted/colored steel to mimic gold.
The best ones use high quality steel though.

>>17120207
yeah those 500 dollar day dates are made out of pure yellow gold

>>17120209
yes and?

>>17120148
39 is the perfect size for me. 36 is too small even though it’s the traditional size. I was gonna get a new Explorer but when I handled one at the store it was too shiny and kind of blingy. The Tudor is more my style.
>>17120137
This guy makes a good point though, that 1 looks a little odd. It may bother me.

I wonder if this one will be very sought after and hard to find

>>17120293
Explorer is blingy af. Used to think I wanted one also until I fondled one in person. That clam bezel case thing they got going on didn't sit well with me either.

>>17119980
Absolutely soulless.
Terrible proportions too.

>>17119980
>YAAS QUEEN LETS MAKE IT WORSE LOOKING BUT SIZE IT UP, THE RETARDS WILL LOVE IT!!!!
Hate to see it, absolutely murdered.

>>17119978
Look like shit.
Hands look like they have rough edges, printed dial and buttplug hand shape.
They play the heritage game pretty hard but the watch have nothing special going for it besides a resemblance to the original ranger.
It's not even an evolution of the Ranger, it's an homage with nothing new.

I would have expected at least some new tech and features to show off the pioneering spirit of the watch or whatnot.

Is it a cope?

>>17120372
Everything is cope.

>>17120293
interesting review from Bark & Jack (best watch youtuber honestly)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgsmEVGbAg4

bros...

>>17120422
I like that quite a bit, but one of the tracks does seem redundant. Hands are good, but not great.

>>17119980
instant soullessness

>>17120422
Not the best sector dial i've ever seen, but still nice. I'd love to see what kind of sector dial GS would do.

heavily fighting the urge to buy a vintage santos

>>17120440
JLC released these sector dial watches a few years ago that I love. Unfortunately these are discontinued.

>>17120452
damn those look pretty cool assuming they are around 35mm and not some monstrous modern upsized remakes .

>>17120440
>I'd love to see what kind of sector dial GS would do.
44mm and with a 24-hour subdial. The dial would be textured to call to mind the pile of vomit one leaves on the floor after a night of drinking sake and eating pickled vegetables.

>>17120465
Why are wristlets so triggered by JLC? No other brand makes them screech as loudly.

>>17120443
Probably the only watch that exclusively works in two tone yellow gold/steel for me. Regular steel Santoses look too plain somehow.

>>17120471
>triggered by jlc
nothing about jlc, everyone does it.

>>17120471
>Why are wristlets so triggered by JLC?
It's not the size. It's that JLC, as a brand, is worn exclusively by Chads.

How's your Saturday going /wt/?

>>17120465
They were 39mm
I think it's a reasonable size for the chronograph. Plus it has no date window, which is nice.

Honestly I think JLC nailed it with this design. Too bad they stopped making these watches.

>>17120484
39mm is super reasonable, although the bezel is a bit too wide imo. Makes the watch look a bit boring. A coin edge would be nice.

>>17120484
im just not a fan of the pointless upsizing of vintage inspired releases.

Am I retarded for liking this?

>>17120443
Just do it

>>17120115
>all those fashion brands alongside Omega and Cartier and fucking Zenith
lmao

>>17120491
Why don't you simply buy the vintage watches then?

>>17120469
That's what you want them to do, so you could then shame them some more.
What Susie says of Salie says more of Susie than of Salie.

>>17120515
>What Susie says of Salie says more of Susie than of Salie.
That doesn't say much for your spelling skills.

>>17120515
Sorry your favorite brand makes ugly watches. It's not your fault.

any mechanical watch that has a similar dial?

>>17120526
Just get that one, if it's what you want.

>>17120117
>>17120119
>>17120127
>>17120139
>>17120165
>>17120183
>>17120186

>>17120372
It's a massive cope. The numbering on the bezel looks horrendous as does the pathetic date window.

>>17120471
It's one guy with autism.

>>17120452
Unfortunately too large(39?) but design wise the best sector I have seen from the 20+ modern ones I have seen (Really like the subtle worldtime)

>>17120471
It's because JLC has always made pretty understated and elegant designs. Normally I don't screech about sizing too much because I get that manufacturers need to follow consumer trends, but the new Master Control being bumped up to 40mm really rubs me the wrong way and the models on bracelet they've released makes me think they're trying to make it a sports watch which is just bizarre.

I get that I'm in the minority though and that almost no one buys dress watches anymore so there's no reason for brands like JLC to give a fuck.

>>17120372
Jesus, how many snowflakes does that watch need?

>>17120563
>It's because JLC has always made pretty understated and elegant designs.
But they really haven't. Design wise, they've made a lot of bizarre/experimental stuff and beyond that, mostly they just follow market trends as best they can.

>>17120572
Exactly this. That wristlet anon bitching about JLC's sizing needs to stop putting them on such a pedestal.
>Congratulations. You stayed true to yourself and kept making 34mm men's watches that no one bought. Too bad you're going out of business but at least your pride is intact.

>>17120514
>>17120484
>>17120471
Not the og anon but vintage watches are a pain in the ass when it comes to serviceability, magnetism, water, shock. I guess I want a dress watch in a cool modernish designs & construction in a classical/vintage size. So it’s really upsetting to see all those big brands never shut up about their fucking heritage & do endless reissues of historic pieces but then never do them in a way that is true to the actual history. JLC is one of the worst offenders on all of these accounts.

>>17120572
>But they really haven't
Yes they have. I'd wager around 40% of the watches they've ever made look like some variation of this. Another 30% are Reversos which are instantly recognizable even if they are 60 years old. The rest are oddball watches that quickly get cancelled or highly complicated pieces.

>>17120582
So you're saying they follow market trends they best they can while regularly making bizarre/experimental designs. Got it. I'm glad we agree.

>>17120580
They still make a 36 ultra thin he can buy

>>17120581
Wearing a tiny watch and going on and on about how 40mm is oversized just makes you look like the kid who wore a suit and carried a briefcase to school in fourth grade. Pompous and silly.

>>17120580
Why do clonkerlovers get so defensive and upset at the idea of someone preferring smaller watches? People have different tastes.

>>17120585
Keep moving the goal posts. Can't imagine the mental gymnastics you have to do to consider precious metal dress watches or Reversos trendy when they've been churning them out for the last century.

>>17120591
>he can buy
lol, no he can't.

>>17120595
it's the same guy with an axe to grind who has been BTFO every time he has criticized JLC in a nonsensical manner like 5 times in the last 2 weeks. He's obsessed probably because he can't afford them.

>>17120595
I'm pretty sure the only one who's upset is the one who starts foaming at the mouth about JLC's sizing. Everyone else is having fun at his expense.

>>17120600
Were you here when he went off about the Polaris being way too big and then when someone pointed out that it's almost the exact same size as the Submariner and he completely evaporated?

kneel.

>>17120605
Back to your containment thread

>>17120544
You're a fucking retard for thinking this you dumb piece of shit. Go kill yourself you useless fucking scum

My problem with JLC-Richemont is how they're trying so hard to keep up with their reputation of movement makers.
They'll often release the weirdest and most useless watches with (often) the stupidest design choice.

Take pic related for example.
>chronograph with a calendar and a moonphase
Such a weird design... What purpose does it serve? Measuring the speed of tides?
>luminova on the hour and minute hand, no luminova on the chronograph hand, subdials and indices
Another weird choice. You're allowed to read the hour at night, but you can't use the chronograph complication. The smart choice would be to get rid of the luminova on the hour and minute hands, VC does it for its heritage chrono and it's fine
>that 12 index
Now this one is pure autism. They kept it because that watch belongs to the Master Control collection which has applied numeral indices. So you have that "12" by itself on the dial and it looks stupid.

>>17120619
Then...just...don't...buy...one, instead of letting them live rent-free in your head.

Your whinging is becoming tiresome.

>>17120600
>>17120602
You mean this guy >>17120465 ?
Thats me, I wouldn't categorize an innocent statement like that as foaming at the mouth or nonsensical, idk why you guys focus so much on the brand name, it was a general statement on the trite fashion in which every brand is just making vintage type watches but bigger nowadays.

>>17120620
Are you the kind of faggot who only seeks positive comments on the watches he likes? Because you sound like that kind of faggot.

I think these Lorier niggas might be onto something
>>17119978
>>17119980
>oversized
>fauxtina
>boring dial
>dollar store oystercase™
Tudor keeps blue balling their customers, I'd feel bad for them if they weren't absolute retards

What are some watches that can double as a hammer along the lines of Ball and Sinn?

>>17120629
>they used the batton indices to make the 6 and 12

>>17120636
Don't laugh, can't you read? It's an Official Standard.

Just copped the Big Pilot
What does everyone think?

>>17119998
based

>>17120593
I just like my dress watch to be smaller than my sports watch.

>>17120644
(You)

Any good recommandation with these requirements? My shit Nixon died a while back and I want to treat myself with a nice watch for my 30.

> Around 500 bucks
> Style: minimalist, bauhaus, something casual and simple. Dark cadrant.
> Movement: don't care
> Desired features: it gives time and look nice. Something that does not break too easily
> Preferred strap option: brown leather
> Wristlet so 37 38mm

I saw a Seiko 5 SKL recently I liked it, I also like Nomos but too expensive.

>>17120644
Eat a sandwich nigga
>>17120619
That's a pretty classic style bro
>>17120670
Lugs on nomos make them wear large, so don't feel bad

>>17120649
I want a golden Tank

>>17120619

>>17120706
Good choice. Actually pretty much the only choice, because a steel Tank is just all kinds of entry-level awful.

>>17120624

>>17120689
Based SeikoChad

>>17120194
>Now show Johnson in accounting a genuine Daytona and a $1500 super replica, ask him which one is real, and I'll guarantee you he'll be right 100% of the time.

Yeah but so what? You're never handing Johnson two watches and telling him one is real and one is fake.

>>17120719
Fake watches are for fake people

>>17120521
Why don't you google that?

>>17120649
Looks proper.

>>17120706
Luv me some gold tank with a tad of guilloche
>>17120714
can still look nice, the new solar one is cool, there is a cool shot of a steel one in the thread

>>17120742
Is there a watch like that that isn't completely fucking gay?

>>17120605
Were not so different, you and I
>>17120625
Fug this is pretty nice. I'm starting to thinking that dress watches are the way to go for mechanical. Gshock for sport

>>17120737
Absolutely, probably my next buy. Here is the large option for reference

>>17120625
Actually wait the left one looks pretty damn nice. How much?

>>17120743
Nope, unfortunately.

>>17120752
why not a santos

>>17120752
Reverso is also a good option

Why are Rolexes from Japan so cheap on chrono24? Is the Japanese dong crashing?

>>17120770
Rolexes are going down in general, all watch Youtubers are talking about it.

>>17120756
$500. Miyota movement. Honestly, not a bad deal the dial looks killer

>>17120778
I almost bought pic related at some point last year but I realized it's way too big. Now this seems way too small.

>>17120765
The Santos is very cool but somewhere in the middle of dress & sporty. I own an integrated bracelet sports watch already so it would feel redundant.
>>17120768
The reverso was my preferred choice until I had the chance to wear a tank for two weeks. It’s the best a watch has ever felt & looked on the wrist. Couldn’t stop thinking of it so I will have to pull the trigger sooner or later

>>17120117
>Should I do it??

don't. thank me later. respect yourself. earn what you value.

How many watches do you guys have?

>>17120840
Three after I gave away the worst shitters.

>>17120770
all luxury watches are cheaper in Japan, mostly because of the weak Yen
obviously this only applies if you ignore import duties

>>17120840
Four that I wear regularly, and then another six that are gifts or family heirlooms that I never wear.

>>17120721
You're just regurgitating jingles at this point

>>17119999
Good.
also check these
snk355
snk357
snk361
snk366
snk377
snk381

snxs73
snxs75
snxs77
snxs79
snxs80
snxs81

>>17120840
8

>>17120605
I like how this shit is aging so gracefully. I'm 100% sure Casio makes great watches like this by accident. There is no way so many things could go so right.

>>17120117
Don't be a loser. Just be a man and buy something you can afford or earn the money needed.

>>17120840
One. Rolex Explorer bought this year. I had an Omega Aqua Terra and a Junghans Max Bill I sold recently.
Next one will be an early 2000s Rolex GMT Master II (rootbeer or Pepsi).
Then a Cartier Tank or JLC Reverso.

>>17120840
7

Let me guess, you need more.

>>17120840
6 in my permanent collection. 3 more I rarely wear that I'm trying to gift and 2 more that I bought as backups. My goal is to bring it down to a total of 8.

>>17120115
#unnecessarydickcages

>>17120893
what are the 3?

>>17120194
I can tell too, when looking at this pic, how shitty it is compared to my real one. Literally every detail on that pic is shit

>>17120194
>If they have never handled a real Rolex then sure, maybe, but it's dishonest.

NOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T LIE
I'M GOING INSAAAAAAAANE

>>17120610
>You're a fucking retard for thinking this you dumb piece of shit. Go kill yourself you useless fucking scum
Looks like someone is coping.
People who buy replicas/fakes are useless filth.

>>17120721
kek why do fake Rolex's make /wt/ cope so hard?

>>17120908
Kek, rep buyers are losers tho. They want the real thing but can't handle the fact it's expensive. Instead of buying something they can afford, they need to pretend to have the expensive. Losers without a spine.

>>17120916

>>17120840
12. Honestly, 6 would be perfect.

>>17120840
Over 60.

>>17120840
5
Quartz chrono, dressy watch, flieger, diver, cheap beater digital.

>>17120916
>>17120922
samefag

also, you're just mad you can't tell the difference between fakes and real

>>17120916
>>17120922
I make more than you can ever dream of making. I buy reps because buying a gen would be stupid, nobody can tell the difference and everyone knows I'm rich, nobody would question if my watches are real. Obviously the intelligent decision (you know, the type of decisions that I make correctly which is why I am rich and why you are terminal middle class) is to buy the watch for $400 instead of $15k for an identical outcome. The only people that care about rep vs gens are middle class Erics that can just barely afford (or really not afford and go into debt for) a gen watch because they live in a terminal authenticity crisis. We all know these Erics, they are sales managers, live in $600k houses in prefab HOAs in the 2nd nicest part of the suburbs, drive leased Audis, really I can't imagine a worse life. At least poor people don't have anything to lose, and of course being rich is great, but being barely middle class and still trying to keep up, and trying to get luxury goods in the mix? Sounds like hell. Pic related it's Eric's dining room.

>>17120908
Well yeah, lying is a very gay thing to do, especially about money.
The only reason people buy fake Rolex is because they want other people to think they're richer than they actually are.
To me it's pathetic and sad. Being humble is far superior. For the price of a fake Rolex you can have a cool Baltic. A watch that I, a Rolex owner, would love to own.

>>17120952
LOL, No.

>>17120957
>I make more than you can ever dream of making. I buy reps because buying a gen would be stupid, nobody can tell the difference and everyone knows I'm rich, nobody would question if my watches are real. Obviously the intelligent decision (you know, the type of decisions that I make correctly which is why I am rich and why you are terminal middle class) is to buy the watch for $400 instead of $15k for an identical outcome.

Buying fakes is a faggot move.

>>17120952
Wrong, and wrong I easily can tell the difference but even if I couldn't that doesn't matter, it's still a cope buy from a pathetic man who don't have the spine to own the normal watches that he can afford.

>>17120957
>Being so assblasted you wrote all that shit.
Lol KYS, fakeanon.

>>17120957
Pretty sure I'm replying to a copy pasta, but my house is 1.6m, not 600k

>>17120957
if spending 10k on something stupid hurts your wallet, you are not rich

>>17120980
The copy pasta is written by a poorfag

Only nigs buy fakes.

Tried this sucker on at a jewelry shop today. Pretty fucking sweet, although it’s massive and gaudy, I still kinda love it. They offered it for 12900 which seems like a decent deal. Probably will pass but I’m tempted. Eventually I will get a big, stupid, expensive Breitling.

>>17120636
They are tritium filled glass tubes.

>>17120619
How to tell me you can't afford a JLC without telling me you can't afford a JLC.

>>17120999
Mall/Grand S o y k o core

>>17120964
>>17120968
>>17120971
>>17120980
>>17120987
>>17120998
>Erics lashing out
Oohh, it stings doesn't it? Climbed 30% of the way up the totem pole just to find out that's the real bottom. The laminate floors, the Kitchen Aid appliances, the non-M BMWs, the non-AMG Mercs, I can always smell an Eric a mile away.

>>17120998
why would a nig buy a fake when they can just steal a real

>>17121012
No one cares about your delusions.

>>17121010
Ok enjoy your Casios

>>17120885
based take

>you see this watch? this watch cost more than your car

>>17121020
>instantly get 10 replies and people spam refreshing the thread to defend their shitty gen that they went in debt over
>"no one cares"
Oh, you care. A lot. Especially with that 401k not looking so good right now, sales down, HOA hassling you about the grass again, getting a little behind on those credit card payments, it's a rough time for Erics right now. All you have is that watch that "went up in value" in the last 2 years (Erics don't understand inflation), and now some actual rich guy shows up with a $400 rep that actually impresses people - it hurts.

>>17121020
cope

>>17121010
seethe

>>17120998
big cope

>>17121014
yup doesn't make sense lol

>>17121045
based

Redpill me about Squale

>>17120999
Fuggin gross :DDD

can /wt/ identify Hank Hill's watch?

>>17121068
They're fine. They've been around for a while and used to make cases for a lot of other brands' dive watches, like Doxa and Heuer.

Most of their lineup is simple Rolex cope, but their signature model, the 1521-026/A is decent. Slightly overpriced for what they are, though.

What's up, my friends?

>>17121144
>"1/10 of a second"
>"flyback"

Does the crown say "pull and twist" on it? LOL

>>17121149
So, we woke up a bit bitter, didn't we?

>>17121108
Patek Philippe Calatrava

>>17121149
Oops, you didn't like his watch. Now he's going to get bitchy. Now he's going to accuse everyone of seething because that's how the ol' Boomer tries to fit in.

>>17121108
Tiffany Dial Platinum Calatrava 1 of 10 limited edition

>>17121144
Very nice, lawyersama.

>>17120959

Well said.

>>17120840

>>17121149
>Does the crown say "pull and twist" on it?
There is not enough space in the crown, friend. What are you wearing today?

>>17121193
Thanks, m8. You too, what are you wearing this fine saturday?

>>17120619
are you joking?

>>17121204
>>17121208
Is this a Tudor thread, Tudor bros?

>>17121216
He literally doesn't know what he is talking about.

>>17121224
it could be

>>17121224
>4 days until I pick it up

>>17120101
I really like this one honestly

best strap to pair with an orange face 7002?

When the hell is tudor going to put the new adjustable clasp on the steel BB58s?

>>17121240
Nice

>>17121243
Four very long days, I guess. Congrats.

>>17120422
Grow up and get an actual vintage shitter like the rest of us

Finally, a watch for ME

>>17121243
Superb choice

>>17121245
I see it as Oris' equivalent to Seiko Sharp Edge Series. The dials are a bit bland but it still works.

>>17121246
Black nato with an optional stripe down the middle. Red or blue should work. Or go all out and pick something that screams as much as that orange dial.

>>17121249
It's on the new ranger

>>17121252
Yeah, bought it over the phone (last one the AD had, and they sold it to me for the old price before the recent rise). I could've had it delivered but I'm in the area of the AD on Wednesday, so will be picking it up and getting them to resize the bracelet, might try on the Ranger for lols
>>17121261
No doubt, it's a great watch (apart from the clasp), wanted one ever since the 58 was released

>>17121268
>39mm ranger
Nice, finally.

>>17121271
I've honestly never adjusted my clasp, would be nice to have I suppose

>>17121272
You missed the wristlets all throwing a hissy fit over it.

>>17121284
It's no 36mm like the original, but better than the 41mm diameter of the old one at least.

>>17121261
It's perfect

What are some /wt/ approved American made watches?

>>17121294
Timex

>>17121294
It's pretty much all garbage except for Weiss and maybe Autodromo if you like their funky designs.

>>17121259
could it be?

>>17120492
I wanna say yes but if it were a G-Shock I'd be all over it

>>17121322
MUCH LOVE

>>17120544
>being this mad at people buying reps
kek

>>17121108
Hank being Hank, I'd say Timex.

>>17121355
Hank is a man who is willing to spend more for a quality tool. He would never buy a luxury watch but there's no way he'd be wearing a $30 Timex that won't last longer than a few years. It's definitely an American brand and I doubt it would be Hamilton since they're basically a Swiss brand masquerading as American, which Hank would take offence to.

Which leaves us with... Shinola?

>>17121383
Timex is an every mans watch, there's no way Hank is going to drop a ridiculous amount on a watch. He'd buy one of the mid tier Timex for about $100 and call it a day.

I also have no doubt it would be an automatic.

>>17121383
based

>>17121389
cringe

>>17121383
>shinola
https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertanaas/2016/06/20/ftc-rules-on-made-in-america-concept-for-shinola-watches/?sh=4ab1efdf7950

>>17121108

call me reddit but i like the timex lca and its 90 bones right now. anyone got this?

>>17121383
>Hank spending $500-$1000 on a watch
Bro he couldn't even afford to fix the truck he loved more than life itself and it wouldn't have cost much more than that watch to fix.

>>17121400
The lower tier Shinolas like the one I posted are currently like $400 but in the 90's they were substantially cheaper since the watch market was dead. Only a little more than double the cost of a mid-tier Timex.

>>17121407
The guy buys his pants at MegaLoMart, there's not a chance he's going to spend big on a watch when some $100 Timex will do fine and is a well known American brand. Infact, it was probably a Jack Mason since that's a watch brand made in Texas and is reasonably priced.

>>17121395
>In Switzerland, for a brand to be Swiss Made, at least 60 percent of the parts must be produced in the country

/wt/ on suicide watch

>>17121391
Exactly.

Mega Lo Mart (which is a parody of Wal Mart) would not sell $100 Timex's. They would have the generic Weekender and Iron Man models.

IM GONNA
BUY IT

Thoughts on Tiffany & Co watches? I keep reading that they are massively unpopular, especially compared to Cartier and similar brands. I almost never see them on here, unless they are vintage.

Are they so so, or their movements junk?

Or are they a good watch (especially if you can find one for $1200-1500, not brand new at $2700+)?

>>17121475
Longines does leather + steel watches so well. There's something about them, like a fighter pilot would wear in 1944.

>>17121488
the CT60 is the bread and butter of the tiffany line up for men and features a movement developed by la joux perret / arnold and sons. The cronograph has the noisiest rotor I have ever heard on a watch. most of the atlas collection feature a quartz movement. The tank is also a viable option and features an eta automatic movement. East/west is goofy looking and no one really bothers, but are available in quarts and mechanical. There is no official word yet but I can say that tiffany watches are about to get an entire overhaul. The current lineup is the last batch of the old tiffany.

>>17121505
>>17121488
just noticed you got 1488, very nice. Unless you are interested in building a relationship with patek dont bother buying anything from tiffanys right now seeing as they are developing new watches. If you have to have a tiffany signed dial, look for a tiffany signed blancpain. People dont know what they are but are still from a respectable brand and look pretty decent.

>>17119978
>fauxtina
>no applied markers
it looks shit
also this should be 36mm and rolex should stay at 40 or whatever it was before they ruined it

>>17121505
It seems that way. When I spoke to a representative, they said they are low stock on a lot of their watches, and some are becoming "Notify Me When Available," and retired.

>>17121524
Yeah, just checked. Almost all of their watches are now retired on their website, and no longer available. A massive overhaul will be very interesting to see.

I'm not sure how often a company fully replaces their watch lineup, so this seems crazy.

>>17119978
Looks like an $850 microbrand shitter tbqh. Another L for Tudor

>>17121513
>just noticed you got 1488, very nice

i don't get it

>>17121541
>i don't get it

>>17121549
why did you post my picture, dude?

>>17121552
Because he's in love with you

Got my watch engraved today with a quote from Thorstein Veblen

>>17121598
>Thorstein

>>17121605
not jewish actually, the name is norwegian

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M95KXO-m7fE

This looks pretty epic with that G-Shock right?

>>17121615
>(((norwegian)))

>>17121621
What a stupid piece of cloth.

Good morning eurobros.

My dick just exploded.

>>17121254
Vintage are a pain in the ass.
t. had a vintage Omega

>moggs all divers up to 1000€
>leaves
convince me not to cop this for 500€. do they really have a QC issue?

>>17121810
Looks nice man I like it. Little learning about an in house caliber at this price could he a pain in the ass t get parts for. Probably a dressed up clone of something but maybe not

>>17121810
Looks like shit

>>17121810
It looks very cheap anon.

>>17121810
>lume mixed in with doodoo
>3 different lumes, seemingly
>France
>but also depth in feet, no mention of meters at all
>piss yellow hand set to go along with doodoo lume
and the worst of all
>patent pending in tudor curve
yeah, nah, it can mog these nutz, i'd rather drop dead than be caught wearing this monstrosity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08Pcj5cUFeQ

>>17121810
>990 feet
Why not a thousand?
Seems like they aren't confident enough in their own watch.

>>17121844
1. Seiko 5KX GMT
2. Tissot Chemin Des Tourelles
3. Phoi Bois Eagl Ray GMT
4. Steinhart Steve McQueen GMT
5. Longines Conquest VHP GMT
6. Citizen Promaster GMT
7. Timex GMT Q
8. C63 Salamander
9. Seiko Sharp Edge GMT
10. Cronos Pepsi GMT

Done, saved you all 15 minutes.

>>17121844
>open video in a new tab
>play it
>immediately give it a thumbs down
>close tab
This is how you'll ruin this faggot's channel.
Youtube's algorithm sanctions channels that make users leave their website.
Do this everytime this soifaggot spams his videos here.

>>17121810
>patent pending

>>17121850
>>17121854
unfathomably based

>>17121854
I want to do it, but first post proof that this works.

>>17121854
>>17121856
Just for this I'm going to open a playlist of all his vids and turn on autoplay while I trade crypto

>>17121857
It's happening with Canadia channels because of a law over there that forced Canadians to appear first in Canada. So as a result, people who didn't like Canadians and wanted other channels would click off and find a better matching channel, which then made the algorithm think the Canadian channels aren't interesting to people after a certain genre.

>>17121715
*opens mouth*

>>17121447
Wrong. 60% of the VALUE of the watch must be from Switzerland, which makes it even worse if you think about it, since swiss labor is much more expensive than chink labor.

>>17121857
https://www.yrcharisma.com/youtube-algorithm/
Basically Youtube's algorithm will promote your videos if users watch others videos after yours.
On the contrary, they'll pretty much make you invisible if users leave Youtube after watching your video.

>>17121869
>>17121860
Thanks and done.

>>17121869
Huh, looks like I'm actively making YouTube worse for myself by using YouTube
>go to YouTube
>go to subscriptions
>watch a new video
>leave YouTube

>>17121814
I think they’re stretching out the term in-house a bit. I’ve heard it’s basically a sellita sw200 with finishing and minor tweaks here and there. which i wouldn’t mind desu, cheaper servicing as you say

>>17121844
I'll post this everytime you spam your videos here.

I want an Explorer 2 bros

>>17121810
>patent pending
what the fuck did they mean by this? patent for what?

>>17121938
Explorers are the best Rolex

>>17121961
They are entry cope and the least desirable, not even close to the GMT or the Sub, the best Rolex is either the Sub or the Daytona or even the daydate

>>17121971
can't afford an Explorer?

>>17121985
No counterargument, I see. Hm. Predictable, anon. Very predictable.

>>17121988
Yep. Can't afford an Explorer.
Seethe more ;)

>>17121961
I like the ones without Arabic numerals. I think I'll just get an oyster instead to wear with a suit

>>17121993
Still no argument, though. I mean, if it's really the best, you should be able to at least offer SOMEthing that supports your position.

>>17121988
>No counterargument, I see. Hm. Predictable, anon. Very predictable.
Be nice to him, he's been waiting for the call for over a year and it's starting to get to him.

Nice cool morning

>>17122001
>date window says 23

>>17122004
Yeah. It's not a quick set date and I can't be fucked with setting it. Eventually I'll wear something else and it'll stop and I'll set it when it's closer

new thread
>>17122013
>>17122013
>>17122013
>>17122013
>>17122013

>>17120914
Because they're fake rolexchads. Real rolexchads buy a rolex because of the prestige without second thought of the pricetag, fake rolexchads scrimp and penny-pinch for years to afford a second hand submariner and then seethe eternally when someone gets a functionally identical piece for 1/10th of the price.

>>17122368
bump

>>17121240