/fa/ - Fashion

>>17077866
Why are they holding hands?

>>17077866
1966-1969 and the entire decade of the 1920s.

>>17077972
They are boyfriends

>>17077984
Good choices. I would personally extend the 1960s all the way back to 1960, or maybe even circa 1957/1958 for the rise in the fashion for narrow lapels and ties, though they sometimes existed before that, as well. Then, maybe the very early 1970s could trail along with the 1960s aesthetics, although clearly, clothing by then looked different from the late 1950s, early 1960s. I feel like bringing back two different eras of fashion, there.

>>17077866
anything prior to 1900 just for the fact that everything now is recycled from the 20th century and it would be nice to branch outside of that

>>17077866
Your pic OP, I was told by my aunt I couldn't get a job if a wore a jabot
????
I hate americans and american culture

Roman

>>17077866
1956

>>17078234
Certainly—though with the late 1950s and late 1960s, the differences in terms of silhouette are night and day. The Halterneck dress was still very much in style in '57 and disappeared by the mid '60s. By the early 60s the silhouette for women was much slimmer with shift dresses. Think Jackie Kennedy and Jean Shrimpton. By 1966 you get the miniskirt and Twiggy and at that point I'm very much reminded of the entire decade of the 20s, which in my view did not have such drastic changes as the 60s did. The silhouette for both men and women were very slim and 'androgyny' as we understand it also came into popularity in both decades. The 'look' in the late '60s just reminds me very much of actresses like Louise Brooks, Clara Bow, and Colleen Moore, and I think the times were very much in agreement.
https://youtu.be/NQiR3l3lqJc

>>17078262
It's a slightly earlier look than my preference, but still good. Also, I like the idea of the post-war 1940s dress sense more than the actual fashions, into the early 1950s. Menswear got very wide. A slimmer form of that started emerging by 1966 or 1967, but which especially got extreme in the early 1970s, at times effective for the wearer, and at times not much.

>>17078301
Good insights into how radically different the styles were from the beginning to the end of the decade.

70s; specifically picrel

Napoleonic Drip coming through. Only right answer

>>17077866
The years of expedition, when feral beasts, parasites and women werent in charge of global affairs.

>>17078587
correct

>>17078634
This looks like a fairly modern picture

>>17078743
Yes, it's revival as would be obviously the case if something would to come back from 100+ years back.

>>17077866
The dandies for sure

>>17078634
The Years of early-20th century Colonial tours and expeditions

>>17077866

>>17078927
Not gonna lie, Norton saying he'll strangle his whore was damn hot.

>>17077866
preps

>>17078301
>>17078234
seconding with both of these anons here. Actually not super big on wearing it myself but would love to see both come back. The color palette of the 60s is just really fun.

>>17077866
Tang dynasty China. Women's.

Atlantean Sex Roles

>>17078587
based and grande armee pilled

>>17081111
what's happening here? also nice quads

Late medieval. Hosen are basically skinny jeans but less faggy, and doublets are like suit jackets, but look even better. Also, cloaks and hoods look great and are extremely practical.

80s were goat

>>17078587
yes

>>17077866
late medieval robes.

edo period japan

Can't get more effay than ancient Rome

>>17078558
nigger
>>17077866
Either this or Victorian

We're going back to the last century

>>17077866
striped tube socks
my biggest fetish

>>17081748
we're all going back to the last century except this guy. This guy goes to Medieval England. Fag.

>>17081805
shut yer hole

>>17078927
More movies like that?

>>17078246
Le Grand Siècle de la France.

>>17078634
>>17078927
>>17081844

"Empire of the Sun" (1987)

"Empire of the Sun" _ Steven Spielberg - *Christian Bale* (Bale's acting debut @13yo) - Kristen Scott Thomas - Nigel Havers - John Malkovich - Miranda Richardson (1987) 18062022093311

>>17078587
Murat killed EVERYONE bruh

>>17078587
>>17083236
too revolutionary desu

>>17077866
i want to live in this picture

>>17084211
You think you're BladeRunner but you're just a dull box cutter blade

>>17084247
>BladeRunner
>dull box cutter blade

good one kek

>>17084211
Boring and soulless. Looks like a hotel lobby.

>>17084473
headband is legit conservative touch

everything after the 1930s is complete shit

>>17084911
how was 1930s so superior to 40s as effay cutoff point

>>17085425
60s defo for sure, 20/40s sounds arbitrary imho
>>17084473
tfw there will never be a return to this. Just ugly fat dyke mulattoes with bad haircuts forever

>>17084473
>>17085562
ummm that pic is subtle gender stereotyped hate of patriarchy desu

>>17085575
Speak english you retarded faggot
What does that even mean?

>>17085612
nazi kys

>>17081246

>>17077866
1980’s Los Angeles suburbs. White punk gangs. Peak kino. Belinda Carlisle GoGos-core for the ladies.
https://youtu.be/BGmVjUGeWrQ

>>17085912
https://youtu.be/4QZtywRfgN4

>>17085912
based

>>17077866
Late Medieval/Early Modern European traditional

>>17078558
The 70s are a fucking goldmine of good style

>>17078558
>>17087031
>goldmine for good style
if you're aiming for n*gger pimp status

qing dynasty fits, hairstyles too (not related)

>>17077866
1850-1900
In this range you see everything:
More ornate and aristocrat looking clothes but also suits that resemble what people would wear nowadays in more formal settings.

2013

1920s work clothes, or even just casual clothes from the 1880s.

>>17078558
my brotha

>>17086389
red riding hood core

Come home, white man

>>17084211
Contemporary, relatively minimal interior design always tries to sell you with these million dollar vantages, like you're living in a penthouse on the 50th floor or far away from the city, overlooking it from a distance.

>>17089936
>Come home, white man
>Posts picture of flintstones tier Nubians
>Doesn't know his ancient history
To be caught lackin basic knowledge of history, that shit ain't /fa/ nigga

>>17089991
Give me a massive house in the midwest with a huge wrap around tv-- Fahrenheit 451 style, anyday over that shit. /Fa/ggot would spend over a million dollars for that view I could have one day out of the week with a massive wall of a tv. Los Angeles skyline one day, sakura blossoms in Japan the next. He thinks he's living cyberpunk bladerunner shit, I'm living it in a majority white city with low crime levels and a barn in the backyard lel

>>17077866
General fashion of that era or also more niche trends? And what about older fictional fashion?

I want brooches and cloaks to come back. Tunic + cloak + jeans would be a based outfit in terms of practicality and fit. I suppose neo-early medieval.

The 70's people got wild and bright with fashion and everyone loved it because they were high on coke all the time

Let's go back to a time where you could meet an ill dressed plebian peasant in the streets at night and cut him in half with a zweihander for being in your way.

>>17091376
Swiss mercenary soldiers of Renaissance with similar uniformcolors to picrel?

>>17077866
Classic british style

>>17087902
There is more to the 70s style than the nigger pimp style, granted that would be much better than what ever they are wearing nowadays

bring back cloaks and robes and cool belts

>>17077866
Emo

>>17092304
emo eboy revival now

>>17077866
1900-1950 working class clothing

Renaissance codpieces revival

>>17081121
looks like witch trials to me

>>17078558
but also this

>>17093496
Swedish sexy satin effay in a kinda mid-70s ABBA "Arrival" way

>>17090950
>Nubians
Nubians already had civilization way before West and North Europeans did.

>>17093347
I wonder how long it took them to get dressed

>>17093715
They had valets de chambre to prepare their clothes and dress them in a.m. desu.

>>17093715
Other people dressed them, usually more than one person so probably not that long, henry the 8th even had his own arse wiper who was one of the most important and powerful people in the royal court funnily enough.

I like the idea of a cape as the most basic piece of menswear

>>17077866

>>17093688
bullshit. sumerians (northern europeans) built cities while nubians were fucking goats

>>17095136
>sumerians (northern europeans)
visible confusion

>>17095143
>we love Sumerian sea bears uwu

>>17077866
500 bc

>>17096032
uhhh ... fashion examples pls

The 40 year period between the 1890s and the 1930s.

>>17093723
I wonder how expensive it would be to hire a ass wiper today...

>>17077984

>>17077866
Fuck it
Rococo

>>17097836
+1 French Rococo

>>17085912
People dress like this all the time now.

>>17097645
You can hire a home health aid for minimum wage.

>>17077866

>>17081114
i'll fight to bring this back so i hope youre not fat and ugly when you show support.

le great reset could have us all harvesting oats by hand (artisan bespoke porridge)

>>17093723
in addition to arse wiper, another valet brought Henry VIII basin and cum rag for early morning wank off

spirit of 69 baby

>>17089936
it was more like this

>>17098514
you would know

Like pic rel — chilled out versions of 1890s public wear

>>17098665
>le /fa/ tarot card poster

>>17098979
cool af Russian Impressionist scene

>>17098665
kinda gay ngl

>>17078587
GIIWTWM

>>17100505
based Nappy uniform

>100+ posts
>no toga posted
disappointed in you /fa/

>>17100939
Also I swear one of these days I'm just going to get a toga and become the mad man who walks around town ranting about politics in latin to any passerby

>1920s Sewing Philosophy
In the 1920s, there was a heavy push to re-imagine clothing construction so that people could continue to make their own clothing, but for it to take less time out of their lives. It came in right after the Victorians and Edwardians, who did not value labor very highly and encouraged the complete opposite. However, unlike today, 1920s dressmakers were not interested in making things cheaper; just easier to construct, practical in a modern way but still equal quality. I wish we could go back to this mindset of design, this idea of trying to make clothing modern, convenient but NOT cheap, sloppy and second-rate right off the rack.

>18th century / 19th century Layering
I want to go back to layering in practical, functional ways; I now wear a t-shirt dress under '90s denim sleeveless dresses during the day, take off the denim and then sleep in the same t-shirt dress. I've cut out sleepwear, except for a winter robe, without actually "losing" anything/going without. I technically don't wear any more articles a day then a normie, but because I'm layering like this I can adjust for weather changes (switch between shirt sleeve lengths, fabrics) and stuff while technically owning less overall.

>>17100940
based

>>17100939 >>17100940

I think the "modern" way to toga would be to wear a simple skirt that has a long section of fabric sewn onto one side of it and then you would wrap it up your body. I think a modern t-shirt of the same color as the skirt would pair nicely with it and using a sewing machine over hand-stitches would give it a clean, modern edge that would communicate you're not wearing a costume, but a modernized garment.

>>17100940
gimi that consul of Rome drip

>>17101244
CONSVL ROMAE FVIT!!

>>17100948
I miss the varied fabric types pattern and texture of pre-20th c. clothing. The myriad of different options and the specificity of clothing for occasions and purposes.

Layering is definitely a way to bring interest and more complexity of color and texture to outfits, and layering allows practical purpose of keeping exterior layers of finer clothing free of perspiration and soiling.