/fa/ - Fashion

Stay salty poorfags

>>17087390

Reminder.

As always, cope, if you must.
If you are already coping, you may continue to do so.

I like this non-rolex watch, it's aesthetic and/or useful
>cope cope cope
H-huh

Tudor shill reporting in

>>17087394
Can't afford a Richard Mille, goy?

I need a good cheap rugged dress watch that's preferably tonneau and vintage looking if not outright vintage (because those are inevitably way too small). Ideas? Something reminiscent of art nouveau maybe?

>>17087394
Chinese rolexes are unironically better (because they're quartz)

>>17087407
fossil? they have a weird selection of art deco looking stuff.

>>17087407
Seiko makes a few.

>>17087417
SUT889, 64 dollarinos at Walmart

>>17087416
Yeah, something along those lines actually. I posted about this already btw, just so you know that I've seen the usual vintage Gruens and Longines and Hermeses and that sort of thing (and most of them would be great if not for being smaller than a postage stamp).

>>17087422
Like this for example.

>>17087394
Nice rep, did you also get it from Chazingtime?

>>17087422
tissot has a quartz art deco - Z173K. but its like 22x36mm or something. so not that large either. but stainless steel.

Explain Richard Milles to me.
Imho those look disproportionate are fucking ugly as sin and don’t bring anything exceptional to the table.
>inb4 hurr poorfag
Maybe, maybe not

>>17087393
fpbp

>>17087444
I think people like that they don't look like a Patek Chronograph from the 1950s. Their designs are completely wild.

>>17087444
Why do poorfags hate what they don’t usderstand?

>>17087444
>don’t bring anything exceptional to the table.
It literally takes 5 minutes of research to see why RMs are exceptional technically speaking. I don't particularly like their design language but their movements and complications are varying degrees of genius.

>>17087454
>implying people are buying these for the "technology"

>>17087444
>Manual winding tourbillon movement with hours, minutes, oversize date, UTC (Universal Time Coordinated), am/pm indicator, function selector, power-reserve indicator.

>Vibrating alarm function with on/off activation indicator.
If anyone else is making anything this insane, I have never seen it.

>>17087454
>>17087462
No one buys it for the tech. It’s a statement piece
Literally same as Hublot or Jacob & Co.

>>17087462
>hey man thats a nice manual winding tourbillon movement with hours, minutes, oversize date, UTC (Universal Time Coordinated), am/pm indicator, function selector and power-reserve indicator
>nigga daz a rickard meal

>>17087470

>>17087458
>>17087468
>>17087470
The guy asked why Richard Mille is exceptional. I know it's difficult to separate the watchmaking from the bizarre celebrity collabs and everything else, but the fact is RM deserves their success based on the merits of the watches. Personal taste aside.

>>17087470
>wearing the erotic watch
Unironically based Drake.

>>17087470
>rickard meal

>>17087475
>personal taste aside
Nigga my personal taste says it looks like a fucking piece of shit.
It literally looks like it came out of a 3d printer in som Pingpong Chong province China.
>b-but the merit
If so Hublot and Jacob makes even more rad shit. Would you still claim those brand deserve respect as well?

>>17087484
>It literally looks like it came out of a 3d printer in som Pingpong Chong province China.
That's fine but if you can't realize the technical merit then I have to assume you either don't know what you're looking at or you're just trolling.
>If so Hublot and Jacob makes even more rad shit. Would you still claim those brand deserve respect as well?
Hublot does some decent work in materials science. Jacob&Co is approaching more haute joiallerie in my opinion but yes it is certainly worthy of respect, even if I think they're ghastly. Hublot is more of a grey area and I wouldn't be terribly upset if you called them shit.

>>17087444
Here's what you need to know about Richard Mille
>hire skilled watchmakers and designers and give them carte blanche to make the most insane movements and cases
>sign patnership with celebrities
>make watches in very small quantities
>brand suddenly gains a lot of recognition on Instagram and among watch nerds
>billionnaires from Dubai and Qatar go crazy over them
>brand is now seen as a safe investment
Now the thing with watches or jewelry, is you can invite buyers from all over the world and sell them in duty free zones. They wear them on their wrist when they take the plane, fly back to their country, and sell them locally with a fatter benefit.
Very few people actually wear Richard Mille watches. They're an investment.

>>17087490
Ok i get that
But your pic literally reeks Swatch

What are you guys thoughts on sending a used Omega I recently bought for service so they send it back as new and every scratch and dent is actually made by me? Worth the $500-$600 they charge? They replace other shit too.

>>17087509
Most will tell you not to repolish the case. It's obvious when a case has been repolished because all the sharp edges will get rounded over and it'll look crap as a result. Getting a new crystal or just cleaning it up is fine though.

>>17087512
Polish it by hand
Old scratched up watches look like shit

>>17087519
Unless you have the proper tools and skills it's gonna look like shit.

>>17087393
>>17087449
The man who mindbroke /wt/

>>17087509
Don't do it unless it's due for service. Polishing it is probably a bad idea.

>>17087521
Wrong
Its super easy

>>17087525
Feel free to show off the sharp edges you've preserved in watch cases then.

>>17087512
>>17087523
Alright, I wont do it, I would think Omega would have a special method to polish them considering that they do it every time a watch is sent for service.

>>17087526
Don't polish the edges down ezpz
You're not putting it under a 2" wide high speed buffing wheel
Do it by hand

>>17087544
Even patek will fuck up repolishing sometimes.
https://www.watchprosite.com/page-wf.forumpost/fi-11/ti-1081708/dv-true/wf.responses.open_bLoB_s-0/

>>17087550
At least they ended up replacing the case for him. No clue how they could let that through.

>>17087560
Who knows. Here's another example just for shits:
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=434013

>>17087390
Any of you faggots get made fun of for wearing a fitbit and a watch at the same time? I've had it happen a few times.
>wear watch on left wrist
>wear fitbit on right wrist
They asked me why I'm wearing two watches.

>>17087569
I don't use smartwatches but I do chuckle when I see Harry Metcalfe doing exactly what you are describing. Not sure if they still sell it but at least Sinn used to make a strap where you have your regular watch on top of your wrist and your apple watch on the opposing side (both on one wrist).
What do you even use a fitbit for?

>>17087569
I wear an Apple Watch face down so it looks like im just wearing a bracelet on my right arm.

>>17087578
>What do you even use a fitbit for?

It keeps track of my heart-rate, sleep, and steps. I've had it for 5 years now and I can see my progress and statistics going back that far, everyday. It's a way to motivate me to stay active and healthy, and I can track it with quantitative data. I'm worn watches for 30 years, so I wasn't going to stop because I got a Fitbit. The Fitbit sucks ass as a watch replacement. You have to turn it up or tap on it to get it to display the time. Tapping it works only half the time. I guess you can have it on all the time but that sucks the battery life from a week to a day or so.

>>17087569
Explain why you need to wear a fitbit all the time. I'm currently training for a marathon and use a Garmin when I'm running and to track my sleep. That's it.
>steps
Useless.
>heart-rate
Useless unless you are actively working out
>sleep
Useful

>>17087400
how about you post a watch that isnt an obvious Rolex cope then?

>>17087591
Why are steps useless?

>>17087591
He probably finds the stats you find useless as useful.
Pretty simple.

Tissot-Seastar-Servicing-Bro...

... i meant to ask in the original thread, did you reapply that lume yourself, because it looks very crisp and hardly degraded?

>>17087604
>>17087606
Counting steps is useful if you do no physical activity whatsoever. If you are an active runner it's more of an annoyance than anything as I can run 25,000 steps one day and then it tries to tell me I need to walk 10,000 the next. No, I actually don't need to do that. I'm assuming if this guy has used a Fitbit for 5 years in a row he is at least physically active.

>>17087610
I find it useful still. I'm athletic enough. I run about 30-50 miles per week (depending on the event I'm training for) but I still like the steps counter because I have an office job. The steps counter reminds me to not just sit at my desk on the phone all day, but to get up and move around.

>>17087569
Whoop was made for this reason.

Post collections.

>>17087650

>>17087654
Nice. I dig the Cosmonaute.

>>17087650
>>17087654
I’ll post mine tomorrow if the thread will still be up
>>17087650
I want that Cartier

>>17087650

>>17087690
If you’d sell all that fake shit you’d be able to affoard a real watch

What is the absolute nicest watch I can get for like $2k? My fiance is getting me a wedding present. My only request is that it's not a chronograph and it's somewhat sporty and thin. Any suggestions?

>>17087693
which ones are fakes?

Does anyone here have a Bluetooth G-Shock?
Are you able to set the 'signal' function to only come on during certain times of day?

>>17087704
The tip off is that you're storing a million dollars' worth of watches (if they were real) in a box that costs about 20 bucks.

No one does that.

Ok /wt/ explain to me why niggers like >>17087706 make watchpics in some retarded places like fucking grass, asphalt or on a beer glass?
I mean like what the fuck are you doing you pseudo artistic fags?

>>17087713
Variety is nice. Sometimes it's nice to have a change of pace from a pasty wrist shot in a poorly-lit basement.

>Tissot Gentleman Powermatic
What’s bad about it in it’s price bracket?

>>17087701
>2k
The only thing you’ll hear about this watch is that you’re coping for rolex but fuck those niggers

>>17087718
I have one in green.
It’s literally poor mans oyster perpetual. Great watch

>>17087719
Save up a little more and get the Tudor Royal, if you're going to go for a DJ-esque Tudor.

>>17087725
Royal’s great but that 1926 is also great. More on a dress side of things imho, but passes as a daily.
Pic rel
My Royal

>>17087709
That and the styles are just all over the place with no consistency. That bottom row is really hideous.

I want to do it guys, the prices are low...

>>17087734
Looks dope
Do it

>>17087731
The 1926 is the choice IF you intend to put the watch on a leather strap at some point. If you're only ever going to leave it on the bracelet, then the Royal greases it.

>watch a review on a watch i like
>every single time they call it a good beater

can any poorfags relate? this was on a $300 g-shock btw. seriously how much fucking money do you have to call $300 chump change?

>>17087741
I’d agree with that statement. I’ve seen this version with pretty nice leather strap.

>>17087742
Unfortunately, working-class people are kind of left out in the cold in a hobby that involves collecting luxury goods.

>>17087742
About 10k$/month?
300

>>17087742
>watch a review on watch I like and actually can affoard
>every single time they call it entry-level

>>17087742
Entry level in autism world but in the real world it's the mid to higher end, since normies just get cheapo watches from WalMart or an Apple Watch.

It's a bit like buying a fully optioned Mercedes E class; you'd be high tier amongst normies and their cars but be a poorfag in a world of Bentley's, Lambos and Rolls Royce.

>>17087755
An entry-level Ferrari is still a Ferrari. Entry level isn't always the cheapest model, it's also typically the most accessible model.
Take Omega, their entry-level models, the "welcome to Omega" pieces are the Speedmaster Pro and the Seamaster 300.

Don't worry so much about the hot takes by YouTube paid reviewers. Buy what you like.

>>17087769
>Seamaster 300
I liked them just because they were in Bond films kek. I probably wouldn't buy one or even really know about watches if it weren't for those movies.

Ok /wt/ here’s my shit. This Royal is also mine >>17087731


>>17087769
Yeah I know but it’s still hard.

Orient Star just put out a new diver.
41mm (that's Japanese measurement, so it should be pretty reasonably sized)
Standard Japanese 200m WR.

No word on pricing that I know of but it looks pretty classy.

>>17087798
I don’t know how to feel about Orient Star. Are those worth paying more for them rather than buying regular Orients? We’re talking something like Seiko/Grand Seiko here or it’s simply more expensive variants?

>>17087806
Seiko vs Grand Seiko is completely different. Different movements, different cases, everything.

Orient vs Orient Star is more, level of finishing. Better case/movement finishing, but same movement, better dials, etc.

>>17087809
Makes sense. Would buy this one purely for XII hour mark.
Having said that i find them expensive if it’s just finishing…

>>17087814
Pic rel

>>17087814
>Having said that i find them expensive if it’s just finishing…
Finishing is expensive. The difference between JLC and VC for example comes down, in large part, to finishing, since JLC builds a lot of movements for VC.

18k gold Tissot from a jewelry store in Treviso, Italy.

>>17087817
Yeah I get that. I saw few Orient Stars in a shop window, but I think I have to take a closer look
>>17087818
Post that Longines i asked for in previous thread ffs

>>17087526
i wore this everyday for like 9 months. It was scratched to fuck. A few minutes with a cape cod cloth, and its looking great. Should've done it sooner.

>>17087832
You are right, it does look like shit.

>>17087836
lmao
i dont have pics what that looked like before, but heres what the clasp looked like, just imagine that all over

>>17087832
DO NOT USE CAPE COD CLOTH. All you're doing is creating microabrasions. Look at it under flat light and you'll see how the surface is ruined with swirlies.

When you sent it to Rolex, they'll refinish it professionally.

Also, not for nothing, it's a tool watch. If it looks perfect then you just look like the faggot who buys a Range Rover and never drives on anything more challenging than wet leaves.

>>17087654
Ah a fellow formex enjoyer I’m wearing my essence right now

>>17087839
after
>>17087843
whatever, its looks soo much better now. i was super hesitant for months because ive seen the 100x pics of the marks it makes, but thats under a microscope, not your eyes. take it easy, and only polish in one direction, no swirls. After my stunning success, the next time I need to do it, I'll get a few different grits of diamond paste and go after it with a wool-felt pad. That leaves no tiny scratches. But it does look so much better. And the reason it does have so much wear is I do wear it all the time, to work and everywhere. I bought it to wear it, after all

>>17087852
No offense, but you really did a shit job.
You should have just left it with its natural wear and tear marks.

Raketa

>>17087866
The linen dial is pretty nice.

>>17087863
it was a few minutes for each side, was not going for perfection. it shines now, and looks much better. i made sure to get close up so you could see the imperfections, but at an arms distance, you dont see any of that, where you would notice the scratched surface before i did anything. very happy now.

>>17087868
You don't sound happy. You sound desperate for some anon to validate your half-assed effort.

>Great job, anon! Looks near new now! I can't believe you did all that in five minutes with a Cape Cod cloth!

>>17087832
>>17087852
>>17087868
>ruined the satin finish and made it chrome

>>17087871
oh but i am happy about it. i was not happy looking at the scratches all the time, listing to "people" telling me im going to round the case off if i try to polish it. Again, if were to give my full effort, I would get a few different grits of diamond paste and a wool pad. You could alternatively get some green paste and do that by hand. I think you really would fuck something up trying a high speed buffing wheel, that is way outside my paygrade.
>>17087872
it was never satin, which is another whole can of worms im not stepping in. not near enough info out there.

>>17087880
>it was never satin

>>17087882
i never did anything to that, only the sides and clasp.

>>17087701
Anordian has nice watches in that style.
Weiss field watch.

Both are better looking than NOMOS and poodor

>>17087832
I guess you can polish a turd

>>17087390
you know what's funny?
Having a luxury watch in bongland or america where people are fat and dress like shit.
Almost defeats the purpose really, just like flowers dipped in shit.

>>17087396
Richard Mille should be edited into one of those freakish plastic bimbos with 2000ccs of sillicone pumped into their tits and lips ready to suck 3242 cocks with a big price-tag coming out her vegenea

>>17087899
thank you! now maybe GO can learn something about polishing, vastly inferior to GS

>>17087650

>>17087915
Show me proper wardrobe for:
>Rolex Day Date
>Omega Seamaster 300m
>Tudor Black Bay GMT
You can also share examples of people looking like shit wearing expensive timepieces

>>17087925

>>17087925
by all means, go ahead and wear your Daydate and Semenmaster, they are great watches, but having them covered in cheeto dust and whooping noises whenever you leave the house or get out the car is going to depreciate those watches lightning fast.
On the off chance that you're not overweight and not dressing like shit, everyone else is and they are going to ask you why you have a fancy watch in the same way stupid people would ask you why you're reading a book.
Just doesn't make sense.

first fake gold watch id be interested. it looks great.
https://youtu.be/cxk9Zc22Kkg

>>17087706
Are those the lines of a parking lot? That watch looks 400 mm. I knew gshocks were big but damn

ID please

>>17087948
Invicta Magnum Zeus Bolt

>>17087742
I can relate. I also bought a $300 g-shock. Seemed weird but who cares? I loved mine when it arrived, it's beautiful, I stared at it for months, and the fact that people called it a beater didn't matter at all

Can you believe that the bracelet does not have on the fly micro adjust but the leather band clasp does?

As far as I'm aware, they are the only ones after formex that have been doing it.

>>17087021
Massive. What I really should've done was spend ten thousand dollars on a watch I don't actually like very much because of a sense of self-inflicted peer pressure.

>>17087399
Can I ask if this is deliberately wrong? I mean, why is Ressence in 'Ultra Luxury'?

>>17087544
Repolishing is always wrong if you want to sell the watch ever.

>>17087780
throw out everything except the hydroconquest

>>17087550
Jesus, I thought this was going to be nitpicky, which given the price of the watch would still be understandable, but fucking hell.
Did they let the intern do the finishing?

>>17087436
Got it on dhgate for $50 lol

>>17087915
>>17087933
>the masses are dumb slobs and I should be one too
quoting you

>>17087650
I REALLY want to, but some anons here may enrage a bit too much.

>>17087607
Nope, dial lume is dead and no longer glows at all but the hands still have the slightest glow to them before fading after a few seconds. I'm nowhere near brave enough to attempt reluming anything myself. Given the condition of the rest of the watch, I'm honestly surprised how mint the dial looks in all honesty. It's literally perfect when you're not looking at it through a scratched to shit crystal.

>>17088113
Just post it already or GTFO, faggot.

>>17087706
No. It's trivial to set it manually but I can see how it can be useful if it were automatic. If you only need it for 5 hours in a day you can set consecutive hourly alarms but you would have to turn them off manually.

>>17087569
I always do this with long sleeves only. With short sleeves it looks too stupid.

>>17087742
I think any sports watch is a beater. The only watches I wouldn't consider beaters are watches with fragile complications. When it comes to price it's all relative since there are people with $50k beaters. All G-Shocks are beaters and regardless of price I wear them carefree.

>>17088166
Why not wear a smart watch like a Garmin if you want a beater sport watch? Genuine question.

I have one myself and I use it when going for hikes in the jungle or swimming. It's versatile an keeps track of shit like my heart rate, steps, my altitude etc.

>>17088169
The only thing I need to track is time.

>>17087650

>>17087742
Imagine having to work to survive LMFAO fucking dumb lazy slave.

Which watch brands you would NEVER consider even if you had unlimited money?
For me it's
>Omega
>IWC
>Tag Heuer
>Panerai
>Breitling
>Hublot
>Girard Perregaux
>Glashutte Original
>Jaeger Lecoultre (especially their recent models)

>>17088191
>t. no individuality or personal taste
kek'd

>>17087719
>founded as a Rolex cope factory
>designed as Rolex cope
>marketed as Rolex cope
>literally sold in the bargain bin section at the Rolex AD

>>17088194
I'm sorry you've spent 6k on an Omega that is now worth only 2k.

>>17087650
I like every single choice here but don’t you find yourself a bit heavy on integrated bracelet sports watches (5/8) to the point of redundancy?
I think the collection would be just as good if it lost the bottom row

>>17088191
Tag Heuer has always seemed like a cheap mall brand to me.

>>17088199
What 6k Omega is now 2k?

>>17087650
Fine. There are still quite a few watches that aren't yet photographed, as I'm still trying to go thru the entire collection, but these are the bulk of it.

Check out the rollies

>>17088227
>posting the same fakes over and over again
This is getting boring anon.

>>17088227
ugly

Dropped out of Harvard...

Went to ICEBOX .... bitch!

>>17088223
Best not-larping collection I've ever seen here. Congrats lawyersama.

>>17088223
Wow post cock please.

>>17087701
Parmigiani Fleurier Tonda

Can white people wear gold? Is it a good look?

Does a poor mans moon watch exist?

>>17088234
Show me where the fuck I can get a Tonda for 2k and I guarantee I'll buy it.

>>17088223
Can't afford a Rolex?

>>17088239
Oh darn i'm sorry, i read that as 20k, my bad.

>>17088223
I hate to admit it, but this collection belongs to someone who doesn't let himself pressure by trends. Unironically, a "buy what you like" very impressive collection.
Well done, anon.
And fuck you, you're the cancer of society.

>>17088246
Lol remember that this is a thread on the public internet after all, there's poor people everywhere.

>>17088262
I should know, i'm one of them.

I camped overnight up in the Brecon Beacons to see the Solstice sunrise this morning, it was absolutely beautiful. I wore this watch whilst lugging all my fucking gear up and down the mountain.

>>17088270
Very jelly, I'm going up Snowdon next month, hopefully the weather is like today.

>>17088223
>42 watches
What's even the point here?

>>17088267
Why? Just fix your life?

>>17087650

>>17088290

>>17088285
Can't be done.

>>17088294
Then why are you still alive lmfao?

>>17088283
This is what happens when you're both rich and like watches, you have a diverse and interesting collection. Obviously most posters on /wt/ are neither and just LARP about Rolex

>>17088223
cant afford a Rolex?

>>17088297
Having 42 random watches is literally pathological moron. It's like liking dogs and having 42 dogs.

>>17088223
You look fat as fuck

>>17088295
Not for long.

Yeah I'm thinking this is the best watch for 1200$

>>17088223
Lots of shitters and too many 90s luxury watches you bought second hand for almost nothing.
Sell all of them except the FP Journe and that one vintage Omega, and buy a Rolex.

>>17088335
Stay mad and keep LARPing

>>17088335
imagine going thru all that work, just for being butthurt
LOL

>>17087650

>>17088318
>40mm case
This is the only on wrist photo I can find that isn't a promo, way too big for everyone but fatties

>>17088010
Y tho?

>>17088191
>Hublot
>Jacob & Co.
>Piaget
>Bulgari
>Sinn
>A, Lange & Shit

>>17088197
Seethe faggot
Post your rolex

>>17088197
Why are Rolexfags so angry?

>>17088335
>An historical Girard Perregaux Caliber 350, first +32,000 hz quartz ever, pushing accurancy measurement into years territory, with the right dial
>shitter
I feel sad for your poor mom

>>17088359
Because they feel the need to validate their terrible decision to buy a timepiece they can't really afford to impress other people by trying to force everyone to be envious of it.

>>17088191
>F.P. Journe
Brand for self felating niggers

>>17088213
>I like every single choice here but don’t you find yourself a bit heavy on integrated bracelet sports watches (5/8) to the point of redundancy?
>I think the collection would be just as good if it lost the bottom row
I just buy what I like. You don't realize how you keep buying variations on the same watch until you've bought a couple. Then again, it's just a phase. I rarely keep a watch more than a few years.
If I'd taken the same pic a couple years ago it would have been Rolex, Rolex, Rolex...

>>17088270
What model is this? Looking for outdoorsy beater watches which stay small and have some other utilities.

>>17088191
If i had heaps of money (i obviously don't and won't)
Definitely no:
Panerai
Bell&Ross
Hublot
Jacob&Co
Richard Mille
There are others that i'm not interested in or don't make a watch that i like, but other than that if i would like the watch i would buy it no matter the brand. I'm more like the opposite, i like certain brands and would gravitate towards them for most of my collection.

>>17088223
Mirring the Lange, the Breguet (which has been my grail for years) and the VC. Perfect trio imho.

>>17088392
I'm not particularly interested in AP but i'd buy ONE Royal Oak, a simple one, i think it looks cool. Same with Rolex, not a big fan of it but i would buy an Oysterquartz. PP as well, not much that would interest me, but i'll admit that in-line perpetual calendar is nice. I definitely would buy a VC or two, an IWC, a Zenith, an Omega (but not a Speedy, DeVille and AquaTerra are more to my liking), a Parmigiani Fleurier Tonda, a GO Panoinverse and one of the Sixties models, a Piaget Polo skeleton, a Czapek, H Moser, a few Langes, plenty of Grand Seikos and a Credor, one of those crazy Piaget mystery watches, a JLC or two, a Minase Five Windows... I would also buy a Junghans Mega Solar, a Citizen Stiletto, a funky Swatch, a Sinn U50, some sleek ceramic Rado, a Ball, etc...
Good thing i don't have heaps of money, i'd probably spend it ALL on watches lel.

What watches are for the guy who "does" stuff? The working, active man's watch?

>>17088413
>who "does" stuff?
You mean butt stuff?
A Grand S O Y K O

>>17088413
The standard answer would be a G-shock, a Rolex Explorer or a field watch of your choice.

>>17088414
Good meme, admitted I won't use it for the intended use case but I like that slightly elegant but rugged/purposeful look lol. James Bond tier diver watches etc. Omegas as a whole. Difference is that I'm a poorfag.
>>17088415
Thanks, I'll check out some field watches.

Which one should I keep?

I think I'm leaning towards the numerals - it will be my proper beater for outdoorsy stuff, not a daily.

>>17088483
left

>>17088483
Can't believe you have 2 of those
Indices for me

>>17088483
None. Both are redundant. Just get an SNK

>>17088491
I ordered both to see the dials in person - felt like if I decided on one online I'd see the other one floating around and regret it.

>>17087701
Currently saving up for my 2k watch and its going to be the fortis aeromaster I like the faux vintage looking one but I think I will probably get the black dial with steel bracelet. Also i dont know why fortis is never talked about in these threads they have nice stuff

>>17088181
whats the one with the octopus on the dial top right? I've seen it before somewhere and I can't remember

>>17088510
Phoibos Voyager V2, I post it once in a while here

>>17088505
I like fortis but most of the stuff is too big for the twinks here

I only have casios, where do I go from here?

>>17088570
Keep a gshock if you got one and buy a steel rolex, never come back here

>>17087701
Used tag calibre 5

>>17088361
Frederique Constant has recently released a movement with a 40 Hz silicon oscillator. 288k beats per hour (10 times the average mechanical movement).
Now guess what? Frederique Constant will always be a shit brand making ugly shitters, and so will Girard Perregaux.
Stop jacking off to watch tech. Nobody gives a shit about that nerd shit. Watches are about prestige, nothing else.

>>17088361

>>17088231
Thanks, m8. Cheers.

>>17088232
Sorry, I don't want to get banhammer. Plus, camara may not be big enough.

>>17088248
No, u. Thanks, and as you clearly stated, I buy only what I like. Also, I'm not society's cancer. At most, an emphysema or a suspicious mole.

>>17088240
>>17088302
I'm not very into Rolex, but I do own one. Well, sort of. I gifted it to my father like 5 years ago. If he ever decides to stop using it, I'll get it back and it would be something my dad used too. :) I'm kinda fabricating my own family heirloom that way.

>>17088283
It's actually more, like 60, but I haven't been able to photograph the rest yet.

>>17088304
Kek 42 dogs. I just imagine 42 dogs living in my house.

>>17088310
That's what your mom said about my D.

>>17088335
I'm afraid you do not have the tiniest idea of wath collecting yet, but it's ok, you will learn. Also, by how much effort you put into modify that image, I can tell you're a bit assblasted. Chill.

>>17088361
You're very right. One of my favorite quartz ever.

>>17088394
Thank's m8. Those would make a good 3 watch collection indeed.

>>17088671
>>17088676
>Stop jacking off to watch tech. Nobody gives a shit about that nerd shit. Watches are about prestige, nothing else.
You are so wrong, it's not even funny. Yikes.
Plus, don't tell me you buy your watches for someone other than yourself. Don't be that simp.

>>17088671
>>17088676
Post your watches, faggot.

>>17088361
If you need to write a paragraph justifying your watch just step on it and forget it ever existed lmfao retard.

>>17088688
>Plus, don't tell me you buy your watches for someone other than yourself.
Like you, who's buying them to lord over teenage internet nerds?

>>17088719
First, you are a bit confused. This guy >>17088361
is not me. Although he understands the watch.
Second, I've been in 4chan since I was in collage and was poor too. I have a taste for this site and I happen to love watches, that's all.
Stop projecting, my friend.

>>17088727
>I've been in 4chan since I was in collage and was poor too.
Shame you can't stop being a third world ESL monkey.

>>17088671
>recently
It's been out for some time now if i'm not mistaken. And it looks a bit erratic and nervous. I at least give them props for having the balls to put it on display in an otherwise completely classic looking watches.

>>17088676
At least you could have put some effort into the meme.

>>17087742
>g-shock
You answered your own question. Every reviewer loves to larp as someone that "needs" a sport watch, but they baby them. Any g-shock is instantly categorised as a beater since it is the watch to wear when you actually do something that might hurt their mechanicals.

>>17088223
That Celadon get me every time, it's so nice. To be honest i didn't like a majority of your watches at first but now most of them have kinda grown on me. At least you have a very original taste in watches which is nice to see.

>>17088735
I was wrong. You're not a bit assblasted, you're completely rectum destroyed. And yes, obviously, english is not my first nor second language. Stay mad.

>>17088755
>english is not my first nor second language
Huehue and Jajaja don't count as two languages.

>>17088754
Thanks, m8, I appreciate it. You shoul try to get a Celadon for yourself, as they are not THAT expensive. Btw, is that a plum dial? Looks gorgeous.

>>17087742
I don't really like G-shocks but they are the KING of the beaters so there's that.
Americans don't have any class so they will call any non-expensive dress watch a beater without understanding what it means.

>>17087650
Under 2k€ poorfag collection coming through.

>>17087890
Anordain has a waiting list i believe.

>>17088764
Lol they're all round.

>>17088791
lmao i didn't expect that

>>17088798
Trolls will troll, my dude.

>>17088791
They all have an S in their name

>>17088806
It was a nice troll thoguh, i was positively surprised.

All you will ever need. You guys are dweebs lol.

>>17087569
I wear a Mi band and a Casio because poor. Couldn't give a flying fuck if someone asked. Gotta keep those Nature Boy vibes alive. WOOOO!

>>17087818
Greetings areo, from a fellow trevisan

>>17088823
I don't need a piece of plasticky shit on my wrist, tho.

>>17088839
>i need piece of metal on my wrist over resin because "reasons"

>>17088851
Sorry, I'm not dirt poor enough to understand your reasoning.

>>17088867
>conflating metal on your wrist as a sign of wealth

That's more like a sign of poverty lol.

>>17088163
Yeah, dogs > females

>>17087569
What the fuck are you doing with a Fitbit?

No but seriously it is usually just fat people who have tried solving problems by buying shit. Like it's telling you nothing

>>17087868
based anon, dont listen to the /fa/ggots here. they need instructions on how cut their balding hair.

I cant decide

>>17088935
Only good option.

>>17088483
Cringe Sellita shitters

>>17088483
Numerals on that MN strap

Indices if you'll wear with bracelet

Guys I don’t think the speedies are soft assets any more

>>17088223
bruh i got to admit, these watches are fucking ugly to me, but you have a style that you clearly like and you present yourself to be unique and confident and of value, bravo

>>17087490
Those look like MoonSwatches

Hey /wt/ can I get an ID on my gf's dad's watch please? I can see it's a Pulsar, but no clue on the ref. number, movement etc. I'm assuming it's a quartz though.

>>17089012
>you have shit taste but I respect it
Why?
Shit taste is 100% the sign of an ugly soul.

>>17087390
Ughh, "fancy" watches are jewellery for queers who can't come out of the closet. A good Japanese auto movement is what 50-100 bucks. Sapphire glass is 20-30 bucks. The rest is worthless metal, or worse yet plastic.
You can get a quality swiss made quartz for what 100-200 bucks, that will last a lifetime. What exactly are you spending 5+ figures for, to say Cartier or VC on the dial? You faggots are worse than women who buy a 2 dollar Chinese made purse but spend 5 grand cus it says Gucci, sad.

Citizen is face raping seiko in the shitter market desu hopefully those seiko gmts will be cool

>>17089033
Holy seethe. Stay poor

>>17089025
Because he's rich? When you're rich and retarded you're just eccentric.

I got a new watch.

(please do NOT bully my choice.)

>>17089050
Neat

>>17087390
Credit shopping trip when?

>>17087390
Wristlet poorfag here and I really want a pepsi diver or GMT watch, though I know it's a long shot.
> Your budget
€300 max, preferably around 200
> Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot
Diver
> Movement, e.g. automatic, hand-wound, quartz
As long as it has a sweeping seconds hand I'm fine with it
> Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd-time zone
Pepsi bezel, (day) date window, and if possible 2nd time zone
> Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet
Metal
> Wrist size or desired watch size
I have very small wirsts, 40mm diameter and 44mm lug to lug is the max.

Who was in the wrong here?

>>17089025
>Shit taste is 100% the sign of an ugly soul.
>I'm poor and this is my cope.
Ok, then. Kek

>>17089044
>When you're rich you're eccentric
Imagine owning 50 examples of the same thing. THAT's retarded.

>>17087923
Is that the new platinum Day-Date with fluted bezel? How did you get your hands on that one so quickly? (pic unrelated)

>>17089070
Forgot to add, no white dial only blue or black. Also no vintage yellow lume.

>>17089066
Good thing Japan is filled with good swiss watches, and not just those japanese expensive shitters.

What watch is the guy in the back wearing?

>>17089109
A G-Shock. Something like pic related.

>>17088935
Black all the way, might be your only chance to get a black one that doesn't have a stupid negative screen

>>17089117
Thanks

>>17089033

>>17089050
stop teasing us

>>17089066
Eichi ii for $20

>>17089070
You can only get a divable, automatic GMT in that price range on Aliexpress. Just go to YT and find the least obnoxious video on the matter

Bough a nato strap for my smp. It was expensive but it looks and feels way better now imho.

>>17089139
It's a Cornes de Vache 1955, it's nothing fancy. I bought it because it's 38.5mm and I have tiny girl wrists.

Really easy buying experience. I called the company directly (not a boutique/store), wired them the money over the phone, and the watch arrived the next day (priority overnight shipping).

I wish other companies made watch buying this easy. Just call the manufacturer, buy it at the price on the manufacturer's website, and get it the next day. Fuck grey market, fuck chrono24, fuck ADs. Just let me buy it from the company and be done with it.

>>17089050
>>17089162
Nice rep. Aliexpress?

>>17089149
I already looked at pagani, parnis, cronos, and san martin but they all have a lug to lug of 48mm. Even if I saved up for a Steinhart 39 it'd still be about as wide as my wrist.
It doesn't have to actually be divable/water proof it's more about the dive watch look, if that matters. If not them thanks for the answer anyway.

>>17089162
Looks like shit.

>>17089162
I love it, bi compax are the best

>>17089162
not hating on you but they were probably glad they could offload this thing onto some sucker, kek

>>17089033

>>17089162
Great watch with a timeless look. Kudos to VC for not fucking it up with a stupid large dial or a date window.
Enjoy it anon.

>>17089197
>not hating on you but they were probably glad they could offload this thing onto some sucker, kek

The waiting list for an Overseas is currently 11 years long (and rising).

I'm sure Vacheron is happy to sell ANYTHING that isn't an Overseas that this point.

>>17089168
do people even make fake vacherons?

hip-hop americans don't even know about that brand so that seems a bit silly.

>>17089203
>>Great watch with a timeless look.
Not really. Looks extremely dated.

>>17089033
There is a difference is quality between some of the actually well made budget watches and well made expensive watches. That said starting around ~$500 is probably where the differences in quality start no longer being obvious from a glance and it's not like strangers are going to inspect your jewelry with a loupe. Heck most normal people won't be able to differentiate between a well made $200 and $2000 watch if it doesn't have branding they recognise. The only logical reason then to pay more is for very specific designs and or features.

>>17089162
Damn nobullychan. That IS fancy.

>>17089205
>The waiting list for an Overseas is currently 11 years long (and rising).
That can't be true, can it? Seriously?

BTW, Congrats on your Cornes the Vache!! Very, very nice. Can you please post a pic of the movement?

>>17089212
That's kind of the point. It's like puting an icon from another century on your wrist.

>>17089073
Idk the guy on the right but the fag on the left and his team makes everything Crazy and Insane. He’s a loudmouth faggot. Albeit he has the knowledge and made some money doing this business.
Who’s the nigger on the right?

>>17089234
>That's kind of the point. It's like puting an icon from another century on your wrist.
Just wear a cuckoo clock around your neck tranny.

>>17089162
Class watch anon
Kinda jelly

>>17089073
Why do all these watch people always have extremely animal-like appearance? From rat to beaver to weasel, then you have various forms of domesticated pigs and boars, lizards, sloths and so on.

What should my next Vacheron be?

They told me I can get the 1921 or an Overseas without the waitlist because I've bought from them before. I don't want an Overseas though it's too big for my wrist.

(If you're curious, they never used the word "waitlist" they just said "It normally takes years to get those pieces, but we can get them for you much sooner, probably around 8 weeks if you're interested.)

>>17089247
Who the fuck cares? Just buy the entire store and stuff it up your ass.

>>17089247
Get a Lange

>>17089247
just FYI you dont get any cool points for buying vc instead of patek. its not more under the radar and it doesnt have more connoisseur appeal
no one needs 2 vcs unless theyre a dedicated collector or something and you certainly dont need a 3rd. by the way you type im assuming ur an lgbtq mid 20s and these watches are for a middle management 40 year old. id get a patek 6006 next if i were you instead of another vc, or sell those vcs you have and go for a patek 5205

>>17089269
It's the rich family tranny retard with the autistic $500 eraser.

>>17089247
Ive always been a big fan of the harmony calendar

>>17089269
>im assuming ur an lgbtq mid 20s

Anon, trannies in their 20's don't have tens of thousands of dollars to drop on watches.

>>17089266
Lange is kraut PoS.
>>17089247
This is the one for you.
But honestly I’d get overseas Chrono. Other’s are pretty unimpressive

>>17089247
Get the 222

>>17089295
I actually like that one, though.

I like pigs. I may call and ask about it.

>>17089301
Lol

You DO have insurance on your watch collection... right?

>>17089334
Of course. It's part of homeowners insurance.

>>17089269
I like buying Vacheron watches because the Maltese cross is cool.

Pateks don't have that, so I'll never buy one.

>>17089162
Very noice, anon! Hope you enjoy wearing it.

>>17089293
Yeah they do, he's from a rich family, he posts on /fa/ all the time.

>>17089244
Good idea! Can we match every youtuber to an animal?

>>17089334
No, if I needed to insure it it'd mean I couldn't afford it. I might as well buy lottery tickets.

You'd insure your house because you'd be so devastated financially if you lost it you're willing to take a negative EV on it. But if you lose your watches, who cares? But more. Or not, you'll still have a roof over your head

>>17089375
Found the casio owner

>>17089380
>He thinks a check from the insurance company will let him jump the line at the AD

>>17088191
Rolex
Tag

>>17089033
guarantee an amerimutt posted this, no class

>>17089382
>So then the salesman told anon there was a waiting list for that watch and...get this...anon believed him and just left the store!

major problem with Rolexs is that they are like modern day Ferraris,
they are never the cool vintage Rollys, like the 335 Berlinettas, just the chunky boomer ones.
Whenever I see a modern Ferrari I think "that guy has the money for a Ferrari and loves cars but does he really have taste, if he did he'd have a 355 and not a brand new California."

>>17089421
That analogy only goes so far. Ferrari is not the single largest sports car manufacturer in the world, though. Rolex is the largest Swiss watch maker by a mile. They're a lot less special than Rolex owners make them seem.

Rolex owners are the guys who buy a Mercedes GLA and tell people that it's basically an AMG GT.

for me its Jeremy Renner shilling shitters

>>17089429
sure, close enough,
Rolex is a big enough company where it's known for having big horology autists share the same rank of consumers as boomer paycheckers who buy a 50mm Gold Daytona and close their proverbial watch book.
But that 50mm isn't really why Rolex made their name, which is the bizarre part.
People brag about Rollys being the bees knees but they are really talking about watches made decades ago. Would people say Ferrari is this ALL TIME car developer if they only had the Ferrari California to go by?

>>17089382
Fun fact, the insurance company actually may be able to help you jump the line. For example, companies like USAA have an entire gemology and jewelry department and can help you get a replacement watch. It will be the same model, but used. I believe they can even pay the service expense. Also, you need to schedule any valuable personal property separately.
>t. guy who points at stuff but whose job leads him to know a lot about insurance claims

>>17089479
Also, do add to that...
Individually scheduled items are also covered by loss and theft outside your home. The premium is negligible. Jewelry loss is a popular insurance fraud item because it is basically impossible to prove and the burden of proof lies with the carrier because of the way state and federal laws are structured.

>>17089476
>People brag about Rollys being the bees knees but they are really talking about watches made decades ago. Would people say Ferrari is this ALL TIME car developer if they only had the Ferrari California to go by?
I get what you're saying.

Imagine if Ferrari still made the Daytona and only updated it by adding fuel injection and ABS. That's basically what Rolex has done for the last few decades.
Modern Ferraris may lack the elegance of older ones and they may even be downright ugly, but there's no denying that they are meant to be fast cars and they are indeed ferociously fast.

>>17089070
You can't ask so much with that small of a budget.
Btw citizen makes a cheap lady's diver watch, exactly like the men's version just smaller diameter case, looks decent. No sweeping hand though.

First the spirit Zulu Time GMT and now the UltraChron. I used to see Longines as a ultraboring brand but those are different and interesting. Also cheaper than GS hibeat.

>>17089162
>I wish other companies made watch buying this easy. Just call the manufacturer, buy it at the price on the manufacturer's website, and get it the next day. Fuck grey market, fuck chrono24, fuck ADs. Just let me buy it from the company and be done with it.

Some swatch group brands have an online boutique as well. It's getting increasingly common. And that's a good thing.

New thread folks
>>17070136
>>17070136
>>17070136
>>17070136
>>17070136

>>17089734
kys

NEW THREAD
>>17089839
>>17089839
>>17089839
>>17089839
>>17089839

>>17089623
Thanks for your reply anon, much appreciated.
>You can't ask so much with that small of a budget.
I already thought so, which is why I said it was a long shot. Oh well too bad, guess I'll have to wait and save up longer or just give up on it entirely.

>>17089632
I want one of these so bad. Can't justify the price though