/fa/ - Fashion

Coogi down to my socks like I'm Big Poppa
keep your girl head in my Tommy boxers

First for anti-JLC poorfags getting BTFO. Keep seething. JLC has been the king for the last hundred years.

Cope, if you must.

>>17053805
>717 KB
Hideous
>>17053816
Stop spamming this, you're not even a watchmaker you stooge.

>>17053816
>no Casio Ocean US

dropped

>>17053806
JLC isn't for luxury, JLC is high horology for movement nerds.

Traska Seafarer will be mine this Sunday. Should I go for the Orange or the Black?

>>17053806
Oh, you own one? How about a wrist shot? I love JLCs.

You own one, right? You're not just simping for a company, right? That would be pretty pathetic.

>>17053820

hottie alert

>>17053824
can someone photoshop this with 5 more crowns around the case?

>>17053828
>integrated bracelet

[toilet flushing]

>>17053824
might as well go with the orange

Got the midsize Seamaster 300, really look how it looks on a smaller dial lads.

>>17053842
Like*

>>17053842
Congrats Anon! It fits you well! If you haven't already, make sure you do a clean with a toothbrush and a little water, and it should be okay if you use soap as well. Detach the bracelet and clean that really well with the toothbrush, inside the link areas because that's where lots of grime gets into. How's it running?

>first for Omega Watches are the Final Word in Horology.

>>17053826
Pussy

Cope, if you must.

>>17053845
This is the better strap config

>>17053842
>>17053845
If these aren't reps, they should be, because the finishing quality is worse than most reps.

>>17053857
I don't know if they still make them though...and Anon's new arrival should be celebrated!

>>17053860
Don't know about Anons, but I assume it's genuine. My full size was definitely gen. before I sold it. Why does the finishing bother you? It's a watch from the 90s....

>>17053860
Not a rep, it definitely looks better irl than the photo with shitty lighting

>>17053864
>Why does the finishing bother you?
You write that as if you didn't know he is just a poorfag troll that can't afford anything better than a Seiko 5, or a Casio.

There is profundity in every person whether they know it or not.

>>17053872
Well, maybe I'm just looking at it from the perspective of what it is compared to what we see today. We're inundated with high-definition macro-lensed videos featuring Grand Seiko and their Zuuuuurratzzzzu polishing and so forth, so a watch from the 90s from Omega would never be able to compete with that from the get-go. Then, factor in 30 years of wear and tear, and you'll have a watch that looks dull, maybe with losanging on the corners and beveled edges, further contributing to the look of the case being unrefined. From a single pic, it's a realistic perception, because most super-reps now are the same quality in terms of photo-look.

So, long-winded way of saying, 'it's a realistic perspective to have' if Anon had never seen one before. Also, the mid-size Seamaster has a different dial set, with different proportions of the hands, indices, and date window, so once again it pushes the viewer towards 'rep'.

For instance: this 2254.50 is genuine, but I bought it used and it's at Omega for servicing right now. This is a pic before...I can't wait to take a pic when it gets back. In this pic, it looks dull, washed out, and plain. That's what 30 year-old watches that have been worn hard look like. Maybe the Anon was just trolling, but it's a fair criticism especially if one is seriously considering getting a used watch. They'll think it's not worth it, and in many cases, it's probably not unless you are a fan of a particular model or find a very good example. Remember that in the past few years, the expectation of buyers has increased significantly, probably due to the amount of material there is on the net.

>>17053816

>>17053816
.

>>17053821
Casio is right where it belongs, in "Consumer".

Which Kang Seiko should I get? I'm black if it matters.

>>17053895
>I'm black if it matters.
"Borrow" the red one.

>>17053895
Red or brushed silver

>>17053895
>1700 for that
That being said I'm fond of the red. I think I like the sunburst silver more than the brushed.

What are your thoughts on wearing “ladies” watches at 30-34mm? How small is too small

>>17053936
It depends on how dainty it looks on your petite wrist, madam...

>>17053936
34 is okay if you have a smaller wrist and are going for a certain look.
32 and below looks fucking comical it's a complete no go unless you are wearing some tiny gold piagio or other luxury dress watch for some kind of appropriate occasion

>>17053877
>there's a perfectly good reason my watch looks worse than a rep, watches in the 90s were built worse than reps are now!

>>17053945
Plus wear and tear. Do you read?

>>17053936
You can wear whatever you want, My Lady.

>>17053895
Easily the pimpin purple one

>>17053989
Oh shit is this new?

Citizen made this diver in 1977.
The watch was lost in the sea by its owner, and found decades later with literal rocks growing on it.
When it was found, the watch was still airtight.
After Citizen serviced, the watch is working again.
tl;dr
>Citizen mogs Seiko

>>17053996

>>17053997

>>17053958

>>17053994
Yeah I think so, not sure if it's even out yet (or if it's even available globally)

>>17054000
probably a tank cintree like mcqueen

Can anyone id this?

>>17054047
Yes, it's a square watch. Probably a "smart watch", so it's crap.

>>17054051
It's a digital watch, so you're crap

>>17054064
So is your mom

>>17053816
What is the difference between quasi luxury and entry level luxury?

>>17054083
So is your dad

>>17054095
Toss everything but the Subs, black Daytona, and the blue AP

>>17054095
So many reps

>>17054018
Boutique only, but non limited. There is a limited version with champagne dial and gold indices based on the SJE083 also.

>>17054095
I like a total of two watches from this box. All of those Offshores are so ugly it hurts.

>>17054110
>Toss everything but the Subs, white Daytona, and the blue AP
ftfy

>>17053806
JLC is Patek/Vacheron/ALS cope

>>17054095
you could have bought a real watch for thr price of all those reps

>>17054095
yoiks

Seamaster or Speedmaster?

>>17054149
Rolex

>>17053895
>King Seiko
Just set your money on fire

>>17054000
This takes place in the past when they didnt even make watches bigger than 40mm
Unless it's a genuine tank or a reverso (for the memes) the small watch looks silly on a man

What's a good conversation starter for under 300? A used gravity master?

>>17054156
If you want to engage conversations with nerds then sure, it's a great choice I guess

>>17054156
vostok amphibia, raketa big zero

>>17054156
Something vintage. An old Waltham or Elgin, maybe

>>17053589
Checked her videos, and interestingly she looks better as a still

>be me
>buy a vintage watch on Chrono24
>when people ask about my watch I say I got it from my grandpa
don't judge me bros, I don't have rich family history

why are watches so expensive?

>>17054193
Why don't you say that you are interested in vintage watches instead of lying?

>>17054193
Just say you got it because you like old watches, or the one in particular you got.

>>17054193
>replica vintage
hoo boy, that's some huge cope

>>17054199
>>17054202
I don't know, I think buying vintage watches is kinda cringe.
It's far more interesting to say I inherited it.

>>17054205
Lying about it being your grandpa's watch is infinitely more cringe than just saying you like vintage watches.

>>17054207
Yea but people don't know that

>>17054193
It's okay, fren.
Get started on making your own family and make some new traditions of your own.
>>17054197
They've been status symbols for a long time but in modern times they are even more so now that watches have been relegated to jewelry for men. And high end status symbols are always expensive.

>>17054193
Which watch did you get? Planning on the same thing.

>>17054208
But you would.

>>17054193
>>17054205
how old are you? When I go to local watchmakers and they asks me if the old watch is my father's I say no, I bought it on the internet, and that sparks a much more interesting conversation than "ah, I see" if I were to say its from my dad or grandpa. And if its not a watchmaker who asks, just say you bought it yourself because you're into it, there are thousands of other things cringy things and buying an old watch cause you liked it is not one of them at all you spergo

>>17054208
>he cares what others think
>doesn't even care what he thinks
ngmi

>>17054149
>The watch that was on the moon vs the watch that was in the worst installation of a series of action movies
gee I dont know

>>17053816
>Louis Vuitton in luxury and not quasi luxury

>>17054236
Anon should ask himself if he actually needs to time things down to the fraction of a second or if he needs a water resistant watch.

You can use a rotating bezel to time stuff down to the minute but you can't swim with a Speedmaster risk-free.

Anons, talk me out of spending 500eur on a San Martin watch with Sellita movement, I'm considering a their Black Bay 58, Seiko 62mas and Black Bay 36 models.

I want a wearable not fancy watch, with reliable mechanical workhorse movement and if possible, the watch being on the smaller side.

>>17054288
For one thing, you might not get a Sellita, you'll probably get an Asian knockoff of the 2824. That's the same movement they've been putting in fake watches for years.
The Chinese are simply in no way trustworthy when it comes to movements. Treat any "movement upgrade" as a lazy attempt to extract more money you of you.

>>17054290
>The Chinese are simply in no way trustworthy
Coulda just stopped right there, no need to add anything to that statement

Is the catalog page on /fa/ broken?

HNNNNG

>>17054313
le mog

>>17054367
>4000 bucks for a Casio? That's so weird, it looks and functions exactly like mine and I only paid 50 bucks.

>>17054290
So what's another alternative?,Tisell (Koreans I think, they use miyota), Steinhart?...
Or should I go for the nip route and get some Citizen (promaster or eco drive maybe), Orient, Seiko or some Chinkshit with nh35 and decent finishing (I already have a chinkwatch with nh35 and it was cheap as fuck and looks and feels nice)?. Other watches I eyed were Hamilton khaki,although not sure about the 48mm lug to lug,would look fine I guess.Also Glycine combat sub is around 500eur and is 36-39mm, uses sellita too, any bad word against that brand?.

>>17054374
Just save up for a real watch this is getting sad.

>>17054313
>>17054367

>meme 5600

Metal Casio or not?

>>17054442
isn't it for women?

>>17054442
Get the man bracelet

>>17054446
I'm not sure but even if it is, who cares? I have small wrists and this design is more unisex than most other small (non-vintage) watches.

>>17054447
I can replace it right? I just like this one over the A1000D-7EF.

>>17054442
>he doesn't instantly buy a casio whenever he sees one

>>17054442
Yes. A silver and a gold one.

>>17054475
Is fake gold acceptable then? I always thought it was trashy.

>>17054149
Seamaster if you’re actually going to use it on the water. Speedmaster for everything else. They’re both great watches but the Speedmaster is a lot more versatile if you want to swap the bracelet for a strap.

I've got an interview with a jewelry store the carries Tag, Breitling, Tooter, and their other location carries rawleks. Any tips to help me ace the interview?

This is so gay

>>17054507
Be black, gay or a woman

>>17054507
As what? A salesperson? I managed a high end retail store for a while. When I was hiring people I was mainly looking for people who seemed friendly, honest, and passionate. Product knowledge is way down the priority list because it’s easy to learn on the job. Let your passion for watches show a bit and don’t come across as a sleazy used car salesman and you’ll be ahead of 99% of candidates. It is extremely rare that a customer will know what finishing is or even be able to differentiate between an automatic or manual movement. Most watches I sold went to boomers who got a bonus and wanted a Breitling because they saw it in Thunderball or a wife who wants a gift for her husband. Unless you start selling JLC or higher you’ll pretty much never be asked a question other than
>How much does it cost?
and
>How long does the battery last?

>>17054447
I pity the fool who doesn't know the caring touch of milanese

>>17054507
tell them there is a waiting list for interviews and you might call them back in 3-10 years (maybe)

>>17054511
0/3 might be in trouble
>>17054518
I've never worked retail but I've had a number of people recommend that I try sales and this is where I go for most of my jewelry needs. I'll try to tone down the sperg, but honestly I've already talked shop with most of the employees that know anything about watches and it might be too late to hide my power level. The idea of a lazy job where I talk with nerds about niche interest sounds fun, but im sure i can manage boomers and people that just want to flex a 2k watch. Thanks anon!
>>17054521
That might work. I don't need this job and they know it.

>>17054533
>0/3 might be in trouble
That's an easy fix, blackface and cross dressing gets you 3/3.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cy7jvfD4erI
It's up niggers!

>>17054634

>>17054640

Guess the input

No better digital watch than this.

>>17054663
Seiko?

>>17054681
Is that a Canadian brand?

>>17054699
Almost, apparently this thing can almost do specific lines correctly so I put in Seiko SKX. Pic related is Seiko Prospex Alpinist, which it doesn't do as well as SKX but still.

Since when did Casio start collabing with the crips?

>>17054734
The real fun is in combining brands or designs. It understands basic designs like pepsi band (dive watch) or dress watch or also two brand names + collab, which can give you something like pic related.

Is the SPB143 the best everyday watch? I want to get a one and done watch for my graduation

>>17054784
looks great, seems a bit overpriced to me tho

Should I get a Seamaster Professional Quartz for $1500 or a Speedy for $2500?

>>17054784
He went to Jarrod's

>>17054681
So fucking thick though, you could never wear this with a dress shirt. I wish there existed something similar but thinner

MILGOOOSE OWNERS ROCK

>>17054800
Try a French cuff sleeve

I bought a new watch and wanted to share with you guys

>>17054853
Looks good, anon!

>>17054855

Gracias! I'm a sucker for simpler watch faces that aren't TOO simple, you know?

Anyone heading to Anime Expo this year? I'm debating on bringing my Seiko or metal GShock Square. Not sure how crime ridden LA is...

>>17054853
take some more better pics where the image isnt rotated

>>17054811
worst Rolex

>>17054865
What do they do at AX?
I've never been to one.

>>17054865
Is that a rep Seiko?

>>17054883
Chads gangbang obese women

>>17054876

I'll do what I can

>>17054853
I like it

>>17054884
Nah it's Gen. Do they even make rep seikos?

>>17054876
>>17054898

A non-rotated variety

>>17054876
>>17054898

Take 2. I don't know why this godforsaken website rotates my pics

>>17054913
It happens to Melanesians sometime, due to the Dateline, methinks

>>17054865
Why would your internal bezel be just ever so slightly ajar?

Still hoping that someone can identify this watch.
I think I know what it is but the case size and color are throwing me off

ngl, being able to customize a watch this much is a based move by the company

>>17054913
If you're using windows, right click on the image you want to upload and select the properties.
Then go to Details and at the bottom it will say:
>"Remove Properties and Personal Information"
Click on that and it will give you the option to:
>"Create a copy with all possible properties removed"
Select OK and it'll make a copy of the image. Use that copy to upload and the image shouldn't be rotated.

>>17054913
are you posting form an iPhone?
i have the same problem, iphone stores the orientation in the metadata and 4chan removes that data

>>17054853
Very nice

>>17054929
It gets knocked out of alignment easily when on the wrist.

>>17054853
Look great, anon.
I've been thinking about getting a Luminox for while now myself.

>>17054853
Always liked this one. Too big for me though

>>17054948

I'm posting from my whack-ass old Samsung lol

>>17054949

It might just be the formatting of the website. Just plain frustrating for an image imageboard

>>17054962

I've had it for a few days and I quite enjoy it. Their mire rugged watches are cool but I'm rarely in an instance where I need a built-in compass/speedometer

>>17054940
Way too hard to read

>>17054973
get a digital, it's a simple dial, it could have no markers at all and it wouldn't be hard to read

>>17054763
neat!

>>17054978
I posted that brand a few days ago
The moon phase one is cool, and you don't need to sit there and count dots
Least functional perpetual calendar, a case of design over function

>>17054509
>concept
Yeah that guy is a complete idiot and has a bunch of wrong information and opinions.

>>17055001
>divide the minutes by 2 where the date dot shows

'sup, my friends?
>Post watches with dicks.

>>17054971
I've been looking at this version for a while now, might have to wait a while before picking it up though.

>>17054940
Shame the watches are fuck ugly.

>>17055021
Cool, what year is that from?

>>17054865
>Not sure how crime ridden LA is...
Since you asked
https://youtu.be/Lw7J_Lkg2K8

>>17053939
>DIE

>>17054758
Gang wars now.

>>17055021
That's a cool looking watch. I have a watch with only one dick (well, two if you count the guy wearing it), does that count?

>>17055062
Thanks, m8. Somewhen between 1972 and 1976, no way to be sure.

>>17055024

They offer a first-time discount on their site which helps shave off $100 or so

>>17055071
Thank counts, my friend. Dicks for everyone. Kek

>>17055071
Thank counts, my friend. Dicks for everyone. Kek
Very nice penis quartz, btw.

>>17054763

>>17055074
That would help, but my dad's birthday is coming up so I'll probably still have to wait for a bit before getting a new watch.
Thanks for the heads up, though.

>>17055021
Just the obvious one.

>>17054935
Someone please end this anon's misery and ID that damn watch.

>>17055021

>>17055021
O'Cock

>>17055086
Clown watch

>>17055021
Sakura Cockom

>>17055090
At this point a baseball bat to the back of my skull would suffice, too

Imagine not being named Rolex

anybody know if this seller on amazon is reliable and I would get the original g-shock and not some fake clone?
https://www.amazon.com/G-Shock-G-5600UE-1JF-Resistant-G-5600-Shipped/dp/B098DBKXV6/ref=ex_alt_wg_d?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_i=B098DBKXV6&psc=1&pd_rd_w=fVL8F&pf_rd_p=4e1b46a8-daf9-4433-b97e-d6df97cf3699&pf_rd_r=HB682DR3ZCV0GP8TWBXA&pd_rd_wg=1URqB&pd_rd_r=0bc9746b-0b36-4100-b005-399565fa73e0&content-id=amzn1.sym.4e1b46a8-daf9-4433-b97e-d6df97cf3699#customerReviews

>>17055110
dont g-shocks made in Japan?

That first scratch feeling. Welcome to the beater club

>>17055064
Well... Guess I'll just bring my Casio F91W. I'm coming from Utah so not use to all this crime

>>17055118

It's not a scratch, it's added character. I love my old Timex due to its various scratches and dings.

>>17055121
>Utah
>land of skinwalkers and UFOs
>still way safer than L.A.
That checks out

>>17055102
Link?
I googled it but only got disgusting videos

>>17055132
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Pattern-REDLeather-Watches-Stainless-Business/dp/B07Y55D2Y1

>>17054913
You just need to adjust or crop the pic after you take it. Then it should align properly.

>>17055089
>>17055096
>>17055099
>>17055102
HAHAHA wtf
Some of those are rather "cocks" watches.
Thanks, my friends.

>>17055110
It should be totally safe to buy.

>>17055021
Very nice, lawyersama. Never seen a dial like that before.

>>17055107
Have you tried checking watchid? I assume that’s from a movie or television show. Just Google the actors name and see what watches he has

>>17055147

Attempt number three. If this doesn't work I'm going to bomb the US government

In Minecraft

>>17055118
40 lashings

>>17055110
Nah

>>17055102
Looks like me

>>17054935
You'd be better off using google than the clowns in this thread

>>17054763
This AI works pretty well for making shitpost collabs.

>>17054237
They're actually high end luxury with in-house movement.

>>17055195
>>17054763
>>17054734
>>17054663
>>17054645
>>17054640
>>17054634
What AI is this? Can you please share a link to it?
I wanna play too, friendo.

>>17054102

Money

Imagine unironically sucking the rich loser's cock.

>>17055248
It literally says it in the screenshot, Dall-E mini
https://huggingface.co/spaces/dalle-mini/dalle-mini

What is a Chesterton?

My AD wont even let me see one

can /wt/ identify what watch Le Reddit Video Game Man is wearing?

>>17055268
Doesn't Tag Heuer Link have this kind of bracelet?

>>17055256
Imagine sucking mine, bro

We can talk about watches afterwards, it'd be fun!

I want a cartier rep that I can put on a milanese band

Is this finna be hard to find bros?

>>17055278
I tried on the santos a week ago at an ad and they are laughably chinsy

>>17055271
tnks

>>17055278
Some anon on here said Milanese bracelets are for women -__-

>>17055293
Yeah that made me google them and like them

Women have cool shit and that anon gets zero pussy

>>17055256
>Low-life-anon shits his pants, yet again.
What else is new?

>>17055317
I'll fix him

>>17054156
>What's a good conversation starter for under 300?

With a bald bearded guy?

Yikes

any alternatives to these?

Audemar trash can
Audemar wheelchair

>>17055267
>What is a Chesterton?
>My AD wont even let me see one
It's nothing personal. That guy's hands are tied. Chesterton ADs aren't permitted to display models on the showroom floor or even invite customers to see them unless they're on a pre-approved list.
Honestly, that guy's probably going to get into trouble for you even finding out he was a Chesterton AD in the first place/

>>17055388
Gotcha bro

>>17055333
>With a bald bearded guy?
Imagine losing your hair and also being too fat to have a good jawline.

>>17055407
The last batch of those was dogshit, every signle one had badly misaligned indicies

Is there anything like the gold casio a158/a168 that won't make people think I'm a used car salesman?

>>17055441

Just go for the gold Casio my man

is there any g-shock enthusiasts here? I want to ask and consult about something

>>17055454
There might be, just ask your question

>>17055441
>>17055447

>>17055447
Alright then, a158 with the black face and shitty led or a168 with gold face and actual functional backlight

Is it ok to use baby wipes to clean my watch?

>>17054898

>>17055456
Contrapoints needs to stop drinking so much

>>17055475
booba

>>17053996
tl:dr - should have worn a better strap

>>17055475

>>17055459

The latter

>>17055456
I don't get it

Citizen > Seiko

>>17055504

>>17055504
Some asshole trying to force his shitty meme, ignore it.

VHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAH

>>17055447
Based
>>17055441
Just go for it, only imaginary used car salesmen have that. Not being willing to rock it is a good sign you're a beta and uneffay

>>17055517
You, uh, don't know how a countdown bezel works?

>>17055513
...

>>17054156
DINOZONE

>>17055527
Stainless steel version when

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

>>17055505
citizen is mogging seiko hard in the affordable diver market for sure

>>17053794
What's the best digital shitter with 3+ alarms?
>Sub 40mm
>Ideally solar/radio
>Decent backlight

>>17055527
More like KINOZONE

>>17055517
You can find plenty of examples of dive bezels where the index closest to a 5 minute marker gets omitted to make room for the numerals.

>>17055529
Best I can do

>>17055523
>>17055543
OH NO NO NO NO CHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAH

>>17055527
>Oh wow baby that's so hot let me give you my number to store in that
>"Oh sorry it's full"
>But it has 50 entries!
>"Yes."

>>17055517
>>17055546
This is spam at this point. Report it

New thread when? This one is ruined.

>>17055552
>>17055553
>openly seething this hard
tudor fags are so embarrassing

>>17055553
A new thread won't fix a fundamentally fucked general.

>>17055553
Aw no your thread is ruined? Spoken like a reddit faggot. Stop bitching, don't feed the trolls, talk about watches and it will get better. A new thread at 250 posts is insane

>>17055555
Checked. Quints for truth, but also, you legitimately don't know how a countdown bezel works.

>>17055555
I don't even know tudor, I saw four lines of full caps laughing, twice. That's enough for me to call it spam. Go outside

>>17055560
explain how i dont >>17055546

>>17055558
It’s better to start one early so that freak won’t post the webm of the long haired guy as the OP

>>17055562
you're crying about full caps and telling people to go outside. i think you should stay inside and starve yourself for 12 weeks

>>17055568
Easy. Explain how one works and we'll know that you know.

>>17055576
it counts down instead of up :)

>>17055569
Don't take shit so personally, we'd make fun of you if you liked Casio or Patek or anything in between. That's how 4chan works.

>>17055573
>Defending low quality, low effort, spammy shitposts

>>17055582
>caring this much about shitposts

>>17055583
>This much
Not much really. I just told people to report it. What, you're scared of a 3 day ban?

>>17055588
you scared, boy?

>>17055588
ok you wanna play that game? i just reported every single post you made in response to mine

>>17055115
Their higher end stuff is made in Japan and some special edition watches are made Japan. Their lower end stuff is not made in Japan.

>>17055454
I'm somewhat of a G-Shock expert.

>>17055464
no

>DW5600s are back in stock on Am*zon

>>17055475
I will now buy your watch.

>>17055592
a wittle bit

>>17055475
Perfect.

The watch is shit tho

>>17055546
Why is it so perfect, lads?

>>17054288
500 is well on the way to an actual bb58. Have some restraint and save up.

>>17055600
Fun, what did you put as reason?

I was thinking of getting one of these Breitling Night Mission watches, but man they really age poorly. That white around the bezel looks like dead skin even if it’s just the PVD wearing off.

>>17055454

Im the Gshockposter with 30+ Gshocks and a display stand.

>>17055665
>wanna buy a watch
>but it's ugly
then don't buy it, genius.

>>17055665
That exact same module is used in $200 watches
https://www.jomashop.com/certina-ds-multi-8-alarm-quartz-analog-digital-mens-watch-c0204194408201.html

>>17055673
That looks disgusting though, the Breitling is cool.

>>17055673
Doesn't look like it's the same; Breitling has two screens.

>>17055702
Absolutely cracking hammy

>>17055673
That looks like shit.
>>17055665
How is it white if it's titanium below the paint?

new bread when?

>>17055720
It's probably just light reflection. It's PVD but not matte.

>>17055735

>>17055735
You make it

>>17055619
its 112$ tough solar g-shock but its from third party seller
>>17055631
>>17055667
both of these gshocks cost the same and the main difference I noticed is that the first one dont have multi band which isnt big deal for me. any other differences I should know about? I like the first one (the bluish) because it looks more clean and less busy and I prefer it over the second one with the red square thing on the display. I am hesitant about buying it though because its from a third party seller and it doesnt have too many reviews compared to the second one, which is sold by casio's amazon store. also in the answered questions somebody said the watch is made in thailand. so I like the design of the first but it seems less reliable, idk, what do you think?

1. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B098DBKXV6/ref=ewc_pr_img_1?smid=A3TCNCNGLOHBSA&psc=1

2. https://www.amazon.com/Casio-G-Shock-GWM5610-1-Tough-Solar/dp/B007RWZHXO/ref=bmx_dp_31qlhgmo_sccl_4_1/138-8181033-7325027?pd_rd_w=SaHfr&content-id=amzn1.sym.47a2c41d-3401-4b6c-b4f8-fd4cee0f0cd3&pf_rd_p=47a2c41d-3401-4b6c-b4f8-fd4cee0f0cd3&pf_rd_r=NE4XN6JNW1ACGZYR4QMC&pd_rd_wg=camJ9&pd_rd_r=2f78fd96-ef31-441b-aeac-df3bce6f9af8&pd_rd_i=B007RWZHXO&psc=1

>>17055742
>It's probably just light reflection. It's PVD but not matte.
Yeah but I mean on the chipped parts. Shouldn't it be a dark grey titanium color below?

>>17055756

I like the first one as well. The less busy watch face is just more pleasant to look at

>>17055021
Very nice. Rado still makes watches like this today? Or just that ugly tugsen abortion?

>>17055702

Is that a leather or resin strap? In either case that's a sharp Hamilton

what do you recommend for every budget for small wrists?

>>17055766
They don’t make that one but they probably should/will. They’ve been mining their back catalog heavily the last several years. The Golden Horse and Captain Cook lines are pretty nice looking.

>>17055766
>>17055773
The new 37mm is kino.

>>17055774
I've never cared for rado at all before but I do like this watch. originally thought the moving logo was gimmicky but having seen it in person, ngl I thought it was cool

>>17055774
Yeah that one in particular is really sweet. I’m not exactly sure how the world time feature works though, I guess the cities are just written on the bezel and that’s all there is to it.

>>17055774
It's based and also dogshit at the same time

>>17055770

Taste is subjective but Timex is a good place to start since they have a million different models in terms of size. I'm guessing you'll want to veer toward anything 40mm or smaller

>>17055638
>awww gee idk maybe I want to get one with solar and radio sync and..
>$38.69
fuck

>>17055770
Budget:
>casio, but usually less complicated models
>timex but only like 3 models
>citizen assuming you avoid 95% of their mallshitters

High end-
>lange

>>17055778
You rotate the bezel so your time zone is over the hour hand then the bezel is lined up properly so you can look at what the time is in each zone.

>>17055783
I am considering getting both

>>17055789
Nah that seems like a waste, when would I want one but not the other?

New
>>17055799
>>17055799
>>17055799

>>17055798
the cheaper one as a beater for sports and physical work, the solar one for casual wear

>>17055774
using the word kino for anything that is not film/animation is cringe

>>17055806
bruh you're supposed to be able to beat the shit out of both og them

>>17055820
you're cringe

>>17055665
Wow this watch would be perfect for doing night missions in my albatross d 3

>>17055118
take a black permanent marker in a store and fix it for free