[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 1.68 MB, 1800x1200, w.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16005098 No.16005098 [Reply] [Original]

itt: post most effay loafer types & brands

shoelets OUT

>> No.16005103

>>16005098
Are you really this butthurt about me saying driving loafers are trash that you need to make a thread to reassure yourself?

>> No.16005108

>>16005103
Rofl I thought you made this thread. Nah I'm not him. My driving loafers are absolute pleb tier I just like them a lot

>> No.16005110

>>16005103
>driving loafers are trash
opinion discarded
post your favorite loafer

>> No.16005117
File: 144 KB, 662x700, PENNYBLA-detail.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16005117

the ultimate.

>> No.16005118
File: 79 KB, 600x800, go straight into the trash, do not pass go, do not collect 200 dollars.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16005118

>>16005110
>driving loafers aren't trash

>> No.16005122

>>16005098
Anyone here listen to Archers of Loaf?

>> No.16005127

>>16005118
>still didn't post favorite loafers
you're a little fragile, sweetie

>> No.16005148

>>16005098
OMG I just felt a literal Endorphin rush when I laid eyes on that OP pic. Stellar choice as bait.

>> No.16005149

>>16005127
I'm sorry I'm not gay so I don't wear loafers
>sweetie
I knew loafer fags are homosexuals. Anyway I will not leave you to your thread, no point in me being here since I don't wear loafers.

>> No.16005151

>>16005149
I will now*

>> No.16005172
File: 234 KB, 750x750, luxury-men-salvatore-ferragamo-used-shoes-p160863-0008.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16005172

Salvatore Ferragamo

>> No.16005177
File: 54 KB, 580x580, m_5b5bc6d38869f737b2efe61b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16005177

>>16005172
shawl tassel loafers
80s classic style

>> No.16005184

>>16005149
>>16005151
extremely gay posts

>> No.16005189
File: 105 KB, 1426x675, 61MeYHtW91L._AC_UY675_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16005189

cop for $250 or nah?

>> No.16005209

>>16005189
They look cool, but suede shows dirt and scuffs very easily.

>> No.16005237
File: 42 KB, 370x500, ab3f2a350b47e5f294a92e63758355ec.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16005237

>> No.16005344

>>16005209
>t. has never owned suede
scuffs and dirt on suede appear at the same rate as they do on regular leather, and they are easier to get rid of

>> No.16005355

>>16005344
You must be much rougher with your shoes than I am.

>> No.16005360

>>16005098
Where can I find a loafer with the oak-ie patina like in the middle right.

>> No.16005362
File: 303 KB, 1200x1200, gucci.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16005362

>>16005098
It's the Gucci loafer and it's not a contest

>> No.16005365
File: 13 KB, 399x400, 1607316175985.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16005365

>>16005362

>> No.16005370

>>16005365
Problem?

>> No.16005374

>>16005362
The style of loafer yeah.
Them being Gucci no,
For the price you pay for them I'd expect amazing quality but was disappointed when I got a pair.

>> No.16005377

>>16005374
Go with Carmina. They do a clone essentially but they're calf lined instead of canvas lined and you're spending half as much since you're not paying for a name

>> No.16005396

>>16005377
I'll give them a look, wasn't upset with the leather quality just the construction and "insides" of the shoes.
I'm not usually this picky or funny with my clothes or footwear, just when you spend that amount of money you kinda expect some real good quality loafers