/fa/ - Fashion

>>15946672
fuck your friends, get aviators

>>15946672
Get plastic frame aviators
Pic related.

>>15946672

In france they're called elevators and they don't even fly airplanes
LOL can you believe how crazy the world is sometimes??

GET WHATEVER FITS YOUR FACE AND HEAD SHAPE

>>15946672
there's squared >aviators
ray ban 'caravan', for example. i feel like a dork wearing full sized aviators but want something that will protect me from glare and find those to be a decent compromise. mostly this >>15947081

>>15946805
wicked collection. can i get an id for the top right ones with the gradient glass?

>>15947103
Vintage jaguar mod 571 with custom lens.

>>15947087
i'm pretty sure that's what tom is wearing in the OP pic

>>15947107
thanks a bunch

>>15947131
You can find similar clear colored acrylic jaguar frames. I warn you that they're kinda flimsy feeling, especially with a demo lens. Once you get a properly fitted lens in they stiffen up a bit.

>>15946672
the clubman and wayfarer fear the Olympian II DLX

>>15946672
I have persol, celine and ray ban on rotation

And kaneko and persol as eyeglasses

Round sunglasses supremacy. Do like Hoffmans sunglasses in the graduate, Belmondos in breathless, and the ones out of wild at heart

>>15947919
Forgot the brand, you can find them on ebay

>>15947922
Clubmasters only look good on FSH

Check out American Optical, they still make the classic 50s USAF aviator shades (in the US) good metal construction, variety of lens material/color choices, mine have been awesome. I wear my grandfather's Ray Bans from the 50s with new comfort temples.

These went out of fucking stock one hour before I could buy them.

i don't wear sunglasses but want to get a pair for summer are ray bans shit quality? does quality matter? i heard about a few companies owning a large percent of the market

>>15947956
>>15947951
(ideals)
Pic related, what I actually wear

Will cop myself these and some black and gold teashades

>>15948026

>>15946805

id on the right side 2nd from the bottom with the reddish lens?

>>15948033
Vintage vouarnet pouilloux px4117

>>15948033
Vintage vouarnet poullioux px4117

>>15947938
Looks like aliexpress trash

>>15947952
Don't buy cheap shit sunglasses. Ray ban isn't worth the price unless you can get them on a big discount. You don't have to avoid luxottica sunglasses if you really like the design, you just shouldn't overpay for them. Polaroids are very good cheap polarized sunglasses.

>>15948059
They are to some extent, but they’re dirt cheap I like how they look so I don’t give a shit, it’s been mostly cloudy in my hometown so Im really looking for polarized lenses right now

>>15947927
Yeah I like clubmasters but I don't dress up ebougth for them.

>>15947087
>>15947111
Rundolph Engineering pilot glasses. These are actually the og aviators over the teardrop design that came out I think in the 70s.

Personally I think they look better because teardrop makes you look like a cop.

>>15946805
id on the yellow boi??

>>15948125
Vintageframescompany XXL
I wish I would have gotten the geo xxls and the turtleshell frame. It's also the company that provided me with all my custom lenses.

Is it true that round heads should buy more angular and square shaped sunglasses? And likewise that angular or square heads should buy rounded glasses?

My head is somewhere in between and maybe oval so I have no idea. I've only noticed that frame which are wider than my head do not look good on me.

Retoasted from other bread

never mind the wack ass hair

how do the glasses look

>>15948342
They look good man. And yes first thing I thought was cut that hair.

You look like a Blues brother

>>15948342
feldman core

>>15948342
>>15948403
They look good on you, but you do look a bit like a blues brother,

>>15948403
>cut your hair

I'm rather not, I'm way too invested at this point. I'm nearing the end of that "awkward phase" (6 months-1 year) of hair growth where it really looks scruffy no matter what you do. It looks OK if I put product in it and pull it behind my ears, but it's gonna be another 3-4 months before I can put it in a tail or give it volume etc.

>>15948431
>blues brother

Dangit I got the ones with a fade lens so that wouldn't happen.

Worse things to be I guess.

>>15948416
Kek thanks for the compliment, guess my age

ID on these?

>>15946672
only have 1 pair, curry & paxton yvan i like em.

>>15950033
this is bordering on having taste but just isn't there. Those temples are atrocious.

>>15946805
those ones on the bottom right are pretty based

>>15950016
you wouldn't understand

>>15946672

any aviator from DITA, even the ones from the Avengers are great.

>>15952269

>>15952135
It's been something I've wanted to do for years. Finally found a place that would do me 2 different colored lenses without charging me for 2 full sets.

>>15952269
They're way overpriced for what they are.

>>15946672
Just copped

>>15952273
the acetate part just makes them look gay

>>15953017
personnaly I like that but they sell a very similar frame without the acetate. But again, DITA is overpriced as fuck for what it is.

Bump. Also round glasses are gay.

Bump. Sad sunglasses are so ignored on /fa/.

>>15946672
the only sunglasses that look good on me are really dark green tinted aviators but my only pair broke this last summer and I havent been able to find a pair that is dark enough. thinking about just eating 200 and getting uncle joe ray bans

Been rocking these 100 percents. Thoughts?

>>15946672
Rothco makes those aviators for sub $20. They make them with either polarized or UV400 coatings. UV400 is better for your eyes. They're basically American Optical knockoffs but AO used to be half it's current price so they're not worth it anymore.

Their "G.I." model is squared like your pic. I think it looks better that way it's just less utilitarian. Excuse the low resolution pics that's all they got.

>>15955572
>Beerbelly boomer yelling at the umpire at a little league game then hopping in his 2007 F150 to his $249k Dallas suburb home core

>>15946672
Reminder that Scientologists deserve to be burned at the stake

>>15955572
based

>1987+34
>vintage blades are still $400+ for a good condition pair

and I'm still waiting for oakley to start doing custom sutro lites. hurry the fuck up assholes

>>15956811
why not mumbos?

>>15956814
hadn't heard of those, kinda reminds me of factory pilots from the front

>>15955623
If they're polarized they're probably uv400 as well. Don't trust cheap sunglasses though.

>>15956842
I've owned
>rayban clubmasters
>rayban wayfarers
>American Optical aviators (they're now fucking $240 new)
There's no difference.

>>15957214
I should elaborate that theirs no difference because the glass and coatings are not expensive for manufacturers. When kickstarter first became a thing there was an ocean of $40 sunglasses startups because the materials are so cheap. If I knew about this shit earlier I would have just bought two cheap sunglasses, one polarized one not and keep the polarized one in the car since those are very prone to scratches and you don't need glare reduction when walking around.

ive tried different glasses, but i found some knockoff plastic wayfarers at a charity shop recently and have never worn sunglasses as much as these ones

>>15957225
If you get some chinese garbage they could just skip the anti uv coating and you'll just be fucking up your eyes. I've gotten glasses without lenses that had a uv400 sticker and tag on them.