/fa/ - Fashion

>>15754090
horrid, looks like something is wrong with you. The shortsleeve goes under.

>>15754090
Trend from late 90s, early 2000s. You'll look like a dipshit

>>15754105
>>15754106
Why? I don't see anything wrong with it, lots of older fashion trends are still acceptable or cool today.

heres some inspo bro

>>15754114
Yeah but ugly people look ugly wearing anything.

>>15754111
this is the worst trend historically. do not do it.

>>15754120
Why? What is bad about it?

>>15754122
there is nothing redeemable about it. functionally outclassed by shortsleeve being underneath, so bad looking that you can't even do it unironically or ascend beyond. it neuters any good contours.

>>15754125
>so bad looking
What is bad about it?

>>15754090
Post one example of it that looks good.

>>15754129
I can't really find many examples of it, I searched "long sleeve under short sleeve shirt" and got very few images, which is why I ended up using an unrelated pic for the OP.

>>15754111
>lots of older fashion trends are still acceptable or cool today.
some are, some are not.
wearing a long sleeve under short sleeve is just illogical. its not attractive or appealing in any way. it definitely looks like a nod to grunge/alt rock and a lot of it aged badly and is very close to cringe territory. grunge didnt age that badly, but its nostalgia momentum definitely has waned a bit. if you dont wear a good grunge/alternative outfit, you just get a reference to a very tacky decade of 2000s that is still not far enough to be nostalgic and just looks like a passe style in a very bad way.

>>15754137
So it's just a matter of time until it comes back around? It's totally arbitrary which things are considered bad and which are considered good?
>aged badly
>cringe territory
>illogical
So are choker necklaces but everyone's wearing those now.

>>15754142
if fashion is totally arbitrary to you, why ask this board? go and wear what you like if it doesnt matter to you
you've been told enough times by enough people already, i dont have all day to argue with you

>>15754151
>to you
To everyone, seemingly. I'm just pointing out that you can't actually reason why certain 90s stuff is cool and certain 90s stuff isn't. You're just quoting other people who decide this stuff for you.
> i dont have all day to argue with you
I seriously doubt you will be doing anything more valuable with your time.

>>15754157
>I'm just pointing out that you can't actually reason why certain 90s stuff is cool and certain 90s stuff isn't.
some things, like grunge, naturally had positive context (eg nirvana) and certain look/feel to them, like the layering/wool/americana vibe, mixed with punk fashion, to produce cohesive whole; it came away but as 90s kids grew up, they became nostalgic, so in a way its a trend for millennial demographic. other things didnt age well, and looked tacky and ridiculous (eg JNCOs). some things just got negative context (eg mullet).
to address you example, choker is part of punk fashion. it became trendy with the whole punk/goth "witch" look that every college whore wants. doesn't mean it's good at all, its just a fad that will pass.
>You're just quoting other people who decide this stuff for you.
you keep implying things just because someone criticized your totally amazing fashion idea to wear long sleeve under shirt sleeve that 100% only gatekeeping drones will reject.

>>15754165
>other things didnt age well, and looked tacky and ridiculous
But JNCOs are so far out of the norm, there were people at the time who thought they were too out there. A layering of shirts is not totally ridiculous in that way, and it has the same context as grunge fashion that is popular now.

idk what the fuck you guys are talking about all those tiktok eboy kids wear long sleeves under short sleeves

>>15754166
>A layering of shirts is not totally ridiculous in that way, and it has the same context as grunge fashion that is popular now.
but the issue is: long sleeve under short sleeve is part of 2000s fashion, and many lower class and out of fashion people still dress like this (see Karen for example, they still sport what is basically a 2000s haircut). this creates negative context. same happened with mullet, we had a huge 80s resurgence but no one wore it because of the rednecks. typically, people who are out of fashion will dress like past decades, even if they are unaware of it. and you risk looking like one, with a questionable trend too. you risk looking like a blink-182 fan who lived under the rock or clueless boomer who still listens to his now uncool bands.
remember that for its good qualities, grunge still went away and never came back until nostalgia came.
also, one more example: fringe. technically its not bad, but emo killed it. it left such a huge negative context that we'll probably have to wait a long time before people forget emo.

>>15754185
>but the issue is: long sleeve under short sleeve is part of 2000s fashion
Much more associated with the 90s I think.
>until nostalgia came
Which is what I said earlier, eventually it will be in again, and the exact same thing that is now "super duper cringe" will be fine, because some designer decided to market it.

>>15754170
this

>>15754170
>>15754332
they look like wispy nerds

>>15754090
they sold sweaters that LOOKED like you were wearing a tshirt over one at H&M in like 2005 - do you want to look like you went shopping at H&M in 2005, aka like me when i was 10? of course you fucking don't

>>15755484
they are, so whats your point?

>>15754090
I do it all the time OP and I think it looks good, ignore this board of deranged homos

If you feel comfortable wearing it then do it and if you don't then don't. It's very easy to tell if you're not comfortable in your clothes.

>>15754170
>idk what the fuck you guys are talking about all those tiktok eboy kids wear long sleeves under short sleeves
And they all look like fucking faggots.
If TikTok e-boys jumped off a cliff, would you think that was cool too?
Fucking sheep.

Much like picrel, it's hit or miss depending on if you have the body for it. Just so happens it was the ideal 2000s male, being a white possibly tan guy with a strong jaw and ottermode body

>>15758889
Also I would just wear two cotton tees over one another, maybe use a button up over a longsleeve, or a thermal or something, have of being /fa/ is wearing stupid shit anyway