/fa/ - Fashion

>>15719132
the jeans are too tight and low waisted, it's a poor imitation of retro working class clothing.

>>15719132
The boots.

>>15719137
it's just a slim cut.
I personally prefer low wait desu

>>15719132
Moc toe shoes are cringe soja shit. Look terrible and out of place with everything even at work.

>>15719222
Yeah, I'm going to go out on a limb and say this isn't actually that onions, unless he spends hours talking about how "authentic" selvage is or something.
>>15719137
Jeans have been normal casualwear for decades, it's not imitating retro working class unless it's a pre-50s repro.

>>15719132
real men wear belts

pants are fitted like an unlubed fist and the cringe cuffing at the bottom lol

shit, in 20 years time people are gonna look at low rise jeans the same way we look at manbuns now

>>15719137
>too tight
You'd need to see them in movement to judge that, since they're clearly not skin tight.
>low waisted
I agree.
>poor imitation of retro working class clothing
You'd need to say more to judge.

>>15719317
Men have been able to buy nothing but low-rise jeans for 20 years now. High rise for men is never coming back.

>>15719317
no they won't. people are way too fat and lazy to deal with high waist. cope

>>15719347
they're been back for 5 years flyover laggard

>>15719352
It's not about fatness or laziness. A low-rise waist certainly emphasizes fatness, in any case. The issue is that men, of all shapes and sizes, preferred low-rise options long enough that the market reflects that. To add to this, since thin people actually do look good in low-rise trousers, the fashion industry doesn't feel the need to change the dominant silhouette.

>>15719347
You can see it in the tea leaves.
>straight fits are coming back because slim fits get called onions now
>women went from skinny jeans to high waisted mom jeans (in case you think fat people can't wear high rise)
>higher rises are coming back in formalwear, as a rejection of the "skinny everything" trend of 2010
>even Naked & Famous made a new high-rise fit, although it's only high rise by their own standards
I'm telling you, it's habbening.

>>15719358
Except they're not. The random, low-impact fashion label cutting high-rise trousers doesn't say anything about where the market is heading. I've been watching marginal high-waisted options pop up and disappear forever now. Sure, they'll likely come back eventually, but the pendulum has lingered for so long on the other end, I'd sooner suspect you to reach eighty before seeing real presence in the market.

>>15719132
Pretty much over styling/dressing up the old school work wear. Stop the tucking and cuffing and beat those clothes up.

>>15719361
>straight fits are coming back because slim fits get called onions now
That must be why /fa/ has only worn skinny/slim trousers since its creation.
>women went from skinny jeans to high waisted mom jeans
This says nothing about men's trousers.
>even Naked & Famous made a new high-rise fit, although it's only high rise by their own standards
A mislabeled medium rise is dubious, but what's Naked and Famous's market share? I'll believe it's happening when a mall anchor like Dillard's or Macy's is offering a brand making high rise. Until then, high rise is a dream for all of us who aren't niche high fashion or Japanese workwear slaves.

>>15719369
Tucking and cuffing have nothing to do with whether the clothing will or is (hypothetically, obviously not here) beat up.

>>15719137
They're just regular jeans. Fuck off grampa

>>15719385
>/fa/ has only worn skinny/slim
Exactly why it's noteworthy that now they're looking at high rise.
>This says nothing about men's trousers.
Technically correct, but the market forces that led to that may lead to the same in men's eventually.
>market share?
It's all downstream. /fa/ was wearing stacked APC PNS when the average person was wearing 501s, normies never buy the stylish brands but they imitate them.

>>15719132
No belt

>>15719412
>Exactly why it's noteworthy that now they're looking at high rise.
I suppose that's noteworthy. /fa/ asks lots of questions that never seem to gain any real traction, but I submit it's hard to judge where the board is moving or not moving aesthetically when what it posts is largely memes and shit instead of thoughtful commentary or fits.
>Technically correct, but the market forces that led to that may lead to the same in men's eventually.
This is a poor application of inductive logic. It could, but maybe it won't. Nothing about the prior event says anything about the latter except that they're both fashion related.
>It's all downstream. /fa/ was wearing stacked APC PNS when the average person was wearing 501s, normies never buy the stylish brands but they imitate them.
It can be downstream, but it needn't. /fa/ boosted APC PNSs a bit back in 2008, along with other raw denim brands, and maybe the board even saw a lot of actual wearers, but raw denim never caught on in the mainstream despite all the exposure. It remains niche today. And the average person hasn't worn 501s in decades. I agree that fashion tends to cycle down, but it's not a given that a particular trend will. Plus, all the movement in menswear still seems aimed toward athleisure, where the cut of the garment's top block is less of a focal point for the average consumer.

>>15719442
Fair enough, it's my prediction but there's no way of knowing until it happens.

>>15719141
>>15719241
Can someone please recommend some semi-casual boots? Something I can wear comfortably on the weekends but maybe also to work? My job doesn't have a very formal dress code, I usually just wear flannels or sweaters and jeans/cords/chinos. Trying to get rid of my sneakers

>>15719395

Yeah, that isn't regular fit, maybe to you they are because you are probably about 15 and have never seen regular fitting jeans/trousers.

>>15719488
Go with a wingtip.

>>15719491
t. fatty

>>15719395
>>15719520
Reverse GIS https://www.indiamart.com/proddetail/mens-stretch-denim-jeans-20595153073.html
Supposedly it's a "skin fit", really probably slim fit.

>>15719390
You don't get it, this guy's are pretty much buying recreations of vintage workwear clothes that wear ment to be worn by miners and similar jobs, and these people try to wear these clothes as nice clothes, perfectly cuffing the jeans, polished boots, tucked tee or shirt and wear a ton of accessories... That's part of the problem, stop trying to dress up clothes ment to be worn extremely casually

>>15719536
Slim fit jeans are not repro vintage workwear.
Please tell me you're not the m65 guy.

>>15719132
Honestly just the boots, moc-toes are so cringe.

>>15719520
Still not regular, they are slim, going on skinny

I find being called a grandpa a compliment too, better then being a clueless zoomer.

>>15719541
The jeans clearly are from those raw denim repo brands and the boots are those meme heritage...
OK, I can give you that the jeans are tapered, but clearly the guy is into the vintage workwear. For me that style is so simple to pull off, just wear it casual, stop trying to polish that style. That's what makes it "onions"

>>15719589
cope

>>15719441
this!

>>15719132
the rolled cuff on the jean and the spotless boots.
alphas aren't that anal.

Fuck, bros. Where can I get a pair of high-waist jeans?

looks too clean and thought-out to look like authentic workwear

>>15720256
*Actual* repro like LVC, Sugar Cane, Warehouse. Look for 50s cuts.

>>15719132
raw denim looks like shit and ruins shoes, just get some quality slim or slim straight jeans in a good wash from Edwin or acne or similar, if you're talking about the red wings then cringe

>>15719442
>tfw i still buy apc denim
if there was one pair of pants that i had to wear for the rest of my life, it would be a pair of petit standards, specifically the jean droit etroit

>>15719132
no belt, workmen don't cuff, no watch, hands are too pretty, boots are brand new. No wear on jeans or shoes makes you look like a poseur.

>>15720256
13MWZ, 936 wranglers, don't bother with LVC, they fuck with the cuts of the trousers and are over expensive.

Asked my gf and she said the boots look good but the jeans are way too long and look uncomfortable. Raw denim BTFO

>>15719361
Only fags, chinks and women wear wide pants
I dont wanna associate myself with those people

>>15719132
raw denim
cuffed
and those boots

>>15719589
30+ years old laggard mfag spotted