/fa/ - Fashion

Instagrams:

Prep:

https://www.instagram.com/kjp/
https://www.instagram.com/alexstourbe/
https://www.instagram.com/dixielandtrad/
https://www.instagram.com/thepreppytexan/
https://www.instagram.com/sweatbrah/
https://www.instagram.com/josephcrabb/
https://www.instagram.com/wmbrownproject/
https://www.instagram.com/thepreppyguy/
https://www.instagram.com/pjhavel/
https://www.instagram.com/hardinglane/
https://www.instagram.com/seangaleburke/
https://www.instagram.com/thepreppynewenglander/
https://www.instagram.com/howieguja/
https://www.instagram.com/_______jung/
https://www.instagram.com/kazuyahiramatsu/
https://www.instagram.com/sophieschumacher0/
https://www.instagram.com/carly/
https://www.instagram.com/abbycapalbo/
https://www.instagram.com/julia.harpe/
https://www.instagram.com/jackiegreaney/
https://www.instagram.com/kileyskeff/

Trad:

https://www.instagram.com/acutestyle/
https://www.instagram.com/tintinfellow/
https://www.instagram.com/andreasweinas/
https://www.instagram.com/thelandlessgentry/
https://www.instagram.com/dave_money3/
https://www.instagram.com/kleidsam/
https://www.instagram.com/parisian_gentleman/
https://www.instagram.com/oskarsalomonsson/
https://www.instagram.com/nortonofmorton/
https://www.instagram.com/muffyaldrich/
https://www.instagram.com/the_mulberry_tree_lifestyle/
https://www.instagram.com/eleanoraudet/
https://www.instagram.com/sonyaglyn/

Ivy:

https://www.instagram.com/benton.down/
https://www.instagram.com/oxfordclothbuttondown/
https://www.instagram.com/arnoldsteiner/
https://www.instagram.com/tko3r/
https://www.instagram.com/jcl.84/
https://www.instagram.com/took_ivy/
https://www.instagram.com/dick.carroll/
https://www.instagram.com/gezzaseyes/
https://www.instagram.com/georgewbush/
https://www.instagram.com/sartorialchap/
https://www.instagram.com/psy3927/
https://www.instagram.com/the_prince_of_posh/
https://www.instagram.com/watatanigahaku/

cringe

>>15321565
leelobean was removed because he made the account private. Any suggestion for his replacement?

>>15321574
It's starting again, boys

What u wearing boyz

>>15321639
I'm naked rn. I'm probably going to put on yesterday's ocbd and some jeans. I need to do laundry

>>15321639
>crap watch
>cheap looking shorts
>untucked shirt
0/10

>>15321648
>jeans

>>15321657
This.
Also it doesn't look like his moccasins fit correctly and his shirt is a khaki colour

>>15321657
Yeah, black rawjawns that come up to my bellybutton in a classic cut. Please miss me with that *jeans aren't ivy* shit

>>15321657
My god. What intense whining. Just post something already.

Also Casios are dope. You're dead wrong there.

>>15321679
>Casios are dope
Get a load of this guy

>>15321564
Howd i do boys? Going for a semi tip more smart casual look. Think it came out pretty good.

>>15321775
Your shirt is too big and you should always tuck it in unless you're at the beach, for starters

I finally got out of the bath. I went with my favorite poplin shirt and some green chinos. I'm off today so it's casual

Here is a close up so you can see the fabric textures and colors.

>>15321775
I can't believe that I'm going to say this but is this bait?

Why is everybody wearing their shirts untucked in this thread?

>>15321804
I don't think so because I recognize the hair.
>>15321775
If you're the guy who posted the striped polo a while ago then this looks better. I'd tuck in the shirt and get pants with a less aggressive taper in a higher rise. Also get different shoes. The sneakers don't mesh with the upper half. Some mocs would tie the fit together we'll

>>15321775
I see too many issues here:
>shirt untucked
>non ironed shirt
>pants too long
>pants too slim
>sneaker laces tied wrong

Sneakers feel a bit out of place in that outfit, but well, I am not going to criticize that. The full outfit... it's a 0/10 for me

>>15321803
>>15321801
Another untucked shirt... WTF is wrong in this thread today?

>>15321826
>>15321806
Be the change you want to see in the world and post a fit that we can all learn from.

>>15321806
I'm in an untucked shirt mood today. That's pretty much it.
>>15321842
Looking good. ID on loafers?

>>15321848
>loafers

French brand Orbans. I don't like them that much though cause of the leather.

>>15321775
Mother of cringe

>>15321775
I'd go with lighter chinos for that shirt

>>15321842
Wasn't this exact outfit in last thread?

>>15321873
This picture reeks of S O I

>>15321826
How am i supposed to tie the shoes? Im pretty fucking in innocuous as you can tell
>>15321812
Also ive never posted here before

>>15321873
It is. I wore basically the same thing (loafers instead of sperry) today. I mainly just wanted to post a fit since there are a load of non-fit shit-talkers here. I'm so tired of pointless spam "responses" which re-iterate the same tired criticisms. Nothing will ever change in terms of the quality of fits in these threads until people start actually contributing. Yeah, criticism is helpful but fits are a million times more. And if you're capable of dishing it out, you should be capable of dressing decently yourself.

For the record, there's nothing wrong with untucked shirts. There, I said it.

>>15321899
Oh, my bad. You look like another THICC tipper from a few threads ago

>>15321927
>For the record, there's nothing wrong with untucked shirts. There, I said it.
Your picture says otherwise, like get a load of this faggot

Any suggestions for boat shoes for somebody with size 12 (U.K.) feet that are also wide?

Any blucher moc recommendations? I want to get the look

>>15322227
Quoddy/rancourt if you can afford it

Sebago/llbean if you're poor

>>15321899
>How am i supposed to tie the shoes?
It's just a small tweak, many people actually do it wrong and at the end you see the lace diagonally:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTElgzFa8cM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YwqQvKtmefE

>>15321639
Awful.

Is gossip girl /tip/?

>>15322409

How would you wear this coat casually, no suits?
It's 44" long, slightly below the knees.

>>15322555
These obtuse assburgers hate your guts.

>>15322556
everyone hates igor

>>15322568
Really? Why

>>15322555
+ bowl cut

Then you'll be ready for NY fashion week.

>>15322579
Forgot to add, it's not oversized, fits nicely, just hits below the knees.

>>15322590
might even be snug fit, haven't received it yet but it's a 42R

What are some good brands to buy on yoox? I've bought zanella and iconotex trousers which I've been pleased with. BD Baggies make decent button downs. Anyone had any experience with the site?

>>15321639
Hey tipp of the morning to ye

How's this hella epic caruso coat on yoox?

>>15322263
I'm poor so thanks for the 'go tip

What happens if you button the top button on a 3/2 blazer? Will you die?

>>15322555
if it isn't kiton or isaia it's not prep

>>15322933
No I know it's not prep, but it is traditional

>>15322629
>caruso

yuck

>>15322938
yeah but london fog is usually poorly made fused stuff

and lacks structure

you can brooks brothers mainline that's slightly higher quality for not much more, golden fleece or even older aquascutum shit that's all pretty qualiy for around the $40 mark

>>15322958
It's Vintage London Fog, union-made in the U.S.A
and structure is for fatties, I am fit

>>15322555
Very hard to pull that off

>>15323240
Why? What if I'm fit.

>>15323256
I wanna see him buzz, stop with the bald hiding

>>15322555
Suit pants and pointy-ish shoes.

>>15323265
That would be way formal. I need that long coat styled casually.

>>15322939
Caruso is a great quality brand what are you smoking.

>>15321657
>tucking with shorts
Ok nerd

i bought a pair of velvet trousers today

>>15322625
bait pic

Now that the dust has settled, is a mid-grey suit acceptable for evening events? Think a theater performance (not a premiere) rather than cheeky dinner with the lads.

>>15322555
light gray flannels, fine gauge navy turtleneck and, may Allah forgive me for uttering this word, black chelsea boots

>>15322681
Sebago's quality has really nosedived. Save a few extra shekels and get Rancourt. They are are $250 and well worth it. My favorite shoes and the most comfortable ones I have ever worn.

>>15322555
plain white t-shirt
light blue wash skinny/slim jeans with distressing at the knees
suede chelsea boot (any colour)

>>15324066
Rancourt costs around 2x what Sebago costs. For boat shoes, anyone around 80-140€ will do the job just fine for a bunch of years

>>15322555
I don't like it, the fabric looks ugly to me. Looks partially felted?
But what >>15323881 said is legit.

>>15322555
I love it

>>15322555
A perfect inexpensive yet classy wool coat.

>>15322202
Sperry

Levi 501 or 502s lads?

>>15324622
Jeans are for plebs.

>>15324793
Rejecting jeans is autism.

>>15325017
This is really sad

>>15325157
My man.

>>15324622
541 Athletic cut because real men lift weights and have legs that can’t be contained in standard cut jeans

>>15325215
I can’t find those online, I am the person who asked that question and I do squat well over three pl8 so my legs are big but I figured I’d just have to suffer with a 501 since I can’t find those athletic ones in EU? It sucks

>>15321657
>crap watch
Who cares. Function is everything when it comes to a everyday watch, new fag
>cheap looking shorts
Truth
>untucked shirt
Nothing wrong with an untucked shirt in casual setting. Smells like LAARRPP

>>15321781
>Your shirt is too big and you should always tuck it in unless you're at the beach, for starters
We’ll call you “the LARPIN LANKLET”

>>15321775
Like the hair and shirt, anon
But the pants are too long and SLIM. No comment on shoes, not my style

>>15325324
>>15325311
samefag

>>15321826
>Another untucked shirt... WTF is wrong in this thread today?
Chill out spaz. Quite the LAARRPP
>>15321873
What’s up SLIMnon? Boat shoes and socks? Cmon
>>15321939
>Your picture says otherwise, like get a load of this faggot
Thats Muffys husband. He’s more /Tip/ than you’ll ever be. Ask for forgiveness, poser.

>>15325344
Woah 20000000 iq. Tell me ol wise one, Are these me too? >>15325334 >>15325354

>>15325324
>NOOOOOOO, MY FIT IS ONE WITHOUT FAULT AND THEREFORE YOU CANNOT CRITICISE IT, IF YOU DO YOU'RE A LAAAARRRRPPPER
Kill yourself

>>15321657
>tucking with shorts
Horribad.

daily reminder to post fits faggots

>>15325387
Not my fit, Llaarrpin Lanklet. It’s just sad how you consider that a “big shirt” lol. That anon looks 4 fn feet tall and it fits him well.

>>15325469
It's clearly a shirt that should be tucked in, it's too long and makes his legs look very short. Stop being a faggot

>>15325157
sprezzatura

>>15321564
What’s up with Brooksbrothers always changing their labels? Date/Era on this label? It definitely Isn’t new.

>>15322409
If you’re 16

>>15325577
Or a girl

I wish there were more preppy brands that were made in the UK and sold their clothes in the UK. I just watched an interview with the ceo of drake's and he basically said that they sell to Italians, Koreans, Japanese and Americans but british people make only a tiny fraction of their market.

Reminds me of when I went to Bologna recently and there was a great traditional shop selling loads of British made clothing and a whole host of shetland jumpers made by a brand that simply doesn't sell here.

I just found this brand through the interview.
https://countryoforigin.co.uk/collections/sweaters-1

Anyone know any others? Specifically looking for lesser known brands. I already know about private white, shoe brands, harley etc etc.

>>15325662
Why not just buy Jamieson’s or Harley? I looked at this and there’s nothing special about it, pretty Instagram tier brand, they deliberately choose lower quality seams for “imperfect character”.

>>15321564
Alright, first time /fa/g poster, home boards are /k/ and /biz/ this is my blog post.

Im getting married, said fuck off with a tux, going with a navy 2 piece, single breasted coat. Fiance said the colors at the wedding are gonna be sage green and dusty rose.

I need some advice for matching this shit/ and some shoes.

What color socks should I wear, what pattern/material should I do for a tie and a pocket square?

Are allen edmonds decent?
Are lighter brown cap toed oxfords gtg?

>>15323013
ignore him, he's out of his depth

>>15325857
So you’re still going with the grey 2 piece suit? If so then just get a dusty rose tie and sage green socks and pocket square. Patterns are up to you. Look some up. Allen Edmonds are high quality especially their Made in USA products. I wouldn’t go with brown shoes as the groom. They’re too casual. Make sure the shoulder width isn’t too wide on the suit, sleeves of suit and shirt shouldn’t go past an inch from your wrist, make sure your trouser hem hits mid or right below the ankle, make sure the jacket covers your butt, and go with double or no vents.

>>15326062
And if you’re daring get a 3 price suit with a sage green colored vest

>>15325157
Because jeans are for plebs.

>>15325519
Just make sure any shirt you buy has the Est before the 1818 otherwise its outlet shit.

>>15325662
Seeing that ivy style had its origins in LARPing as the british, I have a hard time believing there's not a UK counterpart to every ivy product.

I do agree that it's hard to find UK products. There's definitely much less expenditure on marketing than in the US, and I think the british have a different, more muted relationship with clothes than the US, italians or asians. Brits don't identify themselves via brands, products and provenance the way americans do, they don't have the sartorial culture or flair of italians. Asians are just larpers with a weird relationship with ivy clothes. Ever notice how most of the big ivy/prep/#menswear personalities are boy-bodied 2nd gen asian immigrants?

I don't like drakes. They repackage ivy staples at a hilarious markup and probably spend 90% of their budget on their lame "post-prep" marketing a la Rowing Blazers. $215 for a plain OCBD, lmao fuck off. I can get Mercer and Sons for less than that. And no doubt brits with the money will just get their shirts bespoke. Drakes core demographic are probably menswear bloggers like the eternally faggy "bullshot bookclub"

>>15321564

If I want to have a black lounge/stroller/Stresemann outfit, what are elements that I need to look for, exactly?

>>15326093
BB labels pre70s(I think) don’t have an “Est.1818”. And neither do pic related which are from the early 2000s, they’re Made in USA as well. Fn BB

>>15326126
>Ever notice how most of the big ivy/prep/#menswear personalities are boy-bodied 2nd gen asian immigrants?

>>15326093
Nah makers, is a good label so is golden fleece,red fleece, defunct black fleece.

1818 by
Brooks Brothers

Is trash

>>15325519
~2010

>>15326191
Do you know this for a fact?

>>15326126
I own some Drakes OCBDs and sweaters (all either thrifted or on steep sale, these things show up all the time on ebay and Grailed). The OCBD's has some of the best attention to detail I've seen (shanked mop buttons, elegant cuffs, dense stitching, great collar rolls, etc.) Is it worth full retail? I wouldn't pay that. But they have a nice 3-shirt price bundle that brings it more in line with other makers, and the differences between Drakes and those makers come down to preferences. Drake's OCBDs feel decidedly more "dressy", for example, than the Mercers I own from the fabric and cuff types. Not bad, just different.

I think you're overestimating the "post-prep" nature of Drakes and the reason for it being marked up. Drake's doesn't make dad hats and hyped sneakers to appeal to the streetwear crowd. I will agree that it's too expensive, but what I've handled is outstanding in quality.

>>15326219
Not without seeing more of the shirt. But I have bb shirts from that era with a similar label

>>15326244
So do I but with “makers and merchants” below the Est.1818. That’s why I’m curious to know more about BB labels. Like the difference between factory 2nds, outlets, and official stores. Do you know if all Made in USA shirts are good quality? >>15326169
I’ve only seen the top label once. Wby

>>15326068
The wedding is casual the dress and suit are just for pictures mostly.
The blue isnt quite so dark as what I think a navy is, but the Fiance liked the color.

If I had the suit I could post what the tags say, I only recall the inside patch had super 150 on it, and the little I know about how a suit should fit it fit nicely, didnt look bad.

w2c long sleeve polo like this?

>>15326429
PRL, Lacoste, Kent Wang

>>15326484
I have a nice one from Orvis

>>15326429
Massimo Dutti

>>15326068
I cringe every time I see this. Please do this, Anon. I love watching people dress like retards for weddings.
>>15325857
If you want some actual advice, go with medium or dark brown oxfords. Black is going to clash with everything else light oxfords would be too much contrast with navy. For your tie and pocket square I would suggest you get a color swatch of "dusty rose" and do a lot of looking. Green will probably look odd with the navy suit but if you find something that combines both and fits the bill, that's your call. Ribbedd navy or dark grey dress socks are probably your best bet. Contrary to what most people will tell you (and consequently have you looking horrible) your pocket square does not need to be an exact match. It's more about choosing the right one. I hate that I probably own the perfect square for you and there's currently nowhere to buy it since they sold out. My advice is to not do plain and do not do anything too loud with the tie and square. You'll risk looking either cookie cutter cringe or just straight up dumb. I don't have a navy suit, but later today I'll post some inspo aimed at your wedding.
Final note: post /k/ollection faggit

>>15326126
Agreed in terms of culture. Streetwear is huge though in the UK, especially in London. You're still very likely to be called a gaylord if you try to dress nicely in 99% of the country.

Drakes is an interesting one. I don't think they're total hacks like rowing blazers or even dare I say it kjb. Id say their styling has changed a lot over the years and they are starting to creep into Ralph Lauren territory. I think that's fine though and I think they're toeing the line without falling into ironic parody. It's a bit like beams plus in that respect. I myself like to mix formal and informal elements with ivy style (the style originally was seen as informal in comparison to mainstream clothing) and I think it's sensible for drakes to push in that direction whilst still retaining what made the brand (Shirts and ties). Like it or not, the future of popular men's clothing is more casual.

Now of course they have got rebranded clothes sold at a big markup but EVERY brand does that. Drakes only actually makes shirts and ties. I think their suiting is made by Caruso or belvest.

So yeah. It's a risk for a brand to push too much into the youthful lol ironic stuff but it's also not good I m o to go too far backwards into slavishly copying a period of time. If there was a spectrum it would range between meticulous copying of an idealised bygone era of menswear (think simonjamescathcart) all the way to navel gazing, self fellatiating, hipster ironic nonsense (think rowing blazers). Drakes is somewhere between the two.

>>15325662
Lots of british brands in the sweater link from OP: https://pastebin.com/SMMg3tK9

>>15326429
Massimo Dutti usually has many of those for a good price.

>>15326657
>215 for a plain OCBD, lmao fuck off. I can get Mercer and Sons for less than that.

Ocbds are 155 in the UK. They've really gone up in price (used to be 120). You're lucky you have other options in the States. Still, for made in England shirts with a good collar roll, there really isn't anything else. The traditional brands are more expensive and often made in Romania.

>>15326662
Meant for
>>15326126

The fact that I am too poor for Drakes so forced to wear TM Lewin sucks, USA has so many cheaper great alternatives for shirting.

>>15326657
>>15326242
Well thought out posts. I love my OCBD and ties from Drake's, but most of their non-haberdashery just seems a bit of a gyp. I don't think they'll ever get beyond slightly cheeky in their youthful pandering, but who knows?

>>15326670
The factory shop sells shirts for 65 pounds each and 4 for 3 as part of a bundle which is an absolute STEAL. Yeah some of their things have been a gyp, like the rebranded astorflex shoes or even worse, the made in Canada rugby shirts which were sold for something like five times their original retail price. That was partially egregious since there are great rugby shirts you can buy in the UK. Anyway, these are nitpicks. At the end of the day, even if I didn't buy anything from Drake's, I'm glad they exist. The UK menswear scene desperately needs it.

>>15326666
Buy luxire, shirtonony, Eton (at tkmaxx I got a really nice chambray button down for £45), Ralph Lauren (on sale somewhere no doubt), Spier and Mackay (from Canada so there aren't any fees). There are plenty of options. You should never have to buy tmlewin. I'd only but tm lewin for work and that's because I'm a teacher and kids are always spilling ink and paint on me.

>>15326680
Oh and John Simon's. They sell a lot of stuff that's not on the site but the shirts are good. Also yoox, there's a ton of stuff there.

>>15326675
I don't know if I'd say it's a steal, but they certainly make my favorite OCBD on the market right now and the value is certainly there. The collar roll and buttons on mine are exceptional and even in the US it's hard to find anything that quite matches the attention to detail.

can someone fill me in on harris tweed? i see them recommended as pretty thriftable tweed jackets and im tempted, but is all harris tweed equal? i see a lot of cheap names sporting harris tweed badges on their jackets.

>>15326680
as a newbie thriftfag thanks for these suggestions, shirts are a ballache to find cheap.

>>15326706
the only thing worth thirfting is some high end ass suits like oxxford

>>15326680
coronavirus has shit so cheap yoox has mainline zegna suits at macys suit prices right now

>>15326717
is this in general or?

>>15326680
Thanks. Luxire and Shirtonomy are a little up there for me at the moment since I am changing body measurements a lot right now so I'd rather not spend too much right now. I didn't realise about the Spier fees thing but I am not sure about sizing/fit of a shirt and I have no idea what I'd do about returns. Is Spier that much better than the UK ones?

I thought RL was supposed to be pretty bad/comparable to TM or Charles Tyrwhitt.

>>15326682
I checked this out but I couldn't find much info about the shirts from the website like material weights and stuff.

>>15326723
for this style only.

don't bother with harris tweed

it's just a fabric the construction method is what matters

>>15326734
>>15326717

>Not thrifting blazers/suits from vintage brooks brothers, Corbin, j press (watch for shoulder padding!), Ralph, southwick, cable car clothiers etc etc.

This wasn't high end stuff back in the day yet is still miles better than most of the tat you have today. Most of what Benton down and acute style wear is thrifted.

You're right about construction method over material but really it's all about the fit at the end of the day. You could have a fully canvassed handmade suit but if it fits like shit who cares.

>>15326734
well thrifting is what im doing because cash money, ive been buying a fair few things lightly used. right now i only have wool coats, but a jacket would be nice for fair weather.

how can i identify good construction?

thoughts?

>>15326759
what kind of jacket

>>15326787
pitti-uomo circa 2012 tier

I wouldn't.

>>15326787
used to be cool now cringe

>>15326792
a grey tweed jacket would be pretty flexible i think. barring that, maybe a brown one. i dont think i could pull off a green one.

>>15326706
Harris Tweed is a trademark, so the quality of the material is going to be the same on all.The differences on quality will be on how that material is cut or used.

>>15326787
Don't like monks. They feel super pretentious, stick with oxfords or derbies for formal shoes.

>>15326706
Harris tweed is the material. Any company can purchase it to make an item. So the garment construction will differ by a lot but as a general rule, poor construction of garments isn't very likely as the finished items still command a high price when made with Harris tweed.

It's just 100% wool. But a type of wool. A rough wool. I really am not a fan of it. Most people when buying used get drawn to the name so you can find a much cheaper 100% wool item, and most often it will be softer to the touch. Unless you are wearing something long sleeved/collar then Harris tweed can rub on your neck and wrists and it's not comfy.

A 100% wool jacket would also be originally relatively high priced so again the construction is usually going to be fine.

For a good item I would search/check. Is it 100% wool. No blends. No Polyester ion there.

Now onto the lining. It should be a viscose/rayon etc. Never polyester.

Silk is fine too! And indicates an even higher quality garment.

So an older tweed/wool sports jacket will more often than not meet those parts, while a new will have poly blends in the wool and with the lining. A new item that is 100% wool / 100% viscose is often going to easily be in the hundreds new.

Depending no where you live, you can pick up older wool spots jackets for next to nothing. $10 or around that figure. In would have originally cost 10 times that figure if not a lot more.

>>15326796
Yeah, go to etsy to find GREAT blazers. This one looks good for example

https://www.etsy.com/listing/763738915/harris-tweed-jacket-in-grey-thornproof?ga_order=most_relevant&ga_search_type=vintage&ga_view_type=gallery&ga_search_query=ivy+blazer&ref=sr_gallery-1-16&organic_search_click=1

>>15321564
desu, i forgot a lot about higher end menswear labels because it hasn't been relevant in a long time, desu i think the trend is dead

i wear shit like this, except i have this hoodie in light blue and just top it off with miansai jwelry and those persol glasses i had forever

i'll wear those valentino pants occasionally but i don't wear them like i used to, i'd toss it with a plaid shirt

Any ausfags here know where to get nice high collar button downs like Mercer and Son collars?

>>15326811
Lol that price. No thanks. The brown/darker colors on a tweed jacket command a much lower price than lighter colors as they are harder to look good in and lighter colors are much more modern looking so go for a much higher price.

The buttons on that also are the classic soccer ball ones it appears which can date an item. I replace them with simple black/brown buttons.

>>15326817
Strange take. I'd be interested to see a fit from you.

>>15321564
Euro-bros, what are your thoughts on "Hawes and Curtis" shirts (and maybe knitwear)? I'd like to know if it is a good option compared to Boggi or similar brands.

want to get pic related, still trying to piece together pants and shirt
informal summer suit, probably mostly worn with brown loafers. what color pants do i get? brown or beige seems too much brown at that point with the shoes, belt and blazer.
either dark or light grey, navy or black?
navy pants, light blue shirt? white shirt?
recommendations appreciated, i find it hard to find houndstooth spezzato inspo

>>15326848
Nothing to say in terms of 'quality'. Like tm lewin, charles twyritt, thomas pink, it's all chinese made using the cheapest fabrics available. Fine for your job. However, i'd still rather go boggi.

>>15326857
Post a fit so I can assess your noob level. As it stands, I wouldn't recommend a beginner try that.

>>15326845
>sold everything from brioni, zegna, oxxford, canali

i owned, got rid of ALL button ups.

replaced with:

hoodies - chamion x madewell, champion above in light blue, fear of god x pacsun essentials

pants- have the white oak usa selvedge 501s, valentinos, james perse cotton, linen black denim john varvatos

shoes - brown suede chelseas, black toe cap AE boots, suede minimalist sneakers, and whatever meme fad sneaker is around currently just random black ultraboost adidas sneakers

sometimes i wear those POLO RL bear hats if i don't feel like doing hair

outerwear coat rack, light green alpha industries jacket, black levis denim, mmm 5zip (need to sell still)


that's what i wear out most of the time, kinda un-focused on designer labels more timeless basics

most of my jewelry is from miansai, I almost always wear that dove pendant one thats always spammed in GQ and cycle the 4 rings

i sold all my off-white stuff wasn't for me

i don't have all the answers but i def think the mens wear trend has been over for a long time.

the pieces held tremendous value though
like most of it retained 70% value

for used clothing that's INSANE

>>15326867
oh shirts, mostly T's now, champion big C on left chest, james perse white T my girlfriend and i tie-died i did - black and white tie dye only on it, 5 different long and short sleeve james perse and john elliott tees, i still have that dior homme double neck tee and the krisvanassche foam feeling t

i sold all the tby alexander wang and 3.1 phillip lim shit

the best shirts i sold were from etro, i had some other stupid ones that were $495 retail that i picked up for $250ish then sold at 300 something, a few of them were from brand charvet which were built very nicely super nice MOP buttons

>>15326862
I see. Thank you.

What I actually need is 3 or 4 semi/formal shirts. Mostly white and light blue. I'd like to use them with flannel trousers and stuff.

>>15326862
thomas pink is alright if you're trying to floss and have something branded but you're right quality is lacking

>>15326881
incotex at tjmaxx, they're like $35-50, they don't retail for much but they're well built

>>15326866
i dont take fit pics because i dont post anything anywhere and theres no mirror around to show you my white tee tucked in my navy dries pants as im currently at work. i dress like my own grandpa on the regular, 6'1, normal body type, dark blonde, short hair.
i love navy and brown but before i just get another pair of navy pants im looking for some external thoughts
why would you even mind if i run around like an autistic weirdo

>>15326909
sounds nice, wha kind of shoes

>>15321564
what's the deal with this semen sampler moron?

>>15326809
any names i should keep an eye out for?

>>15326811
well memed

>>15326914
Knowledgeable guy but a larper all the same. I wonder sometimes if there's something about men that draw them to obsess over ideas of quality and authenticity whilst completely forgetting to check if anything actually looks good. There's a type of menswear autismo that is readily viewable on styleforum in particular that fundamentally doesn't understand style.

If Stephen took an honest look at himself he would diet, go to the gym and his fits would suddenly look a million times better.

>>15326918
I also say the picking over of details and obsession over rules is also symptomatic of this failure to style properly. I'd call clothing as a hobby rather than actual fashion. Much the same for horology.

>>15326918
But that would take time out of his schedule that he needs for going on cruises and gorging himself at the buffets

>>15326914
He over accessories imo, that's his biggest fault. He usually wears too much clothes with patterns in pretty crazy colours, most notably his shirts. Some of his fits are actually God tier though and like the other anon said if he would go to the gym his fits would look much better and not only that he would probably be more satisfied with himself as a person.

>>15326952
*He also

>>15326911
you mean im wearing now or im looking to buy?
right now im wearing arrigato dunk distressed
for the suit i would love to get a long time grail of mine, rubinacci tassle loafers, but i dont think they are stocked anywhere. But its gonna be some form of brown suede loafer close to those.
just to clarify, i only own semi formal two piece suits in dark colors, same for shoes. a good friend of mine is going to marry this summer and i want to piece together an informal, comfy suit and i basically own nothing in that department, except for black leather dress loafers. not gonna use those.
ill try my navy dries van noten verner panton wave pants with the blazer but i think thats stretching it too far

>>15326956
i don't know sneaker head lingo

>>15326126
Holy mother of based

>>15326651
Thanks anon, the tie the tailor picked out was too loud, even I could tell being colorblind and all.

Ill go for a mid to dark brown oxford, I just need to find a shop that sells allen edmonds, turns out Macys isnt as high dollar as I thought. There wasnt a mens shoe there over 75 dollars.

And here is a partial familuly photo.

>>15327024
Holy Moses ! No one is going to Fuck with any of us tiddly tippers now! Great collection

>>15327024
For reference this is close to the color of navy.

>>15327024
>No BGM-71 TOW
0/10

>>15326914
He is a cringelord half of the times

>>15326857
I don't really understand what you are asking for? You have a blazer like that one from the picture and you want us to recommend you what to wear with it?

>>15327035
Thanks
>>15327064
Someday, ill put it in the garage next to the surplus t72 after I win the lottery.

>>15327064
im getting it, i just want some color combination suggestions since im not getting a full suit and am wondering, first and foremost, what a nice pant color would be since it not quite as simple as with a plain blazer.

>>15327024
Why do you have 9 of the same gun?

>>15327270
They're clearly not the same types...

>>15327024
Very cool anon. So here's what I've got. The short and tie are probably a bit too relaxed for the wedding, but the green worked better with the pink and blue than I thought it would (it's a lot of different tonals so a bit risky) the pocket square looks orange in the picture but looking with my eyes at it right now and it's nearly the same color as the shirt. Go figure. Your safest bet is a subdued pink tie and square, but you can probs get away with more flamboyance than you suspect. Busy and loud should be avoided, but bright is not necessarily the enemy.

>>15327312
Forgot pic like a tard

>>15321564
https://www.aliveshoes.com/basedluigi

>>15327319
Partial pic of the square to prove I'm not insane

>>15327319
That just looks horrendous, you'll rightfully be laughed at.

>>15327252
ok, I get it now. That blazer is quite "shiny", I'd suggest to wear something toned down.

On tops below it, wear for example a light blue shirt. Light green or white might work, I have my doubts on those 2, if you have any shirt of those colours try it and check the mirror.

For pants, any blue, brown, green or grey might work fine. Jeans might actually be a good choice for that blazer.

For belt, a brown belt will work fine. Brown loafers as shoes will work great with that.

>>15327415
>Jeans might actually be a good choice for that blazer.
Not in this thread. Stick to chinos/khakis for a casual blazer combo.

>>15327357
As the person who posted it, I have to agree. Hence why I suggested our /biz/niz /k/ommando friend stick to strictly pink and blue and while I didn't say it outright, I hinted that a plain white shirt is probably the best option. I grabbed stuff that fit the wedding colors that I own so he could see what colors work and which don't. Green would be on the table if he'd gone with a grey suit, but I don't personally think it works with blue.
As a defense of the individual items, I think the shirt and suit go well and the tie and shirt pair well, but the three together simply do not work. Yes, I am autistic enough to type this all out and dumb enough to actually post.

Is this worth copping? What trousers should be paired with it? Looks like part of a suit to me.

>>15327319
I don’t hate the colors but it seems too loud for a wedding

>>15327565
Brand and price? It could have been part of a suit, but it will still pair well with grey flannels or white linens or similar. I'm a huge fan of db jackets though, so I'm biased towards you (or me) buying it.

>>15325857
Argyle socks and neon green pocket square

Does anybody have any good recs for pants that you can dress up and down? Preferably straight or relaxed fit, I’m trying to purge my slim stuff

I have been looking for a fleece that does not make me look like Mark Zuckerberg. Any brand recommendations?

>>15327565
That's an orphaned suit jacket and while yeah, you can use them, the price should never be high for them used. Orphaned suit jackets hold something like 20% value if that compared to a complete suit. It's a massive difference.

It's also double breasted, which means it;s one of the most formal types of suit.

You sound new so I really wouldn't recommend such a formal type jacket if you're just learning. You are also not listing the label/materials on the jacket.

>>15322555
dress like your in a 80s new wave band

>>15326914
He looka like he has Down Syndrome.

one thing i dont like about my flat fronted normal fit pants is the excess material at the ankle catching on things, does pleating solve this?

>>15327574
If he wears that to a wedding he will look like a Jew.

>>15327620
>You sound new

Nope. I'm one of the original posters m8. (not the spanish slenderman). The jacket is obviously wool. I don't think that needs to be said. Anyway, you're right, it's too formal and constructed for what I want. Ideally I'd like the unlined, unstructured double breasted blazers of Anglo-Italian.

>>15327682
>spanish slenderman
Who the fuck is that?

Posting D R A P E
Now give me your SEETHE

>>15327770
You know. The guy who's been posting slim-fit low-rise trouser fits since 2019.

>>15327799
I support you brother. Even if I am in more slim-fit form.

>>15327830
You already posted this like 6 months ago

>>15327799
Uh oh, brake lines been cut. We're heading to DRAPEVILLE

>>15327827
Wait, he's Spanish?

>>15327845
Good fit, if I were you I'd wear it with a brighter tie. Clean your mirror as well :p

>>15327799
something about that pattern of tweed doesnt quite sit right with me, ive never seen it look good.

>>15327830
this i do like though

>>15327845
this is lovely, im saving this because im gunning for a similar look. what things are you wearing if you dont mind me asking?

>>15327799
Hideous tie - looks like some 1970s wallpaper. Imagine how much better a navy grenadine would look

Otherwise good

>>15327799
Add a ring

>>15327840
I'm not claiming that's what I wore today. It's just a fit I thought was similar to his.

>>15327855
>something about that pattern of tweed
What are you talking about? He's clearly wearing flannel

>>15327865
Fair enough, it's just I'd like to see something new, I've got quite a good long term memory :p

>>15327888
the jacket

>>15327905
I'm pretty sure that's a flannel jacket

>>15327799
>>15327845
Lose weight

>>15327845
Anons, I...
I can feel myself changing.
S-something's not right.

>>15327925
sp-sp...
Sp-spuh!!!
SPUH-SPUH- SPREZZATURA!!!!
Happy Pitti Uomo day, faggots. Honestly though, fuck Pitti and fuck sprez. I hope you've all at least enjoyed a bit of OC today. I'll post more drapecore with different combos/clothes another day.

>>15327954
this is great. Source on suit/shirt?

>>15327830
Thank you, slimboi. Duly appreciated and the feeling's mutual.
>>15327852
Thank you. I have a few brighter ties I can try out. Lol not today.
>>15327855
Thanks on both fronts. The second pic is a DB jacket by Timothy Everest, white linen/silk/wool trousers by Kit Blake, tassel loafers by Allen Edmonds, shirt by Drake's, and tie by Bigi Cravato Milano. And to answer your ongoing conversation with >>15327888 the first jacket is in fact tweed. It pairs better with a pair of brown flannel pants and a kind of burnt orange floral tie I have.
>>15327924
I'm 6ft 165lbs. I'm not ottermode like I once was but I'm definitely not fat. Regardless I've started running and lifting again so I'm working on it. I miss being /fit/.
>>15327858
That's why I love it.

>>15327962
Suit is from Bespoke Apparel of St. Louis. I've never been to St. Louis. Dude made a house call out of state for us. Shirt is G. Inglese (was posted earlier in the thread). Be warned, they're extremely fitted and supremely Italian. The collar roll however is second to none. It may be the most sprez thing I own.

You guys still wear suits to a wedding?
Last one I attended I had cuffed selvesge jeans, combat boots, polo shirt (rlpl Marshalls cop) and sunglasses

Are you guys in a role in the wedding?

>>15327845
W2c pants? I can't find decent rise anywhere

>>15328000
Not everyone is a povvo like you. My family wouldn't even let me in.
What is with your autistic anti suit agenda anyway, we know you have no social life

>>15328152
nice

>>15327919
well im retarded then

>>15327977
ooh, those are lovely. you have good taste senpai.

>>15328251
>well im retarded then
Nope, turns out I was all along but desu it did look like a flannel jacket

Pleated and front facing, I can never decide. Fucking slim fits

>>15328152
I used to research them but turns out you don't need to wear a suit ever.

Plus I live in socal....even attorneys wear polo shirts.

Polo shirts = collared shirt so it meets dress code but it's still a tshirt

>>15327977
quick question on that, anon. im seeing a lot of M&S by Timothy Everest stuff, am i right in thinking thats about as much his as RL green label is RL?

>>15328399
Hopefully not in court

>>15328412
I'm not sure. Timothy Everest isn't exactly haute couture, but is certainly above high street tier. That jacket is half canvassed so I know it's at least decent. It's unlined and the cut leaves some to be desired, but I only paid like $300 for it. >>15328053
The Rake. Kit Blake's trousers (mostly) just left their sale but their new stuff will drop soon so that's exciting.

>>15328455
>TFW poor. Guess I will try thrifting

>>15327270
I have a collection of swiss rifles, they have similar design language but they are different from one another.

>>15323271
Gentlemen of Fortune fucking love this movie

>>15328522
If you're broke, you're probably living in a college town which won't have a lot of high end stuff sorry dude

>>15327977
>165lbs
LMAO, weak shit

>>15328455
it kinda reminds me of a YSL jacket ive seen desu, might cop one of those eventually instead. i tend to thrift myself so i likely wont be nabbing a pair of those pants, but ill nab what i can thats similar i think.

>>15329184
Smart man. I'd love a YSL jacket. My next one will be another MTM jacket or so I keep telling myself.
>>15329126
What size do you want me to be?
>>15328824
Based K31 Anon. I never fully commented on your collection. Do you also collect the bayonets and other accessories or just the rifles? Also did you get a Ross rifle too?
>>15328522
There's literally nothing wrong with that. Good luck, brother.

>>15329184
Make sure it's not licensed

>>15329184
gross

>>15329288
theres some really nice stuff on ebay desu, just would be nice if we werent in a financial crisis right now so i could justify buying the summer clothes id like to.

>>15329290
will do man, no point in thrifting tat after all

>>15329321
youre gross

>>15328522
me too, anon. thrifting is a solid call, ive bought things in new and near new condition off ebay for 1/20th their website price. ebay is the reason im now wearing ralph lauren and gloverall.

about the only things youll struggle to thrift are shoes to some extent, and shirts. shirts are a real bastard and i might just pad out my wardrobe with uniqlo shirts that look the part at a glance and have a couple good shirts for best.

What are since good brands to buy off eBay?

>>15329347
Kiton

>>15329325
I haven't turned on my desktop in months.

I have some very highly detailed notes one menswear I typed out through the years on 4chan, want me to publish it into an ebook

I miss denim dan and casey.

>>15329375
i would definitely appreciate it desu. as of late ive had little to do but sit at my desktop.

>>15329392
Alright, I'll be due back in California by tonight but I'll need a few days to do it.

I'll just pop it on kindle for $0.00 since 4chan is dying

>>15329397
eh, i dont own any ebook device desu

>>15329399
Alright I'll find something else.

I usually type everything on notepad but it's not a good idea to send out txt formats since you can embed nasty shit in them.

I'll find a different way to do it.

I used to love the shirts from this brand

>>15329405
>embed shit in plaintext
this the whitespace meme embed that people were talking about?

>>15329325
Do you have any good thrifting stories?

I like to go around to different thrift shops to get lenses for my cameras, I'm a canon basic bitch so Incan adapt literally anything to my EF mount camera obviously.

I've found some sick cops for like $5 and old bitches starring at me like I broke their camera when I dismount the lens and ask them how much for the lens?

But anyways I was looking through watches and shit and saw sweaters for $5.99....my dog loves chewing on sweaters so I'm sitting looking threw shit

And i saw a black cashmere blend Saint Laurent Paris sweater

This was back when Heidi just did the name change. And this was a resale shop in Los Angeles that you see celebs walking out of on tmz sometimes.

But anyways I take it up to go cash out.

And the cashier old bitch is like "this is YVES SAINT LAURENT! You can't have it for $6!" Or whatever the price was.

So I'm just like...... alright and leave....

>>15329417
i live in the north east of england, so not really. charity shops here stock nothing but tat. best ive got is super cheap books from the oxfam near my old uni.

well fuck that guy. price is the fucking price and here id just call bullshit and tell them they cant legally jack up the price at the till, label price is what you pay.

>>15329428
Yeah it's just kinda jewy resale shops. Plus I'm not going to fight over a used sweater I was going to give to my German Shepard anyways.

Would have been funny to post on /fa/ saying my dog hates the new label tho

I love seeing watches or obviously fake Hermes shoes at these resale shops

With a screenshot of ridiculous eBay prices printed out and taped to the box.

I feel like these people are listing these items themselves at ridiculous prices then taping their own listing to it.

Anyways I gave up on teaching normies how to value something (the process of recently sold listings searches is beyond nthe scope of 90% of america instead the unsold listings with stupid asking prices dictates 'worth' to the normies)

Do you guys ever incorporate a basic sweater into your look? I like loose sweaters such as this for comfort and they are just more comfy too than wool to me. Of course they look bad with jeans and casual I think. But with a shirt underneath and a sports jacket on top?

>>15329288
Ive got a few accessories, but not complete ww1 era bayonets are harder to come by same with period webbing and stuff like that. Got bayos for the k31s tho.

Id love a ross rifle and I have plans to get one some day but an excellent example of a ross is prohibitively expensive and more popular than the obscure swiss stuff so its harder to find.

>>15329530
That looks like a sweatshirt, or is it merino?

>>15328824
>collection of Swiss Rifles
>decidedly TIp

>>15329721
Yes, sorry, it is a sweatshirt. I tend to use the terms sweatshirt/sweater interchangeably at times. My bad.

>>15329530
>>15329834
Anon you have this ass backwards. Sweatshirts with jackets and trousers is an absolutely retarded idea meanwhile sweatshirts with jeans and a tshirt is dad fall weekend kino. That's the power suit of raking leaves, drinking beers, and watching football. Plain is good, but you get bonus points for hokey vacation sweatshirt. That's 100% white family man core and is incredibly based. A sweatshirt with a jacket is zoomer tier streetwear shit.
This came across very harsh and I'm sorry but I had a very visceral reaction to that.

>>15329866
Lol. Well I have been wearing a grey polo, black sweatshirt and grey tweed jacket like pic related. It's just more comfy than a wool sweater.

What are your thoughts on Smyth & Gibson shirts?

I am especially interested in this 3 shirts = 100 pounds deal.

>>15329825
Idk what that means anon.

Does anyone know of any competitors to allen edmond in the same price point, 400 ish dollars?

>>15329945
To Boot NY, Bodileys, Scarosso (if you're fine with Blake stitch), and for slightly more Crockett and Jones

>>15329945
TLB Mallorca

>>15329925
You could buy them, I guess, or you could pay 100 one shirt that actually fits you well, which you can choose the fabric, the model, small details such as the material of the buttons and so on.

>>15329866
>>15329428
>>15329325
>>15329288
>>15327977
>>15327682
>anything sieg said
these posts were all cringe.
especially the loser who felt the need to respond to every other post

>>15330228
calling things cringe is cringe

>>15329448
sounds about right desu, people do sadly have a habit of being fucking retards

>>15330228
Finally. This is the sort of quality content I come here for.

>>15330273

>>15329925
Gross.

>>15330302
Honest question, why come here if you think discussion is cringe? Or do you thrive on looking at things you think are cringy? I can wrap my head around that at least. Like /pol/ looking at Twitter screenshots or something. This would be a really strange general to choose for that purpose though especially when you have the rest of /fa/ to pick from. If you're just looking for (You)s that's fine too. Here you go, bud. If you are being 100% serious though and think these posts made the general worse, what would it ideally look like? Explain this to me like I'm retarded.

>>15330355
lmao the mass replier doesnt understand sarcasm. you responded to the wrong person

>>15330367
>you responded to the wrong person
I'm actually genuinely confused now. If you're not going to explain yourself that's fine and we can just move on. After all, if you're not actually going to do anything other than deflect, what's the point on my end?

>>15330389
ok idiot
>>15330302
>>15330231
are the same person

>>15330405
Lol thanks I'm retarded. Although in my defense, it's not like there are IDs and a wojak response is about as insightful as just calling something cringe. You may as well be the same person. Have a nice day, Anon.

Can you wear brown socks with brown shoes?

>>15330503
No, black shoes are formal while brown anything is quite casual

>>15330503
If they're different enough shades yeah. Depends on the rest of the fit too. Patterned brown socks or even just ribbed ones can make them different enough to help. Basically you just don't want to look like a turd themed power ranger. Doable but caution is advised.

>>15330541
Would it be better to wear navy socks with a navy suit then?

>>15330564
Yes. Dark grey would also work. You have a lot of options with brown shoes and a navy suit, but navy socks are certainly the most conservative and safest option.

My tweed jacket came in the mail. The waist is snatched as fuck. Can't wait to wear it this winter

>>15330580
Thanks anon.

>>15330675
Depending on where you live you could probably still wear it, also could we see it? :DDDD

>>15330740
It feels like 95 to 100 most days here in Houston so I have to wait for fall/winter to wear it. I copped it off some person from reddit. Also it was kind of damp for some reason so I'm going to take it to the cleaners before I wear it around the house.

Also: has anyone made a shirt with proper cloth before? I want to make a popover ocbd because the ones at Kamakura sold out in my size

>>15330340
This needs an explanation.

>>15330870
I agree. Whoever made that collar should have to answer for their crimes.

>>15321842
That shirt is too big in your shoulders.

>>15326914
he's living proof that Trad/Ivy/Prep is more than a set of rules to follow.

>>15330919
This
>>15330870
Lurk more loser

>>15331250
Has he ever claimed to be /tip/?

>>15326914
He really should embrace fitness

>>15330405
That's wrong

anyone know european brands that sell good self tie bow ties? pre tied is velcro strap tier but its actually very hard to find self tied ones

>>15331312
No but he's obviously a /trad/ guy.

>>15331597
>bow ties

Unless you're Tucker Carlson, don't.

>>15330919
>>15331286
Don't be snobs. Educate me.

velvet pants anon here, got them in the mail today. 100% cotton or not they are fucking trash. paper thin material, low waist, shitty construction. more fool me for trusting topman.

>>15331743
The collar is too small, here it's called a baby collar, which is a problem because not only is it unproportional for most people but it also eliminates the opportunity for the wearer to have a nice collar roll which looks very nice with or without a tie.

>>15331821
AHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
I told you to go for a dinner jacket :)

>>15331826
im not fussed about having velvet for velvets sake, i have my reasons for thirsting for a pair of velvet pants. im just miffed at myself for wasting money on tat, could have bought me and the bf a nice bottle of something to drink instead with that cash.

>>15331829
How much did it even cost?

>>15331835
like £11, but i could have had a nice bottle of tawny port for that

>>15331743
Radiates big dick energy
>>15330340
Radiates tiny babby cock energy

>>15331821
>topman

Are you 16. As a fellow Brit I'm embarrassed for you.

>>15331861
no, but i bought it online and my dumb ass thought "well how bad could it be?"

>>15331847
I don't fucking believe it, why are you surprised that it's shit? Maybe you got it used (and if so, next time get it from a good brand) because I cannot believe that new trousers can cost 11 pounds, especially velvet trousers.

>>15331858
That's some serious complex anon

>>15331879
>Maybe you got it used
not quite, new but ebay sniped. ive bought far more expensive things like that for similar money.
i was expecting it to be tat, but not quite that tatty.

>>15331696
thanks larper but there are people that attend festivities and wear fitting attire
im not trying to hit up wallmart looking like forrest gump

>larper
I'm not the one trying to wear a bow tie in the 21st century.

>>15331895
Don't get anything new from eBay, 98% of the time they'll be trash. Also never ever go for top man or any other mall tier brands, that's a rookie mistake.

>>15331919
> Also never ever go for top man or any other mall tier brands, that's a rookie mistake.
i know, wont be making that mistake again.

>Don't get anything new from eBay, 98% of the time they'll be trash.
this isnt a good idea though, ive had a couple things bought new off ebay because some idiot put it up on auction with a low minimum and no reserve, thinking people would bid and not snipe at the lowest price in the last minute.

NEW THREAD, this is at 310 posts:
>>15331995
>>15331995
>>15331995

>>15331950
>this isnt a good idea though, ive had a couple things bought new off ebay because some idiot put it up on auction with a low minimum and no reserve, thinking people would bid and not snipe at the lowest price in the last minute
Of course there will be good things but most of the stuff is actual trash, I've had more luck on the used section :))

>>15331823
I understand, thank you.

What brands would you recommend for somebody who just want a few formal (white, sky blue) and informal (same but button-down + jumper) shirts? British style if possible, and no logos.

>>15321775
Shirt is too long m8

One size down, ditch it if it doesn't fit

If you've already bought it get some alterations and it'll be fine

>>15327799
Pants could be taken up a little

>>15330754
Yeah I've used proper cloth a few times, their fabric selection is really good but make sure you send it back and get alterations (pretty sure they're free) or the shirt will not fit right. good luck

>>15326857
If you're still looking for help, the biggest problem is that this isn't a summer blazer. That said, shades of brown, navy, or even a dark green would work with that. You could also try like a mid blue or a maroon. Probably don't do gray with brown shoes, in my experience they're not easy to combine. You could probably even try a beige/stone pair of trousers. As for shirt, you literally can't go wrong with white. Nice pick btw, Husbands is one of my favorite designers