[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 39 KB, 828x1032, FB_IMG_1577620910077.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14895164 No.14895164 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.14895181

>>14895164
Hopefully the geobaskets

>> No.14895182
File: 92 KB, 610x555, hv5ito-l-610x610-pants-kappa-black-white-training+pants-grunge-eboy-trendy-fashion.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14895182

Or pants like this

>> No.14895227

>>14895164
Doge is kill?

>> No.14895281

e-boys, e-girls, art hoes. also reddit will take sleazecore away and make it for soys

>> No.14895310

streetwear
streetwear
streetwear
raf
rick
everything gvasalia
all the lame jap designers

>> No.14895338

Hopefully workwear

>> No.14895395

>>14895182
Kappa looks good you tasteless retard

>> No.14895451

>>14895395
Yeah but not when your pull up your pants that up, and the line pattern is overused

>> No.14895473

>>14895310
>hurr durr i only hate popular designers that /fa/ told me too

>> No.14895477
File: 60 KB, 634x434, 8A99BAF4-278D-495C-83F9-003B6AA93F2C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14895477

Porn
Cigarettes
Coffee
Any drug besides weed
Alcohol consistently more so on occasion

And emotions ima transcend that blemish that hinders me

>> No.14895486
File: 68 KB, 500x475, FE17829A-39F3-4AFA-B131-EC51CE05D210.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14895486

>>14895227

>> No.14895499

>/fa/ shitting on Rick because they don’t understand it and would rather make “how 2 dress 2 date art hoe” threads.
I hope we leave this behind for 2020

>> No.14895525

>>14895164
streetwear
sneakers
logomania
athleisure
etc

these are all products of gen z and as they become adults will die.

>> No.14895663

>>14895499
word
i hope newfags leave this board in 2020

>> No.14895665

>>14895227
Heroes never die Anon.

We're leaving racism in 2019 brothers. We all gonna unite against the elites

>> No.14895668

>>14895395
please say sike

>> No.14895669

>>14895663
they won’t. they treat this place like mfa or r/streetwear except no mods so they can swear as much as they want.

>> No.14895671

>>14895477
underage

>> No.14895683

>>14895499
>making Rick threads after 2012
holy laggard

>> No.14895707

>>14895477
>besides weed
dude weed lmao

>> No.14895719

>>14895665
cringe

>> No.14895887

>>14895499
>doesn't want to accept rick is out of style
Lol

>> No.14895914

>>14895671
Too old in retrospect

>> No.14895916

>>14895887
>thinks being trendy is equivalent to being fashionable
you can wear trousers from 2005 and look infinitely better compared to some fad-chaser fuckboy that thinks hes the shit for wearing whatever celebs are pushing down his throat without a hint of personal style.

>> No.14895923

>>14895916
Yeah but when geobaskets looked good?

>> No.14895924

>>14895923
always

>> No.14895929

>>14895924
this

>> No.14895944
File: 192 KB, 896x1250, daniellelevitt-3847-h1250-q85-rz3-b75.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14895944

>>14895887
>antifashion brand
>out of style

yes, great commentary anon

>> No.14895982

Fat and short people

>> No.14896041
File: 19 KB, 552x471, 1575754619943.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14896041

>>14895395

>> No.14896062

>>14895924
They look like the love child of clown shoes and converse they are ugly.

>> No.14896069

>>14895887
>chasing style trends and conformity/acceptance instead of realizing fashion is self expression and developing his own style
unsurprising that people who hate Rick don’t understand fashion in the first place

>> No.14896092

>>14895944
They were only a thing 2010-2012 on /fa/ and they were always tryhard meme shoes.

>> No.14896100

>>14895916
>peaked during 2011 /fa/
>now 35 and can't let go of the rick meme
ya seethin?

>> No.14896105

>>14896069
Rick literally makes things goofy and exaggerated as an "art". Thats his thing. Its not fashionable at all you look like a fucking goober in that shit.

>> No.14896111

>>14896105
“It’s not fashionable”
t. Zoomer still chasing conformity rather than personal expression

>> No.14896117

>>14896111
If your personal expression is "i will never have sex and I can't cope enough" then by all means go full rick

>> No.14896124
File: 118 KB, 753x415, 1561011503592.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14896124

>>14895944

How is he so goddamned perfect?

>> No.14896127

>>14896105
>one of the greatest fashion designers alive
>not fashionable
right right

>> No.14896137

>>14895665
based

>> No.14896138

>>14896127
Fashion designers like rick do not make things for everyday wear they are for the runway aka art shows but its clothes. They are to inspire actual fashion not be it.

>> No.14896141

>>14896138
>the only fashion is fast fashion
The absolute STATE of /fa/ in this the year of our LORD 2020 -2 days

>> No.14896153 [DELETED] 

>>14896141
Yes because shit like this is totally intended to be worn outside of the runway

>> No.14896154

>>14896138
rick makes pret-a-porter clothing you retard
Rick Owens, Lilies & DRKSHDW are all commerically produced lines sold at stores and meant for every day life.

>> No.14896159
File: 645 KB, 853x1280, rick-owens-spring-summer-2019-paris-fashion-week-7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14896159

>>14896141
Yes because shit like this is totally intended to be worn outside of the runway

>> No.14896160

>>14896117
full rick varies so wildly based on which pieces you pick. he makes things other than the stereotypical shit you’re thinking of. and honestly, even stereotypical goof ninja rick looks better than the shit modern /fa/ zoomers seem to be wearing. The /fa/ zeitgeist is so fucking boring now that it’s difficult to even describe what the fuck they’re into. this board is like 90% trash and the only worthwhile general is thinspo, which is still pretty mediocre given the level of coomposting.

>> No.14896162

>>14896153
It is, which is why it is sold in stores and online exactly as displayed on the runway.
You seem to be confusing Rick for haute couture

>> No.14896170

>>14896154
And it looks like shit. Clownshoe converse do not look as good as normal ass converse which are actually timeless. Pants that sag like you took a shit in them do not look good as regular jeans which are actually timeless. A hoodie that makes you look like a harry potter dementor does not look good as good as a normal ass hoodie which again is actually timeless. Its just cringe.

>> No.14896173
File: 94 KB, 1440x1440, Polizei_Bomber_Back_CLEAN_720x@2x.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14896173

>>14896092
based /fa/ leading the way and paving roads for modern day fashion. by the way should I cop this jacket? I think it would look good with my heat tech uniqlo pants and these gats I found in a dumpster the other day

>> No.14896174

>>14896170
how boring do you have to be to be suggesting jeans and a sweatshirt? Do you even like fashion? I legitimately don’t know why you’re here.

>> No.14896177

>>14896170
ok normie

>> No.14896182

>>14896174
You are so desperate to be unique and special that you end up looking like a tryhard cringelord, its not and never will be effay. You would be better off boring and basic.

>> No.14896183

>>14896174
dont bully my friend. he just came here from mfa

>> No.14896187
File: 194 KB, 744x494, 2271_37148.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14896187

>>14896173
this would look so dope with some roshes!

>> No.14896189

>>14896160
Post some examples of full rick that doesn't look retarded.

>> No.14896200
File: 338 KB, 1000x1500, F6ECAB30-1026-4067-BE2E-FF7B8B53CDA1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14896200

>>14896189
both of these are mostly rick pieces with other designers mixed in.

>> No.14896211

>>14896200
You failed. The man looks like shit emos would wear which is cringe, the woman looks like she is drowning in fabric.

>> No.14896214

>>14896211
hope you enjoy the artistic expression that comes with jeans and hoodies every day anon

>> No.14896219
File: 48 KB, 500x502, uYYiz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14896219

>>14896124

>> No.14896221

>>14896214
Jeans and hoodies will always be in style, rick is meme clothes. Get fucked tryhard. Fashion is a combination of self expression, practically and occasion. Rick is not practical nor is it suitable for any occasion and the self expression is "LOOK AT ME IM A TRYHARD"

>> No.14896224

>>14896221
>practically
*practicality

>> No.14896227

>>14896221
t. anti-intellectual “muh tryhard”
here’s a tip anon: stop worrying about how other people think of you and focus on dressing in a way that you like. I swear westerners literally never seem to understand how this works

>> No.14896230

>>14896221
If Rick is tryhard then hoodies aren't trying at all. Your self expression is "I have given up. Please don't look at me it makes me self conscious."

>> No.14896231
File: 417 KB, 1077x1198, Screenshot_20191229-164713_Instagram.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14896231

>2020
>still no rick gf

>> No.14896233

>>14896173
I love the jacket but they don't match the color of the shoes

>> No.14896235

>>14896227
If what you like looks like shit people are going to call you out on it. Go ahead and dress like shit but don't be surprised when someone says your full rick outfit is garbage.

>> No.14896236
File: 345 KB, 1853x2046, 8ul0bqtfvnwz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14896236

>>14896221
you do understand rick makes hoodie and jeans too?

you can make full rick look normal and mundane if youre too scared to steer from the norm

>> No.14896241

>>14896236
At that point why even blow so much money on basic clothing? I don't have an issue with expensive, unique pieces but for gods sake have some taste.

>> No.14896244

>>14896235
for the record I rarely wear full rick just because there are other designers I like too, but I’ve incorporated his pieces into a style that makes me happy. That’s all. What I’m getting from you is that you’re not happy. Maybe if you didn’t feel so afraid of public spaces and afraid of what people just might say to you, you’d be able to have more fun with what you wear. The first step to looking good is confidence, and if you’re constantly worrying about what people think, you’re not going to have it.

>> No.14896245

>>14896241
anons right. gucci offers all over print stuff where you could actually SEE the money you spent

>> No.14896248

>>14896231
just get ur gf some
womens rick is dirt cheap

>> No.14896250

>>14896244
Nigga I said if you want to larp as a dementor go for it. But you look like a fucking retard, but hey rock that retard core. It lets the rest of us know to avoid your weird ass.

>> No.14896257

>>14896248
Where can I find it secondhand? I primarily buy mine off of grailed, isn’t there some womenswear equivalent of it?

>> No.14896263

>>14896244
>The first step to looking good is confidence,
The first step to look good is TASTE. It doesn't matter how confident you are in a rubber dildo outfit, it will never look good.

>> No.14896266

>>14896257
heroine is operated by grailed and sells womens clothing, also yahoo auctions japan & ebay have cheap stuff aviable at all times

>> No.14896269

>>14896263
t. looks at ground when he walks because he’s afraid his epic t-shirt and jeans fit might get criticized if he makes eye contact

>> No.14896273

>>14896263
taste is entirely subjective

>> No.14896277

>>14896231
See now THIS is good. THIS is tasteful. The pieces are unique but look good, everything is well coordinated and it can be worn in public without looking ugly or weird.

>> No.14896279

>>14896273
No, its not. Shit tastes like shit and will always taste like shit. Just because you like the taste of shit doesn't mean it isn't shit, it means you have bad taste.

>> No.14896281

>>14896279
it must be painful to be afraid of anything different anon. I feel bad for you

>> No.14896284
File: 501 KB, 662x1057, f6v7b8h5v8hyvtvy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14896284

this is now an ROG thread

ss 20 boiler suits are sick. going to stop by friday and try it on. hoping it reaches sales tho.

>> No.14896285

>>14896281
Different doesn't mean good, it doesn't mean bad. Something can be different and look good, something can be different and look bad. Your rick ninja outfit is different in a bad way.

>> No.14896290

>>14896284
faggotry

>> No.14896291
File: 168 KB, 647x800, serveimage.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14896291

>>14896279
>Shit tastes like shit and will always taste like shit
Oh?
You're saying your jeans and hoodie are so objectively tasteful that you could just waltz right in to a 16th century royal court without getting laughed at?

>> No.14896297

>>14896279
you clearly lack common understanding or even empathy for that matter.
you do know that different people like different things? do you instinctively attack anyone that has a different opinion from your own? you need to do some serious soul searching if other peoples taste angers you this much.

>> No.14896315

>>14896291
>You're saying your jeans and hoodie are so objectively tasteful
In todays social climate absolutely, and this social climate will not change any time soon because its suitable for the common man. Its practical in todays world, its affordable, it is suitable for everyday occasions, its self expression is one most people share. Oh and most people in that time period didn't dress like this only people with a lot of money and power to flex, also those clothes fell out of style with rich, powerful people for a reason. Do you even know how much time and work getting you hair into a beehive style was? People, even rich people, do not have the time/interest for that shit on average because there are way more interesting things to do at their disposal these days.

>> No.14896318
File: 108 KB, 692x768, 1420925900240.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14896318

>>14896248
I would buy my gf this if I had one

>> No.14896328

>>14896318
Its a fucking sheer black tank top dress. You could probably cop one very easily for not a lot of money

>> No.14896334

>>14896318
I'd have sex with her if you know what I mean...

>> No.14896335

>>14896328
yea, I just said I would if I had a gf. is your reading comprehension ok buddy?

>> No.14896340
File: 25 KB, 500x667, 1420922864337.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14896340

>>14896334
same. this was a classic back in the rog days

>> No.14896347

>>14896315
>In todays social climate
Now, see, that's not what I asked. You claim taste is objective, that means it is unaffected by time and trends.

Would you or would you not get laughed out of a 15th century royal court?

>> No.14896349

>>14896291
Its like you do not understand fashion at all. Anon is correct. Its a combination of self expression, practicality, and occasion. Royalty does not dress like this because it takes forever to put on, it is not suitable for travel. Rich people move around a lot more. They have access to a faster more efficient means to travels thus wearing a huge ass dress with a lot of layers and drapes onto the floor is not a practical thing to wear. As the world became more streamlined clothing too became streamlined. Clean suites, dresses and outfits without a lot of layers and doesn't get in your way are what the occasion on average demands. These kinds of outfits are only suitable for rare special occasions.

>> No.14896375

>>14896315
fyi this is a fashion board, not a clothing board.

>> No.14896383

>>14896375
Distinction a lot of people fail to make. It’s been like 5-6 years since we’ve had regular runway discussion threads, maybe more.

>> No.14896384

>>14896375
He is talking about fashion, clothing is essential to fashion. Hair, skin, figure and clothes.

>> No.14896403

>>14896291
You would get laughed at because a hoodie and jeans are not suitable for a royal courtyard. Go into a fancy formal ball in todays world and you will be laughed out of there too because jeans and tshirts are not suitable for such events. Now villagers would probably be all over that shit because jeans are comfortable, tough and suitable for working in. These people were ok with poorly stitched together rags because its all they had access to. t shirts would be accepted too because they are easy to wear and breathable, another article of clothing suitable for working in. The reason jeans and tshirts caught on at all is because of their practicality among the lower class.

>> No.14896440

>>14896403
>you would get laughed out of X
the thing you’re failing to understand anon is that fundamentally, people do not care about what you’re wearing as much as you think they do, especially today. You’ll maybe get people staring at you if you’re dressed unconventionally, but even more mundane fashion tends to get people thinking you’re weird. If you pay attention to clothing as an industry, or put a lot of effort into your appearance, you’re already abnormal.

>> No.14896442

>>14896347
>Would you or would you not get laughed out of a 15th century royal court?
You would get laughed out of formal events wearing that in todays world because they are not suitable for the occasion. If you took a time machine and peddled jeans tshirts and hoodie to the commoners back in the day they would be all over it. See my post here >>14896403

>> No.14896469

>>14896383
Because the runway threads were boring and the runway show itself was just awful and ugly.

>> No.14896478

>>14896221
rick is actually very practical and his off runway stuff and drkshdw line is accessible even for normies. theres a reason why the brand has gotten as large as it is and still remains independent to this day

>> No.14896485
File: 32 KB, 1038x540, 1574460693783.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14896485

>>14895707
BROOOOO HE MENTIONED WEED POST DA MEME DUDE POST THAT SHIT

>Dude weed lmao

>> No.14896497

>>14896478
DRKSHDW is just high quality cotton clothes with slightly abnormal cuts, generally. Low top Ramones are ultra inoffensive and fit with most styles. In terms of comfort, Geobaskets and Dunks are above almost every other sneaker for me. They’re roomy but don’t feel like you’re floating or slipping around in them, and the padding is very well placed.

>> No.14896502

>>14896478
If you are missing even just one of the three essential elements for fashion(practicality, occasion, self expression) you are not fashionable. It is like making a cake without one of its essential ingredients you will not make cake if you're missing one.

>> No.14896505

>>14896442
>they are not suitable for the occasion.
What happened to taste being objective?

>> No.14896508

>>14896505
It is objective, but context is important. tshirt and jeans objectively look good, are practical, but they are not for fancy occasions where one of the main purposes is to flex your status and your clothes are essential for this flexing because they are simple commoners clothing. A fancy 15th century ball dress is beautiful, it objectively looks good, but it is not suitable in most occasions.

>> No.14896513

>>14896508
>tshirt and jeans objectively look good
So then why was it reviled as a lax display of underwear in public for so long?

>context is important
How is it objective if it how it looks is contextual?

>> No.14896526

>>14896513
It really wasn't, jeans were accepted since their invention by the working class because they were durable and easy to wear. Same with tshirts. Now they were seen as commoner, poor people clothing in the beginning because thats who wore them so those who cared about flexing their social status did not wear them because you were associated with being poor not because the fashion was objectively bad. This has changed because in the end because they were objectively good and people of all classes wear jeans rich or poor. This is proof of their objectivity.

And context doesn't mean something stops being good, it means something that is good in certain occasions is not suitable for other occasions. It doesn't mean it is objectively bad, it means it objectively doesn't belong in fancy events.

>> No.14896529
File: 151 KB, 800x600, tumblr_n1vqipFXjA1qa2j8co1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14896529

>>14896502
>practicality
I'm putting on this sweater bc it's cold
>occasion
casual
>self expression
I like the color, material and being comfy

it's not that hard or necessary to make analogies out of it

>> No.14896531

>>14896526
>Same with tshirts
T-shirts were underwear not to be seen in public until hotrodding subculture and a movie about devil-may-care rebels made it cool to wear underwear in public.

>> No.14896534

>>14896529
>I like the color, material and being comfy
And self expression can make or break an outfit. If your self expression is bad your outfit will be bad. A tranny may be expressing himself when he wears his school girl skirt and programming socks and gaudy weeb accessories but it is bad and ugly look into who they are which makes their outfits ugly.

In the vast VAST majority of full rick wearers I see they look horrible because their own self is really tryhard cringe person with no taste, so their outfits reflect this

>> No.14896541

>>14896534
lol I'm not going into your psuedo psychological bullshit. maybe another anon but I'm not the one

>> No.14896549

>>14896534
>try hard
>cringe
You must be 18 to post on 4chan.

>> No.14896553

>>14896534
not only are you a moron, youre also a transphobe.

>> No.14896554

>>14896541
Why do you think so many crazy people dress crazy and messy? because they are crazy and they are expressing this intentionally or not. If you are a cringe tryhard and you dress to express this through your clothing guess what? Your outfit will be cringe and tryhard. You really have to be a brainlet to think this is pseudo psychology.

>> No.14896557

>>14896549
>>14896553
No arguments. Peace /fa/, I have once again destroyed you with objectivity, your worst nightmare.

>> No.14896584

>>14896531
Because people realized they objectively look good as something other than underwear and here we are today. It is a basic shirt, inoffensive and easy to wear, it is not hard to understand why they quickly became a popular garment to wear. If something is objectively good it will rise up and last over the generations to come.

>> No.14896595

>>14896584
If it's objective, why was it reviled for so long?
Why did people need to "realize" and grow accustomed to it over several decades and two world wars?

>> No.14896599

>>14895164
why do people try so hard.

Designer jeans, New balance 990s, supreme or amiri tee with a snarky graphic and I'm drowning in mires and poon.

>> No.14896607

>>14896595
Because the truth doesn't always immediately conquer the minds of the people. Rape was acceptable among human society once, but the truth is society functions better without it so eventually it became illegal in practically every society. Humans are flawed, but the truth will eventually win in the end. And the truth is jeans and tshirts are practical, look good, and are suitable for the vast majority of situations in our day to day lives. Amen.

>> No.14896609

>>14896159
Fashion shows are art exhibits and advertisements for commercially available clothes, that dress isn’t meant for everyday wear but lots of other things are. This is true of virtually any brand that puts out a biannual runway show

>> No.14896610

>>14896599
Outside of the main tenants of male fashion and having basic swag anything is cope. any interest in avant-garde or worse poorfag copies of avant garde is just embarrassing for a man.

>> No.14896617

>>14896607
All you're saying is that taste is subjective, which is counter to your argument that taste is objective.

>> No.14896622

>>14896617
Taste varies among people, but GOOD taste is objective.

>> No.14896631

>>14896622
If jeans and a hoodie are objectively good taste, why is it contextual?

>> No.14896636

>>14896631
I already explained this. Not going to go in circles with you.
>>14896508
>>14896526

>> No.14896646

>>14896636
You haven't explained jack shit. You keep saying "it's objective" and then giving examples of how it is, in actual fact, subjective.

>> No.14896651

>>14896646
>context doesn't mean something stops being good, it means something that is good in certain occasions is not suitable for other occasions. It doesn't mean it is objectively bad, it means it objectively doesn't belong in fancy events.

>> No.14896654

>>14896651
Empty sophistry that doesn't explain jack shit.

>> No.14896666

>>14896646
They literally explained it you just have brain problems. I will try to help you, special child.
What he is saying is;
Jeans objectively look good but they are out of place at a fancy event because of the environment and occasion. A ball dress objectively looks good, but it is out of place and doesn't belong in a casual environment. If you wear jeans and a t-shirt to a fancy event you are missing one of the essential elements of good fashion, occasion.

>> No.14896681

>>14896654
Something may look good objectively but be completely out of place in certain occasions. A nice tuxedo looks good objectively, but it is out of place in certain environments. It doesn't mean the tuxedo objectively looks bad it means it objectively looks out of place in certain environments. Do you understand that at least?

>> No.14896685

>>14896666
>Jeans objectively look good but they are out of place
Then their good looks are subjective and not objective.

>> No.14896782

>>14896685
It is out of place not because it looks bad but because it doesn't belong in that particular setting.

>> No.14896829

ugly chonk shoes (balenciaga triple s)

normcore and its children

/r/streetwear

supreme

>> No.14897004
File: 10 KB, 261x195, 1575923230730.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14897004

>the crushing weight and expectations of others

>> No.14897019
File: 88 KB, 800x800, 27E1DEF4-1F05-44D9-89CF-81765D2F0813.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14897019

>>14895164
These godforsaken things are still around where I live, dying a slow painful death. Skinny jeans in general have always been cringe and I'm optimistic that they'll finally die in 2k20 seeing baggier fits become so popular with zoomer because of muh 90s nostalgia.

>> No.14897086

>>14897019
>2k20

>> No.14897186

>>14896111
>It’s not fashionable”
>t. Zoomer still chasing conformity rather than personal expression
The depth of retardation in this post is not that shocking desu. But I will be nice and try to help you understand

>> No.14897191

>>14896062
Underrated post lmfao

>> No.14897259

>>14896666
I disagree, jeans don’t look objectively good they are ugly. The only true objective beauty is in nature, or in this case, in the shape of the body.

Following this argument I can only say that jeans+tee anon needs to realize that it’s ok that he likes his jeans and tees, and that it’s ok that other people like their Rick. Very simple, respect is king

>> No.14897263

>>14895164
her

>> No.14897347

>>14896173
looks good imagine having a original police jacket sadly wearing these is banned in germany obviously

>> No.14897396

holy shit bros this anon is so fucking woke, he reminds me of a 16 year old social justice warrior fighting the good fight against the fashion industry. is this a preview of zoomer ideologies were going to seeing more of in 2020. if so I'm out

>> No.14897409

>>14895395
>Plastic sweatpants obnoxiously plastered with a stupid logo
>looks good

>> No.14897411

>>14895665
Racism never dies anon

>> No.14897430
File: 2.35 MB, 3400x2111, s3 V0017000_V0017252.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14897430

>>14896159
take this gay decadent tranny shit to another fucking board. I hope in 2020 /fa/ gets divided between the 'muh fashion is art' faggots and the true fashionistas who care about this garbage shit undermining the aesthetic values of the collective human spirit. Maybe these people will have to go to /ic/ since they care so much about it being gay art. is there anywhere where we can discuss proper clothing?
on a more positive note, I hope serf-core makes a triumphant return.

>> No.14897599

>>14895227
doge is reddit

>> No.14897630

>>14896557
based sperg arguing until rickfags relent to the superior man
>>14895164
Hopefully my tinnitus

>> No.14897709

>>14895477
ok kid

>> No.14898018

>>14897259
Nah they look objectively good. The really help in pulling an outfit together, they transcend generation and class. They have a nice weave, the blue goes with almost everything. Its hard to go wrong with jeans for most casual outfits. And objective beauty can by found in more than just nature, architecture for example.

>> No.14898035

>>14895668
Where does that word come from? I used to hear it on shows when I was a kid but it seems dead now

>> No.14898577

>>14896200
What this man is wearing looks like cheap shit from Alliexpress.

>> No.14898579

>>14895665
based

>> No.14898597

>>14898035
From what I gather it's "psyche" (as in psyched or psychedelic) but the DC/Maryland area misspells it on purpose.

>> No.14898719 [DELETED] 

>>14895665
>We all gonna unite against the elites
ok but i don't wanna live with niggers or jews afterwards

>> No.14898728

>>14895477
based except for weed
>>14897347
>obviously
?
maybe to you, someone born in an authoritarian shithole but not to us citizens of the free world

shit fucking thread btw

>> No.14899175
File: 42 KB, 679x679, 611R8z1tV9L._UX679_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14899175

>>14895164

>> No.14899526

>>14896829
How can normcore die? What are normal people going to wear?

>> No.14899570

>>14895665
Based and breadpilled

>> No.14899573

>>14895477
This is a man with aspirations

>> No.14899575

>>14895525
>Logomania
Please, PLEASE make it this. I'll be okay with just about everything else staying but PLEASE fuck this shit away

>> No.14899587

Watching other people’s instagrams
Drugs save weed
Unemployment for any reason
Pants without pleats
Short hair
Depression/anxiety
Carbs
Red meat
Tobacco
Dairy for any reason
Any drink besides water and red wine

>> No.14899979

>>14896187
i can't wait for these to come back and be like yeah I rememebr when Roshes were cool