/fa/ - Fashion

>>14586386
First for Seikos are overpriced shitter fashion accessories that have no horological value, tasteless designs, don't keep time and have terrible QC.

First for Seiko

which one should I get?

>>14586401
Kill yourself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hK56rCDpy1Q

>>14586404
post the original

>>14586403
nitpicking. shit like that happens with every brand even Rolex.

>>14586401
Made in Japan gshock. At least you won't outgrow it as you make more money, it'll always be your beater.

>>14586416
*shits on your cuckio*

nothing personal, kid

Thoughts on pic related?

>>14586467
shitter

>>14586475

>>14586475
>top row, second from left
huh

>>14586426
I'm glad you admit the soikos and casios are in the same category. Only one is a true tool beater and the other leans into poseur dress wear.

>>14586472
Very constructive. I love how these threads are the same people jacking off to watches they could never afford. Psh unreal

>>14586490
It's great how many of those watches are on my shortlist.

>>14586490
>tudor
Change the fucking hands on that garbage

>>14586501
The snowflakes are great. Just buy a rolex if you hate them.

>>14586490
no GS?

>>14586467
ugly

Cop or not

Is the Omega Speedmaster really worth it?

>>14586475
Top row third from the left.

That's a fine watch.

>>14586523
You want a Sneedmaster to suck and fuck?

>>14586523
No buy a Seamaster instead

>>14586534
+1. Love mine, just picked it up last week.

>>14586505
>GS

>>14586467
Ignore the other anons. If you like it go for it. See pic related, blue might be nice but either way it's a nice looking watch for the money

>>14586628
Thanks anon. How long have you had it? Gotta love them hands

>>14586505
Hahahaha. No.

>>14586485
I genuinely chuckled this time, there is gonna be a lot more huhs in the future. When the collection is complete you will see these pieces everyday of your life

>>14586628
>for the money
Whenever you have to justify/qualify the purchase of a luxury item with this statement you know you're dealing with a piece of shit.

>>14586539
Rep.

>>14586727
Not everyone likes to pretend they can afford a 10k watch on an anonymous Internet forum. There are plenty of well made, nice looking watches in the $5-700 range you utter mouth breather

>>14586730
No, it's not.

>>14586401
snk793k1

>>14586523
Yes

>>14586755
i'd respect it more if it was a rep, expensive watches that you're not profiting off in the end aren't worth it and you should spoil me with the money instead.

Best watches in each tier:

>Under $100
Vostok Amphibia

>$100-200
1960's Poljot mechanical alarm

>$200-300
Seagull 1963

>$300-600
Seiko SRPB46

>$600-1000
Tissot Ballade

>$1000
Maison Celadon Imperial

>$1000-50000
Shitters. Too expensive to buy while not being good enough quality to leave to your kid.

>$50000
A. Lange & Söhne 1815

>Over $50000
Who cares you'll never make it

>>14586401
Get to SNE57 or the SNE61. It's a super clean design that you can take anywhere

>>14587119
>russian anything, followed by chinkshit
Just the other day anon posted a watch with a 200m WR that started to rust after a week.

>>14587119
You seem to know a lot about watches under $1k but nothing about those higher. I wonder why ...

New jubilee band

Is anything competing with Nomos that has good movement finishing and a simple dial with numbers?

>>14587181
Because it's not worth wasting money on watches above $1k unless they're exceptional tier 1 brands (Patek, VC, etc) that will last generations

Does anybody know of a good Explorer 1 homage that's not Alpha?

>>14587194
That's bullshit.

Rolex, JLC, AP are obvious examples.

>>14587179
Almost everything sub $1500 has chinkshit parts. May as well embrace it and get something openly made in China rather than paying for Swiss and then getting a nice surprise when you open the case

>>14587193
Junghans Max Bill
Stowa Antea

>>14587203
1. closed
2. ugly movement
?

>>14587201
>exceptional
>any of those

>>14587205
Nomos are the best at that price point by a big margin so you aren't going to find anyone else that comes close.

>>14587206
You're an idiot.

>>14587187
Nice if real. My uncle has a 70s pepsi.

>>14586501

>case full of great stuff
>still bitching about chewda

>>14587228
"Iced out" is for people with no taste

>>14587228
>IIII
ok someone explain this shit

>>14587214
No one cares about your Rolex bro, sorry. Keep saving

>>14587241
Try checking the colosseum walls, idiot.

>>14587248
Not a fan of inverted displays myself but otherwise it's nice

>>14587241
While subtractive notation for multiples of 4 (IV, XL and CD) has been the usual form since Roman times, additive notation (IIII, XXXX,[11] and CCCC[11]) continued to be used, including in compound numbers like XXIIII,[12] LXXIIII,[13] and CCCCLXXXX.[14] The additive forms for 9, 90, and 900 (VIIII,[11]LXXXX,[15] and DCCCC[16]) have also been used, although less frequently.

The two conventions could be mixed in the same document or inscription, even in the same numeral. On the numbered gates to the Colosseum, for instance, IIII is systematically used instead of IV, but subtractive notation is used for other digits; so that gate 44 is labelled XLIIII.[17] Isaac Asimov speculates that the use of IV, as the initial letters of "IVPITER" (a classical Latin spelling of the name of the Roman god Jupiter) may have been felt to have been impious in this context.[18]

Modern clock faces that use Roman numerals still usually employ IIII for four o'clock but IX for nine o'clock, a practice that goes back to very early clocks such as the Wells Cathedral clock of the late 14th century.[19][20][21] However, this is far from universal: for example, the clock on the Palace of Westminster tower, "Big Ben", uses a subtractive IV for 4 o'clock.[20]

>>14586501
> complaining about the worst watch in a stunning collection.
christ, the absolute state of /wt/

Quick, the kids are asleep. Post REAL watches

>>14587376
>unlumed second hand

Do hand wind only watches rattle when shaken like automatics that have rotors? Ofc no rotor noise but is there something else that makes noise?

>>14587382
>no moonphase

fuck off kid

How's everyone doing today? I got my asshole clogged up, I feel my intestines being full of shit but I can't get it out. I tried taking a dump in the morning but it's pretty much stuck. So now I hope it doesn't unclog till I get home because I feel it's going to be a bad one. I don't know what caused it though, could be KFC or seafood, what's more likely, /wt/? My bet is on KFC but I already took two huge dumps yesterday. Like three-flushers.

Also opinions on the 50th Anniversary Speedmaster?

>>14587403
Gold colours are unsightly and don't belong on watches

>>14587403
I think it's just a chrono and the moon milking shit is tired and shameless

>>14587241
Balance of the dial, proportions.
>>14587239
"judging others on an anonynous Peruvian coca cultivating board by what they wear" is for people with no taste.

>>14587187

That looks minty as fuck. Nice.

>>14587410
>>14587412
I agree with both of you.

But I'm also thinking about drinking some ice coffee. That shit is like drain cleaner for the guts.

>>14586475

Reallly liking the vostoks and the top right seiko mod

are any of your idols into watches?
this almost made me buy a speedy

>>14587536
Mad Mike.

>>14587536
>assfaggots
>poor taste
heh

>>14587426
Ice coffee and chili beans, with four hours left at work, I'm playing a dangerous game.

Also any current-production V7750 chronos that don't look like ass but also don't break the bank? I looked at vintage Heuers and Breitlings but they're ridiculous.

>>14587680
Update: the coffee defeated me.

Are there any moon phase watches worth a shit?

>>14587248
I just don't get the brick wall around the screen.

>>14587387
No, something's fucked.

What watch will make a woman love me?

>>14587857
if you watch after yourself

>>14587857

typical patek owner

Any recs for a decent 6 piece watch box?

>>14587771
isn't that the solar part

>>14587925
Maybe? It just looks really weird.

>>14587918
Six KFC Flamin' Wrap wrappers each with a Rolex Submariner in them tossed loosely into an old shoebox.

>>14587403
Looks like something out of the late 60s.

>>14586386
are auriol watches effey guys?

>>14587918

I have Rothenschild thats rather nice. Around 50 bucks. I'll post a pic later.

What do you CHEAP NASTY FUCKERS think of Tissot as a brand?

What should I know about buying a watch from an AD?

I've only ever bought online but I'm buying a shitter that's approx $6000 and fakes of it are rife so I'm wanting to go AD. I've been told by the AD they wont do a discount unless I buy the one from the store that everyone's had their grubby hands on, should I be worried about buying a "new" watch that's basically ex display?

Also how autistic is it to go around multiple ADs until you find a watch with perfect QC? I've noticed even on $5000+ watches they sometimes have a small nick in one of the hands or imperfect printing in the numbers of the ceramic bezel. Is it even more autistic to request goodies to go along with my purchase like accessories related to the brand (gloves, a pouch)?

>>14587993
Omega replicated the vintage Speedy bracelet for that model.

>>14588059
Language! Tissot is nice. Keeping it real.

watches aren't /fa/, you're all just pathetic fucks who want to show off your expensive toys.

>>14588059
it's crap

>>14588068
buy a timex and invest the rest in stocks

>>14588070
So it's period accurate or what? The gold looks very weird for modern standards, not even particularly gaudy or anything, just dated.

>>14588068
> should I be worried about buying a "new" watch that's basically ex display?
Absolutely not. You get the discount because it's been unboxed, stickers removed and as you say worn by others but apart from that it's still classed as new.

> Also how autistic is it to go around multiple ADs until you find a watch with perfect QC?
Not autistic at all. In fact you should expect perfect QC. One of the benefits of an AD is that even if you buy it, take it home and then spot a fault you still have the return window to take it back and swap it or get a refund.

> Is it even more autistic to request goodies to go along with my purchase
It's not autistic but it may be classed as rude depending on how you broach the subject. Depending on the brand you'll always get some extra gifts when buying from an AD but you could try asking for catalogues or loupes etc to start with and see how it goes.

>>14588104
It's probably not down to a tenth of a millimeter accurate, since the original was from bent cat food cans and the current I assume is properly milled.

But I assume it's as accurate as the Mark II remake is to the original.

Oh right, now I read you mean PERIOD accurate. Yeah, as much as I can tell from a quick google search the 1967 to 1969 models had this style of bracelet (I think the MOTFM's were 1967 models).

>>14588128
So I should just go grey? I get it even cheaper than AD discount and no one has touched it.

>>14588068
>I've been told by the AD they wont do a discount unless I buy the one from the store that everyone's had their grubby hands on, should I be worried about buying a "new" watch that's basically ex display?
That is outrageous. The only brands this might apply to would be Rolex and Patek. You should always try and get a discount if you’re buying from an AD because you could always go grey market and probably save a lot more. Smart ADs know this and will try and compete on price as much as they can.
>Also how autistic is it to go around multiple ADs until you find a watch with perfect QC?
It’s not autistic, you’re the one about to spend a decent chunk of change on a watch. If perfection is important to you, then you should find a perfect example.
>Is it even more autistic to request goodies to go along with my purchase like accessories related to the brand (gloves, a pouch)?
This is a little autistic. Most boutiques will throw in some extras when you’re buying something expensive like a high quality book.

>>14588072
Unironically like this a lot

I don’t get the purpose of this thread. I’ve beel following it for a week and every single watch that gets posted gets called a “shitter”.

Lmao wtf

Give me one watch that’s not a shitter then

>>14588248
I unironically love this watch

>>14588256
Someone help him out and post the 2019 /wt/ approved watch brand list.

>>14588256
ROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEX

>>14588279
But it's only one brand

>>14588256
Generally approved by /wt/:
Rolex
Lange
Patek
VC
AP RO 15202st
Man on the fucking moon

Hotly contested brands:
Sinn
Grand Seiko
Nomos
Cartier
Other Omega watches, especially Semenmaster 300
Tudor

>>14588309

>>14588256
If it didn't go to the moon in belongs in the trash.

>>14588344
this thing could go to the sun and it would still be trash.

>>14588348
Name a better watch.

I'll wait, this better be good.

I'm eager to see what shit you think can possibly be better than the Moonwatch.

This is gonna be good...

>>14588352
Fortis Classic Cosmonauts Ceramic PM

>>14588352
The Swatch Spooky

>>14588359
HSJANHAHAJAHANAHAHAHHHAHHHAHHHAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA

>>14588313
Approved:
>shit I can never afford

Shit:
>shit I can potentially afford

Great thanks.

>>14588352
Literally any grand seiko

>>14588374
Everybody here owns and wears seikos, and larps that they dislike them and have better watches.

>>14588374
Get a job you fucking loser.

>>14588380
There are several richfags here.

>>14588395
Like me.

Personally I make 200K.

>>14588374
Ask yourself: why do I want to own a watch in the first place?

Well, what is it?

>>14588398
So I can remind menial pieces of shit that drive me around in taxis and serve me food that I can throw away more money on a watch than they make in a year.

>>14588374
this is motivation inspo

now work your ass off, goy!

>>14588389
I have a good job. If I lived on either of the coasts I’d be making over six figures but because I live in Midwest Shitholistan I make 71k.

>>14588398
To have a way to express myself beyond clothes and hair, to have an interesting conversation piece on my wrist. I want a watch that is impressive because it looks cool and works well, not one that is impressive because it is expensive.

>>14588330

>>14587771
It is to convey that the watch is built like a brick shithouse.

Let's say you buy a pepsi rolex with that has a spot on the bezel with the color missing. Could you get a replacement bezel or send it to rolex and get it restored?

>>14586479

Can anyone explain to me why the fucking dolts on reddit seriously think casio watches are fashionable? Like i can understand watch enthusiasts liking then because theyre sort of a meme but if you actually wore it in public people would probably think youre a cheeto munching IT worker who mysteriously goes to thailand every summer vacation to "appreciate the culture."

>>14588416
>I want a watch that is impressive because it looks cool and works well, not one that is impressive because it is expensive.
5k isn't expensive dude. And people aren't impressed by those two things, if you want something that's "impressive" to yourself and no one else then ok, just don't lie to yourself. People are impressed by brand recognition and exclusivity.

>>14588436
Of course. Expensive af tho.

>>14588313
Everything that you’ve listed has been called a shitter in the past threads

>>14588436
>Let's say you buy a pepsi rolex
lol good luck

>>14588492
I can't tell if watch people are like car collectors or gun collectors. Car people like tasteful restoration, gun people would rather keep the rust.

>>14588557
People tend to favour faded bezels, yellowish lume and "tropical" dials... but no so much scratches and chipped stuff.

In my case for my Seamaster 300m "Brosnan", i changed the saphire, crown, hands and had the dial relumed but kept the bezel and case scratched (didnt change the bezel and didnt polish the case).

>>14586467
I'd cop with normal indices instead of 5, 10, 15, ...

>>14588493
You have to learn to ignore the contrarian retards in these threads. Even if you posted mythical literally perfect watch, there would be one person who would call it a shitter. That’s why I said
>generally approved
Why you would put any stock whatsoever in some faceless moron who calls a Patek a shitter without posting his own collection or what he thinks is superior is beyond me. At least half the posts in any given thread is low effort bait.

>>14588256
Not a whole lot of serious posters lately, mostly just 3~4 monkeys throwing shit at each other.

r8

>>14587200

Armida a6. They make it in 36mm now as well and I'm restraining myself from not buying one. Had the 40mm a few years ago and sold it because of the size, it was a good quality watch.

>>14588727
yeah I'm gonna need sauce on that my kind fellow

>>14588727
>.jpg
i fucking hate you

>>14588727
Fake/10
What’s even the point..

>>14587200
Tisell is producing one right now, check watchuseek tisell explorer

waiting on my fucking watch from japan, DHL says est delivery today but it's 6PM est. any chance still?

>>14586475
what is that octopus rolex?

>>14588917
Phoibos

>>14586475
>>14586490
>what time is it?
>huh... not sure

>>14588654
Anyone who calls a Lange a "shitter" should be instantly discarded.

>>14588970
I see literally no reason to get a Lange and Sōyne over a GS. In fact, the quality of the dial, case, and movement is arguably better on the GS. Look it up, there's been many comparisons and the GS comes out on top every time.

>>14588978
>finishing is everything

and GS finishing isnt even that good, go watch some pedo cartoons you fucking weeb.

>>14588996
Sinn shitter detected

>>14588978
Almost no one who can afford a GS actually buys them. That should tell you everything. Just because a watch gets praised on the internet has no correlation to actual sales or demand. Just look at resale value. The instant you buy a GS at retail you immediately lose 30%.

the mods should rangeban toxic seiko shills

I bought this shitter and it gets here on Thursday. Ask me anything.

>>14589160
Do the photoshopped pixels come with the watch?

>>14589160
Hilarious. Please post pictures once you get it. Hope you didn’t pay more than $5 for it.

r8 This faggots.

>>14586479
ID on bottom left?

>>14589183
I most likely overpaid for this shitter. It's a birthday present for my uncle. He's always wanted a Royal Oak but he'll never spend the money on one. He has a couple Rolexs and Omegas but a new Royal Oak is outside what he would spend and the guy refuses to buy used. This is kind of a gag gift Feice/Fake Royal Oak.

>>14589270
You do realise that pic is an actual Royal Oak with the brand name shopped?? What ever you bought will look nothing like that.

>>14588850
>DHL
More like broken piece of garbage you’ll have to return.

I fucking hate DHL

This is all I need

>>14589322
Good for you. Guess you don't have to come to this thread ever again. So fuck off and never come back.

>>14589328
have sex

>>14586523
Yea its pretty good but the new seamaster
>>14586534 is a better watch if your going to wearing it daily, I'd take the black dial more versatile.

>>14589329
I just did. You never will wearing that piece of shit.

>>14589338
Already have. Didn't even take it off during

>>14589341
It's amazing what whores will do for money.

R8 my new watch. Better than any Sinn trash ITT.


And yes, I realize it's a replica but for $350 what fucking normalfag would be able to tell anyway. I like it and that's all that matters.

>>14589302
Yes. That's the point. It's not the first shitty fake I've gotten him and he always has a laugh. A few years ago I got him a shitty Rolex OP39 for like $80. It was a bad copy of a watch he had. He loved that shit until it was stolen when he was in Italy. But he still had the real one at home.

>>14589359
>quarz

>>14589367
Quartz is better than automatic in every way and you know it.

>>14587680
Le Jour makes a poor-mans Heuer Pasadena

>>14589436
based

Is there any reason Grand Seiko spring drives arent more popular?

Are they bad to service? Expensive? Would I regret getting a 2016-2017 one?

Ive always been awestruck whenever I look at one in a store and I think its a real great sleeper watch compared to a rolex or omega and because no one really knows its value it could be easily worn as a daily. I just never see them in the wild.

>>14589359
FMD

Thoughts on Steinhart Vintage GMT

>>14589490
shitter

>>14589475
They're becoming more and more popular. It's rare to see any luxury watch other than Rolex, Tag, and Omega. Go for it.

>>14589490
I got the steinhart ocean 39 and thought it was well built but the way the lugs are it was a poor fit on my writst. I found it really uncomfortable.

>>14589490
It doesn't match the beauty of the rolex.

>>14589524
>everything is lumed except the seconds hand
???

>>14589527
Its not a fucking diving watch you retard. Just put the watch up to your ear LMAO.

>>14589527
It's not a diver, so you don't necessarily need a lume seconds hand to tell if the watch is running.

Rolex explorer 2 16570 vs 216570 black

So torn ugh

>>14589551
Between a non-maxicase and a maxicase version, always choose the former.

>>14589554
Trueeee. Was leaning that way anyways. Good to have some affirmation

Hey I’m new to watches, do you guys have any recommendations for a half decent, inoffensive watch that I can wear when out and about? I liked the G-SHOCK DW5600E but I’m not sure if it’ll look ridiculous with certain shirts and outfits due to how bulky it is. Thanks

>>14589576
Just get a Seiko diver in your price range.

>>14589617
Thanks, I’ll look into those. Do you also happen to have any digital watch recommendations as well?

>>14589475
>Is there any reason Grand Seiko spring drives arent more popular?
It's Seiko and it costs more than Rolex, figure it out Einstein.

>>14589667
The DW5600 is as good as any. I have one myself as my beater and it’s great - cheap, durable, and reliable.

Thoughts on Damasko silicon?

Keep it gentry.
https://youtu.be/8uTrcfxWemI

>>14589711
First time I've ever seen him wear something that isn't a shitter.

I like to trick anons here into buying automatic watches, because it gives me a thrill to see people fall for inferior overpriced products and try to justify it

>>14589475
>shitter brand
>expensive to buy
>expensive to service
>too big
>boring designs
>quartz
>low power reserve
Etc.

>>14589679
no they arent unless you are comparing some bashed up submariner to the full rrp of a GS

>>14589229
Casio AE1200.

>>14589359
Kek.
>oyster perpetual
Is a quartz
>day date
Has neither
Based & fake pilled

>>14586386
Anyone send in a G-shock/Casio watch for repair? Illumenator stopped working.

>>14589942
could it be a dying battery?

So if I can buy an automatic chronometer for $500 that consistently keeps +2 spd what’s the point of wasting money on Rolex and other big boy shitters?

>much movement finishing on a movement that’s not even visible

>>14589945
oh maybe, if I got old stock since I got it a year ago.

How do you think this shirt/watch combo works for a car salesman?

>tfw coworker showed me his new Rolex today
>"Yeah it's an aftermarket case, aftermarket bezel, replica hidden clasp jubilee and a cloned movement, but I replaced the dial with a genuine Rolex one!"

I don't think it should count.

>>14590007
If you have to quibble and talk about price and stuff like this, well then a $30 Casio digital with a stopwatch is all you need for timekeeping and chrono purposes.

>>14590023
Pure sleaze aesthetic.

I love it.

I got this today, it’s fine. That is all.

Who all make sports watches that have the rolex/tudor aesthetic?

>>14590075
You...you alright anon?

>>14590026
Yeah but that’s not a mechanical movement so it’s soulless and boring. If my mech movement performs exactly the same (or better) than one of the big brands, then what exactly am I paying more for besides the branding?

>>14590075
A bunch of Chinese brands.

>>14590075
Rolex and Tudor

>>14588132
I'd bought the mk2 over the seamaster if it wasnt for that date window, love the watch but just cant get over the date

>>14588359
Lmao you what!!!!

>>14588396
Sucking dick pays well

>>14589576
Get the gshock square or metal one if you can push it

>>14590282
Actually I work in a big phucken office doing deals and making cash you stupid fuck.

>>14590306
Lol working for someone else hahahaha I'm happy making 100k for the beach

>>14590306
I still think you must me very good looking to get paying 200k to suck dick

Is the W86 the only classic black casio digital with the better backlight? I know the A168 has it too but I'm looking for a more direct replacement for my F91

>>14590329
>>14590334
I don't suck dicks you cunts, you can't make 200K sucking dicks.

>>14590353
not with that attitude

>>14590353
No but really you must be letting your boss stick the tip in at least

>>14590344
F-105W

>>14590344
Rolex Submariner

recommend me some quartz fliegers and/or field watches

preferably from a watch brand company as opposed to microbrands

>>14590414
https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2380057.m570.l1313.TR6.TRC1.A0.H0.Xseiko+7a28.TRS0&_nkw=seiko+7a28&_sacat=0

>>14590414
Rolex Datejust.

Why are old ass 150m Seiko quartz diver watches so expensive?

I just want a skx007/skx009 looking quartz watch dammit

>>14589359
Holy shit dude

>>14590436
They have phenomenal movements in basically an SKX case. And I suppose since they're Jap divers a lot of them were abused and wrecked over the years.

>>14590454
>phenomenal movements
Woah easy there tiger. That looks pretty cheap and nasty next to some of theother vintage seiko quartz.

>>14590469
>>14590454
>Fully jeweled quartz chrono
vs
>what is essentially a 6309 mainplate with a quartz module instead of a standard train, barrel and balance

I mean, sure the 7A28 chronographs are amazing, but the 75XX series quartz movements are phenomenal on their own and are the basis for the modern 7C46 you see in the Marinemaster tunas.

>>14590289
>>14589688
Thanks for the recommendations, I’ll probably buy one of the metal ones when I have more money saved up

>>14589160

Its really thick sadly. The finishing is still nice. And its $229. Seagull movement but those are honestly not bad at all.

>>14590469
>>14590474
I own both. I serviced both. The 754x are fucking great.

For the first time ever, the Chinese have a 1:1 replica of a Richard Mille

>>14589359
>Says day date but has neither
Did you really pay 350$ for that ?

>>14590518
Let me know when they make a devon tread, then I'll be exited.

best watch with alarm function ?

>>14590638
g shock DW5600

>>14590638
1970's Poljot Signal

What's the best looking movement under $2k and why is it the ST19?

>>14590518
Based.

>>14590414
You can get a shitty tag heuer dive quartz from ebay auction for like 150-200, novody ever bids on them, girls like it because their daddies wore them when they were growing up

>>14590739
Based

>>14590894
Go on

>>14590894
Does she have hairy arms though?

can anyone ID this model of JLC reverso for me?

>>14590949
cant find anything with the head on but the seller has sent me these pictures

>>14589322
hipster watch

>>14590953
Why don’t you just ask him? This is a hard question because you can get a custom engraving of anything you want on the back of a Reverso. If it’s a custom job then you’ll never figure it out unless he tells you.

>>14591080
I think i'll have to, just wondered if it was a special edition or something

>>14591093
It very well could be. It’s always hard trying to place Reversos because there have been so many different ones over the years. Even now, JLC seems to offer about 50 different varieties.

>>14590953
What do you think about the lovely and classy Rolex ambassador Bella Thorne /wt/?

>>14591152
thats an AP isnt it?

>>14591168
Yes it is.

>>14591168
>>14591193
Same shit.

Should I take my Rolex Sub to uni?

>>14591298
How else are you gonna dab on the plebs?

which reference cartier santos should i get? The 29mm is way too small for a 6.5 inch wrist right?

>>14591437
A fake one

>>14591447
WOW! NO WAY!

This is the longest running thread for a while
Did the autist go on holiday

Are Ziiiro watches effay? Their displays are meant to resemble sundials and look fairly futuristic but not techy like Casios or Seikos.

This one's digital with a glowing display.

>>14591298
Living in a dorm? If so you’ll look like an idiot. Living in a big condo/house and have a nice car? Sure why not
>>14591437
You really need to try them on. It’s hard to tell correct sizing when it comes to square watches.

>>14591298
I took my Tag Formula 1 to uni and it was nicer than 99% of the watches anybody wore tbqh

>>14591437
Depends what else is in the collection. Also what look you're going for. The bigger one makes it feel more sporty and an all rounder. I went with the medium one and it suits my 6 inch wrist. I tried in both and they would both be alright. I just have other large watches so went with medium.

If I were you I'd go large. Even with my small wrists. Many people irl tell me my medium looks small. I guess people are just so used to large watches irl.

Just put in an order for the Ploprof (black dial, mesh band) Master Chronometer from an AD, it's to be my first proper expensive timepiece, and second mechanical timepiece (first is a Helson Sharkmaster 300 no date). Though I'll gladly admit that it's the uniqueness of it that attracted me to it rather than anything else, so if anyone has ideas of what to wear it with other than a drysuit, it'd be most welcome.
Pic peripherally related, it's also a watch.

>>14591512
what the fuck are you retarded get that bullshit out of my face

>>14590289
My beater.

>>14591681
>Ploprof
Yikes

My Swatch

>>14591484
>the autist
Who?

How cringe would it be if I wore one of these?

>>14591705
>gshock module in steel slimmed down case
>those pushers
What the fuck where can I buy this

>>14591793
It's just a square g shock without its plastic housing

>>14591802
So you did that yourself, and that steel frame is part of every gshock?

>>14591813
Old gshocks have steel cases

>>14591826
>>14591826
>>14591826

>>14591823
Okay thanks, gonna buy one and do it, maybe brush the steel though, do you know the reference of yours?

>>14591681
Enjoy your PloProf lume. Welcome to the club.

>>14591837
The back says 901 and then DW-5600

>>14586490
Money can't buy taste - the collection

>>14586490
Top left Patek, Lange and Milgauss are good. Bin the rest.