/fa/ - Fashion

>>14278391
More like the worst of both worlds, lmaoing my ass off dude.

The shitty power reserve and expensive maintenance costs of a mechanical, with the soullessness of a quartz. The spring drive makes zero sense.

Oh great another OP from the street shitting gaylord

>>14278394
The thing I've never liked about the Black Bay is that it's just such a mish-mash of designs. They couldn't decide which generation of Tudor Sub to hearken back to, so they decided to try all of them at once.

Why a snowflake handset but not a snowflake dial a la the Pelagos or the old Tudor Subs? The Square part of the hour hand ends up being bigger than the actual hour markers.

In an attempt to further distance itself from the Sub, the slab-sides of the case end up looking crude and blocky, obviously a remnant of those mid-90s-2000s oversize watch thing.

>>14278386
I'm sure seiko fuck it up sometimes on purpose. Look at these spring drive chronos. Suuuure you can get basically the same movement for thousands of dollars cheaper with the GS brand.. if you're ok with it looking like shit.

>>14278418
Without* the GS brand

>>14278418
I honestly can't tell which one is supposed to look like shit here.

>>14278427
The one with the obnoxiously huge power reserve meter and the back-end of the minute hand that is half as long as the hour hand.

>>14278427
Ah ha! He tricked you. They ALL look like shit.

>>14278418
Can't you just buy the face plate as a spare part and change it?

Do manual watches stay steady the whole duration of a wind, or do they start shitting the bed halfway or 75% of the way through it? Is it normal to expect slowdowns at that point? I'm interested in getting a manual one for nice events so I would only wear it every now and then, are they just something you set the time on and wind up when you're actually going to wear them?

>>14278441
Even if such a swap were possible the cost involved would probably be similar to just getting the grand seiko version.

>>14278462
Why? It's literally just a painted piece of tin.

https://forums.watchuseek.com/f2/tracking-celebrities-what-watches-they-wearing-lets-keep-going-300966-225.html

Why are there no celebrities who wear anything below a Rolex /fa/? You'd think that maybe there would be one normal person but there just isn't, they all have collections of multiple extremely expensive watches, how come?

>>14278521
You don't get it do you? Whenever a celebrity gets publicity over a certain watch they're paid to wear that watch.

14060 Submariner No date or 114270 39mm Explorer 1?

>>14278545
Sub

>>14278548
but why?

>>14278565
The explorer is boring any sub is better than any explorer no exceptions

>>14278565
Explorer is boring, no date sub is literally the perfect watch: no ugly cyclops and flawless design. If you want to be a Gigachad slap an oysterflex on it. My man, trust me. You'll thank me later. You're welcome.

>>14278533
Why is nothing below Rolex being marketed like that then?

>>14278545
The 114270 is the 36mm model, no? Anyway, I like it better than the sub, personally, but pick whichever you like as they're both great quality watches.

>>14278596
Omega, Breitling, Hamilton, and Seiko used to be in bond movies. Generally goods known for their value have smaller (or less socially conscious) marketing budgets.

>>14278596
All sorts of brands are marketed like that. Look at Omega's list of celebrity ambassadors, for example.

>>14278609
>Omega, Breitling, Hamilton, and Seiko used to be in bond movies.
>>14278614
No you don't get it, I'm talking about pictures of celebrities just going about their lives, not doing a commercial or a watch being in a movie or a TV show.

For example one of the Hamilton Khakis is worn by Hugh Laurie/Dr House, but he's never wearing it for real, in real life he's wearing a Rolex.

Gerard Butler is a Festina ambassador, but in real life he wears a Panerai.

>>14278633
This line of research is probably valid, But on the other hand I have nothing but pity for any person who devotes their time to figuring out what celebrity wear what watch.

>>14278633
>Panerai
Completely uncool, but worn by tons of celebs. Go figure.

>>14278648
It's still expensive as fuck and it's "not a Rolex" so it makes them feel unique.

>>14278609
>Hamilton
https://jamesbondwatchesblog.com/2012/07/11/officially-no-hamilton-watch-appears-in-quantum-of-solace/

>>14278572
16600 Sea Dweller is the perfect watch: date no cyclop, slightly bigger than a sub but not XBOX huge like the latest models, no OLEXROLEXROL...
Perfect I tell you

Some chink gets an idea to steal the schematics of the machines made to use a movement, and he asks you which one to take. He will use it to create near clones of that movement, causing it to be used in cheap chinkwatches/microbrands all over, and make replacement parts for the real thing far cheaper.

Which will it be?

>>14278740
>16600 Sea Dweller
Too thick IMO, no date sub on an oysterflex is CHAD tier in my opinion.

>>14278807
Doesn't matter if "real" watches are still going to be Rolex/Omega and above. Literally what's inside doesn't matter, it matters if you're in that class or above or not.

Thanks to the anons for recommending the black bay 58.
I wonder how close to retail the bids would end up. There's no way I'm going to win this.

>>14278817
Why not just save up for a real Rolly?

>>14278807
Assuming the QC would be at least half decent, the Rolex 3135. One of the greatest mass produced automatic movements, ever. Tons of watchmakers have the skills and experience to service them. Great capability for accuracy.

>>14278831

>>14278831
I have bitchwrists and the submariner also stands out too much. This is going to be my first taste of the entry level stuff. I'm coming from a seiko prospex and a hamilton. I like the tudor for it's own merits.

>>14278807
It might as well be this mad 15hz movement.

>>14278888
Oh you're still in highschool? Then it's ok, you'll get a real watch when you grow up.

>>14278394
why not spend $6000 and get a rolex sub
plus it isn't an inch thick

Real life dadcore

>>14278935
Because when you try to buy one the people in the store laugh at you like you're poor and tell you to fuck off, this is despite them earning barely 25% over minimum wage and the watches they wear being provided for free by the AD owner.

Ladies and Gents, the most memorable and desirable Seamaster ever made.

>>14278996
Too bad finding one with box and papers and that hasn't been badly polished for a reasonable price is so difficult, and too bad the bracelets on all of them have turned into rattlesnakes by now.

Is this a genuine Gucci?
Got this from dad. The second hand popped off and the watch itself isn’t running. I’m curious whether it’s worth to repair since I don’t know if it is real. All of the advice on google makes me think it’s legit. (Serial number matches, materials aren’t cheap looking/feeling). Every time I post this I get ‘>get out’. I didn’t even spend a penny on this so please no hate

>>14279013
Who the fuck would make a fake out of a watch that's already heinous dogshit?

>>14279011
>Too bad finding one with box and papers and that hasn't been badly polished for a reasonable price is so difficult, and too bad the bracelets on all of them have turned into rattlesnakes by now.
I have box, no papers, never been polished, bracelet has no stretch at all. Omega bracelets rarely stretch actually. They're not comparable to Rolex of that era.

I got mine under market price last year. It's selling for 1k more than what I paid.

>>14279016
Everybody has a preference anon no need to be a little bitch

>>14279013
>UNQUE SERIAL
Uh...

>>14279019
If I strapped a frozen dog turd to your wrist and just said "hey it's not shit, it's just preference" would you tolerate that?

>>14278996
I'm not into omega, but that watch is pretty. The only problem is the bracelet, looks extremely cheap.

>>14279013

It's probably going to be hard to distinguish it from a fake if they faked that particular model.. Looking at Gucci's current watches on their website and the Ebay offerings that thing does seem to be in line with other '316L' watches they sell..

It's a quartz, so whether or not it can be repaired probably depends on the movement. It says 'Swiss made', so odds are it's some kind of ETA or other off the shelf movement, which means it can be replaced. If the seconds hand 'popped off' it might pop back on. If it broke, that's a problem..

"Worth to repair" in this case might be due to the fact that your dad gave it to.. If you're talking money, it's almost certainly not worth it. If you're talking horological meri, it's definitely not worth it.


Also, I never realised just how many butt-ugly watches Gucci markets at ridiculous pricepoints.. Googling around a bit is shocking. Who the fuck spends $2500,- on a gaudy gucci digital (!) watch?

>>14279013
nice fake of an already disgusting watch, faggot

>>14279044
Agreed, I’m not a big fan of the bracelet design or the weird shape (bevel?) of the outer bezel. FWIW though Omega bracelets are really comfortable and solid in my (limited) experience with a Speedmaster.

>>14278857
Already replicated, including the Daytona movement. SH3135 & SH4130, SH being "Shanghai".

>>14278807
Fuck fakes but I'd go with the JLC cal. 920, used by AP, PP, and VC in their ultra-thins.

>>14279209
>Already replicated, including the Daytona movement. SH3135 & SH4130, SH being "Shanghai".
No. The SH3135 doesn't even attempt to copy the 3135's escapement. It's not free sprung. It's not parachrom. It doesn't have the overcoil. It exists to fool clueless dumbfuck fake buyers, not to replicate the technical specifications and chronometric performance of the real 3135.

>>14279013
Are those fake sub-dials?
>get out

>>14278398

This. The spring drive is a glorified quartz movement pedestalized by all the basedboys over at r/watches and youtube.

>>14278398
>>14279307
If you're going to go quartz, why not just go UHF and not bother with anything else?

>>14278961
hahaha this is true
also I heard the salesmen can usually buy them at wholesale price which is 50% of MSRP

is it possible to wear a red G-Shock without looking like a teen or an asshat?

>>14278448
https://monochrome-watches.com/technical-perspective-dilemma-constant-force-watchmaking/

>>14279424
fuck is that?
imagine the servicing costs

>>14278817
tudor really hit the bullseye with this one

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMdmByDGhb0

>>14279446
>riveted bracelet

>>14279445
if you're going to buy a watch with a fusee and chain, servicing costs are probably a pittance to you

>>14279460
>not liking riveted bracelets

>>14279460
Gotta give it that low class look somehow.

>>14279467
More like

(((riveted bracelet)))

it's fake as shit.

>>14279446
too bad they know it would eat into submariner sales like crazy if they made one with the red and blue bezels and without the dogshit fake patina

>>14279467
>>14279460
>implying that the bracelet isn't the cheapest and easiest thing to replace on a watch if you dont like it

>>14279475
I'd rather take a solid link over a folded link that's actually riveted.

>>14279479
yeah I was wondering why they didn't offer more style options
rolex being a shitty and limiting as ever

>>14279483
Yeah dude because there's a bunch of bracelets out there that have the right end link design and fit the aesthetic of the watch (I'm fucking kidding).

>>14279504
It's just a standard 20mm end link. Don't think it'd be too hard to find ones that fit convincingly enough. Even the default one doesn't follow the lug shape completely.

Can you guess whose click is this without reverse image search?

>>14279525
No. What's the deal with the sawblade?

>>14278817
Poorfag anon here. I just went into an AD expecting I could get one soon because I really don't want to keep bidding on something that is almost the same price as msrp new. There's currently a 6 month wait time right now which is unfortunate.
>>14279446
That yt channel is pretty based.

>>14279030
Nice strawman
>>14279048
Thanks for the advice. I do like the style of it so I’ll get it fixed. Obv if the fix costs more than 100 it’s not worth it right? It’s a ~$250 watch
>>14279100
Why do you think it’s fake?

>watches that have glareproofing on the outside of the sapphire

Fucking WHY?

>>14279572
Wish I was a big enough Chad to pull this off.

Didn't /wt/ threads used to belong in /g/? What happened?
>>14279577
I don't understand. Isn't it just a turtle?

>>14279583
>What happened?
I fixed it.

>>14278398
>>14279307
Just because you can't comprehend the appeal of spring drive movements doesn't mean no one else can. They have very little in common with stepper motor quartz movements, and the manner in which the driving force of the movement is also transformed into the braking force is quite ingenious, if you have an appreciation for those sorts of elegant technical solutions.

>>14279583
>I don't understand. Isn't it just a turtle?
Well exactly, it's a cheap beater for high school kids, if you wear something like that as an adult, you'd better be rich as fuck or a total Chad.

>>14279547
Because dual AR coatings are enormously more effective at reducing crystal glare than inner only AR coatings.

>>14279533
lol you should feel lucky they even told you how long the wait is rather than just telling you to fuck off like they did to me

>>14279603
But they scratch, so what's the point in making the crystal out of something unscratchable if you're going to coat it in something that can be scratched?

>>14279595

That's soitalk. If it has a quartz component in it, it's a fucking quartz. It's that simple.

>>14279605
Wow where was that? Apparently there's already quite a line up of back orders for customers in their store. The BB 58 seems to be popular enough that she wasn't surprised that I was asking for it specifically.

>>14279615
store in Tyson's Corner
Probably one of the highest density of richfags on the planet and I've heard the ADs there are some of the highest volume in the US

>>14279620
Might have just had bad luck and got a shitty sales rep that day.

>>14279615
Fake Rolly vs fake fake Rolly :0

>>14279446

>14.75mm thickness

Why are Tudors so thick? Why can't anyone seem to match Rolex and their thinness?

I think the only diver in that price range that gets close to Rolex is Seikos 62MAS re-issue- under 40mm and just about 14mm.

>>14279657
The BB58 is 11.9mm thick m8.

>>14279657

It's all about making so that Tudor does not compete with Rolex directly. You either get the thick as fuck BBs with no dates, or the pretty Sub-like BB58 with that there faux-patina and also no date. In other words, they have to make sure that Tudors are not too good for what they are. Although one could argue that Tudor not being Rolex is a disadvantage in itself.

wanting to expand my collection. so far I'm one and done with a rolex op 36 black dial (casual/elegance + versatile every day wear). i plan to have 3 watches; sport, everyday and dress. how's this go as far as a tool or sports watch? Is it reasonable to spend 2g on a sellita core?

>>14279660

Oh nice

>>14279665
>faux-patina
Where? Unless you mean the off white lume.

>>14279665

Yeah, the no date shit bothers me too. Also do we know how that faux patina ages ?

>fiance is buying me this for our wedding
I told her I wanted a Bond watch. She wasn't retarded and seems to be getting me a good one. I love her

>>14279693
but anon... the rolex sub is the original bond watch.. lol

>>14279698
I know but a vintage Rolex sub costs more than $3000

>>14279699
thats a lot less than a new seamaster no?

What's with the Rolex trolling? Is he archieposting?

>>14279533
>6 month wait for a fucking Tudor
This is so rich. Even poorman’s Rolex creates artificial scarcity to drive prices up. What a joke of a company and industry.

>>14279693

She may not be retarded, but it appears that you are, marrying in this day and age.

>>14279707

It's only going to get worse with the chinese and the indians wanting their slice from the luxury pie now.

>>14279703
/wt/ is fucking tot. Look at the quality of the posts these past few threads.

>>14279674
bump. thoughts guys? i thought sinn was popular here

Can you reasonably expect a 43mm Navitimer to look okay on a 6.75" wrist? I don't have an AD nearby.

>>14279718

Don't do it, or at least not just yet. I heard they're going to switch back to ETA due to how common reliability issues are with Sellitas.

>>14279708

What's the alternative? Staying single and poor ? The other thing that is a given "this day and age" is that the only fucking way to be able to afford a home and such is to be with another person.

>>14279726

Ahahaha... you'll know what I meant, boyo. You'll know.

>>14279724
crap :(. my second choice was the spb051.. just worried about the 6r in it. i heard bad shit about it randomly failing, losing 5 sec a minute, etc its about 700 bucks cheaper too

>>14279724
>43mm Navitimer to look okay on a 6.75" wrist?
A bit of a stretch man. Seiko can get away with sizes up to 45mm just fine because they usually put shorter lugs on the watch which isn't the case all for navitimers. I recommend actually trying out the watch before buying it.
>>14279726
I have nothing against people that are married, but I know a lot of people that are single and bought a house on their own. People that buy >$500,000 homes on their own is not unheard of.

>>14279730

I wish it wasn't like this, but you're better off with going the ETA way in that price range. They're far from unique, but they work, and that's the number 1 thing with a watch. Service is much less of a hassle, too.

>>14279735

I tried on my brother's SKX and it looked good, I even had some real estate left, so maybe I have a shot at it, but I don't want to drive 200 miles just to try one on. Such is life in EE.

the same old divers get posted every thread

>>14279703
>What's with the Rolex trolling?
About 2.5 years ago a mentally deranged faggot got enormously booty blasted that he got repeatedly proven wrong and made fun of on /wt/ for posting stupid opinions and sperging out defending them whenever someone corrected his idiocy.

He got so mad about it he has spent the subsequent 2.5 years of his life perma-trolling these threads, driving them off /g/ to this shithole of a board and spends his every waking moment in here shitposting. Without exaggeration about 50-70% of the posts in /wt/ are trollposts from that dude plus a few more people who join in here and there.

Since his main goal is to ruin /wt/ for the posters from back in the day on /g/, anti-Seiko trolling, calling everyone poor, and shitting on any watch not a Patek, a stainless sports Rolex or an Omega Speedmaster Professional amuses him, because he's tarring /wt/ in the very mindless buypig brand whoring whose absence used to make /wt/ what it was.

That guy, and mayble 1-2 more people, have been posting 150+ times a thread for 2.5+ years now in this insane sperg out jihad.

>>14279777
Thanks for that. I used to go in the old /g/ wt threads and I didn't remember it being that bad.
>150+ times a thread for 2.5+ years now
I'd rather have the thread be slow instead.

>>14279424
Perfect, thank you for posting something so informative.

>>14279777
>shitting on any watch not a Patek, a stainless sports Rolex or an Omega Speedmaster
That's the opinion every serious watch enthusiasts has past high school though (or in high school if his parents aren't poor).

Thoughts on the Aquanaut?

>>14279845
looks wonky

>>14279751
Man that's a cool seastar

Why is a free-sprung balance good?

>>14279845
Bad date window style/placement, and you can't afford it anyway.

>>14278961
This is accurate.
Life gets so much better when you realize that this snob clerk who’s used to intimidating customers because he WORKS FOR a prestigious brand/bank/hotel is just a wagecuck hoping the luster of his products/customers will wash on him.
You should always treat them 2x the way they treat you. Be twice as nice or twice the asshole they are. That’s very satisfying, also help make nice people even nicer, and put the asshole product pusher back into his place

any reason not to get a PO 8800?
the size is better for my baby wrists

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07MSMG26D/ref=ox_sc_act_title_3?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER&th=1

Just ordered this timeless classic, feelsgoodman. Can't wait to style on these kids. Authentic Japaneses Quartz technology seems to be the way to go for watches these days, full functionality with no upkeep required.

how did i do?

>>14279937
> 14.something mm thickness

too thick IMO. have you tried it on before anon? i was thinking about buying one but when I tried it on i felt the thickness made it feel really cumbersome but YMMV so you should make sure to try it on

Why don't people usually wear a Speedy on a NATO?

How easy/difficult it is to change a crown on a watch? I just got a hamilton khaki field mechanical. While it's nice, I want a larger crown to so the handwinding process will be easier. Can any watchmaker fit a flieger style onion crown into the watch?

I'm getting TM-215065 and none of you can stop me.

>>14280008
Aren't Khakis automatic though? Probably won't find an onion crown that fits on the Khaki tube so you're going to need a new tube, crown, gasket, and maybe a new stem. Not sure what the movement is on the Khaki but a watchmaker would just remove the old tube, rethread the hole for the new tube, thread new tube, fit stem on the crown, insert, and done. Start searching for parts.

>>14280017
Nah i got pic related it's the handwinding version. Can't they just cut off the old crown and solder a new one? Sounds like a lot fo work I think I'm just gonna accept the watch as it is.

>>14280026
How do you think the new onion crown will screw down if it doesn't match the tube on the case?

>>14280028
I don't know anon I'm fucking dumb

>>14280010

shittersville ain't all bad lads
i get plenty of fun out of these without breaking the bank

>>14280134
My condolences.

I'm doing an illustration of a vintage watch and I'm conflicted. The printing on vintage dials aren't exactly perfect, should I try to copy the "mistakes" or have them perfectly crisp and aligned?

Is there a correlation between gluttony and watch collection?

>>14280147
Depends if you picture the watch in its original time (new) or today (vintage).
Most of the flaws/patine you see today are prints/paints/materials that got damaged trough time, sun, humidity exposure.
A vintage sub with painted T indexes was crisp when new...

>>14280162
No causality but I guess being able to afford everything you like, even in excess, may lead to addictive behavior. Collecting stuff (from watches to shoes to cars) is pretty akin to being an addict to drugs/booze/gambling.
I am myself easily “trapped” into a hobby, if I had unlimited resources like a few people I know I would have a retarded amount of many different stuff.
Would also probably be borderline obese As I love good foods and wines.

>>14279693
But anon, Bond never wore that watch.

>>14280147
If the printing was flawed even when the watch was new, then follow that.

>>14280172
It's an iconic watch, my reference photos of different watches but of the same model all show the same mistakes meaning it's the way the pad printing plate was made. It's not a mistake exactly, just maybe a line being thinner here, and a corner rounded off on another, and etc.

>>14279424
fuck me I want this Zenith

>>14280162
Yes there is.

>>14280211
What exactly is going on in the bottom right?

>>14279770
Jesus Christ, what is like that case thickness?

>>14278996
That's a funny picture of the black bezel PO 2500

What a profit. Auctioned off for about 427k USD in 2000 by Antiquorum (about 630k USD today), and then auctioned off at Christie's last March 2018 for 7,1 MILLION USD.

>>14279718
>sinn charges €500 for a sapphire option
You be the judge. Their watches look good on paper, because they actually write down shit like electromagnetic resistance etc., but the prices are quite hefty.

>>14280141
>casio marlin and a marathon
Noice. Whats the diameter on the marathon?

>>14279777
>every single post in every single thread was about seikos
>I'm the problem

If you fags wanted to talk about Seikos you should have made a Seiko general. /wt/ has never been better and it's all thanks to me.

I’ve been on /wt/ for a couple weeks only.
It’s a shitfest all right, but in the meantime I have returned to a major watch forum in my country after almost 10 years...boy are the seikos everywhere now. Crazy really.
Also “get a sub, a speedy and a vintage dress watch” was the credo already when I was into watches 12 years ago. Only the subs are retardedly more expensive now, a no date used to go for around 4K€

>>14280430
where u from

>>14280438
India

>>14279819
>>14280403

>Still mad that the Swiss got BTFO eternally and perpetually

Kind of sad, really.

>>14279777
well when rolex and patek are two of the only handful of remaining brands who arn't owned by another company (swatch, richmont, etc)... can you understand why?

>>14280162
? the guy on the right is slim

>>14279693
I hope to god you're not buying that new. By the way, the only Seamasters with staying power are those actually worn by Bond in the movies. Such as the original wave dial. The Planet Oceans are not very popular either, nor are the ATs. Actually you should only be buying >>14278996 because it's the only Seamaster that's going UP in value as it gets older. It's surpassing the ceramics right now.

>>14280564
>because it's the only Seamaster that's going UP in value as it gets older
They were made by the million, they'll never be worth much, they'll just increase slowly as the price of the current Seamaster line increases with time. Same as the 5 digit Sub increased as the Submariner line in general had MSRP increases, though this was obviously assisted massively by a demand increases.

Omega is never going to have the same shortage/demand/supply setup that Rolex has going on, so the 2531, though a very nice watch, isn't going to make anyone any money. Unlikely to lose anything, though.

>>14280578
Rarity is not directly tied to value at all. The worth of the 2531 comes from being *the first* Bond watch. That's why it is as valuable as much more recent, higher quality pieces. The ceramic ones are going for the same money on the used market, so it's not connected to inflation or price hikes at all. Google the watch a little and you'll find an editorial calling it the ultimate sleepers watch.

Fuck does it look good on a blue rubber strap.

>>14280586
sorry bud that's shit. get a cartier tank

>>14280581
>Rarity is not directly tied to value at all.
It is.

>The worth of the 2531 comes from being *the first* Bond watch.
They aren't expensive, everyone who wants one likely already has one. Goldeneye is a 20 year old film (yes okay it's the quartz version in that but same point), if someone watched that on release and can't afford a $2000 watch by now, they never will. It's the same as 60s-70s muscle cars, prices can only go so high because the people who want them reach a certain age and/or die eventually.

>That's why it is as valuable as much more recent, higher quality pieces. The ceramic ones are going for the same money on the used market
Omega has diluted their brand hardcore with a billion special editions, and no one really likes the plain dial Seamasters. That's why the ceramic ones aren't so hot, and why you can get one on a 72 month 0% deal.

>so it's not connected to inflation or price hikes at all
The price of all things is connected to inflation, that's how inflation works. It's extremely bad for a luxury brand's image to reduce their prices.

>>14280595
Shouldn't you be collecting the trash in your neighborhood, faketudorfag?

>>14280596
Enjoy your new Seamaster then. I'll be here laughing at you when you resell it taking a 50% hit.

>>14280596
I should say, I don't think you're wrong, just that buying a watch like that because it's an investment piece isn't really very solid thinking. Sure, maybe it'll outstrip inflation by 25%+ in ten years, but that isn't really a lot of value. The main value is in the enjoyment of wearing it.

>>14280601
The current gen 300M is too big and ugly and the ones before that are shitters.

Absolutely if I were buying a Seamaster I wouldn't even consider anything other than the 2531.

>>14280597
i am not the fake tudor fag. i posted about a sinn earlier

>>14280564
Not interested in quartz shit desu

>>14278394
NEW THREAD ^__^
COME IN FRIENDS ^_^

>>14280614
>>14280614
>>14280614

>>14280614
>>14280614
>>14280614

>>14280615
You are a faggot. Keep beating the dead /wt/ horse.

>>14280615
I've seen some pathetic posters on 4chan but you take the prize. You make the incels and /pol/tards look normal.

>>14280617
No, you :)

>>14280438
Don’t listen to the other guy, I’m from France, as you could guess an Indian would not use EUR as a metric.

>>14280636
Shut up street shitter

>>14280643
Actually I have my own personal toilet in my home.

>>14280646
Based tudorfag

>>14280646
>>14280665
I don't think I've ever seen samefagging so blatantly obvious.

>>14280609
>2531
>quartz

>>14280646
>>14280665
based

>>14280675
kys

>>14279564
hey u anon
i assume you’re the one who always posts these classy datejust photos

i just really wanna thank u for that i love it

>>14280686

I thought you fools were talking about the 2541

>>14280699
They'd be classier if he posted the much more tasteful five and four digit ref versions of the DJ rather than the bloated maxi-case versions with those bloated indices.

>>14280403
Thank you for finally admitting it was all you, all the way back to the original avalanche of anti-Seiko posting ~2.5 years ago.

>>14280738
I'm dedicated to my craft.

>>14280595
At least recommend something within the same category.

>>14280798
Wait. You've spent over 2 years trolling a watch thread. Fucking lol. That's sad.

>>14280646
What the fuck is your point. Don’t getting enough (You’s)?

Anyway sorry other anon, if it was useful to you to discuss about watches in France 12 years ago there’s this retard who can’t help shitting posts.

>>14280828
Devoting your life to being a gigantic faggot isn't trolling it's just being a faggot.

>>14279845
The only Patek people wear like they are supposed to.
It's ugly af though

>>14279845
lol is that a fake? it's hideous

>>14279845
People are only saying they like the Aquanaut now because no one can get a Nautilus. If the availability and prices weren't fucked it would go back to being the cheaper inferior version.

>>14280326
36mm, i tried the other sizes up to the jumbo and the 36mm felt the best on wrist out of all of them
it's an absolute tank of a watch, even at 36mm it feels really weighty and just awesome to wear in general

>>14280955
No fakes are posted in /wt/.

>>14280564
I got an AT about 6 months back; bad decision?

>>14279048
to me the watch screams "halal"