/fa/ - Fashion

>>13938305
Why would anyone wear gats? They're some of the most boring trainers you can find next to CPs and people eat it up

>>13938314
MMM Replica is probably only behind CP White Achilles Low in terms of most fashion victim sneakers out there.

>>13938305
The denim jacket looks retarded and the turtleneck doesn't match but the pants and shoes are aight

>>13938305
Pretty funny how you'd see most blunt people wearing stuff like this on the daily and believing they're "fashionable" or "looking fresh" just for throwing in some color. Clown tier desu.

>>13938305
He dress like this for sex.

>>13938305
this bowlegged ass nigga made gats and black jeans look bad LOL

>>13938317
CPs are simply poor quality overpriced crap. the leather feels like plastic. MM reps are at least decent quality, but they are a bit tacky and frumpy

>>13938305
Can someone explain why this looks so terrible? Other than the turtleneck the outfit seems like it should work. Maybe its the angle of the photo or the posture?

>>13939200
awkward duck feet pointing outwards. somewhat pudgy overweight in the belly. blue jacket clashes with black pants. white worn out running shoes will never look good, unless you are painting your house or washing your car and don't care about them

Not a big fan of his outfit, but here's your daily reminder that this guy is happier than you and gets laid more.

>>13939206
>blue jacket clashes with black pants
No it doesn't. Stop acting like you know shit. Blue blazer with black trousers is normal. Blue denim with black jeans is normal. It's the turtleneck that's causing the colours to clash here. If he had white to balance to the jeans and jacket it'd look fine.

>>13939392
blue and black is always shit. fucking zoomer colour combination because they are afraid to wear brown shoes
black and blue is just shit, never has looked good. when someone wear black shoes with his blue suit it is the main giveaway that he is a prole
>>13938305
because he fell for a bunch of memes and put them together. black trousers look like shit and should never been worn, besides that his are way too slim.
sneakers with denim looks like shit
cotton turtlenecks look like shit, atleast get a wool one
denim and sneaker combo is shit

>>13939399
Christ, you sound like an insufferable MENSWEAR mfa faggot. The combinations you mentioned have been around far longer than zoomers have been around. Black trousers should never be worn? Sneakers and jeans, one of the older staples still around, look shit? Agreed on the turtleneck though.

>>13939407
Wanted to add: the main reason his fit looks bad is because of his shit body shape and ill-fitting clothes. Replace turtleneck with white tee and put it all on someone skinny and it looks fine.

>>13939407
just because it common doesn't mean it isn't shit. cargo shorts and graphic t shirts are also common.
black clothing, on men, is only for ultra conservative enviroments and funerals. on women it can be worn more often but black clothing on men just looks like shit and somehow also very feminine

>>13939413
You sound like you've taken advice on suits from GQ and are trying to apply it to casual wear. This is the most bluepilled opinion I've read in a long time.

>>13938305
this wouldn't even look that bad if he had a better body shape

>>13939417
i don't take clothing advice from anyone but my grandfather
black clothing is just shit, casual or not. ugliest colour there is. i have never seen it look good ever. Even the most well fitting funeral suit looks like shit

>>13939422
>i don't take clothing advice from anyone but my grandfather
It all makes sense now. Please fuck off to mfa.

>>13939424
lot of asaumptions to make. mfa is full of incela dressing exactly like the pic in MFA with cringy SLIM FIT all black garbage
why would i ever want to visit that

It's just a boring ass fit with an out of place turtleneck. Who cares.

>>13939392
>Blue blazer with black trousers is normal

>>13939392
If that jacket was at least black or even gray, this would be ok

>>13939436
I'm obviously not talking a lighter blue, but a dark navy, almost black, blue looks fine with black trousers and has been pulled off so many times that it's not odd to see.

>>13939436
>>13939444
Pic related. You telling me the royals don't know classic dress? You're following some outdated rules, my man.

>>13939441
It'd look the exact same because it's the turtleneck and his proportions that are ruining the fit.

>>13939457
This is a completely different outfit. And the pants look dark blue not black. The shoes are also black, and are dress shoes. Also white shirt. OP is wearing maroon shirt which changes everything. It affects everything. The point is, put any non-neutral color shirt instead and that black and bluejean jacket will never look good.

if the shoes are black, and the shirt is white, that makes the entire fit totally flexible. because black and white go with every color. thus your hypothetical argument is not relevant

>>13939516
My man this was in response to someone saying that blue jacket/blazer and black trousers (which is an outdated rule of fashion) doesn't work. The pants are definitely black, you can find more pics of his fit online. It's not directly related to the OP fit. I agree with everything you're saying. Try and follow the thread next time, will you?

>>13939200
Shirt and/or jacket are too long, making his leg "profile" too short

Seems a little fat (shoulders less wide than belly)

You can tell just by the pointy chin this dude isn’t attractive

>>13939532
Sure, but it's a case by case basis. And this case the OP is wearing white sneakers, you can't wear a Blue jacket, black pants white sneakers. Even with a white shirt, it would look bad. The jacket in question is literally a Blue Jean Jacket. Blue Jeans, and Black, simply do not go. The colors clash horribly.

>>13939422
>i don't take clothing advice from anyone but my grandfather

lmao

>>13939678
he was more effay than you proles will ever be

I probably look like a fashion victim too from time to time, wearing all sorts of recognizable pieces and general types of fits you see on /fa/.

>>13939038
define good or bad quality

>>13939399
>>13939413
>>13939426
bro there you are! mom says you've been on the computer for too long and it's my turn now so please come back upstairs

>>13939691
Not him but it's something you can very easily feel when touching/wearing some items. Same goes for the leather on my Adidas Sambas. It just doesn't feel very good.

>>13939697
great meme man
keep rocking your sick ass mfa colour scheme

>>13939701
>easily
more like your wallet has been cucked by brands into automatically thinking low price = bad quality and high price = good quality when in reality you're not educated enough on leather quality to make a real judgement

>>13939710
not him but you're argument is wrong because cp aren't cheap for a sneaker

>>13939710
Based and redpilled

>>13939710
>leather quality
In general quality is subjective though. If you wear something and the material feels poorly made to you, it is low quality. It's the value you give to an item.

Regardless I see your point. I don't know much about leather but then again I highly doubt Adidas uses a lot of high quality leather for their shoes.

>>13939710
This. Quality is a meme

>>13939730
that is not at all what he is saying, brainlet

>>13939733
It is. Stay mad quality cuck.

>>13939737
jesus christ you are so fucking stupid.
let me spell it out for you in middle school english:
he is saying that expensive doesn't mean good quality, and that cheap doesn't mean bad quality
now fucking off yourself or leave this board because people so stupid like you shouldn't be allowed on the internet

>>13939691
Define it? Ok, I'll play your game....

>Good
The leather should feel firm yet buttery, not silky, but you can tell if you have ever actually owned a pair of footwear that has GOOD leather on it, leather that was hand selected out of many hides... including what sections of the hides to use

>Bad
See my comment on CPs.... the leather feels plasticy, and stiff, milky, you can tell, it is not hand selected. because anyone selecting that, that wants to call themselves leather shoe makers, would not select that leather.

>>13939742
>quality cuck is seething with anger for literally no reason
Quality is a meme. His post his reassuring my point by saying it doesn't matter what you buy. Stay mad cumbreath.

>>13939743
Bunch of buzzwords and trying to act like an intellectual

>>13939758
>>13939737
>>13939730
this is the worst troll on this board. i believe it has to be a troll since he has been so thourougly btfo for so many times now already that unless he is legally retarded he is trolling
it was never once funny, it has never gotten good reactions. acting like a brainlet isn't good trolling

>>13939761
>everyone is retarded except me
Quality cucks really are just constantly seething

>>13939776
except for that everyone but you know that quality is a thing in some shape or form

>>13939422
>ugliest colour ever
Say that to my boy Yohji Yamamoto's face, I dare you

>>13938305
apart from turtleneck and red+blue its a good normcore fit

The turtleneck is a completely random color that's not tied in anywhere else, the jacket looks cheap and stiff, almost like a Halloween costume, the pants are baggy which is a weird contrast to the jacket. The shoes make sense with the lower half, but the upper half is such a trainwreck that they're hardly noticeable. And worst of all
>pink phone
Is it ever possible to pull off turtlenecks with jackets, especially when they clash this hard?

>>13939211
>t. Guy in OP's pic

>>13939683
>being a proletariat cannot be fashionable
Stop being narrow minded and ignorant. Adam Sandler dresses like that and he looks great- lots of lower class people can look fashionable and better than people with more money and class.

>>13939857
He's wearing too many colors. Three colors max for normcore, and even then the palette has to make sense you brainlet

>>13939211
yes, SEX comes to him

>>13939399
>blue suit and black shies means youre a prole
yes, following business dress codes up until recently meant you were a prole