/fa/ - Fashion

second for sweep second hand

>>13668451
Nice Lemania 5100 OP

>>13668451
Those sinn chronos are fucking beautifull!

I want a 936 so badly!

>>13668451
This is the thread

time for a wristcheck
>show me what you got

Seriously though, why hasn't any company started to make a clone of this mov't? Sinn could sell 5100-powered watches like sliced bread!

REAL THREAD

>>13668408
>>13668408
>>13668408

>>13668483

>>13668451
Bless you anon!

>>13668494
Sad!

>>13668490
agreed.
After reading an article of the 5100 movement I came to the conclusion, that this would be perfect chrono for me, because I don't give a fuck about caliber finishing.

my favorit sentence of that article
>All in all, the 5100 is the movement equivalent of the million-mile-capable Mercedes OM602 2.5 diesel engine. It ain’t pretty, but it’ll run for ever and if you’ve got a 15mm spanner and a hammer you can fix it. For example, there’s no need to dismantle the whole movement to get to the barrel. Just pull out the central arbour and you’ve freed it.

>>13668497

Why do you create double threads? Seriously, it's so autistic and cancerous. Whoever you are, you're worse than tudorcuck. Fucking annoying.

>>13668494
I can't belive I use my nvpn just to roll new IPs to report your threads

>>13668508
So letting the shitposting troll get away with it is somehow better?

>>13668508
>disagreed
just let tudor fags thread die with only his own samefagging replys.
He will get bored soon and stop this shit.

>>13668512
It's just a fucking OP. Only difference from his and yours is the picture, and I guess your pride.

>>13668517
He will samefag in here too. It doesn't matter. You're making it worse by creating these double threads. I hate this autism so much, you're literally getting down in the mud with him. You're the same.

The C Trinity
> Credor
> Celadon
> Citizen

>>13668508
do you think there will ever be some new people coming to this general if the op picture is allways some timex or fake tudor?

There is a need of diversity!
I only started lurking here, because I got facinated by the look of a gyrotourbillion op

>>13668520
Chill out anon. Some of us appreciate good looking and well made watches. Not the utter shit the trolls post.

>>13668502
It goes beyond even those virtues. The Lemania 5100 is the most shock resistant mechanical chronograph movement ever made because the chronograph is directly driven, it has a central register chronograph minute hand, and has a vertical clutch combined with the more robust cam actuated design.

It really is a marvel of functional mechanical engineering.

>>13668522
This.
> I got facinated by the look of a gyrotourbillion op
Good taste bro.

>>13668522
>>13668525
Yeah yeah, I guess I'm overreacting but why don't you just create a new thread before him?

>>13668531
Because the autistic troll literally lurks all day until the thread hits the limit just to repost a new OP before anyone else. There are some sad fuckers on this site but honestly some of the worst hang out in /wt/. It's weird.

>>13668531
>Yeah yeah, I guess I'm overreacting but why don't you just create a new thread before him?
There used to be a guy who would do it sometimes and made some nice threads, but his gf just turned 18 so he has been busy with her

>>13668508
Tudorcuck created it before the bump limit. This is the legitimate thread.

>>13668521
HolyC?

>>13668451
It pleases my eyes to see the tudorfaggot cucked again.

>>13668530
so beautifull

>>13668535
Can you wear the black gshock? I wanna see how it looks.

>>13668555
They really are.

Someone need to buy this beauty.
Maybe it will be (you)?

>>13668451
>>13668502
If anyone is interested here's the article: https://wornandwound.com/chronography-4-lemania-5100/
It's worth a read.

I hated skeleton watches until I saw this.

>>13668572
wow this is also a readable watch, that is very rare on skeletons imo

nice taste anon

>>13668566
I actually saw that in person last week. It did look rather good. Not sure I'll buy it though. I'm hoping to get the new Seamaster 1948 Ltd Editions.

>>13668596
I've seen it in person twice. It's so nice!

>>13668521
>$998
Not much, it looks way more expensive
8/10

>>13668530
Tourbillons are too gaudy for my taste

>>13668572
It looks good until you realize you can see your skin and hair through the watch with completely ruins its aesthetic imo

I cleaned and assembled the movement, but I can't get it to work yet. Then again this movement has some weird shit going on with it, the 38xx being Seiko's first more mass produced quartz movement.

>>13668572
Whats that fucker doing there?

>>13668627
Not all of them.

>>13668632
Some of the really unusual stuff going on. The rotor is six-pole, instead of the usual two-pole (I've done the Citizen 8620 before, which had an 8-pole rotor), and the stators are (for some reason) adjustable by eccentric posts.

The connecting ribbon for the coil block is also pretty flimsy, but I managed to fix that.

>>13668627
>>13668638
Or this.

>>13668645
one of three pateks I realy like.

>good taste anon

>>13668667
what is the ref number on this?
looks gorgeous

>>13668643
Also this movement doesn't even have a trimmer cap, you need to swap out a tiny capacitor with a different one. I think these caps may have been proprietary Seiko caps, and I have no idea what their values might be, so the one it came with will have to stay in.

Here's the next page: The second wheel has an adjustable indexing finger, which is not that unusual for the time, and the wheel is driven immediately by the rotor, which on the other hand is pretty unusual. I guess this is the advantage of having a six-pole rotor.

Furthermore the rotor has a the-leaf cam for hacking, but since the rotor is six-pole, this means you can only hack the watch the NEXT EVEN. Fucking crazy!

Also the third wheel jewel on the dial side is adjustable by an eccentric, which is fucking nuts, and I suspect it might be the main source of my problems. I'll try running the movement tomorrow with only the rotor and second wheel.

>>13668675
Also the electronic section is really convoluted and not very intuitive, with a bunch of plastic insulating, contact springs, and even a blue wire running under the battery insulator, it's like Seiko was still figuring out just how to lay out the electronics, as they were finalizing the design.

But I really like this movement, I already got another one, and won an auction for a day-date 3803 just recently.

>>13668675
My 4883 hacks to the next ten-second mark with a satisfying click when you pull the crown, very nice. Presumably a similar mechanism?

>>13668667
Blue hands on white dial is the most asthetic combo

>>13668566
That fake patina looks like shit. Or buy vintage or buy new.
If they want to make a reissue that's fine, but make them death stock.
This reminds me of the heavy relic guitars.

>>13668695
I don't know, I've never worked on that before, but I'd bet on that movement the hacking cam is on the second wheel instead of the rotor. Would make more sense IMO.

>>13668572
literally though this was an aliexpress shitter without opening the full image

>>13668708
>this is a brand new watch

>>13668535
What's the name of the lower left one?

>>13668725
It's a vostok amphibian 420

https://meranom.com/en/amphibian-classic/420/vostok-watch-amphibian-classic-420306.html

>>13668709
I see. Thanks for the content, I'm in the market for a 3883 to round out the collection a bit.

>>13668733
Thanks!

>>13668717
>These are new jeans

>>13668750
>3883
holy fuck how have I never seen this?
did they only make a few?

Rate

>>13668725
>>13668733
>>13668754
No it isn't, it's an auto komandirskie

https://meranom.com/en/komandirskie-classic/vostok-watch-komandirskie-921306.html

>>13668757
hot

How does the classic tudor user look?

>>13668768
Not a lot, certainly. The morpho ones sell for pretty high premiums on top of the normal Superior/GFA premium. The market for the lower end vfa models are a mess because of how they used the vfa brand in essentially unremarkable watches.

>>13668768
oh looks like they made 200 a year and it was the most expensive quartz they made at the time

also it fucking pisses me going to watch forums and seeing posts as recently as 1-2 years ago and seeing them talk about how expensive a watch is when it commonly goes for fucking 2-5x that much now
same with cars. I remember when NSXs were 30k, FD rx7s were under 10k and testarossas were under 40k. it's so fucking obvious the price was going to skyrocket but it's not like I had money in HS or college

>>13668812

This makes me want a Rolex more than ever. Tony was the original Chad.

>>13668812
shitskin

>>13668563
so beautiful

USE MY THREAD YOU FUCKING CUNTS

>>13668408
>>13668408
>>13668408

Not sure if this is a good place to ask, but I was looking for some advice.

My dad has always been sort of into watches. He has/had Cartier, Breitling, Omega and some other stuff I don't even know. He's getting old now and I'd have to decide what to get him for his next anniversary birthday which is 80 in a few years.

I have this reoccurring idea of getting him something like pic related. (I'm not into watches at all, but I guess this is the standard watch that everyone wants or whatever) The thing is just that I'm a failure and don't earn much money. I could afford it, but it would tear a huge hole in my life. The other thing is that (and please don't hate me for it) I find this obsession with materialism absolutely ridiculous. To me personally, it's just a worthless piece of metal with an ancient purpose. Any phone or any 10€ plastic crap watch is more accurate than a Rolex. I think my dad is just from a generation which really projected through these things and I would not know anything else to get him.

Part of me rejects this stupid, irrational idea, but on the other hand, maybe this is his last round birthday before he dies and maybe I will look back at it and regret not giving it to him for the rest of my life. Also I could never sell it after his death, because it would remind me too much of him, so 'you can get some money back' is not an option.

I feel very conflicted about this and it has been bothering me for a long time to be so thoughtful about this conflict of materialism vs idealism.

What advice could you give me?

>>13668901
My advice is to get better at trolling, or for everyones sake stop posting completely.

>>13668901
A Rolex Sub is pretty unoffensive and he's very unlikely to dislike it if he's actually into watches, interest in them is typically a range from "meh" to "oh my fuck it's the best watch ever". It's a safe pick if you don't know what you're doing. Just don't get the no date version though as it's fucking gay. Also, in case you don't know, there's typically a wait list for steel Rolexes. Depending on how soon his birthday is it might not even be an option unless you want to pay 25% over list, but this depends where you live. If you decide on one you need to go to a couple of ADs in person (phoning is a waste of time) and offer to put a deposit down on one (they won't take it but it shows you're interested).

Maybe anons could give you a better idea if you had a pic of his collection, saying brand names doesn't really mean much as it's not just like brands make one type of watch.

Ayyye

>>13668919
What's wrong? I'm being serious dude. I did say that I'm poor, didn't I? For me this is a huge investment. I never bought something this expensive in my life.

>>13668921
He has some Submariner 'omage' that I've seen. So he's definitely not put off by the general style of the watch.
>Just don't get the no date version
The date version much more expensive + I've heard that the additional complexion makes it more susceptible to faults over time etc. Also I personally think it looks cleaner this way. I don't like the small dome on the front.

>>13668901
are you really coming on here and bitching at the same time about wanting to buy an $8000 wristwatch and hating materialism

are you fucking stupid

I plan to buy a orient bambino

How good is it?

>>13668940
>Water Resist
what did they mean by this?

>>13668928
>The date version much more expensive
It's like 10% more if that.

>I've heard that the additional complexion makes it more susceptible to faults over time etc.
Nigga it's another fucking gear just like the hour and minute hands only it's on a ratchet set to flip over at 12 o'clock, it's the least complicated complication there is. The 3135 movement has been in use since the 80s, Rolexes don't sell as well as they do because they are unreliable.

>Also I personally think it looks cleaner this way
I don't care what you think.

>>13668940
S'gud
Check out the orient star classic too while you're at it

>>13668928
>For me this is a huge investment. I never bought something this expensive in my life.
no parent on earth would want his child to buy him a nearly ten fuckign thousand dollar wristwatch if it was the most expensive thing the kid had ever bought, a watch that expensive is a preposterous luxury no matter how much money you have, what are you even talking about

the only way you should be buying your father a watch that expensive is you inherited a billion dollars from his father (your grandfather) and you both give zero fucks about any amount of money

>>13668928
This is bait stop responding for fucks sake it's like baby's first day on 4chan

>>13668928
> What's wrong?
Because you write exactly like the shitposters here and make the same statements.

> any 10€ plastic crap watch is more accurate than a Rolex
> worthless piece of metal
> his next anniversary birthday which is 80
You also sound like a teenager which makes that statement very odd.

how i buy submariner?

how do i tell time on analog watch?

how do i find casio watch online

how do i recharge rolex?

guys has anyone seen my tudor i cant find it

How can I use solar watch at night?

>>13668988
it has a lume so it self charges

>>13668962
I see. Maybe because English isn't my first language. Anyway, I'll piss off then.

generic af here

>>13668974
Just give it the old Seiko shuffle

>>13668636
click spring for the pivoting reversers.

That's why I buy reps

>>13668838

>>13668451
about time someone posted a proper watch. It's regularly become a Seiko / Casio board

>>13669334
It's one obsessed guy who premakes the thread then mashes f5 until the old one hits 295 posts the clicks create

>>13668776
awful...and does your wrist have aids?

You may not like it
But this is what peak slavshit looks like

>>13669430
Love it.

>>13669437
Wow that might be the first power reserve indicator that doesn't make me immediately say no to the watch. Still not very aesthetic but it's not as bad as most.

>>13668572

I doubt you could afford that watch though. ofc you're going to like the creme de la creme

>>13669556
They're not great. A lot of them are unserviceable, 0/1-jewel, riveted movements.

>>13669568
The M31(what you have there) is very serviceable. It's not pretty, I'll give you that.

Why is the drop noise on my movement so noisy?

Thoughts on Sternglas watches?

Newest arrival. Only smooth-sweep haq watch movement I'm history as far as I know.

>>13669636
post the face right now

>>13669639
Okay. The majesta line from the late 80s/early 90s evilved into the credor line. This one has applied minute markers like the older superiors and a textured dial.

>>13669636
>quartz

Wow dude that's really nice, what a piece, wear it in good health my dude.

>>13669649
That looks very fine anon, great cop imho.
Post a webm of the seconds hand sweep when you have time.

>applied sub second indices

>>13669665

>>13669692
>*big yawn*

>>13669692
Doesn't look applied.

>>13669695
Nice
How much was it?

>>13669710
about 400USD. Not a great price but was a much nicer case reference than most 5S42 pieces out there. It also came with a Majesta signed buckle. I might replace the crystal with a non-cyclops one but I'll try it out for now.

>>13669695
Which seiko watch is this?

>new orient shitter just arrived
Will post later

>>13669695
>>13669719
The pulsometer one, I mean.

>>13669722
A 5S21-7A10. The non-HAQ version of the smooth-sweep 4Hz movement. It uses a hairspring and a vial of viscous liquid to damp the 4Hz stepper to get a true smooth sweep.

>>13669720
Don't call timepieces shitters

>>13669727
>5S21-7A10
Is it easy to find on the market or what?

>>13669733
No.

>>13669733
It's probably impossible. I got mine over three years ago and have kept an eye on the 5S21 market, haven't seen another one since. This one however is findable; another anon just got one recently. 5S21-8A19

>>13668893
noh

>>13669732
It's a meme you dip!

>>13669743
you, your mother and your watch collection are memes

>>13669746
Delete

Thoughts on Gemius Army watches?

>>13669755
Looks like a fucking shitter.

>>13669771
Rude

best watch

What's with all the poorfag watches ITT? If you don't have the cash then don't bother bros, you
honestly have nothing interesting for us to look at

>>13668535
horrific

>>13669755
>fake sub dials
Eat shit cunt

>>13669788
way better than your collection

>>13669787
>you honestly have nothing interesting for us to look at
We are not posting for you cunt, just sit down and be quiet

>>13669281
Thanks bro

>>13669636
>>13668460

That quartz got a sweping second hand.
Also are there any quartz watches, that are non hacking? Pulling out the crown disconnects the battery so it stops moving instant.

>>13669872
Swatch watches are non hacking, or mine is at least. Pic related.

>>13669733
>>13669736

I got lucky and got the 5s21-8a19 and fell in love with the second hand sweep.

Here is a short clip I uploaded.
Sty I am bad on this so it's onlx on yt

https://youtu.be/v55du4i0yMU

>>13669877
I didn't know that. They got some sort of powerreserve?

>>13669889
>They got some sort of powerreserve?
Yeah, you can test it by taking out the battery and testing the voltage you dumbass

I might make a little review of my SBPG001 as there are none on YouTube. There’s also none on eBay...
How many of these were made??

>>13669892
Thats not what I meant, but I got it anyways. I thought you'd disconnect the battery but it would keep running.

Anyways thanks

>>13669934
Sorry my response was rude, but what's the point of having a power reserve indicator in a normal quartz watch? The battery lasts for 3 years, no point making a indicator for that.

Oh, and the reason for the swatch having non hacking seconds hand is just that the swiss were lazy designing that and swatches are pieces of shit.

>>13668451
Not exactly a 5100, but a cal. 5012 is close enough. And I like it a bit more for the cleaner look.

What do you guys thing of Bark and Jack YouTube channel?
I think it’s quite comfy

>>13669970
Looking good anon, would appreciate a more clearer pic though

>>13669952
nice

I've had two old broads come in with an analog Casio they bought in our store. Their complaints:
>it's running slow by many days
The watch was exactly on time, they didn't know that they have to adjust the date after every 30 day month.
>the watch changes date at noon instead of midnight
>mfw

>>13670001
easy fix, just take the watches to the back and spend some time there and charge them 20 bucks for it kek

>>13668521
Its a shame celadon doesnt make them in 34mm :^)

>>13670015
Nah, I just wanted them to fuck off as soon as possible so I can get back to the real work.

>>13670001
My god people are fucking stupid.

I have a problem with affordable homage watches.
I've spent days thinking if they're legit or not, frequently changing opinion from "they democratize good designs and are the best bang for the buck" to "they're just blatant knockoffs with no inherent quality"
What do you think /wt/?

>>13670001
Kill em all. Kilm em all with fire anon.

>>13669946

No offence taken.
I askes so poorly, I deserved that.

But thats also not what I understood, I thought there was also some mainspring built into the watch, that gets feed by the battery and takes over when disconnected from said battery.

Still dumb, I know.

>>13670066
Homages are fine. Nothing with wrong with liking a design but not being able to afford the real thing. That applies to every popular luxury item, not just watches.

Fakes are cancer.

>>13670001
People are so dumb

>>13670078
What? No it just engages the mechanism to allow the crown to move the hands, but without disengaging the seconds hand.
Why would it have a separate mechanical movement to keep the seconds hand going??

>>13668812
I find this accurate.

*sips*

Vostoks were good watches.

>>13670132
Is that radium on the dial?
https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/new-report-shows-radium-dials-might-pose-serious-danger

>>13670133
No, slavs never really used radioactive watch lume. However this one is also relumed with proper luminova, I just stained the paint with coffee to give it an aged look.

>>13670132

>>13670133
I don’t know but I just got cancer from looking at this post.

>>13670136
Man, that poljot looks pretty good

>>13670132
Did you forget to screw on the cap or something before going for a swim?

>>13670167
I found it on a fleamarket like this. There is no water damage though, so I have no idea what caused it.

Soviet no-date 2409 Amphibia dials are impossible to find, so it stayed.

>>13670167
Also ask me how I know you're /fa/.

IM GONNA JUMP

>>13670173
How did you know?

>>13670171
Nice get friend

>>13670198
Because a gentooman would have appreciated the unique patina of this high-class Soviet nautical timepiece.

Its 9/11
Post your casios

>>13669912
I have no idea, I've never even managed to ascertain when they started and stopped making them.

>>13670213

>>13670242
>Buying the same watch seven (7) times
Was it autism?

>>13670242
Does that Casio on the top left work? Is it steel?
Love your G Shock too.

WAY/WT/?

>>13670293
Right now, old faithful.

>>13670213
Casio part of the holy trinity.

>>13670276
It does work, it just needs a new battery. It is indeed a steel case.
>>13670255
7 times? Also probably more OCD than autism.

>>13670293

>>13670322
Nice; how's it running for you these days?

>>13670337
+1 s/d

Good morning wt

>>13670293
>>13669636
>>13669649
>>13669695

Anyone know why my Lord Quartz would stop every so often and start again when I shake it gently? I’ve already changed the battery and made sure the battery contacts are making good connections.
Pls halp. I love this thing.

>>13670359
Morning office guy!

>>13670360
Further to this it seems to stop several hours after I put it down and very occasionally on my wrist.
It doesn’t seem to be caused by movement. Could be a dud battery?

>>13670360
just bin that shitter you shit head

>>13670367
Eat a dick you vapid cunt.

>>13670370
kys

>>13670367
get cancer

This came about an hour ago, any guesses?

>>13670395
a shitter?

>>13670405
depends on your definition of a shitter, a clue: it's between $100 and $5000

>>13670395
> Posting a full FedEx barcode
Uhh

>>13670360
Unfortunately quartz watches don't last forever even if you change the battery

>>13670407
Vostok

>>13670408
whoops, cheers old chum!
>>13670411
nope!

>>13670418
Bad box, but please go on!

>>13670418
BB58?!

>>13670427
ta-da! been putting away a couple hundred a month for over a year for this tooltastic little titanium tank

>>13670434
Off with plastic immediately!

>>13670432
man I was really torn for a while between the super contemporary tooly pelagos and the softer more charming black bay, but the pelagos kept drawing me back in, it's much more 'me' with its monochromatic utilitarian aesthetic. I would love to also own the black bay but I think in the coming years i'll be looking at the seiko presage (picking it up in japan this december), the sinn 104 as a daily driver and then something obvious like a speedmaster to finalize the collection.

Morning wt
How's it going?

>>13670444
>>13670434
Falling for tudorfag memes lmao

>>13670359
That Majesta is a nice find. Best looking 5Sxx model I've seen, I think.

>>13670418
>>13670434
>>13670444
Cringe and bluepilled (not based)

>>13670444
If you don't wear it on your actual wrist, then I will crush it in the ground. PUT IT FURTHER BACK ON YOUR WRIST NOW, OR ELSE.

>>13670469
you want me to wear it directly on my knobbly wrist bone rather than the natural indentation where hand meets arm?

>>13670444
Excellent choice

>>13670444
If they made the Pelagos in 40mm I’d be tempted.
Nice watch man.

>>13670480
Wear it here, like this.

>>13670444

>>13670465
Thanks. It's a little gaudy for me - in particular the gold-colored dial - but it's not too bad. I prefer my 5s21 pulsometer but I certainly like the 5s42, and I'm interested to see the timing performance - it was rated 20spy.

>>13670481
nice! how do you find adjusting the crown ion that side? ive seen arguments against the LHD for this reason but i personally take the watch off to change the time/date and i'm guessing you do too.
>>13670483
thanks dude! it actually wears a little smaller than I expected, but i do have 7.5" wrists

>>13668627
What's a tourbillion?

>>13670489
>>13670487
Ahh I see! yeah that does look a lot better, though maybe the seiko one is a little too much

>>13670504
It’s like a McFlurry

>>13670505
It actually isn't.

>>13669041
>seamaster
>drives an audi instead of being at the sea

>>13670505
enjoy your new watch bro!
Also don't listen to us, wear your watch the way you enjoy it!
But don't break your wrist tho

>>13670511
He should listen to us about this. It's utterly ridiculous to wear it on your hand.

What's wrong with a Tudor watch? I have only seen you people give a negative reaction to it.

What's a leather strap color better suited to a dark brown skin? brown or black

>>13670519
Nothing is wrong with it. They are quite decent watches.

Just found out that I have a battery for this, damn it was weird to set.

>>13670534
Backlight is good.
Sorry for shitty pic

>>13670534
Pretty decent for 2 € kek

>>13670524
Black, or navy blue.

>>13670504
It's a Swedish Overwatch character.

>>13668596
I'm in the same exact boat as you. Do you know if the 1948's will be available to actually buy in stores, or if you had to preorder? No one at any store I've been to had an answer :\

>>13668566
I love this but it's a shame it's not 38mm.

>>13670691
Okay. So?

>>13670189
do a flip

>>13670468
based post

>>13670564
Thanks buddy.

Should I buy pic related or I should better save for a Meister?

>>13670680
I never pre-order. I have to see in person before I'll buy any watch. I was told about 5 months ago they expected them to be released some time in September. That's the last time I've had any update.

I'm such a knob. I took a watch to get reszed because the screws were too small for my smallest screwdriver and paid £10. Now I realise they were split pins.
I want my tenner back.

Post your quartz grail watches

>>13670917
Ew.

>>13670917
> quartz
> grail watch
pick one

>>13670917

>>13668535

>>13670923
>>13670928
lmao faggots

>>13670917
One day I will find a properly working one for a decent price

>>13670917
Haven't pulled the trigger because i'm scared I will end up hating it.

>>13670917
Credor minute repeater
Citizen crystron mega cal 8650
Casio 4mhz LCD
Working Seiko 35SQ
Asulab hpm

>>13670929
Did you spill some juice under the bezel?

>>13670917
The mountain-jew holocaust machine.

>>13670965
Fuck yeah

>>13670959
>>13670965
Good luck finding any of these ever. I like to think of my grails attainable so that they just don't end up being a dream.

w2c affordable 22mm bund straps?

>>13670971
It's called Grail for a reason. I'm not just going to list stuff I can find by lurking eBay for six months

>>13670981
I get you anon, but a working original quartz astron.. you will never see that anywhere ever and that's a fact.

>>13670971
>>13670981
Seiko should just say fuck it, and start making a remake of the 35SQ, like they did with the Turtle and Giugiaro models. Only as a quartz Grand Seiko of course, not as a fucking 7Nxx shitter.

Left or right?

>>13670917
Just got mine.
Next is maybe a 80s Tag Chrono. Something silver as fuck.

>>13671014
kys

>>13670917

>>13671024
Congrats anon, one of the best digital watches ever made, if not the best.
How thick is it?

>>13670960
nah its just dirty

>>13671026
love you too bro

Who here extremely autistic about watches?

>has to be mechanical
>has to have a seconds hand
>if arabic numerals, has to be on a bracelet
>if roman numerals, has to be on leather strap

>digital watches

...why? Why not just look at your phone? Why would you do this? Why would you miss out on the beauty of a sweeping hand crafted automatic movement? I dont understand...

>>13671044
>I dont understand
they are poor

>>13671044
They'll tell you something about digital watches being relevant too or something like that, but they're just poor really.

>>13671049
>>13671050
>preference is poverty

>>13671044
sometimes you need a watch that you dont mind fucking up. i wouldnt want to take one of my nice watches kayaking, for example

>>13671062
Agreed but I also wouldn't post it to a watch thread as a desirable item.

>>13671044
>Why not just look at your phone?

>>13671044
Why look at your phone when you can have a horologically significant timepiece on your wrist?

>>13671078
The choice of a non-enthusiast.

>>13671079
Incorrect

>>13671079
still no bad choice like shitting on anonymous people on the internet for having a different taste.

>>13668460
Looks expensive

>>13671088
>Looks expensive
It's not too bad

>>13671087
pretty much this
people itt need to learn how to ignore stuff they don't like instead of trying to force their indoctrination on everyone

>>13671089
More than a spring drive?

>>13671094
>More than a spring drive?
depends on which one

>>13671095
A good one anon

>>13671101
>A good one anon
not more than the ones that cost the most

>>13671102
The space one is 50 K

>>13671104
>The space one is 50 K
that's too much

>>13671095
No it doesn't. 5s21 watches typically sell for under 300usd at most.

>>13671105
It’s not too much of you’re Elon musk and you’re going to Mars with your million dollar girlfriend Grimes

>>13668451
NEW THREAD ^__^
>>13671108
>>13671108
>>13671108

>>13671108
>>13671108
>>13671108

>>13671107
>It’s not too much of you’re Elon musk and you’re going to Mars with your million dollar girlfriend Grimes
That's a good point, watches are more worth it if you are taking art hoes to Mars.

BUT THE BUMP LIMIT REAH


NEW THRAD PLOX AND NOW!!!!

POST VAST BECLOSC THREAD!!!

NEW BREAD

^_^

NO TIMEX

>>13671044
>tfw fell for the digital meme
I'm restoring a vintage one right now.

>>13671110
New Thread

>>13671120
>>13671120
>>13671120

>>13671110
wtf

>>13671034
Seems around 10mm. Doesn't feel thick at all.

>>13671044
>implying digital watches can't be hand crafted mechanicals
lmao @ ur lyfe

>>13671044
today is digital watch appreciation day

>>13671049
>>13671050
How many thousands of dollars does your watch collection need to be worth before you are no longer defined as poor?

>>13671457
infinitethousands

>>13671014
Right with leather straps

>>13671044
Because this board is filled with gotless liberals who hate men.

>>13670189
Give me the subby first

>>13669437
I want a set of those coffee cups.