/fa/ - Fashion

>>13645730
Generally, this is how I see it. Contrast makes for a good fit.

>loose bottoms:short top(doesn't have to be tight)
>big shirt:shorts that fit well/pants that are neither tight nor baggy
>big jackets:big shirts are fine, pants of all types are fine
>fitting jackets(not slim shit): pants of all types are fine(cuff?)
Shoes are up to the wearer and should either go well with a fit or contrast it, not some weird in between.

Here's an example of my theory from some reddit lad.

>>13645958
Thanks so much for that

>>13645958
Gud post, also loose fits look best when incorporating opposing textures

>>13645730
Biggest rule is be asian lol

Is it true that most people have to upsize with Japanese brands?

>>13646494
Yeah, I usually wear M but I buy L from asian stores in order to get the intended size, their concepts of shoulder width is also usually smaller than the normal (non-fat) american

>>13646531
Looks like I'm about the same. Some shirts I like have their Japanese models usually wear a size below mine. I'm usually a medium and even then their measurements don't fit my shoulders.

I've only ever been able to pull it off with sweaters, cardigans, unbuttoned flannel, and non formal jackets. Where do people get pants with super wide legs?

>>13646639
Try Dickies, many workwear and outdoor brands have a wide array of pant fits. Uniqlo U also wont be a bad spot to look.

Where do i buy Japanese brands? And how expensive are we talking?

>>13646400
w2c coat?

This is basicaly my look. Loose everything. I buy shirts xl now and my pants on thrift shops cause its hard to find high rise wide leg pants.

My personal rule is if i wear wide pants, top should be a bit big too or at least not tight. Sometimes it works even if top is not big but thats rare.

For loose shirts i try to tuck them when its too long on me.

>>13646685
Doesn't have to be Japanese
And doesn't have to be expensive
A lot of work wear and outdoor wear have most of what you need and you can even thrift.
Japanese brands are popular for this look because there's a bunch that achieve this look with quality and interesting techniques.

>>13646744
>>13646755
>>13646666
>>13646680
i wnnna marry her and brim her womb with my seed

I need a Anorak like this

>Most loose and relaxed clothes are made for women
>Men are expected to wear fitted and slim clothing :c

Battenwear FW18 when?
Also post more brands for this aesthetics

>>13647389
you just dont know where to look lmao

Do you size up one or two sizes to achieve this look?

>>13647389
>:c
leave

>>13648469
It can't look ill fitted. Of you know the brand then you can make it work.

Should I cop?

Comfy sandal suggestion?

>>13648987
Yeah, great pants.

>>13645730
Layers. Cardigans.

>>13649391
Chaco

Any shoe suggestions for a drapey outfit? I'm expecting my first pair of wide pants to arrive this week, and I've got my bases covered concerning tops. Unfortunately sandals are a no-go as I'd like to wear these outfits to work.

>>13650038
Anything goes.
Personally for sneakers I like New Balances, the texture on their shoes are perfect. Any canvas shoe and depending on your aesthetic you can wear military boots

any tips for places to buy trousers for this kind of style besides dickies? I'm hesitant to buy stuff cause I cant tell if its what I want when its shown laying flat on the picture

>>13651474
Use google

i'm a tall(ish) guy [6'2] and have a relatively solid, athletic (especially by /fa/ standards) [wide shoulders, broad chest, strong back etc.]

should i still be wearing oversized/loose/relaxed fit stuff, or do you guys think it is just simply too much fabric to be wearing on a single person?

i'd like to think i look decent in more fitted clothes, but i'm just way more comfortable in baggy shit

>>13651707
yeah everything just looks bad

>>13651814
Look harder

>>13647043
pretty sure I saw one at old navy the other day that looks just like that