/fa/ - Fashion

Half the image is comments

>>13377210
He's presenting the comments without comment

>>13377202
reddit like it so i hate it

I literally cannot stop farting

Wtf do i do?

the guy is right, that is an ASOS tier fitting suit

>>13377202
That's a nice suit. I'd wear it

>>13377202
>no cuff links
>contrast buttons
>ugly shoes
>ugly colour palette
>no watch
>no pocket square
>no rings
>short trousers are fine if cuffed with nice socks or dress socks
nice try

>>13377202
What is a shirt triangle of death?

>>13377202
Lol, this is some generic store suit worn by a slim and relatively tall guy. It looks ok but this is how all suits look on slim/athletic guys. Are all redditors fat manlets?

>>13377315
He probably means the way his collar looks

I mean the dude is right on the fit bit it's not like terrible. It's a solid suit it's a far cry from "fashion" but who gives a shit about people liking a guy in a basic bitch slightly too small suit? Don't you got better things to bitch about Anon?

>>13377715
>Are all redditors fat manlets?
Most Redditors are American.

>>13377202
I guess the contrast detailing is a little gaudy but it’s not something I’d ever pay attention to irl if this dude was my peer/friend/acquaintance. The fit is fine at least it’s not skin tight like I’ve seen some people wear their suits. That actually looks like shit but this is pretty tasteful and conservative. It looks like relatively substantial material. Honestly the negative commenter is probably just a menswear autist and pays too much attention to shit. This is a perfectly inoffensive suit to those who aren’t fuckin autismos

>>13377715
>it's not fashion if you're attractive

>>13377314
>wearing a watch in 2018

>>13377913
dress watch you big willy head
although I wear a casio f91w when i'm out and about, don't like taking my phone out

>>13377979
>I spend money on a dress watch for no functional reason while also pretending it has great functional reason

>>13377885
They're acting like this suit fits incredible while it just fits normal. I could go into a store and try on any slimfit suit without any additional tailoring and it would fit just as good or better. Also the little pattern is reddit tier and makes you look retarded irl unless you're working for some gay ass marketing company and wear a beard

>>13377981
>on a fashion board
>thinking about '''''functionality''''''
wearing shorts in the snow is dumb
wearing a dress watch to make your suit look better is not

>>13377202
They guy is a speg but he's not wrong, this fit is terrible for all the reasons he stated. That copypasta shitloss is max cringe though.

>>13377315
It's when your trousers are too low/gorge too high so a triangle of shirt shows through under the coat button and above the trousers. The waistband should be at, *just* below, or above the coat button on a properly fitting suit.

>>13377985
Why are you getting mad?

>>13377992
I'm looking at the picture and I still don't really get it

>>13377996
Yeah, it doesn't really show in the pic, I think he's just assuming it based on the fit of the trousers and how low the tie is.

Honestly, though, explaining how a sperglord thinks is beyond me, I just wanted to explain the term.

>>13377995
>u mad bro??
where did that come from big boy

>>13377996
Shirt showing between trousers and button

>>13377981

In certain jobs a watch is a must have.

I can't pull out my phone to check if my meeting is overrunning when I'm with a client. I can glance at my watch.

>>13377777
Checked

>>13377291
go play mj 1 on 1

lol

>>13377220
this

>>13377202
Looks like a kid who has grown out of his clothes but doesn't know or care.

>>13377202
This is the proof that being tall and athletic make any kind of outfit wearable

>>13377202
Looks pretty good actually

>>13378053
What does this mean

>>13379875
lurk more, newfag

>>13379875
get out

This thread is proof that fa is just as divided and clueless as reddit.

>>13379875
you have to go back

>>13377226
change your diet eliminate lactose or an excess of protein first most likely to cause it

>>13377812
>obsessed

>>13377992
Thank you.

>>13377210
>>13377213

>>13377202
I actually saved this to my inspo when I saw it. I don't like the shoes and the fit is iffy, but the colours/textures were worth it.

>>13377985
"aesthetic value is an inherent part of functionality"

Method: Has the piece been constructed optimally, efficiently, ethically, and resourcefully with respect to materials and tools?

Use & Need: Naturally the base use and need is modesty and respect, but going further - does a given piece work for your current disposition? For your status, your values, etc. Do you really need a given piece to fully live up to or meet with your disposition or values? Are the articles of clothing appropriate for all possible actions you may have to take while wearing them?

Telesis: "deliberate, purposeful utilization of the processes of nature and society to obtain particular goals." Is that oversized T-shirt and those high-waisted pleated trousers an honest and accurate reflection of the current time? Or are you just yearning for the good old days? Are you just trying to recapture some functionless out of place aesthetic in order to stand out or be different? If not, what is it about today that genuinely demands a recall to such a style?

Association: What values do you associate with your style - or what values are associated by the marketers to your adopted style? Are you more vulnerable to marketers and trends than you think you are? What words does your style evoke - and again, are they an honest representation of you; elegance, formality, ruggedness, grandiosity, conspicuousness, etc, or are they just an aesthetic - a costume that you harbor no deeper connection with?

Aesthetics: After the above considerations, is there anything that can be done to enhance the beauty that a piece delivers? Can the stance on a blazer be lowered or raised to more flatter the wearer? A baggy T-shirt obviously doesn't flatter the physique like a well-fitting suit does, but is there another positive unpretentious, possibly artistic component that it offers? Identify this component, honestly - truly.

>>13383018
tl;dr
i'm right
if you're wearing a suit then accessorise as it can't hurt unless you have awful taste, in which case you look like shit regardlesss

>>13377202
he's not wrong, I bet that suit jacket looks like shit in anything besides this specific pose