/fa/ - Fashion

aviators, but get American Optical. Ray-Bans are luxottica shit.

>>13297282
I guess it's a battle somewhere in buckfuck Arizona.

>>13297466
Fuck that, I'm going with H&M

>>13297282
Aviators

>>13297282
>The virgin Wayfarers
>The chad Aviators

Aviators if you're actually attractive unlike the guy in OP.

I've always felt that aviators make people look like sad dogs for some reason. Almost no one can pull them off, yet everyone tries. Ray Bans are a classic for good reason.

where my clubmaster niggas @

>>13298597
In 2012 where they belong

>>13297282
both incredibly basic plebby sunglasses. bait?

>>13298597
Here nigga
Lol at these aviators virgins they can't even pull off

>>13297466
I so would, but the nose bridge on the big pilots is like 20mm and 14/15mm is what fits my face

I swear to god those pilots were made for Uma Thurman

>>13297474
No. In Arizona it's a debate between wraparound subglasses or drugstore sunglasses.

t. arizonan

>>13297282
It depends on your face and style holmes

>>13297282
Persol 649s are better than both.

If you're a highway patrol man: aviators.

If you're a male stripper who jumped out of a cake dressed as a highway patrol man: aviators.

If you're anything else, including an actual pilot: anything else.

>>13297282
Fps Russia here and today we're shooting something very special

>poorfags shitting on RayBans
every thread has them

>>13300355
thats like saying people hate on bose because they are poor. associating rayban sunglasses with quality or wealth is for people who do the same with LV monogram bags and burberry tartan scarves. ie plebs, pseuds, and ignoramuses

while better than your $5 drug store pair they are mediocre, along with the dozen other designer brands luxottica produces.

if you look into other names like lewis fredericks or mykita you'll discover makers who have new frame designs made of materials like actual horn or titanium.

i like to wear mine on my head if i go indoors, and the aviator nose pads get caught in my hair. wayfarers are the only option.

>>13297466
why are you americans so salty at luxottica
they're still better than 99% of your corporations

>>13297486
Don't they're massive I made that mistake

>buying low quality sunglasses
enjoy your eye damage

If you're ugly then stick with wayfarers, aviators otherwise.

>>13300355
He's not wrong though. I like Wayfarers, but they're not exactly expensive or amazing quality. Mediocre glasses at an average price.

>>13300575
You aren't supposed to stare at the sun, idiot

>>13298573
I agree, but I don't know if they are exactly Aviators, nor do I know the brand, but those kind of 'smaller aviators' like in pic are much easier to pull off and looks better on most people as opposed to the big-ass classic aviators

>>13297282
is this (You)?
glasses on the left>>>>
glasses on the right does not suit your face

>>13300717
That looks better (not good, but better) but I feel like they look like aviators for a baby just because people are used to seeing the big ones
I own pic related which I feel is a nice compromise

>>13300799
Those look like something you'd find at an old ladies yard sale.

>>13300852
You are telling like that is a bad thing

>>13300852
Yeah I feel like it's a good balance of modern and retro

>>13300355
>thinking RayBans are expensive

>>13300852
i want to buy them now

Does anyone have prescription lenses?

>>13300355
I just checked the price for Ray Ban aviators online was around 80 €. How is that expensive? That's in the first price bracket of decent sunglasses.

>>13302194
We're talking about something most people either break or lose within a year.

>>13302194
>80€
Where?

>>13297282
what about clubmaster's anon's I like the style and im thinking about picking up some warby parkers