/fa/ - Fashion

Bamp for boots

>>13252726
Red Wing Heritage is the be all end all of boots and I was not paid to say this

>>13252726
There is literally nothing quite like viberg. If it's not in your budget then get their silhouette out of your heard. Try wolverine 1000 miles, chippewa Aldrich boots, or various other entry level heritage brands.

>>13253055
To be honest, Thursday boots look really similar, but the quality is terrible.

Thursday Boot Co

>>13252726
There's really not much, that's why they're so expensive. You can try Sagara, and indoesian maker, but sizing can be a pain. If you can somehow get them, the Red Wing flatboxes are similar in silhouette, with an unstructured toebox

As for thursday, I would skip them unless they're under 200. They're a low quality boot

Anyone have any experience with Paraboot?

>>13253084
Pure trash. And yet they have 20,000 five star reviews.
Never seen a brand shilled this much before

>>13253055
>>13253087
Does anyone actually own some Vibergs who could tell me about them?
I have 1000 dollars of disposable money to spend on boots if I wanted. Obviously I won't spend that much but if Vibergs are really worth it I'd give it a thought. The most I've spent on boots before is 350 for Red Wings and I have no issues at all. I just want that damn sexy shape of the Vibergs.

Opinions?

>>13252726
Help me develop out of my fetish and obsession for tall, shiny boots like pic related. I know Corcorans are better quality than any corrected grain-leather skinhead/punk-boot, but they just look so much better to my eye when straight-laced mmmmmmmm

>>13253157
Look good and from what I hear are very comfortable. Since they are danners though, they weigh a bunch and cost a bunch.

>>13253121
Been wondering the same. I think there was like one guy who had em here somewhere and thats about it. Wanna know if anyone owns Chambord or even any other silhouette

what to wear with these? (Doc Martens 1460 Gaucho Crazy Horse)

>>13253157
I find that mesh patch really unattractive

Any Australians have any experience with the quality of Windsor Smith boots? Durability, comfort in the long run, etc.
Also general opinions on this boot are welcome I suppose, I quite like them.

are these /fa/

>>13253551
popular with women ive met so i guess they are fine fashion wise

cop?

>>13252884
Love my Iron Rangers to death, I wear them most days of the week and they just get better and better.
I have some Blacksmiths which are unwearable due to the toes on the right boot being too tight and hurting my foot. Everyone said just wait and they'll stretch out, and they never did even after months of torture wearing them hoping they would, so that pair is unwearable, which is too bad because I like their color.

I'm just looking for different shapes and styles now, as the bump toes on the RWs are pretty hit or miss. They're fine if you have small feet, which I do, but on bigger feet they look like clown shoes.

>>13253679
I like them, looks very clean and classy.
I just like to wear my boots for daily activities, so keeping a super nice looking pair like that isn't my cup of tea.

>>13253551
Pretty crap imo, we really do get the short end when it comes to boots. If you’re willing to save up though RM williams are excellent upgrade or pick one of the dozens of online options (e.g meermin shoes, the last conspiracy, etc)

Otherwise I would just go for clarkes or something like that. Cemented shoes like windsor smith and aquila can be comfy and hold up for about +- 2-3 years before breaking down and needing to be replaced, and leather options tend to be poor.

Goodyear, Blake, Stitchdown or other?

What's the best construction and why?

what would you guys wear w/ wolverine 1000 boots?

Best alternative to SLP Wyatts in terms of looks? I can't afford £800 on a pair of boots

>>13253789
Good point, thanks

>>13253802
Goodyear and stitchdown for durability and waterproof

Blake for lighter, for more flexible boot

>>13253832
I wouldn't because of terrible quality control and a shit leather sole

>>13253841
Story Et Fall

>>13253796
RM Williams are pretty good, pretty unique with the single peace construction

I have a pair, pic related

Carlos Santos make good boots too

>>13253841
This please. God I JUST WANT SOME WESTERN STYLE BOOTS THAT WILL FIT WITH SKINNY JEANS THAT DON'T COST 600$+ REEEE

>>13253084
They are heavy as hell. It's like walking around in anti gravity boots

>>13254812
How is sizing, compare to other brands?

Goddamn, I want a pair of Dayton service boots so bad. They look better than Viberg's service boots in my opinion and they're not as expensive

Anyone here ever owned a pair of Dayton before? How are they?

femanon here
what are some nice minimalistic boots kinda like these >>13253487 that come in black and wont make my feet look massive or feel clunky?

>>13256301
Literally just get those same boots. They come in an all black option that looks really clean and simple.

>>13256301
Clark's Mali desert boots might be a good option to consider, too. Even less clunky.

>>13256218
They're in UK sizing, so typically size down 1 from your usual US sizing.

However, I would recommend trying them in in person, since the you have to get the fit spot on with a chelsea, since you can't tighten or loosen with laces

>>13256278
Daytons are certainly chunkier than vibergs, but the construction is on par

>>13256761
I'm fine with them being chunkier. I've own Red Wings, so I'm used to it.
They just have that flatter, minimal look that Viberg has without the Viberg pricetag.

>>13256767
Yeah, they're pretty neat, they let you pick the leather, and will even ship in custom leathers (for an upcharge, of course)

Anyone have any good recommendations for a chukka or monkey boot? The sky is the limit on price I suppose (Viberg is fine) but I am looking for something not in suede, but in a leather is is a flexible color or style for either jeans or chinos.

>>13257069
Alden makes a really good unlined chukka, great for summer, for a dressier style

>>13252726
what are some good alternatives to these?
i dont want to buy a used piece of shit

>>13257293
Clarks desert mali has the same crepe soles and similar profile

>>13253796
>RM williams

Fuck, why'd you have to make me aware of this brand's existence as an American poorfag

>Buy two pairs of boots
>Both look like Sora shoes on me

Is it because I'm wearing skinny jeans?

>>13257697
The sad thing is that you used to be able to get them for around 350, but now they're 500+ after they got acquired

>>13257293
clarks desert mali, same crepe sole, similar silhouette

I'm somewhat new to this board, anyone able to recommend some boots to fit a 5'10'' lean guy?

Nothing over $500usd, no docs, no chelsea boots please

>>13258171
could look at the DM slip on boots

>>13253121
A little bit here and there. I haven't worn any vintage paraboots, but I have worn Corcoran and the Rocky jump boots.

They are very distinct in their fit, and if the manufacturer doesn't nail the make, then the boot will feel like complete shit. Overall though, they do supply quite a bit of support and are relatively comfortable for extended periods of time on the feet. Plus they look good with anything and are simple to maintain...

I'd recommend the Rocky Paraboot first. At all costs, stay away from the Bates Paraboot. Their leather and outsole is complete shit.

>>13256301
Solovair's tend to do the trick. They are very similar to Doc's.

>>13258112
That's what the op picture was

>>13258171
you could get viberg used at that pricepoint

Chelsea boots look hideous and are automatically associated with homosexuals.
Discuss

>13259623
>this much projection

>>13259623
More with fuccbois

>>13259693
Fuccbois are straights masquerading as gays because women like gays because they feel no pressure around them.

>>13253144

You can get better than Viberg. Viberg's silhouette is cuck as fuck.

What are some decent looking hiking boots? Something you don't mind getting muddy and can walk 10+ miles in comfortably. 99% of shoes in this category look like they were made to be deliberately ugly. Are Danners the only option? Any European alternatives?

>>13259765
What are some brands to check out then?

>>13259765
thursday boot shill pls go

>>13259984
Dayton is alright too, same with Truman (though they're going downhill fast. Grant Stone, relatively new company, provides Alden styling without alden prices

>>13259916
I like Paraboot.

>>13259984

Cheaney and O'Keeffe have interesting boots that are exceptional quality.

>>13260243
absolutely delectable but I'd feel bad fucking them up. they look too nice, if you know what I mean.

>>13260178
Grantstone does leather soles which I hate on all the colorways I like

>>13260491
Just put a topy

Cuff or no cuff. I normally don’t.

>>13260595

>>13260595
cuff, and make it an inch higher

the footwear of my people

>>13260595
>>13260597
Cuffed

Got these 1984 vintage ro-search jump(?) boots for 40 bucks.

Good cop?

Do you guys wear boots on a regular basis? How do you match them with regular clothes

>>13260864
Yep, most days. I'm a grown ass 27 year old. Wearing Vans and stuff like that and t shirts looks pathetic and childish especially joggers and other juvenile trash. If you're an adult then dress like one.
I have a pair of brown boots and a pair of black ones. That's all you need for 99% of outfits.

>>13260864
All I wear is boots.

Luckily I am a pretty simple guy and have simple taste when it comes to clothes, but it's functional and looks appropriate for anytime wear. Normally I just wear jeans that I cuff and t-shirts, hoodies, long sleeves, or button ups.

HOW DO I FIX THIS HEEEELP

>>13260864
yea. agree with >>13260873 though I am 21, and I dress like >>13260921 pretty much. Have a brown and a black leather boots and one grey suede chelsea which although I'm not a fan of, I wear it. Three options is more than enough. Main reasons for only wearing boots
>most sneakers fucks up my toes, even if it fits "properly", whereas the vast majority of boots I had gave me no problem
>have always enjoyed military/war apparatus
>they are (or can be) cheap, they (should) last forever, and they are functional. No fear of rains or unknown terrain

Looking for low profile black derby boots. Don't want to spend too much more than $200. What's available to me?

before n after

>>13261106
Looks good.

What products did you use and what's your process like?

cop or not?

Should I?

>>13261127
i just use pic related and every once in a while a little coconut oil if they're looking particularly dry.

I take the laces out brush them down, rub some conditioner into them(a little bit at a time so too much isn't put on), then use an old shirt and the kiwi polish on the toes. do this process every few weeks or so .

>>13261251
im dumb

>>13260864
Yes, just wear them with chinos and jeans

>>13260976
The loose grain? You can't

>>13261106
>shining iron rangers

>>13253784
>>13252884
>>13252726
Are they really as good as /fa/ makes them out to be? I think they look terrific, but the price is high compared to other brands here in NZ and I'd need to import them. Am I right to consider them my endgoal for daily boots?

>>13261280
I own the 8111s in Amber harness and they're my daily boots. I love them. Best boots I own. They're like a good pair of jeans, they just get better and better the more you wear them and nothing looks better than a worn out pair of Rangers.
The only reason I'm in the market for some new boots is I want some in black without a bump toe, to mix up my outfits.

>>13261184
Definitely. At least they are not Doc's.

https://www.meermin.es/in_en/10152710190000he-19-101527-black-calf-e-negro.html
meermin any good?

>>13261280
I own that same pair for 4 years now. 1 resole and it's still going quite strong

>>13261334
Excellent value to dollar, but be weary of sizing, though they do have a physical store in jew york now

>>13261309
>>13261389
Thanks for the responses. Do they typically run small, or anything like that? Anything I should know before buying a pair?

>>13261404
I have baby feet. I wear an 8.5 in Vans and I size down to an 8 in my Red Wings. I own the Blacksmiths too and wear an 8 as well.
Half size down seems to be the norm

>>13260666
>them trips
Y-your people??

>>13260666
>not even nokia

>>13261227
no

>>13261404
Try them on in store. That's number 1 priority

>>13261227

If you work construction.

>>13261413
newfunland, fren

>>13257293
What are those?

>>13253144
Yeah, I've got some Viberg Service Boots and Derby Shoes. The fit on my feet sealed the deal for me. They feel really solid and reliable but at the same time flex with my foot. They don't feel like a big clunky boot. If the fit, style and leather options don't grab you then go for what does. The leather on my Derby shoes is really beautiful. I just fucking love them. They've got worn-in character but still look sophisticated and refined, that's kind of the Viberg thing.
>>13261106
>>13261251
>>13261253
>>13261274
What leather are RW using on these now? Wax on some of these leathers is not recommended. Well, I should say really fatty leathers shouldn't have wax on them. If they're ok for wax a dull matte or beeswax could look amazing?
>>13261457
>Try them on in store. That's number 1 priority
This is the best advice. Try a bunch of boots on and walk around in them in store. Get a pair of boots that fit just right and you'll get more value out of wearing them for years, no matter what the initial price tag.

>>13261334
Anything similar in this price range that I can get from America?

bump

>>13262273
It's still the oil tanned leather from the tannery they own

Should I cop?

Posting recent cops
>>13260666
How do those fit your feet?

The angle is fucked i dont care.

>>13260595
id on boots?

>>13263093
Crockett and Jones Islay

>>13263231
Nice boots

>>13263039
>>13263036
>>13263033
Fucking gnarly/10

>>13252726
What do you guys think of Dr.Marten 1460's?

I don't really have any casual boots and I'm liking the look of these in the shades of brown they come in.

>>13263039
id?

>>13263300
I really like that, if they had one without yellow stitching id cop.

>>13252726
Anyone know what top/jacket goes with Chelsea boots?

>>13263433
Jean jacket

>>13262273
>>13262965
>It's still the oil tanned leather from the tannery they own
Since the mid-80s SB was bought by RW and they produce a tremendous amount of "oil tanned" leather which is really really great quality. Red Wing recommend a variety of their own products for care of their leather which contain waxes and silicone. You can freely use any waxes including beeswax on RW boots. That is a huge plus for many people.

I've got some Truman Boots with Horsehide Pull-Up leather that is oil infused. When people talk about oil in leather production that is usually what they are referring to. It is a completely different process than what RW/SB do. That is one of the main reasons some boots are 2 or 3 times more expensive. Is it worth it? Does it matter? The only reason I bought those boots is that I knew that is specifically what I want. It is the same way with any premium product that is really specific. It could actually be worse for your general needs.

Shell Cordovan is expensive but some people absolutely hate it. If you don't know what Cordovan is then don't worry about it. The thing is though that many shoe companies kind of pretend that their Cordovan colour is also Cordovan leather.

All of this stuff is great in its own way. It is all out there to be enjoyed. I just bought a pair of completely beat up Chippewa boots from the 50s. With a little care they'll be awesome!

>>13263433
>Anyone know what top goes with Chelsea boots?
Bruce

anyone know where i could get something like this/ has something that looks similar?

cheers fellas.

>>13263433
Top is usually a bigger, stronger guy. But lots of gaylords like the smaller one on top so you can decide.
Gays wear really flamboyant clothes a lot so get creative

>>13263563
Tell me more about your Trumans. I'm torn between a pair of them or some Daytons.
How does their sizing go compared to RW? I'm an 8.5 in regular shoes and wear 8 with all my RW boots.
I just don't want to pull the trigger on some Trumans and have them not fit right

>>13263618
Red Wing Iron Rangers are that exact same boot but in 6"

>>13263705
I wonder how many people have bought the meme in an effort to find a 6" jump boot?

>I did

>>13263711
What meme?

>>13263033
id?

there are some boots that look absolute godtier when they get a bit worn out and a bit softer

would that be the case with chelseas? do they look better more tight and firm or a bit more loose and soft? specially suede chelseas

>>13263704
>Truman/Dayton
The Truman's were a group buy in advance and I sent in my Brannock details and a tracing of my feet I already had on a different company's form. Basically went a half size down and up in width. They fit great but have their own feel. The waist feels kind of rounded? So completely went against my own advice of trying boots on but it all worked out. The leather is kind of like in this pic but is horse hide. My experience was very positive.

I went to Dayton in Van and none of what they had was for me. Lots of the boots looked like 70s platform shoes or Glam Rock gear. They do lots of custom stuff and are very into customer service. The quality and workmanship is great and the prices are very very good. They have a Tough Logging boot that is really cool looking. I was looking for a pair of Engineer boots and really considered those Logging boots but maybe because I didn't like anything else there.

I go up half a size from the Brannock in my running shoes, sometimes a whole size. For the Truman's I went down a half size but went wider. Let them know about your RWs but maybe consider checking your Brannock size and doing a tracing of your feet as well?

>>13252726
OP Take a look at the brand Thursday boots. I can almost guarantee you'll find what youre looking for there. I have the black captain boots and they are gorgeous in person and very comfortable. True to size as well.

https://thursdayboots.com/collections/boots

>>13263618
Corcoran 1500 Jump Boot in Brown.

It's identical but the stitching is a little different.

>>13263819
I'm more into Dayton's service boot and parade boots. I don't care about their other stuff but those two look amazing. I like basically all of Truman's stuff too though

W2c these? What even are they?

>>13263859
Not OP but thanks for this. Gonna grab some chelseas from here

>>13264090
blundstones

>thursday shilling their boots on a mongolian throat singing forum

>>13264106
Thank you so much

>>13260856
Yes, great cop. I have ones like those as well.

>>13264109
Thursday has people shill for them so much it should be illegal.
The worst customer service and quality control around and yet thousands upon thousands of 5 star reviews on every page of the internet? Hmmmmmm......

>>13260856
i bought a (somehow) completely unworn pair too recently, i love them

>>13264109
Yeah, there's always a thread about thursday boots while nobody actually ever buys ir owns them

Cop these or not?

>>13263419
You can just black them out yourself

opinions on carrera panamericana boots?

I'm looking for new boots. Had a pair of these for ages but they're fucked. They're Canadian army surplus but I now live in Europe. I'd ideally like something similar that can take a bit of a beating and still look good after a clean.

Any suggestions?

Bought them this week. Opinions?

>>13263819
>Dayton Tough Logging boot
Here is a pic. It looks really cool in person. I haven't seen another that is quite like it. You can customize it as well. Not for everybody though. Remember their prices are low AND in Canuck bucks.

>>13264675
They look cheap

>>13264675
wtf are those even boots? looks like running shoes LARPing as boots

>>13253679
meermin? no, thanks.
>>13260595
>>13260597
C&J Islay, nice, but they fit you large.

Lookong for black whole cut round toe chelseas that are US made. Goodyear welt is a minimum, though anything above that is very much acceptable.

Help? Yes I've looked...

>>13264941
Not that low anymore, they had a price hike earlier in 2018

>>13265116
Only people making wholecut chelseas are RM Williams and Unmarked (spic brand). There aren't a lot of people making wholecut chelseas

>>13265116
the most important is how much you want to spend

>>13264212
https://www.styleforum.net/threads/thursday-boot-co-appreciation-thread-news-pictures-etc.539785/page-3

>>13265652
And...?

>>13265033
I’m a 13US. They are 11.5 and still tight in width.

>>13258512
I was referring to these, i.e the made in France Paraboot brand. Didnt realize they had those other ones, sorry bruh

>>13265652
>what are paid promotions

>>13263300
That leather look bad man. They’re alright beater boots tho

>>13264262
Nah

>>13265841
Michaels are supposed to fit with no extra space in the toe box, or at least that's how the french wear them. It's a wide last, half size down is usually recommended. I think chambord fits similarly, but rest of their shoes fit tts afaik

>>13265033
Look at the creasing you mong.

>>13263819
>70s platform shoes or Glam Rock gear
Roller Derby is a thing in Vancouver.

>>13265852
Ok, my man, im gonna buy them soon and give you a full review.

>>13265682
>nobody actually ever buys ir owns them
Not true.

>tfw want SLP boots so bad but poorfag
HOW DO I DEAL WITH THIS FEELING. NONE OF THE KNOCK OFFS GET THE SILHOUETTE RIGHT.

>>13260856
Those looks exactly like the boots I had while I was in the military. Even got the same sole..

>>13266932
You can but them with our prize money

>>13266037
that's what I'm looking, they fit you large af

>>13266932
>wasting money on slp

>>13267036
True desu. I checked out
>>13254166
and they actually look somewhat similar so I put an order with them. The silhouette still isn't the same but its close enough I guess.

Should I get the RM Williams Comfort Craftsman or the round toe one?

Team chelsea?

>>13267402
craftsman

t.ausfag

>>13265856
Super helpful, thanks

just bought austrian meme boots, hope I won't look like a complete fucking autist in them

>>13253551
>theiconic
probably shit sorry mate

whatever the farmers wear out in Woop Woop (RM Williams?) is probably the go if you want to buy Australian

>>13267450
oh i like those. how much?

>>13253553

dad called

What's the general opinion on CAT boots?

>>13252726
team

>>13267901
chocolate or die

>>13267904
>*steals my wallet*

Post boots nerds

>>13267402
The comfort craftsman, especially if this will be your firs pair of boots

>not wearing Red Wings exclusively

>>13267865
Thursday boots company chelseas, 200 bucks.

w2c black combat boots like these?

https://youtu.be/5LLNTURw_7Y?t=28

>>13252726
What are your opinions on boots that say have a buckle on the side of them but it's not operative in any way, it's just cosmetic.

>>13268984
How do you get them on then? Buckled boits like that are called jodhpurs and they have functional buckles

shoesg.top
Are these guys legit? Just got an ad on insta that they have -75% on dms

>>13268988
They are zip boots but they have a buckle on them. That's not the pair I was looking at but they are somewhat comparable, the zipper is on the other side.

What the hell?

>>13268739
That used to be me, then I slowly developed into alden, allen edmonds, white's

>>13269009
>if you have to ask...

>>13264142
I believe there is a lot of old stock of these. I come across unworn ones fairly often on ebay. It's good - they're great boots.

team suck my dick

>>13269110
Don't like any of Alden's stuff, but AE looks pretty nice

>>13252726
chelsea boots are similar

>>1326745yo can never go wrong with chelseas

are there any other boots like Stacy Adams Madison without the shiny, but with similar price?

>>13269741
>but with similar price
There's your problem right there. Stacy adams puts on that plasticky finish to hide how cheap the leather is.

Look at allen edmonds on sale, their leather is much less finished like the SAs are

>>13269968
any cheaper option than Allen's? Kind of dont want to spend 300 on boots. my limit is 200, yes i know, im cheap

Any recommendations for water proof boots?

>tfw team creme on /fa/ but peanut butter on all other boards

Not sure how to feel about this feel

>>13270004
hmm

>>13269988
Nothing that won't have that cheap plasticky coating. it's to be expected at that price point

>>13270094
are thursday boots any good?

>>13270133
low build quality, they had a fake kickstarter campaign that swallowed people's money through bait and switch i.e. promising horween leather, then actual production was some shitty spic leather.

QC is pretty bad, have seen people receiving 2 left boots. For the price you pay, you're better off saving an extra $70 to buy some red wings

Also they have a really strong online shilling campaign

>>13270159
im just trying to find something to wear, it doesnt need to be really high quality. im just looking for some blacks boots, thats all

>>13270133
Thursday is a scam company that is shilled to the moon and back.

>>13270177
Sure, spend 200bucks but throw the boots away after a year

Versus 300 and keep them for at least 3+ years. If you're looking for value, red wings still win. I've had my iron rangers for 4+ years now

unless of course, you're just cheap

>>13260595
Cuffed looks better imo

>>13266944
is that a good or bad thing

ordered these memes a few weeks ago and even though they are a size 13, they definitely fit more like a 12 cause they are way too fuckin small or maybe even mislabeled idk.

is there a cheap way to stretch em out? the company doesn't go any bigger in size, and i just need to lengthen them near the toes, the width is fine.

>>13270364
better pic

>>13270364
>>13270382
They can't go any longer than they already are. You fucked up by not trying them in store

>>13270159
>>13270228
Any proofs?

>>13270397
the bait and switch from kickstarter is pretty well documented

as for the shilling, a lot of the men's style sites did paid promotions for it. IIRC dappered, primermag, alpha m all shilled for thursday

>>13270364
You're fucked bro.
Leather can stretch to get wider, but not longer. That's why the most important part is making sure the length is right before you buy

>>13270397
Literally just read any independent review and it will be overwhelmingly negative. Their problems are well known and lots of people have talked about them.
Yet any review from a website is gonna say it's 5 stars and Viberg-tier quality and construction. It's classic shilling.

anyone id these please? i think theyre perfect and id like to purchase them

>>13270257
> Throw them away after a year
I have a pair of boots I bought in 2014 for 70 Dollars brand new (No sale) and I have owned them since early 2014 and they have been through all sorts of work, weather, abuse, etc. Pic related.

>>13270699
1. I don't believe you
2. Cheap boots have always fallen apart on me

>>13271400
Believe whatever you want but these things have stuck with me when other "higher end" boots let me down

>>13271417
You haven't even worn those

>>13271458
Used for walking several km pretty much daily and some work often in shitty weather like snow or rain, daily worn besides in June and July (Usually) in 2014 and 2015, and I wore them a lot in 2016 and 2017 too

Any vegan boot recs?

>>13271481
Do you exert no ground pressure at all?

>>13271497
He's probably not overweight like you.

>>13271417
those have been worn for a month

>>13271497
No I'm just not either obese or an ape that drags his feet along the ground instead of lifting them, also the soles are rock hard but the boots still have wear (It just isn't very visible in photos because my camera sucks)

>>13271506
most wear on shoes comes from the heel strike, you literally cannot walk without doing it
the heels should be substantially more worn

>>13271499
>>13271506
Yeah, nah, no matter how light you are, concrete/paving is very rough on rubber, there's no way he's worn them for 4 years

What do you guys wear in the summer when it's too hot to be wearing boots.

>>13271514
Two years, with the occasional wear in 2016 and 2017, and I don't walk on a lot of concrete, it was mostly dirt and mud, plus I needed some boots for riding

>>13271526
>it was mostly dirt and mud
And that's the difference, walking on concrete/pavement is much harder on any type of footwear than walking on dirt

>>13271521
unlined chukkas, handsewn mocs

>>13271540
Yes but they still held up against all sorts of weather and conditions despite me never really caring for them, it's not like if the heel starts getting worn down the actual boots become destroyed. I had a pair of Made in England Dr Martens too and they cost me more than twice what these cost and those didn't last on dirt or concrete.

>>13271551
doc martens are shit and you used them in more trying conditions so there's your answer

Alternatives to red wing iron rangers in Australia? Really like but can't justify exchange rate and shipping.

>>13271551
Martens are completely terrible meme shoes. They are drastically overpriced for what they are.
Don't think you've had good boots if they are all you've tried.

>>13271551
>doc martens

You're kidding, right?

>>13271417
Those look like you've owned that entire time and worn them twice.
Actually wear them and see how they hold up

>>13271575
Just shell out a little extra for the Rangers. They're worth the price and they'll last for as long as you take care of them, so the return on your investment is worth it.
I love my Rangers and I'm wearing them right now actually

>>13270439
tips on making em wider then? its not too bad just need a bit more room

>>13271918
Take it to a cobbler, home remedies aren't that effective.

But if you're determined, buy a pair of shoe trees that are slightly too large, put a couple pairs of heavy wool socks over the shoe trees. Insert the socks and trees overnight. The effectiveness will increase if you wear the boots for a bit at home, just to get some warmth and moisture into the leather (which helps the stretching)

>>13271918
Honestly just wearing them will do it as the leather softens up and gets looser.
I used to wear mine inside just to have them on my feet longer to get them broken in quicker

>>13271918
you can get a boot widener that is kind of like the front half of split wooden shoe tree but the back has a long metal handle. you crank the handle and it seperates the front halves outward to widen the boot. some people recommend spraying a little watered down rubbing alcohol inside the boots as well.

i bought mine on eBay from China but never ended up using it. the boots have just widened a little on their own.

>>13252726
G8040s cuz they met my holy trinity of price, features, and looks.

>>13267450
what color chelseas are good? I can't remember what kind just looks awful on people. Is it black or brown?

>>13272876
Dark brown with a hint of red

>>13272257
>those godawful tassels

>>13272892
do you mean oxblood?

>>13273279
oxblood is too red, more like mahogany

Bump bitches

>>13273913

I'm building a wardrobe from scratch as I just got out of jail. I have a pair of florshiem brown derbys and now need a casual boot for jeans and chinos(?) in fall. I usually wear slim fit jeans, navy and blacks but I also want some creams and greys.

Should I go suede or leather? I'm thinking suede for a more casual look. I have some tan suede chelsea boots in mind.

>>13253487
I wear my derbies with jeans/ a white tee. Really anything that most black shoes would work with

>>13275034
Yeah, ok I guess

r8 boots I just bought new for $100

>>13275485
Unfortunate.

>>13275490
why?

>>13275485
disgusting/10

>>13275063
Suede is falling out of fashion a bit so I would go with leather. Leather also tends to be a bit more versatile, which you would want with a new wardrobe.

>>13275511
why though

>>13275520
>patchwork leather
>mangled moc toe
>double pull tabs in the back
>brass eyelets
>edgy commando sole

>>13275518

Yeah thanks I might get black leather chelsea boots first and go from there

thoughts on my current daily wear boots?

>>13265854
I was thinking of getting a pair, they come in many types of leather and I like the look of beater/distressed/worn leather, so that'd be the plan

>>13275577
I don't like them but I can't put my finger on why.
If they're comfy and you like them then keep it up and enjoy my dude

>>13275485
Hideous.
It's like they tried to shove as much shit as possible and mix all the genres and that's what they shat out

>>13275590
If you like the look of distrissed, go copper rough and tough iron rangers

>>13264673
Corcorans.

I'm quite an /fa/ newbie and I've been looking at some good boots and narrowed down pic related.

I live in southern california though, is it ok to use boots when the weather is never really too cold?

Also, how long do these last if I'm paying $750 on them?

>>13260243
Yeah, I'd like a nice Paraboots too.

cop or not

>>13276232
Buy the seconds for shell, they're much better dollar to value.

Though the 6.5inch shaft might be very warm to wear

>>13276232
AEs in casual settings in socal is pretty wack, only buy them if you really know what you want for yourself.

>>13262231
steve madden troopas

>>13261184
I love my Solovair, cop for sure.

>>13272257
That's a solid purchase. Seriously worth the cash.

I got them as an alternative to the Danner rainforest....but I still really want to try the Danner rainforest kek

>>13262971
W2c

>>13276316
>seconds for shell

You mean factory seconds? Sorry just making sure.

Just copped new RM's

>>13276540
Yeah, they even go on sale from their seconds price once in a while

>>13263859
I like the styles and the price is low to be fair but I can never tell their marketing from genuine feedback

>>13276690
>not buying what RM Williams is famous for: wholecut chelseas

>>13276948
Already have a pair...

>>13253679
yeah theyre actually nice

>>13276272
No.

>>13259623
>>13259693
>>13259746
>>13259746
chelsea boots can be used regardless of their reputations for very /fa/ fits. change my mind

>>13275590
>>13277492
Fag

>>13264675
The "classic leather look" doesn't fit so well with sporty running soles.
(Summer shoes in general look "off" with the leathery look)
Also the shoe laces look cheap and is probably not the right colour to use imo.

>>13275577
Really nice boots!. Tough personally i would change out the shoe laces with something that has a bit more "pattern", to seperate the colours a little.
Reminds me somewhat of my worn down winter boots that i currently use
(and have used for +5 years or so)
I'll add a picture of the boots i mentioned using, and yeah the laces have seen better days.

>>13276211
They look pre-distressed, I'm more of a fan of wearing them in myself and getting them worn that way

>>13276959
Well then, I guess that's alright

>>13278103
If you go to the store and look at them in person, it'll be way different

>>13271575
Theres a couple of local stockist over here

>>13275034
Oohh baby baby

But can someone explain to me why brogue boots are a thing? Does the brogueing serve any other purpose on the boot other than bring decorative?

>>13278661
brogue shoes serve no purpose other than decorative too so idk what the question is

>>13278661
It used to be functional to aid in the drying of the shoes

does anyone have any pictures of the 11-eyed hawkin boots

>>13279197
>what is google

So lads I went to an Allen Edmonds store and had the master fitter try out some of the boots.

We tried out a 9E which felt like a "firm handshake" but the guy said I might need a 9 EEE.

I'm going to order one soon, so I'm thinking, should I got with 9E or 9EEE? Would going 9EEE be a safer bet?

>>13279243
yes

>>13279247
Ok, I'll try EEE then.

They're kind of chunky and the leather isn't one piece, but $70 for a pair of chelsea boots with a goodyear welt? Sounds too good to be true.

Vintage (90s) all black mono Doc Martens

Truman makes the best looking boots available at the moment.
Viberg comes close.

It's not up for debate

>>13279626
Not sure if bait...
thats not a chelsea thats a workboot lol

how'd i do

>>13256301
might not be quite what you're looking for but i just copped these from a horse riding equipment store, cause i wanted something actually relatively durable without looking like a construction worker

>>13279928
forgot pic .

Viberg Sample sale coming up in NYC. May 3 to 6.

>>13275034
those boots are too damn big for you

I see a lot of hate towards DM in general, is there any solid reason for this? Why is it such a meme?

I'd really appreciate if someone could provide an objective review regarding price/quality, durability and comfort.

The silhouette looks neat to me and I think I could match them with most of my fits.

>Pic related, considering getting them

why is it so fucking tough to find black crepe sole ankle boots

https://www.mrporter.com/en-ca/mens/common_projects/leather-boots/1017672

all i can find thats still available but it's costly

and theres the fucking retarded serial number that i hate too, nobody cares about that brand here it's only gonna look like a retarded serial number

>>13280408
Non resoleable, shit-tier leather, meme looks, expensive for the quality

What kind of pants would go well with very expensive boots like Islay and AE Cordovan Daltons?

>>13280574
>>13280408

To add to this, currently made docs are horrible cheap quality. Vintage ones are much, much better. Look into Solovair's desu. Basically the kind of quality Doc Martens used to have. They are more expensive, but would last you. Made by hand in England.

>>13280351
Why do you say that?

>>13280536
Just scrape it away or paint over it then?
Holy fucking autism, nobody will ever care.

>>13280704
the creasing on the vamp is way too back. If the wider part of your feet's balls rest on the wider part of the boot, it means that they fit your width, but not the length. Next time buy a shorter but wider last. C&J offers them.

>>13280732
There is some truth to that however with a boot you will always have extra room in the toe box. Look at full brogue boots from any maker and and you’ll see creasing in the same area.

>>13280536
Clarks desert mali

>>13280851
Some room, not a full inch

>>13280869
A half in to full inch is normal. Not sure what boots you’re wearing.

>>13280901
good fitting boots

>>13280925

>>13280966
no, C&J and Cheaney, but I didn't buy them online and I'm not american.

>>13280574
>>13280694

Thanks fellas.

I had seen Solovair posted around, but was still on the fence about Docs since there-s a store that sells them in my godforsaken country.
I'm still reluctant to online clothes shopping but guess I'll give it a shot

I need a new pair of chukka/desert boots to replace a pair of Born Harrisons that finally gave up the ghost. They held up really well, ultimately convinced me it made sense to spend over $100 on daily shoes, and now I'm hungry for the quality.

Was looking hard at a pair of the Danner Wolf Creeks, anyone here have experience with them?

I have a pair of Danner Canadian 10" heavy duty boots that I use for heavy duty innawoods type wear, absolutely phenomenal, but they're in a completely different class than daily wear chukkas.

>>13281101
Also considering the Jack II, for that matter.

>>13279933
implying anyone here is rich enough to buy vibergs

Thoughts on these?

>>13280732
Toe length is cosmetic.

>>13280973
Cheaney's own fit guide says toe length is irrelevant to the width and fitnof the heel.