[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 700 KB, 671x671, 1515572267495.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13058941 No.13058941 [Reply] [Original]

How do I style high waisted pants?

>> No.13058948

crop top

>> No.13058950
File: 1.34 MB, 1080x1080, highwaistinspo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13058950

>>13058941

>> No.13058952

>>13058950
This is pretty shit though.

>> No.13058954

>>13058952
foh

>> No.13058956
File: 1.84 MB, 1200x1600, IMG_1805.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13058956

>>13058941

>> No.13058962

>>13058950
his necks on 90 degrees tf

>> No.13058967
File: 1.32 MB, 3155x4732, 35Tvf4T.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13058967

>>13058956

>> No.13058969
File: 157 KB, 750x1000, 1469287363154.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13058969

>>13058967

>> No.13058973

>>13058956
ok now im wet

>> No.13058984

First, tell me where to cop high-waisted pants. Excluding Wrangler Cowboy Cut.

>> No.13058993

>>13058984
uniqlo u ss18

>> No.13058995

>>13058993
I'd avoid short-sleeves and cop a Levi's type 3.

>> No.13059011

>>13058984
levis 501ct

>> No.13059013

>>13059011
>>13058984
or buy larger size (but slimmer fit than your usual)

>> No.13059015
File: 1022 KB, 1440x1795, Screenshot_20180110-115529.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13059015

>> No.13059039

>>13059011
I have a headache but if I didn't have one this would give me one.
I know they've done it forever but it shits me that 501 means a different thing every decade.

>> No.13059046

>>13059015

stop posting pics of famous people. Every girl would find him repulsive if he wasn't rich

>> No.13059135

>>13059015
He looks like 2 completely different people joined at the necj.

>> No.13059157

>>13058941
having gyno apparently

>> No.13059165
File: 59 KB, 700x625, 09d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13059165

>>13058941
>Not posting the original

>> No.13059614

>>13059046
>caring about what girls think
You are repulsive.

>> No.13059624

>>13059165
Wiiiideeeboooiii

>> No.13060082

w2c high waisted jeans for men?

>> No.13060085 [DELETED] 
File: 168 KB, 414x433, COSTANZA2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13060085

>when i learn that mongrel fag was a US Marine

>> No.13060088
File: 1.78 MB, 350x255, impressed jelly as hell.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13060088

>when you learn that faggy mongrel has a "former US Marine" on his record

>> No.13060098

>>13059135
What

>> No.13060183

>>13058967
wear fucking socks you faggot

>> No.13060204

>>13058950
Is that a Patagonia jacket?

>> No.13060217

>>13058941
This is an edit right?
I don't remember his waist being quite this /thicc/ in the film, although I do remember it being noticeable.

>> No.13060219
File: 115 KB, 984x720, The.Mummy.1932.720p.BluRay.FLAC.x264-CtrlHD.mkv_snapshot_00.13.43_[2017.06.15_18.38.23].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13060219

>>13058950
>>13058956
>>13058969
These soy rises look like normal rise pants pulled up too high.

>> No.13060231
File: 16 KB, 382x382, picard-laugh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13060231

>>13058941
Haha that body with his face looks pretty strange, must something to do with his jewish genes.

>> No.13060235

>>13058950
Soy tier rings aside, this looks pretty good my man

>> No.13060277
File: 186 KB, 1200x1798, Workhouse_AW17_021099.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13060277

>>13058941
i want a pair of gurkhas now

>> No.13060291

if you want to look like you are 4 feet tall then yeah sure

>> No.13060295
File: 1.23 MB, 1213x903, 1494536979807.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13060295

>>13060291
The manlets fear the high rise.

>> No.13060299

>>13060291
>insecurity
Yeah, stick to your skinnies

>> No.13060304
File: 118 KB, 700x910, 1696.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13060304

>> No.13060308
File: 231 KB, 1024x1024, 3449416_4_857c_un-autre-funambule-facon-dandy-thomas_6ae6a63aa5e59fb6773ad8223024af98.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13060308

>> No.13060323

>>13060291
I'm taller than everyone I know, so I'm not too worried

>> No.13060345

>>13060308
>wearing a belt and suspenders

>> No.13060373

>>13060345
I think that's some sort of utility belt. Belts weren't really worn in that era, and that doesn't look like a normal belt anyway

>> No.13060776

B A T T L E D R E S S

>> No.13060803

>>13060277
Dope fit

>> No.13061355
File: 740 KB, 2000x3000, _RIC0291.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13061355

this is the future

>>13060345
that particular picture is nonsensical but in the trades a belt + suspenders is very practical when you also have to wear a toolbelt

>> No.13061868

>>13058956
Oh hi Mark

>> No.13061871

I'm a manlet and I'm starting to dress with high waisted pants, is it a bad idea?

>> No.13061880

>>13058941
Just buy some fucking Dickies 874s anon. They're the most comfy pants I've ever worn, and they only cost twenty bucks a pair brand new. It's not quite as difficult as laser propulsion bro, you'll figure it out

>> No.13061889

>>13059015
this only looks cool because of his tattoos and hair

>> No.13062011
File: 174 KB, 395x613, 1452115175624.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13062011

>>13060217
It just didn't look that weird in movement, this is the one angle where it looks so extreme.

>> No.13062132

>>13058950
can't stop kek-ing. fuck. i think this might actually be my all-time favorite photo on /fa/. it looks like he got in a fistfight with cthulhu and emerged with the most goddamn bizarre pre-human posture i've ever seen.

>> No.13062279
File: 63 KB, 1000x1333, loooooooooongcat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13062279

Don't worry, Rick has you covered.

>> No.13062284
File: 75 KB, 1000x1333, tinyjacket.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13062284

Some more inspo.

>> No.13062290

>>13060219
are you a virgin, if yes, don't call people 'soy'

>> No.13062291

>>13058956
did not hit her, it's not true, its bullshit i did not hit her, i did not

>> No.13062316
File: 49 KB, 431x597, 15ewl5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13062316

>>13062279
>>13062284
That's like next level high waist

>> No.13062349

>>13061871
Naw just tuck in your shirt

>> No.13062600

>>13060291
lmao what

that's the complete opposite of what it does, proportionally

>> No.13062603
File: 124 KB, 744x1385, 14ddb51c4c8d2f4d15223432abe8b38d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13062603

>> No.13062604

>>13062600
>that's the complete opposite of what it does, proportionally
it just makes your legs look longer and torso shorter, it doesn't inherently make one look taller, that depends entirely who is wearing them

>> No.13062605
File: 168 KB, 704x960, 1501485592155.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13062605

>> No.13062606

>>13060204
jacket is a joules sherpa jacket. this pic is from >r/streetwear

>> No.13062620

>>13058956
good looks my g

>> No.13063291

high rise only looks good if you have a long torso desu

>> No.13063326

>>13063291
never seen anybody prove this

>> No.13063419
File: 128 KB, 669x1000, 1470756263735.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13063419

>> No.13063428

>>13062279
that's a jumpsuit, it doesn't count

>> No.13063431

>>13063419
>>13062603
>>13060304
>>13060295
>>13060277
>>13058956
>>13058950

These are normal-ass pants, not high rise. Do you guys all wear your pants hanging off your dick?

>> No.13063439

>>13063431

literalyl all of those are high rise

do u wear ur pants at ur neck or something

>> No.13063442

>>13063431
>this >>13060295
>not high rise
what? that zipper alone is probably like 15 inches long

>> No.13063447

>>13058950
lmao did he just wedgie himself with normal pants? wtf at the rings lol

>> No.13063515

>>13063431
You really think this >>13062316 is the only rise high enough? You have skewed perception. Show me a regular rise jeans that sit as high as any of those pants.

>> No.13063562

>>13058941

Don't. So far every pic people have posted itt to support such a thing is cringey. The style associated can look good but wearing your pants like Steve urkel should only be ironic.

>> No.13063579

>>13063562
I like it, and i'm doing it at this very moment. Death to low rise.

>> No.13063585

>>13063579
Cringe

>> No.13063627

>>13058967

this is so disgusting seriously. tfw you realize this guy is a 38 y/o real life autist

>> No.13063648

>>13063562
stfu pleb

the only cringy thing here is you

>> No.13063660

>>13063627
Tfw a 38 year old autist has beautiful pants and you don't

>> No.13063695

>>13063585
>triggered

>> No.13063716
File: 85 KB, 570x751, 60353ED1-AD94-412F-85CB-1B0AB3E8C346.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13063716

PLZ helP

>> No.13063738
File: 36 KB, 500x628, howell1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13063738

>> No.13063741
File: 90 KB, 500x637, 1494003577187.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13063741

>> No.13063745
File: 413 KB, 1366x2048, 1494003683531.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13063745

>> No.13063751
File: 67 KB, 473x704, mishima1de355a55c12314891b831761945bbc9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13063751

>> No.13063755

>>13058956
To answer your question OP, don't style them like this.

>> No.13063757

>>13062605
are those men or lesbians?????

>> No.13063760

>>13058967
The pants themselves look great, especailly with those loafers, yet this guy somehow manages to look incredibly gay despite such a classic conservative outfit, idk what it is.

>> No.13063762

>>13058941
Are you a woman? If so, big thighs + thin waist with a crop top.
Are you a man? Then you need to look like a bodybuilder (or be going for trap, I guess?) and go around shirtless. Martial-arts style

>> No.13063763

>>13063760
his face/posture and lack of socks. Also the cuffs of the pants themselves are a little fag tier

>> No.13063765

>>13063762
learn fashion. these fucking cookie cutters requirements on every fucking thread.
>>13063757
new romantics, so i guess neither

>> No.13063766

>>13063762
nobody cares about your arbitrary complex-tier "rules", gtfo

>> No.13063768

>>13058969
hey this is me

>> No.13063773

>>13063765
>>13063766
>No, body shape is obviously irrelevant in making a specific article of clothing look good

>> No.13063781

>>13062132
when did the posture nazis invade /fa/ and when is someone gonna tell them it’s literally just to not show face in fit pics

>> No.13063803

>>13063773
of course it is. you are just making it oddly specific when in real life it's just: don't be fat, and get the cut right.

>> No.13063806

>>13063803
This is asking about a specific cut. There is a specific body shape that goes well with that cut. We’re really in agreement here.

>> No.13063812

>>13063806
i n s e c u r e c u c k

>> No.13063813

>>13063806
yes, and you can cut high rise pants however you want, to suit whatever body type there is.

>> No.13063815

>>13063813
I disagree with you. I’ve never seen someone look good in high-rise pants with any body shape other than what I described. But who knows, maybe I’ve just been looking at the wrong people.

>> No.13063832
File: 63 KB, 640x700, Jazz-Photography-by-Francis-Wolff_6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13063832

>>13063815
obviously we disagree on most basic terms of aesthetics.

>> No.13064976
File: 17 KB, 480x692, A0Q22E00A-Q11@10.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13064976

Anyone got any tips on a cheaper pair, that looks remotely as good as allsaints

>> No.13065066

>>13063431
>Do you guys all wear your pants hanging off your dick?

You say this like anyone has a fucking say about the rise of their pants. 99.99% of shit has been low-rise and mid-rise AKA low-rise light for decades.

>> No.13065265

>>13064976
id love to know this to if there are any

>> No.13066579
File: 64 KB, 600x600, 1474426462026.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13066579

>> No.13066939

>>13060088
>marine is impressive
If he was a Ranger I'd be impressed.

>> No.13066942
File: 57 KB, 419x420, pfft putin.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13066942

>not Delta Force

>> No.13067146

>>13066579
LMAOOOOOOOOOOO WTF IF THIS LOOKS GOOD TO ANY OF YOU FUCKS THEM LMAOOOO. The only people I know who dress like this are white trash GIRLS who work at walmart or CVS

>> No.13068812
File: 83 KB, 736x981, 1488035221067.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13068812

>> No.13069082

>>13060295
>>13060308
>>13062605
I'm confused,what are the rules for ties and high-waisted pants ? Where should the tie end ?

>> No.13069290
File: 35 KB, 640x360, pants not high enough for this faggot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13069290

>>13063431

>> No.13069400

>>13068812
Lawrence :3

>> No.13069418

>>13069082
same as with any pant? it's not like most give a flying fuck about the minutae of detailm, also tie lenght is something that varies by fashion of the decade

>> No.13069437
File: 48 KB, 642x800, large_000000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13069437

>>13068812
>>13069400
i must have seen that picture a million times but i've newer even tried to look who he was.

>> No.13069636

>>13069082
Conservatively - around the middle of the belt buckle. This is of course, relative to the rise of the pant.

>> No.13069673
File: 64 KB, 656x800, JC-7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13069673

>>13069636
It's just that those photos are from different eras when different lenghts and styles of ties were favored. None of them are incorrect per se

>> No.13069740

>>13069636
I'm inclined to agree,but I would prefer seeing someone do a tie tuck, rather than wearing high waisted bottoms and having your neckwear touch your balls