/fa/ - Fashion

>>12903600

>>12903600
Daily reminder that we British stole the mantle of most fashionable Europeans from the French in the sixties.

>>12903609
Ah yes, the British Gopnick.

>>12903611
I think I'd put Italy ahead of France too

>>12903680
tucking your pants into your boots is like tucking in your shirt into your underwear

dont do it

>>12903685
fuck you it looks dope

>>12903713
lmao nerd

>>12903718
That guy can be brit like can be a normie from anywhere in the western world.

living in (((london))) ive gotten sick of seeing these fits pretty fast, which is a shame cause i do like them

80% of the thread is just generic menswear with no obvious connection to Britain

>>12903755
>80% of the thread is just generic menswear with no obvious connection to Britain

80% of what's been posted in this thread is from Drake's who literally make their clothing in London and the rest of the UK.

>>12903760
So what? Normie universal stuff made in the UK. Good for them.

>>12903685
>"he trips on /fa/, his advice must be good!"

>>12903685
>"he trips on /fa/, his advice must be good!"

>>12903773
>Normie universal

Normies wear jeans and sneakers and hoodies

Are you even trying

>>12903773
I think it's that a lot of British stuff is just so good that it became universal.

>>12903829
Could be, but bear in mind that lots of the original inspo came from certain european style developed from borrowings around the continent mainly since the XVIII century, thanks in good part to military and upper class travelers.

While I really like some British clothing, most there don't wear that stuff that I like.
It's the same in Italy, they have really nice stuff but most of them are extremely tacky.

>>12903685

That's the whole point of dress boots you imbecile

>>12904273
you mean not tucking, right?

>>12903685
Wrong
God you're the worst trip

>>12904302

No. They were designed for tucking. I live in a country that snows and I tuck to keep my trousers from getting wet.

>>12904363
>They were designed for tucking.
no they weren't. you tuck into cavalry boots and jackboots. blouse over combat boots. but never fucking tuck into dress boots

>>12903730
The most handsome fucking guy in the world.

>>12903651
THose look like Alden unlined chukkas.

>>12903604

Man... Brits are the only ppl who can pull off preppy and formal style casually, without looking like pretentious try hard dicks.

Even back then the working class nailed this style.

>>12903730
is that banderdict cunderbatch ?

>>12903643

>>12903680
id on the boots?

>>12904397

Does anyone know why these gentleman is wearing three cuffs?

>>12906254
Crockett and Jones Islay.

>>12906266
Some sort of edwardian fashion thing. They look rigid and made to structure the jacket cuffs. Looks like it's part of the jacket

>>12905516
Why do Americans think any suit or any jacket not made of polyester makes an outfit "formal"? Jesus fucking Christ almighty, formal means whit etie in the evening or morning suit in the day. Semi-formal is DJ or as you like to call it """"tuxedo"""". Everything else is CASUAL. Lounge suits are completely casualwear. Why is this so hard for you faggots to comprehend?

>>12906369
He's obviously using the word "formal" loosely here. And no, loosely doesn't mean incorrectly. Formal certainly can mean "formal attire", the way you're using it, but it can also mean "dressier than you usually see in that context." That's the way he's using it, which is obvious to anyone who gives it more than two second's thought, you fucking autist.

>>12906394
>being this defensive of someone who's just plain wrong
Burgers truly are the worst of cancer.

>>12906369
Tuxedos or black tie as it is correctly known is informal. White tie is formal

>>12906301
Thanks alot. I first thought it was two shirts, but you are right, of course - when I looked closer, I could tell it's part of the jacket.

Actually a good idea, especially in summer. Could make a comeback. Unfortunately only for the same people who wear clip-on ties, though.

>>12906435
>Actually a good idea
I dunno, they look way, waaay too wide, to me. Even if you disregard the actual shirt sleeve showing, it looks badly fitted, clumsy as fuck, not at all elegant. (Plus the seam where it attaches is highly visible up the cuff)

>>12903643
Source on these shoes? I know they are dr martens but I forget what model.

>>12906359
Bah this isn't British. These guys are a type of chav akin to Jersey shore American guidos. Pure trash and not fa in anyway.

>>12903643
What the fuck is this guy doing.
>collar flopped over the shirt
>fake flower boutonniere
>attemped and failed flop pochette
>sleeves about three inches too long
>those skinny-ass jeans

Unironically the only thing that looks good here is the pleat in his turban. That's a sharp piece of headgear, the rest is pure dufus.


>>12903760
>Drake's who literally make their clothing in London and the rest of the UK.
Drake's is overpriced parvenu shit and they make loads of their shit offshore. Quit shilling.

>>12906291
thanks man, I also found a pair on meermin that looks similiar
https://www.meermin.es/en/10148716170000he-17-101487-brown-country-calf-e-marron.html

>>12906487
These are a very good option, but they have significantly lower shafts than the Islays -- this is true of other models of C&J boot as well, the Islays specifically have a higher than normal shaft.

t. another guy who really likes them

>>12906487
>>12906493
Actually, Meermin have an even more similar pair that I thought you were linking at first, check these out: https://www.meermin.es/en/10150416170000he-17-101504-brown-country-calf-e-marron.html

>>12906496
>yeah I had both of them open at different tabs and cp'd the wrong one, thanks anyway though

>>12906493
yeah it is noticeable even if the difference one extra eyelet
>>12906496
yeah I had both of the pairs open at different tabs and cp'd the wrong one, thanks anyway though

>>12906493
indeed it is noticeable even if the difference is one extra eyelet
>>12906496
yeah, I had both of the pairs open at different tabs and cp'd the wrong one, thanks anyway though

>>12906476
Hear, hear, Anon!

>>12903678
Poor man forgot to put his socks on :(

Anything with a newsboy cap ?

>>12907139
That's a flat cap

>>12907166
It was the only thing that pintrest had that looked british

>>12907172
Flat caps are very british

>>12907191
Yes but this doesnt remind me me of britain

>tfw peaked caps aren't /fa/

>>12907306
Damn, Her Maj. had some nice ma'ammaries back in the day.

>>12906467
>Source on these shoes? I know they are dr martens but I forget what model.

Solovair.

>>12903611
probably looks like shit in color

>>12907196
Red Wing 875?>>12907196

>>12907196
That's a newsboy

>>12903680
w2c literally everything

>>12907880

https://www.pediwear.co.uk/crockettandjones/products/3530.php for the shoes

meermin.es have a cheaper version

w2c jacket like this?

>>12907977

Stone Island

ty, which adidas piece is bottom middle right wearing?

>>12906359
The final nail in the skinny jean coffin

>>12906359
Holy yuck

>>12903600
not bad. trousers are a bit too short, shirt needs to be buttoned.

>>12903678
jeez he looks like a White Walker!

Classic look. The Aquascutum coat in that film is also nigh on legendary.

>>12908068
there's more smithsposting here than on /mu/

>>12903611
these bois are from denmark lmao

Nobody in Britain dresses like this, stop romanticising us you americucks

>>12903600
Like this?

>>12909042
that's because the only native Britons left are tracksuit-wearing chavs.

>>12909053
fuck non-Londoners on the tube, respect the urban solitude.

anyone know where i can find a jacket similar to this one?

Bump

>>12907984
kek

>not a single picture of Farage so far
Plebs.

>>12909779
I don't like him politically but he's undeniably stylish and charismatic

obligatory

>>12909818
Uncle Ozzie.

Wrong thread, Billy

>>12903604
That is a lot of jawlets.

>>12909818
>autist brigade