/fa/ - Fashion

I can't wear these pants. I have long legs and a shirt torso

>>12767558
Post pic

I wish it was in style. Or at least medium rise. I have a long torso and average legs and I look goofy as hell in all this low rise shit. Also I Jeanne a larger than average dick and a larger ass.

Fuck my life.

>>12767612
Pic related. Trousers feel ok but I wish they were higher waisted.

>>12767554
a shit ton of "avant-garde" designers make high waisted pants

>>12767554
Because high rise looks good only with wide pants and since skinny pants were in style for last decade it is a bit complicated to return high rise.
Wide/regular cut slowly becoming "default" for normies right now and high rise is a next step.

>>12767715
>Wide/regular cut slowly becoming "default" for normies right now and high rise is a next step.
Normies are still wearing skinny jeans as their default.

>>12767558
you actually can, you've just never tried them

>>12767615
Why don't you just buy high rise pants? You don't look you really care what's "in" to begin with.

>>12767715
>high rise looks good only with wide pants
nope

It was never fashionable, these guys were literally just losers who could not pay for a tailor. Never in history has it been fashionable for a man to wear baggy pants.

Lemaire

>>12767735
thats just too effay man

>>12767554
Our Legacy Chino 22 and 24, Lemaire, and Margaret Howell do this style of pants.

>>12767902
Where can I find decent high rise effay chinos for us peasants?

>>12767554
I have a pair of 80/90s high waisted black jeans, they're comfy, but even more so when dropped to "normal waist" height if needed

>>12767735

>>12767735
Ur stupid

>>12767920
>when dropped to "normal waist" height if needed
You mean hip, to get the fashionable poopy pants look??

>>12767727

I find it really hard to find them, that's why. Specifically trousers that aren't hideously baggy and wide in the leg. Do you have any suggestions? (Euro)

>>12767902
Something under 200 euros please.

>>12768128
You have to tailor them, but you should wear them more relaxed imo

they are for women now

But yeah the way my body is built, I need high waisted stuff. I've got an unfashionably huge cock and balls, and not the longest legs, so finding pants is a nightmare.

>>12768050
luckily no, they're not super high wasted and they're quite loose at the top, so it looks normal at the intended and "sagged" height, I'm not dumb enough to look like I shat myself

>>12768128
I would suggest searching specifically for Tapered high wasted/rise trousers, they usually have a wider crotch area and then get a more refined leg

>>12768128
Army parade trousers ;^)

>>12767910
Universal Works.

>>12768174
Ditto buddy.

>>12767554
>Why are higher waist pants out of style for men?
Because most men are fat now and high waist pants look terrible on fatties.

>>12768174
A huge cock is always fashionable.

>>12768369
low waist looks equally bad on fatties

>>12767735
false

>>12767612
>in style
What the fuck is this garbage, just go buy some or make some yourself if you like them. Fuck "what's in style" You do you, faggot.

>>12768390
People are used to men looking like that though, and in my opinion it's still the lesser of two evils.

>>12767735
this post is hilarious

>>12767728
id on walkman?

>>12768598
Aiwa

>>12768421
The problem with not being in style is the same as not being popular. It's not widely accessable for decent prices (120€ around about is what I want) in slimmer fits.

>or Make your own

Hey how about fuck you?

>>12768753
>It's not widely accessable for decent prices (120€ around about is what I want) in slimmer fits.
it absolutely is

all you have to do is look in the women's sections of thrift stores

>>12767554
>Why are higher waist pants out of style for men?
they're not

>>12768759
I thought this was be a good idea until I realised it wasn't.

>>12768766
as normie fashion they are out.

>>12768928
it actually is

>>12768759
why not just buy the grandpa pants from the same trift store, and then have them tailored?

high waisted pants are definitely in for men you fucking retards
why are any of you even on a fashion board

>>12768972
too much effort

>>12767554
Because companies decide to make low wasted pants to save pennies

Also if you look like shit in low waist jeans then you will look like shit in high waist jeans, there’s no hope for you

>>12768952
“Normies” don’t even give a fuck about the waist height

>>12768598
Sony walkman

>>12769000
>Also if you look like shit in low waist jeans then you will look like shit in high waist jeans, there’s no hope for you
not in the context of good proportions, no.

>>12769021
Maybe you shouldn’t be tucking in all your shirts

>>12768989
guess what buddy, if you want something you need to put effort into it

>>12769034
>not tucking in your shirts
>not owning mid-rise jeans in the midst of a low-rise epidemic
t. nu-male

>>12767715
sauce on these pants?

>>12769181
Uniqlo

>>12769084
why do that when you can just cut out the middleman in the first place?

>>12768979
this

North Korea fashion capital of the world? They've been rocking the high waist for 70 years.

>>12767735
q. Is all of fa this stupid?

a. No. Just you.

>>12767715
This, I gave up on slim and skinny

>>12769093
What are some decent, affordable mid-rise skinny or slim/slim-regular jeans? I like how my 511's fit but hate the low waist. The tiny pelvis and long torso looks awful and needs an untucked shirt hanging down to hide it.

>>12769443
Also inb4 go to tailor. I'm far too much of an autistic hiki to bring my pants to someone for modification.

>>12769310
are those JNCO dress pants?

>>12769959
jnco jeans have an entirely different fit and drape

why can't /fa/ comprehend nuance

>>12769033
W2c sweaters like this, that don't go all the way to your crotch?

>>12768989
Sure if you don't actually care how clothes fit.

>>12769310


this only works if you are tall and white.

for us ethnic manlets, we need slim closer to the waist to help not looking further like little kids

>>12769448
if youre a neet, use free time to learn sewing???

>>12770068
Excuses

i have high waisted thom Browne pants, feels comfy and honestly looks fine with just pants and a ocbd and complimenting shoes.

No belt loops though

>>12770032
good fucking question here

>>12770330
Care to post a fit pic with the TB pants?

>>12767554
>Why are higher waist pants out of style for men?

It took them a long time to con men into wearing low-rise and it's taking a long time for them to con them back into high-rise.

>>12770396
>tfw only picture you had got deleted and only thing left are glass window reflections of fit.

I'll try take one later on. They're long as fuck though so I gotta roll them up super thick

I'm 5'9 and 70kg.
Is it a matter of proportion?
I HATE low rise pants as I constantly feel like they're falling off.
BUT
I don't know what suits my proportions...

>>12770504
Yeah it's proportions. If you have proportionally long torso then you should wear higher waisted trousers.

>>12770534
yeah +1 to this, I'm 6'2 but i just have long legs and a fairly short torso, high waisted look really dumb on me unless I get a really good fit which takes ages to shop around for.

>>12768369
>high waist pants look terrible on fatties
This post is almost as retarded as niggerhater guy's. High waist pants make fat guys look better than all other options do. It's just that there's only so much you can do with the concept of "being a fatass who wears clothing". You'll never come out looking like David Gandy. Just a damn sight better than if you wore a low rise.

>>12770032
Time travel to the 1950s t bh

>>12769093
I actually don’t wear jeans since jeans are the ultimate normie wear >;)))))

>>12770035
/fa/ cares way too much, to the point of pure autism

most clothing will fit fine if you just buy your size

>>12770534
this is stupid advice and nobody ever backs it up with examples

>>12771333
Pants are very rarely true to size anymore, vanity sizing is fucking rife.

>>12771338
You never heard of high waisted skirts? This is literally what girls with short legs do every day lol.

>>12770068
>this only works if you are tall and white.
yet it was Mexicans who made the Zoot Suit popular

>>12771411
Most high waisted trousers are true to size i've noticed

Do high waisted pants for around $50 even exist?

>>12771411
I find trousers to be pretty true. Average jeans keep diving in quality and have more size variation. Like the same jean model in the same size will vary slightly pair to pair.

>>12772823
Dickies 874 really. Wool no except trifting

>>12772823
I've got some Hard Yakka (Australian workwear) pants that seem at least comparatively high-waisted. I'm not sure if that's a trick of the way they're sized, though. I got these when I was relatively fat so if you get them with a slimmer waist the rise might not be the same?

https://everythingaustralian.com.au/y02501-cotton-drill-trouser-black.html

Wrangler Cowboy Cut* are definitely high-waisted and I'm pretty sure well below $50.

*If it doesn't say cowboy cut it almost certainly isn't cowboy cut. Get them online.

>>12772879
Seeing as Dickies has them on sale for $20(okay so that's only $5 off but it's still something) I'll get a couple of pairs, thanks!

>>12767615
cringe

>>12767715
girls have been wearing high waisted skinny jeans for a while now

>>12772823
wrangler cowboy cut

>>12771933
I unironically like that guy's look.

>>12767735
90s faggot

>>12770090
I have a full time job. When I'm not working I can't resist constant lurking and shitposting

>>12769033
full homo paul newman is the most attractive man i think ive ever seen

>>12775075
That's young Marlon Brando you nerd

>>12768369

Dr Eggman!

>>12775196
It most certainly is not and I suggest you go see a doctor about your face blindness, might be brain cancer.

This is why

>>12775196
He's right it is paul newman

>>12775196
>>12775890