/fa/ - Fashion

Discord link is dead.

>>12663606
Good, stay out

Trying to get ideas on how to make this style work on warmer/summer climates, I remember how the concept art for the first Mirror's Edge game had some sketches like pic related.

Now, the aesthetics for the runners were inspired by the bike couriers from early 2000s IIRC. But, given that the clothes are made with the right materials, could something like this work as techwear for the aforementioned needs?

>>12665316
It most probably can, but you'll have to give it a try and see what happens

>>12665316
>Trying to get ideas on how to make this style work on warmer/summer climates...
>... given that the clothes are made with the right materials, could something like this work as techwear for the aforementioned needs?

YES.

>>12665316
Cool dry materials all over, your underwear, socks, and shirt. Make sure those pants breath. maybe throw on a vest or a pack with little pockets on the strap(s)

Last thread I was talking about pairing some Superdomes with a flecktarn surplus parka some some tapered and/or cropped rothco cargos. A guy said they might be too sporty. Anyone have some alternative footwear I should try pairing with them? Any suggestions will be welcome, even those unrelated to footwear.

>>12663592
What's the consensus on outlier? Is it overpriced

Has the whole tech thread died, where is everyone?

>>12663592
Can anyone recommend me a North Face jacket for around -25 degrees?

>>12667382
Why wear one jacket when you can layer?

>>12665611
Everyone says it's amazing, but I can't say from experience.

>>12665611
i'm wearing their ultrafine merino right now and its amazingly comfy.

i took two of them on a two month trip to asia and i rotated them everyday and only had to wash them once a week. you can wear them for a week and they'll never stink unless you get shit on them. dont have any experience with their pants tho.

>>12667382
at -25 you want a hardshell and layer the fuck up, lined shell or just straight up puffer jacket or the like

Why is /fa/ so dead?

Jesus tech wear costs a lot. If I just get a UEG shell and wear some Uniqlo thermal shit under can I still be /techwear/?

I don't have a spare 8 grand for clothes.

>>12669769
Usual OP for the most recent threads here.
Things are definitely slow, not just for this thread alone.
I wanted to wait a bit for more F/W news and stuff before kicking off the winter jacket hype, but I have nice friends here who keep the threads up when I fail to do so.
I'll be back later in the month with more inspo and hopefully more news on stuff like the 11 x Salomon Alpines, etc.
>>12670031
Yeah man, work with your budget. Tyvek will not last long, but if you hunt around you can find cheap goretex like this nike for example https://www.grailed.com/listings/1585955-Goretex---Nike-Nike-Goretex-Jacket

>>12670556
> 11byBBS X Salomon

Stop the tease

>>12670031
As with all stuff, the clothes you wear can be as expensive as you want. There are expensive designer clothes that cost so much because they are produced in small batches and retards buy them, and there is mass-produced clothing that may or may not be particularly stylish.
Techwear doesn't mean "ninja cosplay", but "clothes that use technical materials and construction techniques that allow for better performance". Just find something that falls within your pricerange, but still has breathability/water resistance/full range of movement, etc. There are good sports and hiking brands that do that.

If you are purely for aesthetics, however, I think there are a few mainstream brands that have started to make shit with your regular cotton and nylon, that don't offer much in terms of tech, but will help you achieve that "I like books by Gibson" look without spending as much money as on a new car.

So I got a black rain parka. Looks like an m51. In hindsight I should have gotten olive but it's too late now. What can I wear with it so that it doesn't look like a school shooter coat but instead /techwear/. I wore it once with tapered cargos and a turtleneck.

>>12671256
You could go for more color in other places like the pants being olive instead.
Wear sportier shoes and avoid boots.
You can DIY a jacket sling so you can just wear it casually around when it's not raining and not look like you might have a sawn off in your coat.

live

I am looking for some sort of pants that can be used as both everyday clothing, and are suitable for riding a bicycle in the colder weather. So preferably something that allows for a wide range of movement, but doesn't look like something that construction workers wear.
Bonus points for breathability and some sort of water resistance.

Must be available in EU with delivery to eastern Europe. Because some stores like Uniqlo just don't deliver here.

This shit is autistic.I have never seen this style being worn in public. If I ever saw one of you ninja autists at college in this I'd laugh and then call campus security and then laugh some more. It looks like it should cost 50 dollars but instead is 5000 dollars. That is a car.

>>12673725
There is techwear and there is techwear. Autists will pay huge amount of money for expensive designer clothes that they like. It's their money, let them do what they want.

Then there are clothes that use technical materials because they are used in harsh conditions - mostly sports, outdoors, mountaineering brands. Good quality stuff that is supposed to help you out when you are out there. Yes, they don't look like urban ninja cosplay, but they do their job.

What pisses me off is the people who think that shit like Acronym or ACG is functionally better than Patagonia or Black Yak. Opinion disregarded immediately.

>>12673734
Actually ACRNM uses bleeding edge materials better than TNF or Patagonia by far and the design is actually far beyond anything from those outdoor brands. There is no brand more avant garde than ACRNM. So yea, they kind of are "functionally better". That is the whole point.

>>12673742
Could you please provide some examples? Because what I saw was mainly cotton, nylon and sometimes membranes like gore-tex, with some water-repellent coating sometimes. Maybe I missed something, because admittedly, I didn't look into it too much.

>>12673747
Hard shells are all goretex pro, in summer they change that ventile, they've done packable jackets in windstopper and they use a lot of schoeller materials too for things like trousers

>>12673742
>>12673767
Goretex Pro and Ventile are not "bleeding edge materials". Goretex Pro is the standard high-end for jackets, and Ventile was invented during WW2. Neither of them are magic materials, and nobody uses Ventile in serious conditions. Goretex Pro also lags on breathability compared to some other newer materials.

>>12673828
I was only arguing the point of "what I saw was mainly cotton, nylon and sometimes membranes", chill

>>12673832
Sorry, that wasn't me, I just asked the question. Thanks for providing with info.
But I do agree with the other guy that these materials are not anything new. All of that stuff can be found in sports, outdoors and mountaineering clothing.

>>12674479
It's true they're not anything new, but still nice to know they at least use the right materials, that said still not my thing

>>12673742
>Actually ACRNM uses bleeding edge materials better than TNF or Patagonia by far and the design is actually far beyond anything from those outdoor brands. There is no brand more avant garde than ACRNM. So yea, they kind of are "functionally better". That is the whole point.
you are mentally ill

is military surplus a good place to get techwear? too poor to afford some of the name brand stuff. also can someone post military inspo for a civilian?

>>12676592
Flecktarn is stylish, check out bundeswehr parkas and shit.

>>12676592
Surplus gear is on the lower end of tech since it's mass produced and made as cheaply as possible to be supplied to a large number of troops.
A lot of it is still good stuff though, and with a little DIY or styling you can definitely pull it off.

>>12673725
You are on an aboriginal boomerang carving board like the rest of us. You are just as autistic, if not more, than everyone else here. Congratulations.

>>12665549
>>12676612
flecktarn is autistic as fuck my dudes

>>12665611
Also asking about Outlier. Really looking for tech/out pants that look like low profile slim/straight pants, preferably in black. I see alot about Outlier pants being prone to snagging or anything sharp. The futureworks implies it's the more durable outlier pant but I can't find a definite about snagging. Im looking for a pant woth similar look and function, that is either sharp stuff proof, or maybe just cheaper.

>>12677197
OG climbers would be the way to go then. 4-way stretch and very durable. There's also Mission Workshop that you can look at.

I thought I remember those ones specifically being susceptible to sharp stuff? Like even outlier themselves say it. Anyway, thank you, and I'll check out mission. I live in a very brambly wilderness and most people just wear carhart all day everyday.

>>12673712
Arc’teryx A2B commuter pants

>>12677312
Thank you for the suggestion. I'm not a huge fan of the design, but I'll take a look if they have some other interesting models.

>>12665316
>mirrors edge

techwear: the game

>>12677401

>>12677404

Where did that 1000deaths guy go? Haven't seen his shilling anywhere in a while, did he finally get arrested for looking like a terrorist?

>>12676813
your autistic my dude

techwear sunglasses?

urbance thread?

>>12678046
Idk, I guess one of the chameleon sunglasses.

Also, captcha was extremely relevant.

>>12669769
No more Rick Owens General.

This board desrerves to rot.

>>12677408
>Denim
Gross
>>12677460
He went off the deep end after realizing he's a giant lolcow. Deleted his insta and was about to delete his Twitter too. He's apparently building his own apparel company now out of his apartment or whatever.
>>12677987
Boob pockets kek
>>12678054
>>12676612
Shoe masks are top tier cringe
>>12678084
>>12678066
>>12677401
>>12677404
You can take inspo from anywhere, but always be aware of looking inauthentic. See Hugh and Acronym for an example of how a lack of authenticity leads to lulz.

>>12678961
what is "authentic"?

>>12679013
There's a certain idealism that permeates in tech-wear that you have to dress like you're from the year 20XX and should look like a Cybercop when all you're doing is getting in your suburban sedan to go get Starbucks and drive home.
Sure you can ham things up for fashion's sake, but techwear draws influences from fictional sources like Gibson's works or the Mirror's Edge that guy posted.
At some point, it can and will look like cosplay. It's no different than when the movie Drive came out and every kid on the block wanted a quilted bomber with a scorpion on the back of it.

>>12677401
>>12677404
>>12677408
why are video game outfits so awful

Can ponchos be tech? This one can be folded into a small baggie or used as a tent.

>>12667382
skin a bear and later it with a light hoodie

>>12677197
Outlier are top quality and built like tank. Also if your shit rips or tears send them and email and they'll probably just replace your shit for free (they did for me with a pair of shorts)

t. own 2 pants and 2 shorts from them

>>12680295
holy shit w2c?

>>12680391
https://www . amazon . com/dp/B00AJ5FS30/
They come in Coyote, too. When thrown over the shoulder they remind me a lot of the British WWI ponchos.

>>12680394
sick
ty anon

>>12679043
to be fair i don't know how people who don't either
A) live in dense urban areas
or
B) live next to hiking paths
manage to suspend their disbelief while they leave the house in techwear

>>12680413
Put together this basic outfit idea off of the poncho. Any recommendations on bags to put with it?

>>12680459
for what kinda application? i know quite a bit about bags
going /out/ or for tech in an urban environment? edc?

(btw those shoes look kinda shit imho)

>>12680595
Rain running or trail blazing are the primary applications. Any shoes you'd recommend?

>>12680603
check out Outlier's ultra-high roll-top
also bagjack makes a technical sling that you might like
and of course since your fit already looks military-inspired check out goruck. seems overpriced to me but everyone is always swearing by them
if you need something absolutely waterproof then Patagonia's stormfronts are rly gud

idk about shoes they're the hardest part for good tech fits. i alternate between pilotenstiefel and solovair boots

>tfw I really about to drop $2K on an Acronym jacket, so I can flex on people on the internet and so that people in real life can make fun of me.

>>12680709
atleast youll have a nice, fitting and durable jacket thatll last you a long time

>>12680830
>>>12680709
> thatll last you a long time
Nice meme

>>12680709
Which jacket, anon?

>>12680674
Maybe I should just go for combat boots? Which brand should I go with? I'm balancing between S&W, Nike, and Underarmour.

>>12681730
nike sfb are actually a pretty safe bet
I've heard good things about the austrian meme boots but i don't own any so i can't say for sure
pilotenstiefel are great but i wouldn't use them for running or anything

Do you think we should name a style of techwear vigilantism as some seem to be something you'd straight up see in a comic book.

>>12680434
autism tends to help with the whole lack of self awareness required to wear this trash

>>12681730
The 11 x Salomon Jungle Boots

>>12681884
heh, sounds like Mallninjas x Techninjas
>>12682025
>he posts on /fa/
Hmmmmm

>>12682043
doesn't make what i said any less valid faggot

>>12682043
a gaggle of /fa/ggots

To those of you who actually own tech pieces: what's your favorite?

>$1500
Im about to do it, boys.

>>12682996
Why not wait until f/w drops this year and just buy directly from acronym?

>>12683026
They're gonna rerelease it? I looked at the f/w 2017 items and none of the jackets really caught my attention.

>>12683038
Ah, yeah, if nothing really caught you eye then go for it.
Just sucks paying resale.

Would anyone explain why Gore-Tex material's expensive?

>>12682996
might be fu

Is this techwear enough?

https://store.nike.com/ca/en_gb/pd/sportswear-bonded-woven-trousers/pid-11008271/pgid-11555053

>>12683327
Your link doesnt work for me for some reason, but the bonded woven pants are tech wear as fuck.

>>12683329
It's these

>>12667919
>>12668960
>>12680383
Can't tell if you guys are memeing or not does layering really works on sub zero temperature?

>>12683400
yes

>>12682996
I really don't like those straps on the center at all, it sticks out like a sore thumb I prefer something minimalistic

>>12682996
looks sick
do it and post detailed pics here

>>12683247
It's a teflon membrane. Not the cheapest material that has to be processed in a certain way.

Just bought this, too bad they dont have black color in stock and I ended up buying the dark blue one
Does it look dumb wearing dark blue with black tapered cargo ?

errolson pls shave that awful facial hair already jesus christ almighty

>>12673742
ACRNM is like this super pretentious Blackest Ever Black label. Calling it avant-garde is like signing up a paper that states your Kanye-level of obnoxiousness.

>>12683952
jethus cwithe

>>12683400
if it's good for the military it's good for you

>>12673742
Which jacket from Patagonia actually nice?

>>12684821
Doesn't he just have a mustache and a goatee?

>>12684053
Doesn't he just have a mustache and a goatee?

are there any affordable hardshells with carry straps? acronym is out of my budget

>>12685262

Yes, that's what facial hair is, moron.

techwear is so childish
grow up and get real jobs

>>12685871
I have a job, do you?

>>12684242
It has gore-tex pro with the price of 40 bucks
Although it's a Vietnamese company, the store seemed really legit

>>12685871
>get real jobs
>techwear is one of, if not the most expensive styles regularly posted on this board

>>12685903
and yet it is all worn by manchildren living in their mom's basement bought with allowance and christmas money

>>12683952
Are you serious? Black and Blue such a timeless colorway. Its never going to look dumb.

Anybody know where theres some relatively(relative to acronym) cheap cargopants with a very small pant legopening in a narrow/slim/skinny fit that have that waterproof-ish material? I know skinny fit isn't in vogue for you guys but its what I like.

I don't actually care to much if they're waterproof but I like that sheeny material

>>12686062
Nike have a few pairs of slim or skinny fit cargo pants with a sheen to their fabric.

What does /fa/ think of these? They're pretty cheap and supposedly very lightweight.

>>12686538
They're a clone of 6in sfb's why not get the real ones?

>>12680394

it's like they're trying to sell it to shadowrun cosplayers

Any thoughts on the F2017 Prestos coming?

fuck me I found a cheap alternative pants to those acg right after I have my cargo tapered

>>12686773
woah what are those!

>>12686830
Bershka
the pullover looks kinda dumb with all those useless straps tho
would cop if it only had that kangaroo pocket

>>12686773
Those cargos look like garbage
And the brand being bershka they will look even worse in real life
If you want to cop the pullover, those straps and shit are super easy to remove with a seam ripper

>>12683247
Partially because goretex for years has maintained a lite-monopoly on weatherproof membranes.
No competition? Then it'll cost more.
>>12686007
You could argue that about this the entirety of /fa/. The majority of hardcore tech-wear enthusiasts are urban commuters, students, and people in the tech industry. But please, keep projecting in here, it's a free bump :^)
>>12686538
Just get the 6in SFB, it's not even that expensive.
>>12686773
Tread carefully.
>>12685785
Use goretex patch repair kits. You can sew the straps on the patch, apply the patch to the inside of the jacket, and use the dryer to seal the adhesive to the inside.

>>12686062
Skinny fit is and isn't. just depends on your intended look. ACG and Nike Sportswear have some slim cargos that would work.

ACG won't drop until like the end of October.

Guy I managed to get Nike boned woven pants for 100$, which belts should I wear it with?

>>12686669
I don't get this olive meme, even Y-3 and Adidas are jumping in to it

>>12687271
>Partially because goretex for years has maintained a lite-monopoly on weatherproof membranes.
no it fucking hasn't you dumb dumb, there are several different branded technical membranes out there and it has been like that for good 20 years at least now

>>12688218
https://www.outsideonline.com/1898541/insane-membrane
>there are several different branded technical membranes out there and it has been like that for good 20 years at least now

Yeah, none of which have the backing and outreach that goretex has. The only one's that have come close are Schoeller's C Change, and Polartec's Neoshell.

Times are changing, but goretex is still king.

>>12686007
Yet even the normie brands jumping in to it

>>12685871
you would need a decent job to afford these overpriced black garbage bag cutouts desu senpai

>>12685903
>most expensive

acr shells top out at what 1500 bucks?

thats cheap as fuck for high end outerwear you fucking retard

This is what I wore today. What can I do to improve this? Is layering a windbreaker over a hoodie bad? It's extremely light-weight and pretty water resistant unlike the hoodie. The phone is my real phone btw but it's not really important to the fit.

>>12688244
>Yeah, none of which have the backing and outreach that goretex has
That is entirely besides the point, there is no monopoly on gore tex, it's probably the one with most brand recognition but calling it monopoly and the reason shells are expensive is some grade A horseshit.
And to be honest technical jackets really aren't that expensive, outerwear in general costs a lot.
> The only one's that have come close are Schoeller's C Change, and Polartec's Neoshell.
I would say as far as brand recognition goes, eVent and hyVent are probably the next best known. As far as the technical properties go, it really doesn't matter what you pick, there is really no clear 'winner' in the category who is ahead of the others.

>>12688669
thrash the shoes for starters, the qasa boots are mad fucking ugly

>>12688693
Well I already bought them and I like them plenty that I'm more willing to change the rest fit for the fit to better suit them.

>>12688701
> I'm more willing to change the rest fit for the fit to better suit them.
That really isn't going to help, the design is just really bad, the shape is awkward as hell and I have never seen a single fit where they have looked good.
I mean I don't particularly like normal Qasas that much personally, but I understand the appeal and I can still appreciate the design. The boots are just abomination, there is a reason they went on really steep sales on lot of places recently.

>>12688704
And I really wanted to like them too, the concept on paper is great
>hey let's take this really popular and already iconic silhouette and make it a high, boot like iteration
Sign me in
But they really dropped the ball with them

>>12688707
>>12688704
Yeah I got them half off the y-3 store but I guess I really don't know enough about fashion yet to be buying pieces like those, especially unpopular ones. The only other tech-wear shoes I have are pic related, but I feel like there's only so much I can do with them and I've done most of it already.

>>12688669
i hate this grid meme
how do you want honest critique if we can't even see how shit fits?
for all we know your jacket could be xbox hueg and your cargos could be stacking madly. save yourself the time of making a shit grid and post a pic of how you look; everyone will be able to appreciate better then

>>12688757
I'll post a pic in the morning but really it's because I don't have a good mirror and that is my real phone which has a pretty shit camera

>>12688771
translation: it looks like shit

>>12688773
>translation I suck dicks lol

>>12688707
Yeah, I guess the idea was to refresh the Qasa a bit. It's gotten really old and stale over the years and I think it's on its way out. There are plenty of shoes within the aesthetic that are new and fresh.
>>12688669
You're new, and that's okay. You can try to make the boots work but Y-3 tends to work well with only other Y-3. I would instead go for some shoes like the Nike Mercurials for a sporty fit like this.
The watch can be off-putting for a techier vibe. Perhaps cheaper-end G-shock would be better fitting. I have one that was $40 and not gigantic like most of the G-shock line.

>>12689415
Alright I'll keep these things in mind

80s techwear inspo please

just got these shoes but they kinda ended up looking goofy with all my pants. what pants should i get that will work with em

Is this techwear?

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2116152785/apricoat-a-zero-compromise-jacket-for-adventurers/comments?cursor=17429049

>>12690649

Like this? Or is Alien too lunarcore?

>>12691034
If their claims are to be believed, then yes. But we don't know how the coat will fare in actual real-life scenarios.
A lot of clothing items that claim to be waterproof have some issues with that when used in heavy rain. Breathability is also iffy.

I don't know, I am tempted to get one just out of curiosity to see how well it works. But I have my doubts about actual performance of materials.
And my rock-climbing experience tells me that the harness definitely looks unsafe.

>>12692256
same

kekwear

Anyone know what jacket this is? I am interested to get into techwear and want a nice leather jacket to start.

>>12692256
this is what happens when niggers discover yahoo japan

Can anyone recommend me a budget ACRNM jacket?

>>12692698
Don't let those kids with the memes get you down blee, you're a big guy.

>>12693049
Like, Acronym, but cheap, or something cheap by their standards?
If first, then it's very unlikely, it's expensive designer clothing. That's kinda their point - small amounts are produced, and you pay a lot of money to get their items.
Your best bet would be to find someone who sells used items, I guess, but even then resellers usually raise the price, so you'd have to be lucky.

If you just want something from them that is cheaper than $2k jackets, just browse their shop when the next batch drops, and look for something a bit cheaper.

Has techwear gone too far?

>>12692698
>techwear
>leather jacket
>yeah dude but is has buckles

>>12693496
What's up with these oversized pants they look like manlets for fuck sake

>>12693507
>implying
most techwear fits don't feature technical clothing for the most part
if anything, leather is more technical than half of the shit the techkiddies wear

>>12693507
>>12694039
and probably good to remember that your techwear jesus released leather jacket

>>12693507
>>12694042
with nothing less than buckles and straps

>>12683395
They're great pants last years

Found this, pretty tech

Can I wear non-techwear pants with those?

>>12693496
Cheers,
Staos

>self-proclaimed communist
>wears $500 shoes

twg is dead and boxwood is a cuck
i hoot and slap my belly

hey whats up dope gorilla gang tank top rain coat cool dope swag
hey cargo pants running shoes without the stamina to run 100m
coat < umbrella u mad

>>12695060
This is not me.
And also I would like to publicly apologize to TWG and boxwood in particular. I am sorry. I am ready to be let back in and contribute.

hey you scared kiddo????????

>>12695118
this isn't me
hoot hoot hup hup

>>12695121
stop stealing my internet lingo >:(

>>12695121
>slapping his belly
>not hooting

hahahahahahaha

>>12694988
>>12695060
>>12695102
>>12695118
>>12695119
>>12695121
>>12695123
>>12695126

Stop shitting the thread up you autistic retards. I can tell you are all Canadians.

>>12695160
>I can tell you are all Canadians.

>>12695160
LOL

>>12695171
Please. "I hoot and slap my belly". You are too obvious.

>>12695204
>too obvious

its clearly a false flag

First off, the posters in here aren't me.

Second. this is long overdue, but here is my apology.

By the way, before I start, I know I wasn't being serious enough before - this is because I didn't really understand what you were attempting to build with the TWG discord in actuality. So if this is jarring, know it was because I didn't seriously consider your merit as a moderator, which was my fault, not yours.

I'm truly, publicly sorry for posting about you on /fa/ and other discords, and for being a shit stirrer on TWG. I didn't fully comprehend the difficulty of running a server, of juggling 20 different personalities at once, and how my actions made that so much harder for you. I felt weak, and personally taken down when you removed me, so I lashed out - repeatedly. How could "Boxwood" treat *ME* like this? It took me time to understand that the issue was I had crossed a line, and then crossed it again, and again, and again when given a chance to redeem myself - this wasn't your fault, it was my immaturity. I may deny writing this to some people to maintain certain optics, but it is me.

To anyone who I've hurt, sorry.

>>12695273
>optics
Nice try, snek.

>>12695273
the snakes outta the bag with this one kid

kangaroo jack and macca jones got ya cornered

>>12695273
jo smokes weed

Do not associate yourselves with techwear. It is literally a fascist movement. This man is a racist.

Techwear is so stupid
you talk like its about being practical and high performance but it is just ninja cosplay
none of this is wearable and you just try to look cool for your crappy instagram accounts
cant wait til this meme dies and you guys look at pics of yourselfs and realize you wasted so much money to look autistic

can i get some techwear inspo for women?

>>12695473

>>12695481

>>12695485

Is this techware?

>>12678046
ESS eyepro perhaps?

Dumb nigger, here's your (You)

>>12695489
Cringe.

UEG X Puma hoodie
Nike Field General boots

what color pants should I get with this fit?

>>12697056
forgot pic

>>12697056
>>12697063
go to the Lunarcore thread

>>12695481
>>12695489
Disgusting
>>12695485
The only good one

>>12697419
>the only good one
Yeah, no.
That one is absolute trash. There is no cohesion with what she's wearing. You can be waterproof as fuck all you want, but you still have to have style. Otherwise just buy some real outdoors/mountaineering gear.

>>12694988
top jej

whats the difference between $300 guerrilla group pants and these?

http://www.lordzapparel.com/product/black-tactical-nylon-paneled-cargo-pants

>>12699342
Fuck, they have some amazing shit, might cop something when they are in stock.

>>12695273
ok boxwood, tim buddy, i did what you want.

time to let the prodigal son come home

>>12695489
ill give her credit for pulling off the the BDUs

>>12695485
this is just a mens fit transposed

>>12695489
ill give her credit for pulling off the the BDUs in a womenswear context

>>12699393
#freejo

He dindu nuffin, he a good boy who just wanna hoot and slap his belly

How can poorfag into image? I think I could DIY pants from cargo pants. Can I get similar hoodie somewhere cheap and does it have specific name?

>>12700828
the hoodie is from boris bidjan saberi so its gonna be pricy

>>12685247
its a sportswear/outdoor brand with some relaxation/camp clothing as well - it's all nice for what each item is designed for.

>>12691067
the more waterproof an item is, the less breathable it is - and the less well it will perform when you sweat underneath it due to comparitive humidity on each side of the membrane

>>12694139
yes

>>12700828
I think it's funny that you're a poor person who wants to look like a rich person that wants to look like a poor person

is a polyester scarf tech?
its for cold climates so im curious

Starring: Errolson Hugh

>>12677257
Yeah if live in wilderness/do outdoorsy stuff there's no point in outlier.

>>12676612

would maybe look cool without the glasses but then it would just look like cosplay

cop or not ?

>>12703495
If it has some sort of membrane and water-repellent coating, then why not. I have a similar hardshell from a different brand. It's really useful in rainy climates, and small and light enough to fit in a bag.

>>12703495
I like it.

>>12703495
looks like a good starter. Especially if that's a paclite.

>>12703495
Cop

>>12683400
Are you kidding?

>>12683400
Ogres have layers... Goretex has layers... Do ya get it?!

Help me out, what are those funny techwear hats called?

They're like baseball caps but with more boxy/pointy bills and usually they'll have some kind of techy rope thing going down the middle and a pencil sleeve. I can't find ANY pictures of these for some reason but I remember seeing some on fa awhile ago

>>12707145
Think this is what you're after https://nasirmazhar.com/shop/product/black-cord-detail-cap/

>>12707511
150 bongs wtf

>>12695559
would be very practical during october-november when the weather over here is allllll rain, all day, every day.

>tfw I really like and want to get into techwear
>tfw I live in Georgia

>>12707511
Thanks this is exactly what I was looking for
>>12707570
:(
Hope for an off brand version eventually

>>12707616
I feel ya there. At least you get some good rain. California fags don't get anything.
Windstoppers and the such are really nice up here in the Great Lakes.

save

>>12710854
stop bumping this rancid shit

>>12710956
why'd you bump it?

Can you hike in boost soles? Going to Washington soon and plan to do some innawoods, but it's my first time and don't know what to buy footwear wise.

Y'all are so fucking afraid of looking rediculous it's such a meme.

Who cares what some normie thinks is too "cosplay?" If it looks good it looks good, and what are people gonna do? Laugh at you? For what having a fashion sence and knowing how to dress? At most people would just look at you and go "huh that guy kinda looks like a ninja" and just forget about it and go on with their day

On the other hand, autists who pay 2k for a fucking jacket need to stop.

The price point problem with techwear is insane, for the price of one techwear peice you can buy a whole fucking wardrobe.

C/N?

>>12711156

Do not cop

>>12711047
If you are just planning to do some light hiking, regular sneakers that fit well will do alright.
If the idea is to literally walk all day, you need comfortable shoes that have been worn for some time already, and the type depends on conditions.

Is it going to be cold and rainy? Better get some proper boots, otherwise your sneakers will just absorb water and a bunch of dirt will get in. Good boots will have higher ankle part to keep shit like rocks and sand getting in, and some sort of rubbery finish above the sole to keep moisture out. Gore-tex or similar membranes might be used, and they are pretty cool if you can afford the bill.
Is terrain soft or rocky? Paths with a lot of rocks will require a stiffer sole, which might be less comfortable, but will prevent your feet from bruising. They also often have hardened sole to help protect the toes from damage when accidentally hitting rocks and stuff.

Do not wear new shoes, or shoes that don't fit you perfectly on long hikes, you will get terrible blistering and bruises.

>>12693496
I think these have become such an echo chamber trying to mimic Acronym's catalog shots that people think it's fine to look like this

What type of pants could go with it?>>12694139

https://www.grailed.com/users/myitems/683017

Selling stone island Size L

>>12680459
id on pants?

Does anybody have a schematic or something that explains in detail how gravity pockets work? I only found short clips of 'guy waves hand, phone appears in hand'

>>12712004

Cop or not ?
Also any recommendation for a pair under 150$ other than presto utility

buying expensive ass shit, whats yalls job and do you spend all ur money on techwear shit or??

>>12712197

They look good.

>>12712197
Are they water resistant?

>>12712271
No

>>12712248
I am unironically a bin man

>>12712197
Id on those ?

>>12714431
EQT support ADV

>>12681753
I own the meme boots, they are actually good

>>12683395
ID on the sweatshirt?

>>12711112

Some dudes kicked a guy to death for wearing a simple straw hat the other day. This wasn't a ghetto either but a hipster hangout in a park in the center of the city. So, yeah.

can techwear be cute?

>>12716008

Where do you live, senpai?

>>12713830
>I am unironically a bin man
Heh, cool. I heard you get good pay doing that - is it true?

Was prowling the net for some obscure tech pieces when I stumbled upon these Hi-Tec Para boots. They're waterproof and made for hiking. Might cop in the future.

>>12716103
Yes, it's true.
The job isn't as disgusting or physically straining as one would think, it's only a bit repetitive and unpleasant at times.

>>12716161
Cool, many times I actually thought about dropping out to be one but I had no fucking clue how. How do you become a bin guy?