/fa/ - Fashion

>>12382988
Just copped pic related, please tell me i didnt fuck up

>>12383021
what is that

>>12383021
sick, what will you store in them?

>>12383046
My feet?

>>12382988
Sauce?

>human race

>>12383021
they look like cars from 2500

>>12383063
not OP, reverse image doesn't find anything and I'm also interested

>>12383071
Why not a horse race or a car race? They go faster and the tracks are usually more interesting

>>12383021
Sick Y-3s bro

>>12383063
>>12383090
jk m8 were fuckin idiots. second one is me. took me 20 seconds on the adidas website
http://www.adidas.com/us/pureboost-shoes/BA8903.html

thoughts on these? i like the argentina spezials but i can't find them anywhere.

>>12383141
you can custom spezials

Copped these today, ugly af

will the Mallison ever come back? It seems to be out of stock everywhere.
any thoughts on this model?

cop for $70?

>>12383216
Why did you buy them if they're so ugly?
(They are rather unfortunate looking.)

>>12383284
link?

Posted these already in the previous thread, but again, they are so fucking comfy. Definitely the most bang for your buck out of all boost models.
Strange how they are still sitting on adidas.com eu site

>>12383021
you did well

>>12383284
They look awful and I hear the boost is mostly cosmetic, in the sense that you can barely feel it
Would not cop

I have been looking for for some light shoes for summer and was looking specifically at primeknite's like the pic but desu I'm not a fan of adidas. Can you recommend soemthing similar from other brands? I love my roshes flyknit which are crazy comfortable but wanted to try something different.

>>12383472
fuck me i cant believe this word filter is still there

>>12383216
Actual tenniscore, my style in the early 2000s

I still have a pair of K-Swiss for throwbacks to that style whenever I feel like it

>>12383388
I love the Pures. I have the triple black, the black / brown, and the OP colorways but still want to cop at least two more. Such a clean, minimalist silhouette that goes with any type of fit. And they're top tier as an all-day walking / active lifestyle shoe.

>>12383472
Nike Flyknit racer, Nike free run flyknit, asics gel kayano knit and the new zoku runner ultra knit from reebok are the first that come to mind

>>12383525
OP's cw is pretty nice, but I feel like on most of the colourways the digicamo/glitch/whatever pattern is a bit too loud and obvious.
Makes them look like those fake light up yeezys imo.
Why do you want so many gr pairs of the same shoe? I'd rather have variety instead of just one shoe in different colourways.

Just bought these for 70 usd shipped from germany

>>12383525
i don't have any yet but I'm liking these. blue is my favorite color. i think I'm about to order them

>>12383098
What is this picture my friend?

>>12383600
Where from? link?

>>12383658
Search "BUNDESWEHR SPORTSCHUHE" on ebay.de

http://ebay.com/itm/390486579142

Thoughts on these?

>>12383388
I think the OG PB knit was the best PB

This is quickly becoming adidas best new sneaker

just got this one. Thoughts?

>>12383775
How's the comfort on these?

>Adidas is rereleasing this under the Yeezy line and charging an extra $80.

cop or not

>>12383799
w2c

>>12384198
http://www.urbanoutfitters.com/urban/catalog/productdetail.jsp?id=40312811&category=SEARCH+RESULTS

>>12384206
Meant the pants :/

Anyone got any info on these?

Bought them like 3 years ago off ebay, only info I can find is if you search Adidas Blue Label, some shit comes up about a limited run in Europe from a couple years ago but I can't find a single picture of these online anywhere

>>12384247
Also they're canvas. The dirt can easily be cleaned off but I can't be assed

>>12384196
big time cop

>>12383472
How about http://store.nike.com/us/en_us/pd/air-zoom-all-out-flyknit-mens-running-shoe ?

I have the low version and the full length Zoom sole feels pretty awesome.

>>12383775
These look like wannabe new balances.

Why is this so perfect?

>>12382988
>>12383525
I was stuck between ordering OP's colorway and pic related. I ended up copping pic related a couple days ago. My first pair of boost sneakers & now the comfiest shoes I own

>>12384219
What pants are those? W2c

>>12384561
That's what I was asking lol

>>12384594
google search leads to weird jap sites

>>12384615
https://world.taobao.com/item/544923812827.htm?fromSite=main&spm=a21f2.7918495.1000002.79.Myiq9T

Cop or not?

>>12384690
nah

>>12384823
>>/cgl/

looking for something to wear on my trip, gonna be walking the city for a big portion of the day

>>12384941

>>12384943

>>12383771
I concur,
I WANT MORE COLOURWAYS THO

>>12383771
the construction is extremely flimsy and cheap

>>12383771
It's just looks like Samba's with boost added

>>12384690
What model? Really like these.

>>12383600
CW doesn't look authentic, sorry anon :(

>>12383673
Thought about copping, but went for the Pure Boosts. Cheaper, nicer shilouette and this sock thing looks weird.

What is the best adidas shoe that offers support all around? A shoe thats not just a sock attached to a sole

>>12386083
EQT Support RF

>>12386083
UB 1.0 of course

Best gazelle

>>12384322
what are these

are there any adidas shoes that are good for running while at least looking decent?

>>12386403
GATs

>>12385138
There Seeley's

Which kind of footwear sites that you can buy affordable sneakers, and don't bring up Payless Shoe Stores I want good prices.

>>12386598
Amazon

>>12386598
>don't bring up Payless Shoe Stores
OK

Payless ShoeSource

>>12386441
>>12386441
Clearly says 'adidas' on the sole though
But found out on my own already

>>12383850
Basically the same shoe already, same materials and everything.
Really feeling this cw, been wanting them since the first pics leaked in july or something, but now that they are available I'm not sure.
Thoughts on these for casual wear?

>>12384247
what does the tongue read? and is there any info left intact inside?

Some people were asking about the miadidas in another Adidas/boost related thread, apparently they weren't only exclusive for the Adidas 5th avenue store.

I just need some new shoes, I guess sneakers, for the summer
what do I get
is pic related good enough? it's like half the price at the local store

is this the best NMD colorway

Picked these up recently pretty happy w/ em

>>12385863
CW?

Cop or not

>>12387415
just steal a roll of gauze from your nearest hospital

copped some NMDs in mesh earlier today. the rear heel part rubs hard and the shoe generally feels weird and uncomfortable. sizing is spot on though, I tried .05 down and up before buying so I know these are right. Really hoping that there's a break-in period that'll solve itself out. Anyone with nmd mesh experience care to share their break in stories or tips? how long did it take?

>>12387407
Color way. The front part is blueish and the sizing isn't that of the Bundeswehr. Pic related are authentic ones, first number on the tounge is the size, 285 in this case equivalent to a European 44 or 44.5 I think.

where can I buy these

>>12383388
Are they yours in the pic? How did you black out the soles?

what's a nice cheap sports shoez for trauining

>>12387684
I got white mesh NMDs. I also experienced the heel rub as well as some chaffing around the mouth of the shoe. I just wore socks with them for a while so I still felt the rubbing but none of the chaff. After wearing them in (about a week and a half worths of walking) the uncomfortableness goes away. I think you'll just get used to the show's "hugging" feel too so that won't be a problem for too long

>>12387865
feiyues

>>12387848
Yes they're mine, and that's the pure boost ltd triple black, so the sole is black by default.
Released like two weeks ago, but I hear they didn't release in the US.
Plenty of sizes in stock on Adidas eu sites

There's lots of guides on how to black out boost on youtube. It's not hard but you need the right dye, paint and finisher to make it last

Had these come through the mail today

thoughts on the newest release?
I dig'em a lot.

>>12387884
awesome, I'm wearing them right now and they're a little better than day 1. maybe has something to do with the socks I wore, hopefully they get even better with time. thanks for the insightful response bro

Just copped these, thoughts?

>>12388314
these are nice, how do they fit and feel? specifically the super long tongue and rear heel tab. looks like they'll rub a lot

>>12388318
Ordered online, won't be until thursday that i'll be able to try them on :(

I own about 3 pairs of black shoes, definitely want to buy the Pure Boosts.

Should I go for the all white ones? I normally wear dark-blue skinny jeans.

These are out of stock again lads. Really wanna cop me some. Anyone took notice of how long they take to restock?

anyone coping these

Will these sellout

Anyone know the release date for these?
I know caliroots had them on their site with a countdown, but it's not there anymore (forgot the date) and I can't find anything else than "april 2017" online. Local sneaker boutique employee didn't know the release date or if they were getting them.
I need these in my life.

>>12389720
M8 are you dense those are cs1

>>12388191
These are better

Does anyone like the sandles?

but for a guy?

>>12383216
these are sick, thanks

>>12383359
u type like a fucking mongol

>>12390181
fuck i want these now

>tfw can't find an 9.5 uk albrecht

Just kill me lads

thoughts?

>>12390497
wheres the tan/beige one? I want to cop that one

>>12390500
no idea, but i think the green one will look sick with my coté, i'm actually sold on it

>>12390508
Damn. I was going to buy pic related but those Cote's are nice

>>12390514

Cotes, along with the Albrechts (low and mids) are my favorite adi shoes. They deserve more praise i feel

>>12390508
>>12390518

Why i never heard of these before?

>>12390523

They're all deadstock anon, that's why

>>12388909
Yes
>>12390181
techwear meme tho

>>12390528
these are just a less nice mephisto rainbow
still nice tho

Why is this so perfect?

>>12388113
Thanks anon. I'm based in Aus and we seem to only get leftovers, I doubt I'm going to be able to get triple blacks retail.

I'm gonna test it out with some beater ub's and see how it goes.

I copped these when they realeased. Pretty good so far, really soft cause of dat primeknit but that also makes them more prone to tearing

>>12390595
Are these still available? Thinking of copping for someone

>>12383284
Copped these for $55 some time ago. The boost is felt only on the heel which is ok for high shoes like that. To my eye they look good. They are quite tight width wise but not sure if that goes away after you break em in.

Would cop for $70/10

>>12390497
>Magazine pockets that high up
Bruh you'll end up shot because you couldn't reload fast enough or you incapacitated yourself by fracturing your ribs while charging forward and the magazines hitting your chest.

Think smart.

>>12390175
No, they are restocking ( and as far as I know they haven't released in europe yet, the date got pushed back or something)

>>12384219
want . bumping these

got them recently, very nice :)

>>12384943
my sides

Best adidas sneaker? best adidas sneaker

>>12390583
w2c

>>12390597
still available on premier

>>12387336
triple white better

Sold my black 1.0's and bought the black ltd's with the leather cage, very nice in person.

>>12392134
you done goofed

these got here today v comfy

>>12392015
yeah, w2c? i don't see it on their website

>>12383021
you know what you need to do.
plant tomatoes in them

>>12392631
[plant tomatoes in them]

>>12386427
I'm also curious about this. I need a replacement for my running Nikes but most of this thread looks like fashun sneakers.

Never worn Adidas so I don't know how good they are for running.

>>12392644
adizero primeknit. you should buy new balance mizuno or asics for running instead of nike or adidas anyway

>>12392630
hanon or end

>>12383698
except these are shit for arch support. way too squishy in my experience

Should I?

Guys please give me some advice on what shoes I should get.

>No more than 80 dollars
>Something black to go with blue/black jeans for my everyday shoe
>Running style shoe preferred but willing to get regular style shoes.
>Adidas obviously
>Shopping on ebay
>Slim straight jeans and not fat, im like 5'10/170
>Pic related is my top choice

>>12393212

>>12393212
!

>>12383284
they look dope. anyone else know if they are as comfortable as they look?

>>12393212

>>12388397
They won't, it's a limited release.

>>12392134
>Sold my black 1.0s
FOR WHAT PURPOSE?

>>12392268
>>12393313
Not him, but what's the problem here?
If you can sell your beat up 1.0's for a ridiculous overprice (considering that you are selling used shoes) to some massive faggot who thinks that 1.0 is the only good ultra boost, and get a fresh pair of premium ltd 3.0's why wouldn't you.
Sounds like a pretty good deal

>>12393517
The 1.0s have the only nice primeknit pattern, the 2.0s' gradient is weird, and the 3.0s have this weird stretch mark going on. The 1.0s are also way rarer, and they will appreciate much faster than 2.0/3.0s.

>>12387336
Most definitely. I hope they do another restock

>>12393536
You sound like on of those massive faggots.

If you have worn out your 1.0's (which everyone knows wear out fast due to not having continental) why would you keep them around when you could get a fresh pair that will last you longer. They're not museum items, you're supposed to wear them.
Worn shoes, despite being 1.0 Ultra Boosts aren't going up in value the way you think. DS pairs sure, but worn, nah.

2.0 looks good on some cw's, 3.0 looks good on most cw's, and the 4.0 is going to be great.
The black ltd actually looks sick in person.

Need advice on what kind of pants to wear with NMDs. Do you guys always pinroll your skinny jeans? Or do you hem up all your pants a few inches? Or joggers?

Adidas shoes just look bad with long boot cut pants covering them.

>>12393704
>Do you guys always pinroll your skinny jeans
dont do this

>>12387794
custom your spezials

>>12393600
3.0 cb are sitting on shelves for a reason . He should have stayed with 1.0

>>12384690

>fl*tsoled

absolutely not

>>12393904
JFYI the most iconic trainers are all flat soled, AF1, AJ1, Blazer, Stans, Superstars, Oldskool, Converse

that shoe is horrible nevertheless, that is true

>>12393772
I'm guessing the reason is that the whole boost hype has decreased, so resellers don't bother to cop, Adidas is coming up with realeases and new colourways way more often than during 1.0 and they are producing way more pairs.
Ultra Boosts are more popular than they've ever been even though /fa/ggots say that 1.0 was the only decent pattern.

>>12394053
>I'm guessing the reason is that the whole boost hype has decreased
Actually its the opposite. sales have been better than ever for adidas and EQT 93/17 sell out in seconds , as well as yeezys and other boost models.

>>12393938

Well i don't care they're iconic, they're absolutely sordid and make your feet hurt

The huarache on the other hand may look weird, but damn it feels like walking on cotton wool

>>12383771
Just picked up the grey. I really hope these do not become the next Roshe..

Cop? I've been looking for something Khaki

>>12394071
flat soles can be comfortable too, if you don't have any, just try on some Lunar Force 1s for instance or the Cons II

>>12394209
Its a good alternative for french beige R1

sell or keep them?
i'm not really sure i need someone with a sense of style to help me

>>12394284
What size

Copped those for 110€, as well as black Pure Boosts 2 for 60€. Did I do well?

>>12394371
Good cop on the pure boosts . 2.0 UB are meh

>>12394375
I'm not sure it was 2.0, I just took the pic that looked closer to what I had. How do I tell?

>>12394387
Gradient pattern

>>12394068
Well there's colourways of NMD's, Ultra Boosts etc. sitting, the ones that sell out don't sell out as fast, resale prices have gone down
Of course there are the models that sell out instantly, like collabs and new releases like the 93/17, but some time ago pretty much every cw of every lifestyle boost model would sell out quickly

>>12394371
Pure Boost 2 is ugly and so is that UB colourway. That weird yellowish streak ruins it.
Decent prices though

>>12394343
44 eu

>>12394402
>ut some time ago pretty much every cw of every lifestyle boost model would sell out quickly
because UB 3.0 is not as great nor is r2. r1 OG's sold out quick as well as city socks and other r1 colorways. UB design has been on a downfall.

>>12394433
Give you 240 for em

>>12394441
Even though you say 3.0's are ugly, you can't deny the fact that a part of the reason for them sitting is the quantities they are releasing.
Even though they are probably selling more pairs than ever, there's less hype around it because of the sheer number of pairs produced now, and because they're easily available, unlike before.

>>12393313
>>12393517
Op here, 1.0 knit is overrated. The only reason people prefer 1.0's is because they want to be a part of the OG crowd. If the 2.0 knit released first, everyone would say that those were the best and everything else that follows is subpar. Nobody wants to admit it but it's true. I sold my 1.0's for $170 and bought the ltd's for $200, easily worth it imo.

>>12394505
>the quantities
OG NMD released in a large amount of quantity and sold out quickly

Blame everything but the sneaker except 98% of the people will tell you that they prefer 1.0. This isn't nothing new. Uncaged UB sat as well as xr1's last year.

3.0 UB are not just attractive R1 NMD , EQT 93/17, UB 1.0 or y-3 PB. If 1.0 released I'm sure they won't sit anywhere. People would be doubling up or more

>>12394521
2.0 is generally considered the worst of the UB patterns so no. The reason why people like 1.0 because the knit is one of the best knit patterns of any sneaker.

>>12394521
You are absolutely right about everything here, 1.0 is ridiculously overrated.
Also $170 for worn shoes easily worth it. Plus the black Ltd's look really good and the continental will last much longer.

>>12394523
The OG NMD restock was indeed huge quantities, but it sold out purely because of hype. All the fuccbois and resellers thought they were getting on some rare and limited shit, because the original release was so low in numbers. If they originally made same number of pairs as they are making now with gr mesh NMD's they would've probably originally sat on shelves too. So much of the hype on some colourways and models revolves around the fact that original stock numbers were really low and people couldn't cop the shoes.
On the re-released OG NMD's now the resale prices are low and the shoe is ugly. Pretty much everyone who really wanted a pair got their's for retail.
There are much better r1 pk options out there.

XR1's and R2's are sitting because the colourways are thrash. The first XR1's however did sell out.
Also the first few releases of the uncaged ub sold out instantly, now they're in stock everywhere. The hype on those is gone, because again, now they're making more colourways and pairs in every release.
>If 1.0 released I'm sure they won't sit anywhere.
Yes, because of the hype that was generated due to low quantities in the original releases. Same as the OG NMD restock
As >>12394521 said, people just want to get in to the 1.0 club

People should just cop the shoes that they like, not the ones that are artificially hyped due to limited releases and the "og" factor.

>>12394686
I do not understand why so many people do not like nmds, I don't think they're ugly at all, the silhouette is very nice and the eva plugs make it unique

>>12393704
Why would you ever buy boot cut pants?

But my personal preference is that the more modern/futuristic shoes should be worn with pants where the opening of the legs don't overlap the shoes. That being said, it doesn't have to be skinny jeans, it could just be aggressively tapered pants or joggers. I also never wear jeans with shoes like that either

>>12394686
>id, people just want to get in to the 1.0 club
It doesn't work that way. I've never seen a one sided opinion when it comes to preference to sneakers. Every one will always say they prefer 1.0 because of the pattern. little if few prefer other UB because of comfort or the upgraded sole. But like I said. it's onesided as it gets. People prefer the air yeezy 2 to air yeezy 1. yeezy 350 v1 vs V2 is probably 50/50 in terms of preference. I can go on and on. You guys can complain about quantity and hype, but in general people are gonna choose the better looking sneaker. and The original Ultra boost is better in terms of looks.

>>12394699
I'm not hating on NMD's, just don't like the OG one, which I was talking about. The models with theat overlay stripe going across the midfoot don't look good to me. The og get's too much praise anyways, and it's just because it was limited.
The tricolors, glitch camos and gum bottoms for example look much nicer. I actually own a pair of the tricolor whites, and I will cop the gum bottom cs1's soon.

>>12394722
>original Ultra boost is better in terms of looks
Just wonder if you'd think that way if the 2.0 released first

I get that some people genuinely prefer the look of the 1.0, but calling other versions "trash" as many people do, just goes to show that you don't care for the actual shoe at all, since basically it's the same.

>>12394745
>Just wonder if you'd think that way if the 2.0 released first

I wouldn't because I prefer 3.0 over 2.0. I haven't seen a 2.0 that I like . 1.0 is the superior sneaker when it comes to looks and that's what the majority see when they buy a sneaker

wheres the love for eqts

>all this pedantry over minor differences in sneaker models and versions
sometimes the sneakerhead contingent of /fa/ makes me laugh and laugh and laugh

>>12394521
Nigga, if we're being objective here, it's clear that the 1.0 pattern is the nicest knit pattern, follwoed by the 3.0, then 2.0. That is why the Reigning Champ Ultra Boost is the best one.

>>12394071
>thinks the AF1 is uncomfortable

>>12395216
tee times are nicer tbhfamimo

>>12386083
If you want the most support go with the Ultra Boost ST. They're more dad shoe than normal UB's but will probably get you the best feeling shoe ever.

>>12395445
Was not stable or supportive at all imo. I wanted to cop but the regular version feels much better.

>>12386083
Get the EQT support 93/16. Really great support due to the upper's materials. Comfort is really good as well.
If you want a little more breathability go with the pure boost 2017. It's a knit upper but doesn't stretch and give in as much as primeknit

>>12394527
I get this, but I still think the 2.0 triple whites are an amazing shoe that are unfairly shit upon because muh gradient

are there gonna be more of the city sock original releases?

>>12387382
nice yeezys

>>12387336
so truuu

3rd best adidas after Dooms and UB

>>12396377
>dooms

>>12396436
Dooms have a better silhouette than UB easily. Just don't have the comfort

>>12395761
The gum bottoms are restocking april 27th
Pretty sure they never released in Europe. A local boutique owner said on facebook a couple months ago that they had them, but shortly after said that the date was pushed back and they'll have to wait. They just have them in the back waiting, super frusturating

>>12396587
they're already out

>>12396441
The toe cap on the PK version is seriously a pain though. That's literally one of the two only issue I actually have with the shoe, since overall comfort is not an issue.
Second issue being the fact that my foot slip inside the shoe, which with that terrible toecap hurts a fucking lot.

>>12396625
Yes I know the gum bottom city socks have already released but as I said there is a restock coming up and as far as I know they didn't release in europe back in january when they came out. At least not where I live, even though we get consortium collabs stuff like that.
I know some local stores have them and I know that Caliroots had them online with a countdown timer. They took them off the site for some reason though, I'm guessing it has something to do with the latest R2 drop.

It's so fucking annoying when adidas releases shoes on different times in europe and usa

>>12397097
What size are you? There are some sites with those shoes available

Guy will there be a restock on White Mountaineering NMD R2, I'm so pissed that I missed out on it

>>12397625
probably not

>>12397627
Don't break me heart fàm, you gonna make me cri

>>12397625
The navy ones are nice af

>>12397205
8.5 in pk NMD's
Where?

This is a really nice nmd colorway imo. I really like the plugs being white since they blend in to the sole and don't stand out too much. Subtle but a nice detail.

Imo you don't have to show ankles as long as your jeans aren't too loose. This colorway us only sold as women's, but they have been pretty easy to cop the past couple weeks, just size up 1 for men's.

how do gazelles size? I've never bought adidas and I wear 8.5 on Vans and 8 on Docs and they feel the same (space left to move my toes), what should I wear on adidas?

>>12383600
congrats on the gats

>>12398045
I wear a US9.5 (EU42.5) in Vans and a US9 (EU42⅔) in my gazelles. Both fit with just enough wiggle room for my taste, all though gazelles are a bit more narrow in the toe area

>>12383388
Where on the EU site?

Name of these?

>>12398602
Pure Boost ltd
Plenty of sizes still available on adidas

>>12396377
I still like the adv better than the 93/17s

what do you think of closed toed sandals

>>12383284
these look like foreskin,

Are the regular adidas pureboost sneakers O.K or should I strive for something better?

>>12398637
What do you mean, they look nothing like the picture.

Pic looks like Yeezys

>>12398034
What pants can you wear with these or adidas running shoes in general? I normally wear jeans with everything not so /fa/

>>12398865
i prefer pureboost 2017 to ultraboost.

w2c?

>>12399233
if you are gay then maybe

>>12398926
I don't know if you're looking at a previous version or somtehing, adidas has some trouble naming their new versions
Anyways this is the pure boost (2017) ltd and it's same that I have in >>12383388

>>12399233
urban outfitters

>>12399233
sneakerstuff also

>>12394209

>>12399730
You tried I guess

How hard will it be to cop these y-3s

c/n all white NMDs

>>12399858
triple whites? mehhh
mine have some blue grey heel tab and off white block and I think that little bit of contrast goes a long way IMO
pic related

>>12399870
i like these a lot but reverse image search says they're women's shoes

>>12399880
just go one size up they're the same

>>12399880
yup, I bought em from the women's section. nothing wrong with that though, just convert the sizing from women's to men's

Want to buy a nice white pair of Adidas. I don't like the plain white ones, but these have some style to them. What do you think /fa? 1, 2, or 3?

>>12400415
get the undefeated ones or custom spezials on the adidas website

How do your mesh nmds fit? Got the triple blacks and my toes are pretty much as far as they can. Any bigger size and it would be too wide. It's also the reason that I can't wear Gazelles

>>12399377
im a grill

>>12400887
girls are gay

Should I cop the triple blacks?

>>12401190
sorry meant to say help me choose lads

>>12400415
The white Iniki is dropping pretty soon, best white adidas sneaker in my opinion.
From those three I'd pick the first

>>12401117
They took the mesh NMD upper and made it even worse. What the hell am I even looking at?
Don't cop

>>12401190
The sub green 93/16 easily. Boost sole and better materials. The left is some strange synthetic suede-like material, didn't like it at all.

what kind of pants does one usually wear to these kind of sneakers? I noticed almost nobody wears jeans, also my jeans are wide at the bottom...

What pants / jeans should I get, /fa/?

>>12399926
Men's and women's feet are different in other ways than size. We run, walk, and even stand differently because of it.

Who knows if Adidas takes that into consideration like more serious running shoe makers do, though.

>>12401202
Inikis are super cheaply made, the only reason they don't cost $50 is because they are boost shoes

but seriously, aside from the sole, they feel like outlet shoes

>>12401275
Depends on which kind of color you get. You could wear some gray/brown/any other color chinos

>>12401684
can't wait until they are outlet prices so I can buy them at the outlet then, and I hope a subculture of haters grows to number in the millions

Iniki 4eva

>>12401603
good point. I bought women's and men's stans in the same size and they honestly don't feel any different. Maybe Adidas doesn't.
It's best to just try all your shoes in store though right?

>>12401684
Yeah I wasn't too impressed either. The materials could've been way better. Stitched leather stripes instead of the glued ones would already make a huge difference. Also a gazelle type tongue would be way nicer. Maybe even swap the mesh for something else.
The white cw is nice and I like the silhouette, but I'm not in a hurry to cop inikis, not for the full price at least.

>>12383021
Since when did people start wearing fridges lads?

>>12401684
>but seriously, aside from the sole, they feel like outlet shoes
but at least with the styrofoam sole, they look like one too kek

Are those good for the techwear maymay?

>>12403197
yea

>>12401275
>>12401687
okay, but stil, most people seem to wear some kind of sweatpants..
Are there any brands of those that I can go outside with, without looking like an immigrant?

>>12401275
get slim/jogger-style/tapered/etc, sweatpants. they're all different names for the same type of pant

for regular pants and jeans just make sure they also have a nice taper or aren't super wide

>>12395047
I have those if anyone wants to cop

https://www.grailed.com/listings/1944950-Adidas-EQT-Running-Support

>>12401275
Tech fleece

I need these in my life but according to some sources they're limited to 500 pairs worldwide

Why is every Ace 16+ purecontrol ultra boost so fucking limited? Friend managed to cop the triple blacks and I'm so jealous.

>>12398815
pretty fly my friend

Just copped pic related, am a man, dont know if it will look good, what do you guys think?

>>12405102
looks decent for a superstar

>>12382988
I just purchased these online, what do you guys think? I want to buy yeezy's but im not stupid to buy the resale.

>>12405586
worst tubular

>>12405831
why is that? I think they look great on feet.

>>12406001
nah, even instincts look better

>>12406019
do you not like the silhouette? or the material? I feel like these are dope for 100 bucks and if Kanye had worn them people would be going ape shit over these

>>12382988
Thoughts on these? Old pair of black shoes is 100% worn out so I need something to replace them. I dunno how comfy these are, but the styrofoam part on the boosts looks ridiculous to me.

>>12406145
and I forgot my pic

The basic black/white and oreo UB 3.0s are on discount at my local store RIGHT NOW

c/n??

>>12406156
how much

>>12406162
180€, but I bet you can't really find a better discount on UB retails anywhere

>>12406115
Not him but it's because the shadow is a poor man yeezy meme shoe for kids who can't afford yeezys. So for many it's not that much about the shoe, it's about the image the shoe gives off
In my opinion it's also ugly. Having the different colour materials on the medial and lateral side looks terrible. Also in my opinion it's the worst tubular sole to date.

>>12406148
better than regular stans but still kinda meh.

>>12406156
180€ is not a good enough discount that I'd cop them if I wasn't already planning on getting them. They're 189€ in most stores anyways.
If it's your first UB or a replacement for a beat up pair then cop, but personally I'd pass because it's not the most interesting cw.
I've seen better discounts too, albeit most times they're only small or big sizes.

>>12406223
UB anon here. I understand, a 10% discount isn't much at all. I've never seen them on discount, at least with stock still available. But if you really want UBs, you won't mind the extra 10€ anyway.

Related question, what does /fa/ think of oreo UBs in general?

>>12406239
Mate this is the oreo. Actually just found these with the same 10% discount and I'm really thinking of copping.

Your pic is the core black 3.0
Not a huge fan of the translucent cage on that cw. Uncaging them could look pretty nice.
There are much better 3.0 colourways coming soon, so I'd save up for those instead.

>>12406253
Yeah I couldn't bother shooping the oreos in the same pic so I just posted a pic of the black ones. I agree the oreos look really good, now would be a perfect time to get them a bit cheaper.

should I?

>>12406350
85$ btw

>>12406331
Just went shopping and tried them on.
The 3.0 pk is way too thin and flimsy, 2.0 is way better in terms of support. Would have to go a half size down which would be too narrow for me.
Not worth the 180€ in my opinion, they look really good but even pk NMD's offer more support and feel more stable.
Gues I'll just pass on 3.0's. Better to cop 1.0's, 2.0's or wait and see if the 4.0's are better.

>>12406639
Really? I've tried them on as well and even true to size they were very very snug, devinitely couldn't have gone one size down. I agree UBs feel a bit flimsy, but they're also really comfortable to wear. Oh well, I guess I'll wait for 4.0s for now.

>>12386125
Literally the only good shoe Adidas is making right now, next to original shell toes.

It's the only new Adidas shoe that doesn't look like a fucking pointy tip witches boot, like some shit out of the wizard of oz. A solid shoe that doesn't look feminine as fuck.

>>12406768
its seriously hard finding shoes that look like they were designed for men

this new gender neutral movement is bullshit, has everything looking gay as fuck right now

one of the few 3.0 worth getting. We all copping?

Cop or not

Hard, prickly, or soft? I'd imagine preferring soft but maybe there's something better about the prickly.

And why are the prickly ones the only ones that are adjustable? I have normal arches but a high instep (thick at the midfoot).

>>12406915
I like soft tbhimofam

>>12384219
what shoes are those on the top left picture? Some vans collab?

Cop or not?

>>12407363
I would get some EQTS instead

>>12407363
Even more ugly version of nmd_xr1 without boost. Definitely not.

>>12407363
Get the eqt support rf's or adv's, Inikis, Havens or any low top originals models like spezial, münchen or samba instead
That's just an outlet version of xr1's

>>12383636
A black female, an asian female, an injun female and a human woman.

How's /fa/ feeling about the 4.0 design? What are the chances we'll get a 1.0 retro in the near future?

>>12407414
Why is everybody hating on xr1s?

>>12408813
I think the core black and triple black that Zalando already sold were pretty nice. Some 4.0 samples have been terrible though.
I'm pretty sure they'll retro the OG purple later this year/ early next year.

>>12408866
At first I thought they were pretty nice, but the first time I saw them live they turned me off for some reason
I just don't like how they look on feet and the cage design isn't good in my opinion. Doesn't help at all that they're coming up with terrible colourways, like the duck camo.
I like the leather cage on the masterminds and customs like pic related. Otherwise they're trash imo.
I don't know if they're releaseng a new version anytime soon, but I hope it will be better.

>>12409117
adidas needs to release a sneaker similar to nmds that normies would even buy so they can get easy money off from. Otherwise, UB mids and EQTS look great.Probably Iniki is that sneaker?

>>12409435
They already have plenty of those "normie" models. Tubular line is pretty popular as well as the EQT support adv.
The x_plr is clearly made to look similar to the nmd_xr1 so there's that, and the mesh nmd is sort of a pleb version of the r1 pk
I'm pretty sure adidas is reeling in quite a lot of cash from these cheaper models as well.

I don't think Inikis appeal to the masses due to the retroish upper. They'll just stick to the mesh NMD's since the price point is about the same and the NMD is generally known to be more popular and hyped so normies want to be a part of that.

Should I buy the Superstar Foundations or Superstar 80s clean? I can get the Foundations for 20 bucks cheaper than the 80s, but I feel like the 80s can be used for nicer fits?

is it gay for a mayn to wear superstars?

>>12407048
Revenge X Storm

W2c

>>12384219
>>12409615
what are those white ones on the top right picture?

>>12409606
Never seen the 80's clean ones before but I think they look much better

>>12409610
Actually very heterosexual. Pic related.

>>12384943
beautiful

I just need new sneakers that I can wear every day
like a no brainer that you can wear to almost everything
are stan smiths good or just a meme

QUICK

>>12409987
you won't turn any heads but you won't get roasted, boring boring shoe that doesn't warrant any conversation

>>12384943
did not expect to laugh in this thread

>>12409987
get the Primeknit Boost version

New thread:

>>12382988
>>12410331

>>12384219
No please, don't! The shoes look rad, but the pants looks like it's part of a 1970's professional bowling league uniform.