/fa/ - Fashion

wrong site

OP most of the posters here are underage teens. They don't even know what a job is.

You'll have a better time looking up youtube channels

RMRS
Gentlemen's Gazette
Art of Manliness
Etc etc

>>12093686

wrong site mate. Only underage anorexic goofninjas come here.

>>12093686
if you want to start a serious thread try starting with a picture that doesnt look like utter crap.

>>12093722
>>12093857
>>12094025
Great contributions. You keep pointing the finger at other posters but you're the real cancer of /fa/.

>>12094321
?? I posted sources.
You didn't post anything of value. Real hypocritical anon.

What do you want?

>>12094321
Nigga, dressing in this style is easy as fuck. Literally go to banana republic, nordstrom, and jcrew and buy some shit. Go to a tailor and get it fitted. Fucking done. It's not difficult to wear chinos or jeans and a button up with some wingtips. Seriously, you don't need inspo. You just need a credit card and a ride to the mall.

>>12095468

Well the guy in OP pic still miserably failed

It's not that easy

>>12095218
Yeah you posted autism-tier youtube channels congrats anon

>>12095497
He's slightly overstyled, but it honestly doesn't matter that much. If you're dressing like that it's for chicks and they would definiately fuck that dude.

Step one to looking good in clothes is looking good without them.

>>12095556

He'st not overstyled

He's wearing unfitting and unmatching clothes

>>12095583
Navy, brown, and indigo all like each other. That is clearly a casual woven sold to be worn with jeans or chinos. Everything is slightly too small which is how they always style models for photos. The fuck are you talking about?

>>12095599
>Everything is slightly too small
So it's unfitting just like I said

> Navy, brown, and indigo all like
Navy and brown or indigo and brown, yes

Navy and indigo, not here. They are too close and it doesn't look good to have matching or quasi-matching shirt and pants. It might have worked with a lighter shirt or with washed jeans, but not this way

> The fuck are you talking about
:^)

>>12095617
Retard alert. They always put models in things slightly too small because it looks better for photos. The shirt and pants both work because as you can see the textures and patterns are different. It's a fine jcrew or nordstrom or whatever advertisement pic.

>>12095617
bro the colours are fine and the clothes are fine too, if anything maybe just too slim
stop being contrarian, you're not convincing anyone who isn't a serial memer

>>12095621
>They always put models in things slightly too small because it looks better for photos
Only retarded low end brands do obviously, since that's the first time I ever read about such bullshit :^)

>>12095643
Look at any gq magazine ever

>>12095655
Lol if GQ is a reference for you then I might as well stop replying

>>12095583
this

>too small blazer
>wearing indigo jeans with a blazer ever
>untucked jcrew tier shirt
>undershirt visible
>pinterest tier accessories

utter garbage

>>12095703
I did not even notice the undershirt
Even worse than I thought

Any inspo for these shoes?

>>12095703
>>12095706

Undershirt being slightly visible is not a fit-killer you spergs, although this fit does suck.

>>12095703
And while typing this out yoy fags can't come up with a better alternative on how to dress smart casual.

>>12095927
Same shit but in the right size
Replace shirt with rough beige or lighter blue oxford
You're welcome

>>12093686
>itt dad's money

>>12095703
Jeans and a blazer is fine.
>>12096316
>light shirt and dark jeans
Oh wow, so unique.

>>12096328
How? Most of this board loves expensive shit that looks crap. You can dress like this for cheap

>>12095500
??what youtube channels do you browse tough guy?

Also you're being hypocritical again

>>12095500
Have you actually watched their videos or are you just fun-posting? Objective cricism right now or you're 100% full of shit.

>>12096540
They're extremely subjective and reflect nothing but the own personal taste of the guys behind them, who usually don't know shit about fashion. Their advice is biased and generic as fuck. Only art of manliness gives a few useful tips from time to time, but that's pretty much it

>>12096529
I don't know any good English youtube channel on the subject so I don't watch any :^)

There's a good French one though, and the reason for it is that the guys behind the channel actually grew up to be designers. They work with various high end brands, they have their own high end line, and the team is very diverse (many of them dress smart, sometimes with Italian vibes, others are more casual, and there's even a darkmeme lord as well as a techwear enthusiast). So in the end they actually know what they're talking about, and they are aware of what is subjective and of what is objective, unlike the other channels

>>12096329
>Oh wow, so unique.
Please this outfit is meant to be basic as fuck, I only said how it could at least not be a fail

>>12093686
The problem I have with this fit is
>too many accessories
>wearing jeans with that outfit
Otherwise I like it. No one here likes it because /fa/ likes to dress either goof ninja or "le street wear". Both come as a result of no actual career, which means underage

>>12095909
anyone?

>>12096923
Smart and casual is supposed to be generic no?? You can't branch out too far then it isn't "smart and casual"

French and Italian?
Send links anon.

>>12097428
No you can add some personality to a smart or to a casual outfit. It doesn't have to be generic

See the fits in pic related for instance (but please ignore the cringeworthy posing)

The same goes for sartorial outfits, there are really outstanding ways to wear suits and formal clothes in general

The yt channel I was talking about (in French obviously) : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULn2EuEVUD4

Which is ran by the team of this website : https://www.bonnegueule.fr/

>>12094321
Underrated post

>>12097547
Thanks for finally contributing. I'll check it out.

contributing to this teen-infested fedora cringefest known as /fa

>>12098987

>>12098990

>>12098991

>>12098992

>>12094321
hes right though

/fa/ has resented any fashion that isn't cringe for years now

>>12098994

>>12098998

>>12099003

>>12094307
t. fedora autist underage faggot

>>12099013
epic bro!

you really got me!

>>12099034
>>12099031
>>12099025

>>12099092
bump

>>12099107
>>12099092

>>12093686
nice

>>12095909
You can match those with a lot of things. Those shoes would look good from casual to semi-formal. SR the top of my head I'm thinking white shit with a sober pattern (tiny dots, some like that) dark blue/black jeans and matching belt. Brown blazer if it's chill outside

What can a tall guy do for decent pants, im fat (42 waist, can fit a 40 uncomfortably), but am losing weight. The problem is i wear a 34 length and most under $100 pants from decent brands i only ever find in 32 length even if i find my waist

>>12101160
Lose weight.
It is easy as fuck. Calories in, calories out.
Read the /fit/ sticky.

>>12101490
I am losing weight. Im down 40lbs actually

if you're going to dress like this please do your best to look like you arent dressed by an infographic

>>12093686

Some really nice contributions, shame these spergs can't stand good looking fits

>>12095703
Oh my god it doesn't fucking matter, he's probably more successful than you and definitely gets laid more. Get over it

>>12102780
>Navy sweater
>Navy pants
>Navy blazer
>White shirt
>rinse and repeat
Great fits wow amazing

>>12105110
They'd all get more pussy than you

>>12105134
Faggot

>>12093857
>RMRS
>Gentlemen's Gazette
>Art of Manliness

These look like clickbait trash to exploit all the "Swag is for boys; Class is for men" fedoras.

>>12095916
t. sweaty lard bucket who uses undershirts to prevent pit stains

Tbh the only smart casual that isn't cringe or played out is done by yohji and lemaire

>>12105368
It's an introduction to smart casual..don't be a dick.

Post your sources then.

good looking non-meme trends when?

>>12105368
>These look like clickbait trash to exploit all the "Swag is for boys; Class is for men" fedoras
Yup he's right

>>12105368
this is so accurate it hurts

i like how people on /fa/ keep saying smart casual (this word alone gives away how clueless they are) is boring and easy but never fail to demonstrate how little they know about it and the subtle differences between the each different style encompassed in the term "smart casual".
no need to mention the lack of aesthetic sense of most posters, that's a board-wide phenomenon.
/fa/ was a mistake.

>>12093857
>those shitty Reddit tier recommendations
Die

>>12101490
To get a shorter inseam he needs to lose HEIGHT

>>12108068

>>12108069

this image always rustles /fa/s and fedora redditors' jimmies

>>12103738
Yes it matters, this board is about clothes, not celebrities and getting laid.

>>12108077
lol wtf
why the fuck would he leave the monkstraps open
look like he's trying way too hard to be sprezzatura

>>12108068
>>12108074
What's casual about this?

>>12108077
Beautiful pattern but it's a bit much when it's both jacket and pants.

>>12098996
what the fuck is going on with her knees

>>12095673
>established fashion magazine: utter shit

>anonymous Japanese image board poster: fashion aficionado

I'm sure your opinion is highly regarded... somewhere...

>>12095621
What the fuck are you on? those clothes fit fine.

>>12108552
The blazer is too small, if he buttons up he will get insane button pull.

>>12107826
Bro, everybody in high end retail like Nordstrom and Saks Fifth and Barney's wear smart casual. It doesn't look good. It doesn't get them laid. End of discussion.

>>12108624
gb3 ask andy about clothes.

>>12109223
gb2 wearing clothes that are too small and looking like a douce

>>12109041
you should delete this post immediatly before anyone else sees it. then kill yourself.

>>12108509
Lmfao kys