/fa/ - Fashion

They didn't. There is nothing brave about leaving the house in full Rick. This is for people that are truly committed to fashion.

>modern kenzo
that's what went wrong

oh how the great had fallen

>>11924694
>>11925436
These were based on vintage kenzo textiles. once again fa is retarded

I actually really liked the wool shirt jacket piece but it sold out quick and I'm not paying these fucking resellers $250 for this shit

nothing
shit is lit

I bought the white sweater. Thought it looked cool.

>>11924405
absolutely nothing at all.
though it doesn't surprise me the slightest that insecure laggards on the internet can't appreciate the pieces.
autists aren't exactly known for daring visual expression

>>11925722
>absolutely nothing at all.
>H&M

>>11924405
It's H&M, that alone should be the reddest of red flags for you as someone who is supposedly interested in fashion.

>>11925752
must be depressing having 0 interaction with people irl who have an interest in shopping, let alone fashion

>>11925748
T h i s

>>11925722
>autists aren't exactly known for daring visual expression

they are known for saying things like that though

>>11925798
You can cry all you want, if you wear H&M you might as well shop at target. People irl who have an interest in fashion do not shop at H&M. Teenagers who like to blow their 20€ savings on horridly woven sweaters like >>11925722 and so called "jeans" do. Poor people too lazy to thrift do. Shopping at H&M and similar fashion discounters is the ultimate signal that reads: I am not interested in fashion, I just like to buy whatever, I care neither about quality nor design and I certainly don't care for putting actual work into my outfits.

>>11925748
>>11925815

But collaborating with
>kenzo

Nothing of value was lost

>>11925855
Sorry but what you're saying is retarded. You're not "fashion" just because you buy specific brands. If you think something looks good, but you decide not to buy it because it's from H&M, then you're a mindless sheep.

>>11925874
I never said anything about buying specific brands. What I'm saying is that if you think something from H&M looks good you are obviously not interested in fashion. It doesn't necessarily make you a "mindless sheep" but it certainly shows that you are uninformed, which is likely a sign of laziness and lack of interest.

>>11925923
not the anon but if I buy something from a different website and it looks vaguely the same as one product from H&M that means it's okay? cool thanks anon

>>11925954
If you buy bad quality clothing for inappropriately high prices, you're an idiot. That's the bottom line.

>>11925967

define quality, I always feel the material and ask a few questions about my products before I purchase it and I just finished a run from H&M a week ago, pair of jeans, sweater and a few tees and button-ups for less than $100 CAD which is really nothing now a days.

The bottom line is that you don't really have any evidence or concrete answers besides saying "lol H&M? please i only buy QUALITY clothing" without anything to back up the idea that H&M is shit and you can buy stuff for way cheaper at another place.

>if you think something from H&M looks good you are obviously not interested in fashion.

oh that's your point. Very engaging and detailed explanation, care to elaborate why for entry level people getting into fashion? What alternatives would you prefer for such a budget? I'd love to hear.

>>11925980
What would I need evidence for? You can just go to any H&M store and look at the clothes they sell, all the evidence is right there. Wear whatever you like, I'll just stop responding to you. If even after feeling the material you decided to buy $100 worth of H&M clothing, I don't think we have much to talk about anyway.

>>11925980
Also
>I'd love to hear
Nah, you seem rather content with your choice of wardrobe.

>>11926003
okay I can agree most of their clothing isn't exactly the best quality, at the end of the day does quality become fashion? Then fine, what company would you recommend for somebody who wants a more affordable price range?

>>11926010
my choice of wardrobe is pretty trash that's why I'm trying to expand my horizons by gathering what info I can

>>11925855
delusional. if your entire outfit and wardrobe is h&m then that is an issue, mixing select items from h&m/similar brands with other items is common, who doesn't do that? commonly done by people within the industry and those who have an interest in fashion...can't even believe this needs to be said. i think the last time i bought something from h&m was 2014? but I'll still occasionally take a browse and I won't condemn someone for buying something from them?

like yeah we're on 4chan, you have to be an edgelord and hate everything popular but take it a down a notch.

>>11926024
this, there's literally nothing wrong with combining brands

>>11925855
idk, i think people who shop at H&M do have some interest in fashion, but it's a pretty superficial interest based in trends. even worse is it's usually trends from a few seasons ago

>>11926010
>>11926003
Holy shit, you're a clown. How far up your own ass can you be?

>>11926029
>realizing you spent daddy's allowance on shitty clothing: the post

>>11926003
You really sound like a person with zero personality who needs to fill this gap with expensive clothes

>>11924405
I dig the women's items, but it looks like it'd be pretty hard to pull off mostly. The outerwear is cool at least.
The men's stuff looks like what 24 year old black guys who hang around at the mall all day would wear

>>11924405
shit thread
if you can't appreciate a collection just because it's in collaboration with a fast fashion brand you're a moron and you don't belong here

>>11926027
An interest in trends is not the same as an interest in fashion

>>11925722

I wanted that jumper but only managed to score a tshirt.

>>11925855
There's nothing wrong with having a few cheap pieces from H&M to supplement a wardobe. I doubt anyone figures clothes from them will last forever. It's really hard to beat their prices when yr just looking for a quick trendy piece to have fun with.
>currently wearing $15.00 ripped skinny jeans from h&m
>get compliments on them constantly
>when they die I'll get some better ones now that I know I like the look.

can i cop this or something similar in good quality anywhere?

>>11926024
who is this cum guzzling temptress

>>11925722
I tried that bad boy on yesterday. The fit is shit and its itchy lel

Only really wanted to cop the Jungle sweater in white. Prolly all sold out now. And the world keeps turning.

I'm tired of resellers.
What's worse is the people buying off these resellers.

For once can people not think of profit? Just leave alone the people who want to wear and pay for the clothes at retail price.

>>11926383
Kek I have a tie with almost that exact pattern

>>11925967

if you think identifying quality is as easy as reading the brand label or knowing which store an item is from, you truly know nothing about the fashion industry.

a corporation as large as h&m is going to have extremely varied quality because they work with a wide variety of producers and factories. sure, a lot of it will be shit. but a lot of most brands are shit. making a dumbass blanket statement like 'everything from h&m is bad quality' is actually the true mark of a lazy, uninformed person who is not really interested in fashion.

you have to judge garments individually. brand name, country of origin, even to a certain extent material composition (there are high and low quality grades of every material, even materials like polyester that are supposedly "inherently bad") don't really mean nearly as much as holding a garment in your hands and trying it on for yourself.

you're a pleb who drank the entry-level kool aid and you believe you're some kind of gatekeeper. congratulations, you've reached the summit of mt. stupid.

now shut the fuck up and maybe you'll actually learn something.

>>11927376

Rola

>>11925855
This is some of the most masterful bait I've seen on /fa/ in a hot minute. Well done anon

I would get something if
1. the tshirts weren't $50
2. the store was not full of autistic teenagers who think theyre stylists because they follow a facebook page about clothing
3. it wasnt h&m

>>11927887
Thank you :^)

>>11925855

>"putting actual work into my outfits"

which one in the pic is (you)?

>>11927990
Dude with the bowlcut, on the right.

>>11925844
underrated post

>>11927990
this pic is full of H&M though and I can't imagine any of those fits took work.

>>11928063

just curious, how much work do you put in your fits on a daily basis?

>>11928321
Duh, he puts in ACTUAL WORK. Not H&M. You know, QUALITY PRODUCTS?

fuck me all you cunts are shit

>>11927911
1. The t shirts were $34
2. I'm 24 and i was probably the youngest person there
3. It's kenzo

You played yourself