/fa/ - Fashion

>>11468201
that's not "60s stuff"

that's YSL, he's his own time period

>>11468212
it's from the 60s
makes me think of the 60s
never hurts to post something even if it's not exactly right, its just inspo

>>11468201
seeing that then seeing pic related makes me sad

>>11468212
ok i get it stop giving me shit and start contributing ;:^{

>>11468298
Shut up, Hedi ruined YSL

>>11468319
>>11468298
oh i thought you meant that my choice of pic was bad
now i understand what you meant, sorry

are the 60s the goat decade for fashion?

>>11468336
yeah thats my point. its a huge fall from grace. you esl mate?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Au9oohI1MuM

https://highwatersinhell.wordpress.com/2013/04/27/life-in-watts-1966-the-ones-that-got-away/

http://time.com/3640068/the-fire-last-time-life-in-watts-1966/

http://www.missrosen.com/bill-ray-watts-1966/

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=olUEAAAAMBAJ&printsec=frontcover&lr=&hl=en#v=twopage&q&f=false

https://books.google.nl/books?id=WFMEAAAAMBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=nl&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Sy_MXRta8o

If anyone has a better resolution of this picture, could you please post it? I can only find a slightly better site with an Asian watermark.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ojaofcXmS8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9VhI8S_INI

>>11468773

also if you're looking for 60's inspo the movie (or the original tv show) The Man From UNCLE is pretty great

>>11469504
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-AvjMHs7U7I

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yMU-vo-BKc

https://media.. [infinity] ch.net/film/src/1415316821733.webm

Qui êtes-vous, Polly Maggoo? (1966)


Found this blog:
http://fashionfilmstudies.blogspot.nl/2010/11/1960s-europe.html

I can't find a good picture that flatters Marisa Mell and her dress, but here you go.

Danger Diabolik! (1968)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEdqvkBKvaI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAv5Ip9v1dA

Full movie in 360p: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKkPjz-kKZs
protip: 12:28 - 18:23

>>11468217
I'm still not sure about him as Beast.

>>11468217
getting those jeans and sweater dirty on the grass

fantastic movie btw...

>>11468397
God everything about this fit and her make up are vile

god just imagine going through life looking like this man

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAlfr7wsqcM

Riddle met this! There are three men an a boat with a pack of cigarettes and no matches. How did they manage to smoke?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAlfr7wsqcM

Riddle me this! There are three men an a boat with a pack of cigarettes and no matches. How did they manage to smoke?

bumpo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrYB8hgyq4s&spfreload=10

>>11468201

That's such an awful bastardization of De Stijl

>>11471848
Bastardization? It is directly inspired from Mondrians paintings, and I would say it's done very well, not in a "bastardizing" way.
Why do you think it's awful?

http://www.michaelbarnaartvanbergen.com/epages/62324553.sf/en_GB/?ObjectPath=/Shops/62324553/Products/Classics-Mondriaan

>>11468773

>>11471864

Because it doesn't play with the idea of form and loses all the dynamism that is in the movement.

Look at interiors,design and art belonging to the movement and you see that they are multidimensional and contain a lot of depth, I suppose if we are talking about fashion the design and interiors are more important. The famous chair by Gerrit Rietveld for example, it introduces a new image on each plane of viewing.

In the case of this YSL deisgn, it doesn't really play with the form in any way,it simply introduces a reference to the movement through it's use of colour and then follows traditional form and proportion guides. In essence, it uses the idea of De Stijl as a marketing trick to pedal something completely different,losing the whole point of the movement entirely.

>>11471910
What would be a better deisgn? A dress that introduces a new image on each plane of viewing? Do you have an example?

>>11471942

A dress that uses shape and colour to change the perception of form

>>11471954
Do you have an example?

>>11471959
What I think he means is something less pure/simple in terms of shape, protrusions and stuff that make the dress less identifiable as a dress. consider pic rel and apply it to a dress

And >>11471910 I appreciate your point of view, and your constructive response, but I don't agree. These individual dresses weren't inspired by the movement as a whole, only by Mondrian who strived to simplify and reduce his works, it is only fitting to have a simple dress rather than a complex one

http://www.dse.nl/~evoluon/index-e.html

>>11468397
I like it. she looks so pretty

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Xo6FaypcpY

Why do women in the 60's look different than modern day women? They all look so cute and natural back then

>>11472526
the ugly ones don't get photographed

>>11471789
god this man is handsome

my grand parents

>>11473020
they are more effay than u are how does it feel

threads like these give me faith in /fa/ again

>>11473748
I doubt posting these pictures here do any good. It will mostly be reposted on tumblr, reddit or whatnot. I have yet to see, for example, a /diy/ project that takes >>11471864, >>11471910, >>11471954 and >>11471988 into account or an outfit in the WAYWT threads that takes inspiration from imagedumps.

>>11468419
God tier

>>11471910
>it doesn't play with the idea of form and loses all the dynamism
just like mondriaan. how's the view from atop mount stupid?

>>11473313
it's pretty cool

>>11469635
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dS_aJN7c8ps

>>11476084
>>11472507
Eyy paesano

>>11476054

The 10th Victim - 1965
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kobrYqV7nk

>>11474853

Mondrian plays with form, that's the whole point of the movement dumbass

Really makes you think just how shit the 60s were if this is anything to go by.

>>11476173
>"I have no idea what I'm talking about"

yeah, I get it already

>>11476925

>"I have no actual argument or counter argument so i'll just asininely call him a dumbass and hope he doesn't notice"

yeah, I get it already

>>11474853
>>11476173
>>11476925
>>11476961

Way to go.

>>11469635
ayy

The 70's were such a hideous decade compared to the '60s. Baby Boomer fashion=shit. Silent Generation is where it's at.

>>11477295
small beans compared to millennials and subsequent generations

>>11477295
>>11477338
How can you disregard those decades so easily?

that modrian piece is actually from the 20s

https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1946&dat=19650914&id=a6UtAAAAIBAJ&sjid=h58FAAAAIBAJ&pg=3657,2686306&hl=en

i failed this thread pretty badly t b h we just discuss ysl and de stijl instead of the 60s

>>11480497
I'll ask my teacher at sewing class, this dude from the website (>>11471880) and het Gemeentemuseum Den Haag for their opinion.

>>11480506
cool, great intiative!
it would be fun and educational to hear professionals voices on it

and im also digging this thread in a hole by continuing i realize that now, but yeah it's educational

im the "bastardization? it is..." and " i appreciate your point of view..." and "what i think he means is..." posts btw

>>11480524
Apologies for deleting the response.
Apart from asking het Gemeentemuseum Den Haag where a lot of 'De Stijl' is shown and asking a designer himself, I (or you too?) can send an email to Saint Laurent and look at some previous critiques (although I don't know where to find that).

>>11468773
that's so bayern munich I love it

60s was cool as hell especially in design and architecture.

Eames lounge chair, legit one 2k used, a good replica one 1k new.
I'm gonna get one some day but I gotta think about if I want to drop the money on it. Replica has zero resale value but you can always sell the real one for zero loss.

Friend's dad paid 1k for a replica and it's cool as shit, some say that they are ergonomically better than the real one.

>>11473020
Why were men so handsome and women so qt back in the day? What happened?

>>11481667
2k used seems low unless it needs some tlc. I'm looking for one as well, but the all black one so it's a bit more :(

>>11481719
E-pills and thus estrogen in drinking water which still can't be removed even in 2016.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/male-fish-are-being-feminised-by-river-pollution-1446764.html
>1994
>fish in thames become transgender

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/jun/02/water-system-toxic-contraceptive-pill
>2012
>problem still not solved

>>11481730
Yeah, maybe 2500 is a better number but it can change depending on where you live.

In replicas there are some which cost 600 which are garbage but the 1k ones are told to be almost as good as the original. Used fake would be a good option. :D

>>11481740
wouldn't that make women prettier then

>>11482772
>>11481740
The actual reason is people are overweight now and you're looking at black and white film, which is very flattering.

>>11482772
It fucks up the natural hormonal balance, when exposed to extra estrogen women become manlier and men more femine.

It's the your body trying to balance it out and in reality just helping the damage.

>>11484064
> when exposed to extra estrogen women become manlier
Complete bullshit, broscience or information you have taken completely out of context?

>>11469851

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBsz1xdYCN4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oH_6-O0554

>>11468773
Is this Karen O

>>11487115
Peggy Moffitt

>>11480524
Here's the first reply. I'll wait till I get more so I can compare the answers, ask some more questions and in the end add them together in a nice collage.

>>11481719
Selective archives, Film photography

>>11487733
The composer I think he's referring to is Jakob van Domselaer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2r8i47zk3m4

https://katedaviesdesigns.com/2015/02/09/sonia-delaunay-the-dress-of-the-future/


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV6m9NlsOJ4

>>11468847
Just watch 3-4 seasons of Mad Men. Janie Bryant was continuously lauded for the substance of her constume design.

can you spot the two jokes

>>11472526
Less fat people. A lot less.

>>11480524

Hohé, Madelief; Sloof, Rosalie (2011). Mode [loves] kunst. Zwolle: WBooks. ISBN 978-9040078132.

>>11480524
She wrote a book about art and fashion

>>11468201
>>11468212
Its De Stijl, a Dutch style movement founded in 1917.
Has this board always been this uneducated?

>>11492203
Did you read the thread?

>>11487733 Nice nice hes a cool guy for answering so extensively
And i look forward to >>11491921

>>11492482
1. Do you have any questions? Now you have the opportunity.
2. Madelief (Michael a bit too) is asking about /fa/ and I don't know what to answer. I mean, /fa/ is a place where teenagers are fucking around and are dicks to each other, but I don't want to focus only on the negative aspects.

>>11492884
/fa/ is a board for discussion where threads are created by anonymous individuals about anything they want related to fashion, and everyone can anonymously respond with text and pictures. It kind of has a culture of it's own that you only understand once you're a part of it yourself, it has come to generate it's own "memes", and everyone kind of talks shit to eachother but by doing so shape your understanding for the better by steering you away from objectively bad stuff, generally. Everyone in the forum is anonymous, but you can choose to use your own name too, but people frown upon that. There are certain types of threads that recur regularly, such as "WAYWT" (what are you wearing today), W2C (where to cop, where to buy something youre looking for), "recent cops" where people post what they've recently purchased, among other threads.

It's mostly younger and less knowledgeable people who browse /fa/, and the discussion can often be lacking in quality, but there are still opportunities to have a genuinely nice discussion and deepen your understanding sometimes. For professionals in the industry it would probably be less appealing to be a part of, but maybe it can be a window into the activities of the youth.

(written as if to them, change things as you like)