/fa/ - Fashion

>>10412419

This is super cool even though techwear was never really my thing, I like it but I think it would be better with more techy boots. 8/10

>>10412426

i want to like this but the lanyard and holes in the boots are holding it back. 6/10

>>10412431
>black socks

this kills the palewave

>>10412440

There is literally nothing wrong I can find in this, everythig balances out perfectly, added to inspo folder. 10/10 i really like how the sandals are kind of oversized, it balences out the bulkiness of the top half.

>>10412450
There's somethign about this that really puts me off 5/10

cool thread

>>10412463
elf shoes and dress 5/10. I like the jacket, but not feeling the other stuff

>>10412472
Out of all of Theo's fits this one is one of the more boring ones, but it still is pretty techincly perfect, and I really like it. If anything the collared shirt doesnt really mix with the hoodie 9/10

>>10412472
Not a fan of the hoodie but still good fit 7/10

Since my post>>10412477
Is technically below>>10412475
I shall rate.
I never liked this fit. Shorts are bad along with sandals. The only thing that would makes this fit not cringe is the fact that the guy wearing it is manly af and has that cool "old mature" vibe going 4/10

>>10412477
I would love this except that the white of the socks seems out of place, if there were somethjing else white in the fit it would balance taht tho

>>10412486
what gender is this lmfao

>>10412486
>womens jacket
>t shirt too small
>white jeans
>2 pairs of horrendous shoes
fam what u up to? 1/10

>>10412527

Scarf over collar of jacket
Rolling pants with chelsea boots
Carrying a designer shopping bag
multicolored top half full black bottom half

NOT EVEN ONCE

4/10

>>10412527
Not a bad fit, I'm posting something similar actually. I don't know if I like the Chelseas with high hemmed pants, but it could work. 9/10

>>10412536
4/10

Grey is awful and too big a part of the fit, layering makes it look like two outfits (gray sweater, boots pants, and scarf, & shirts, blue jacket, hat & pants) messily thrown together

>>10412566
Is the arm part of the dress?

>>10412566
just ugly 4/10

>>10412577
are those doc martens?
good fit btw, nothing groundbreaking obvs but everything looks nice :)

>>10412535
This one needs a review, so...
WHAT ARE THOOOOOSEEE!!!!

>>10412577
classic /fa/
7-8/10

>>10412577
6/10. I'm personally not a fan. I think there's too much going on there. Imo, it's all about looking great while also looking like you didn't spend a lot of time gerrng ready. That's why overgroomed people loom weird. Simplicity and make a statement.

>>10412577
looks great
9/10

>>10412577
8/10 a pair of superstars would look better on that fit

>>10412627
Kanye/10

>>10412651
7.5/10, I would usually hate the pearls but they look very nice with the top.

>>10412668
adrianne ho/10

>>10412668
8/10 really like the nbs but the pieces sort of clash here. especially the jacket. she's perfect though.

>>10412463
Buddhist monk-core

>>10412677
Honestly, as far as Kanye fits go this has got to be one of his least interesting. I mean, it all works together, but there's nothing exceptional going on. I give it a C, 7/10.

>>10412612
w2c fit

>>10412688
+Silhouette by itself is hugely interesting
+Long sleeves
+Layered jacket over skirt
+Buckles over that corset thing
+Interesting geometric lines
+Very slightly disheveled hair
+Showing of some skin, tastefully

-Yellow and silver 3m stuff, makes it look like a firefighter
-Boots look out of place

8/10

>>10412712

it's unbalanced. maybe if she was taller

>>10412712

9/10
it's unbalanced.
maybe if she was taller

>>10412733
10/10, fucking perfect fit. God I wish I was tall enough to pull this sort of look off.

>>10412712
your fucking gay

>>10412733
Very sleek, with a great spin in traditional silhouettes. The person balances complexity in fabric with simplicity very well, and strengthens the impression with a monochromatic theme.

8/10

>>10412753
Oops, meant to reply to >>10412745

>>10412755
Nice clean simple
I like it
8/10

>>10412450
what shoes are those

>>10413321

5/10

im not a huge fan of the shirt.

>>10413432
Don't care for the color of the socks. Too much of a skin tone and kind of clashes with the beige of the sweater.
8/10

>>10413439
one of the best full rick outfits I've ever seen and everything actually flows together well. The earth tones aren't used a lot with rick and this guy pulls it off perfectly.

9/10

>>10413465
Really simple fit. Well done, but I feel like it could benefit from some subtle accessories or something to make the top half more interesting.

>>10413484
would look cool in a movie or something but I would cringe at in real life

5/10

>>10412419
>>10413484
>>10412755

W2C shoes?

>>10413529
well these shoes >>10413484 are a1923
says so right in the filename

>>10413508
Really like the double cuff that's evenly split between the shirt and the overcoat. Never thought to do that before, honestly. Is there flecking in the jacket? I can't tell, I think this would look much worse with that incorporated. Not a fan of smacking at "see I'm just like you xD" AF1s trying to "balance" the pretenses of a fit whilst only doubling down on them. Also there's no visibility on 30% of the fit and I can't tell what this would look like standing up and actually modeled. It works alright as a still-life though. 7/10?

(Really great thread btw OP, hope this is a new staple.)

Can't find anything that I consider 10/10 in my folder from the last month, but we'll see what /fa/ thinks.

>>10413508
Hard to judge this without seeing the full fit.
As it stands I like everything except the shoes. It's quite difficult to pull off an all wool fit with sneakers and AF1s are particularly bad.
Would look great with some Marsell derbies or something.
6/10

>>10413432
w2c sweater or one like it?
>>10413570
Awesome fit. Lady diplomat in the middle east core. Couldn't see it on the street, but still an easy 9/10

>>10412426
the television pants and the sweater are awesome

>>10413321
is there a name for this kind of jacket?

>>10413583
5.5~6/10
Looks ok but I don't see anything much and it's far from my style.

>>10413583
just a chunky fisherman knit
that style was popular in the '70's
thrift shops are a good bet

Never been a big fan of zippers on overcoats. It would work well here with simpler shoes and pants as a minimalist fit but I don't like it with the Converse. Might just be a personal opinion.
8/10

>>10413607
This is laughable, if only because of his hair/beard contrast and that dumb expression. Those things aside it's just a boring leather jacket and tee and jeans fit. Casual, slightly edgy, and looks fine, but not nearly a 10/10 fit.
5/10

>>10413620
afghan hounds are listed as one the least intelligent and obedient dog breeds.

>>10413620
>Casual, slightly edgy, and looks fine
You just described perfectly what I like tbh, but I see your point.

>>10413607
3/10 scoop neck looks super faggy, rider has too many buttons and zippers, just like pretty much every rider. not at all interesting. guessing youre a faggot and just picked this because of the model? or are you some mfa type?
>>10413583
4/10 collar is way too small for such a boxy jacket, oddly shaped as well. sleeves and shoulders are too wide, the jacket is too big overall. zipper and especially the pull are obnoxious. lining looks like shit. shirt colour is too similar to the jacket and the print is awful. shoes are ugly as hell. is this you? dont see anyone else picking it as a 10/10
>>10413570
4/10 colour scheme is good. would be better without the necklace. collar of the sweater is awful and it also falls at a bad height, could be a few inches longer. too many layers on the bottom half, leggings should be tucked into the socks at least. teal stitching on the pants is horrible. by the filename im guessing its some mid tier pseudo designer? looks like h&m quality
>>10413566
2/10 yet another shitty asian designer im guessing? everything sucks except the pants. jacket is awful, socks and sandals are awful, shirt is pretty bad too

>>10413620
A very safe maneuver out of the detail extravaganza playbook. Almost enough small features where it becomes sensual by sheer quantity, but not quite. Almost enough layering where it looks inviting, but not quite. It looks very flat and flippant (but not to the point where it feels cleverly effortless) for having so much incorporated. those are goat-level winter boots though. 5.5/10? His face face and dog and the way he stares through my criticisms make this look like a 7.

>>10413663
All these trashings and my boy posts knoch, lmao. At least some of your critiques were thought through though. 3/10 post.

>>10413636
I believe they have a low obedience intelligence, which is markedly different from being unintelligent. It simply means that they obey given commands a smaller percent of the time as compared to other breeds.

Whatever.
I think the afghan compliments the fit well. Color palette is on point.

>>10413321
8/10 if the jacket was a button up, and tuck in, it would be a whole lot better.

>>10413620
7/10 those boots are super ugly, socks arent the nicest either, too matchy matchy. other than that a nice outfit. cant really tell whats going on on the top half, looks like some sort of cowl overtop of a cardigan? the look suits him
>>10413665
6/10 pretty nice, collar could be a little less stiff, wish the pocket and bottom of the shirt were cut a bit slimmer so they didnt flare out. sleeves hang down nicely but could be a lot slimmer, bicep especially looks bad
>>10413670
sorry i didnt like your shitty fit bud :(
>>10413674
0/10 try waywt

>>10413663
I'm not sure what mid-tier pseudo designer means. The label/designer got tons of praise in the NY fashion scene. It's closed now, but the focus was on minimal stuff designed from an eco-conscious standpoint.

>>10413665
you sound like you're high and trying to sound intelligent
you use a lot of words in the wrong context
I understand what you're trying to say though so it's cool

>>10413699
Which words were out of context?

>>10413674
5/10
It's like a six year old saying he wants to grow up to be a claims officer at Sears. Have some ambition

>>10412431
tanned smug model is killing me . this fit looks like average 1st gen rich asian immigrant wear 4/10

>>10413705
not out of context, just the wrong context
sensual, for instance
flat and flippant, for another

anyway, let's get this thread back on track

>>10413710
I guess it's a good fit. Nice colors and I like the details of the sleeves poking out. Way too many buttons though and, obviously, it'd look ridiculously out of place in the modern world.

>>10412463
le memecrome monk

>>10413663
>scoop neck looks super faggy, rider has too many buttons and zippers, just like pretty much every rider. not at all interesting.
I like your critique lol. Any chance you have some fit that would be in the same style in a way but that you consider to actually be good?

>>10413729
?

I mean sensual because there, for instance, Harajuku styles which are "bad" but are at the same point "good" because they're extremely emotive by virtue of how many movements and bits of intrigue there are--extremely sensuous on the whole. Flat and flippant was meant to describe the failure of the sensual. It looks like "I'll just put everything I have that matches" while lacking any outward motion. It looks stuck and uninterested in going anywhere.

I don't feel this is off track because one of the nice parts of this idea is that people can try their hand at "sustained" criticism. I think people should also be able to discuss the way they talk about clothing as well.

>>10413740
there are*

>>10413740
Sorry. Didn't mean to imply that your post was off track. I was referring to the thread being derailed by several posts without photos and the one out of focus high school fit.

You're using a broader meaning of the word sensual than most would, so it might've helped to explain it as you just did but in your first post.

I still don't understand what flat and flippant means in that context. Putting matching things together is somehow displaying a disrespectful attitude? Explain what meaning of the word flat you're going for.

>>10413762
I'm all for active discussion. This thread, while far from perfect, is much better than most here.

>>10413762
Flat as a counterpoint to sensual. The sensual beckons into a fit. Flat keeps its distance. The fit has a lot going on, which *usually* has it seem very fascinating (I mean this in the passionate fixation sense), but his fit, at least to me, doesn't feel like it wants me to walk in it or touch or feel visually conversational with it.

And no flippant in the sense that there is a certain level of careless composition. Flippant where nothing is intentionally articulated in the way it is. He has kind of a "homeless" (not a prerogative) look to him, a "found fashion" way of putting together a fit, but it doesn't quite succeed.

Thank you for hearing me out.

>>10412536
Are those bean boots? I've never seen them monocolor, it looks nice.

>>10413566
We've had these kind of threads for a while now

>>10412611
momcore 1/10

>>10413817
fuck hedi/10

septx3 is the waywt king of our generation

from sz to styleforum what cant he do

>>10413782
Thanks for explaining. I understand what you're getting at now. You mean flippant as sort of a failed attempt to be effortless, yeah?

>>10413817
Those boots are godawful. Otherwise, yeah, typical Hedi skeleton shit done well.
9/10

>>10413835
No problem. I just wanted to check to make sure that what I write, while perhaps seen to be too pompous, can't be followed through and found to be a bit more exacting than just "it looks kinda lazy" or "not enough effort put into garment choices." I've written before and people are often too taken in by the aesthetics of the words rather than if they're more comprehensive for their context than other options.

And yah, flippant in that way (although flippant can be good, it's just a very fickle way of putting together an outfit. Kudos for him trying it. He's wearing gamma bleu, so it's not like he can't afford to do lookbook-esque fits.)

>>10413843
I'll be honest, verbosity should be avoided. You're not adding anything to the discussion simply by choosing to use uncommon words and writing a paragraph on one aspect of a fit. It just muddles your main points.

Be succinct. Eloquence is encouraged.

>>10413843
>I've written before
It's funny cause you say this as if you think the way you write is any good. It's totally cringeworthy for literature, for a imageboard it's even worse.

>>10413875
I'll strongly disagree with this, but I don't expect anyone on 4chan to back my point up so I'll just let it die as is. I honestly have no respect for the Strunk and White approach to writing, and can definitely see why people enamored with it grow slowly unable to appreciate meandering and intentional stalling/restarting of minor points deemed "officially unnecessary to the point *I* think you're making, and points off for taking too long to get to there."

>>10413893
I'm not making an argument as to whether or not its good, I'm saying its valuable. Your reflexive judgement of writing as good/bad speaks very clearly to how little I should think of your opinion.

>>10413729
ID on those ro dunks?

>>10413944
Rare cut out iteration of dunks from aw05 collection Moog.

i cant believe people actually dress like this.

>>10413963
mandatory, "why are you on /fa/" coming your way Mr. Aboveitall

>>10413944
>>10413955
Oops. My bad. They're from AW06 collection Dustulator.

>>10413963
Care to explain which one of the many stylistically different outfits you're referring to?

>>10413977
All the men's fits are bad. Can't comment on the women's fits because fuck bitches get money.

>>10413906
And the fact that you think writing can't be qualified as good or bad shows how much you understand of it.

>implies writing can't be judged as good/bad
>but 'valuable' is fine
>as in having value
>as if having value is not considered something good
You sound like a hell of a philosopher too.

Seriously, you write like a kid who has just read Nabokov for the first time, got a thesaurus, smoked a joint and decided to post on 4chan thinking he's the shit.
The only value your writing style has is for highschool literature teachers, cause they can print your posts and use them as a study case in classes talking about purple prose. That's about it.

I'll not keep discussing this cause I don't wanna derail the thread, but I swear the only reason I'm telling you this is because you sound like someone who writes or intends to. So I'm giving you a reality check in case you don't ever step into someone that says that to you. Otherwise you're probably gonna be told by all your illitarate friends that what you are doing is good and keep writing like shit for ages.

Also you are not writing a fucking book, you're on 4chan. Nobody fucking talks like you are talking. Idc if you think the way you write is as good as any other way, the people you are talking to are telling you it isn't. That should be enough for you to stop doing that, unless your level of autism is too high.

Idk if you think someone is gonna read that and think "wow how impressive" and want an ego trip, but protip: the only people who are ever going to do that are edgy teenagers who are "into literature" cause they wanna sound smart but have never actually read anything more than the two first chapters of a random silly YA novel, cause these people tend to think this is how it's done. Everybody else is gonna be laughing at you inside.

Take this the way you want, I seriously don't care.

>>10413992
>unable to imagine a set of values outside moral judgement

xd, I'll pretend Badiou never wrote a book too m8

here's your wew and your (you), take them to Uni when you get there lad!

>>10413998
>>10413992
okay time to stop
this thread was good until I started critiquing that dude's writing style and now I regret it
just post fits and review

>>10413998
>quality of writing
>moral judgement

Ok, you're just trolling. 10/10 fell for it.

>>10414009
fair play

Have a good evening. I didn't expect you to write a wall of text and honestly I'm very sorry to have made you write that all out. I don't like it when I'm having a bit of fun, even at your expense here, but then someone puts serious time into responding. Life is honestly pretty precious and it makes me feel poorly that I had you waste an evening like this. Reminds me that I shouldn't waste my own time putting this on.

>>10414017
You too.
Don't worry cause I actually had a good laugh after your last post and wasn't doing anything anyway (even though I should).

>>10414007
sry breh we're done here

>>10414030
Glad we both got something out of it at least, but I can't count on an outcome like this again, especially after fucking up an otherwise decent fashion related thread. That's honestly unforgivable the way /fa/ is right now.

Anywho I'll be on the way out now. Stay motivated. Get your shit done, son. Keep on in the graze of days.

>>10412577
w2c coat?

>>10414007
Man, rick is weird. Between those skin-colored kneepads and the shreds that would be major tripping hazards, this fit is really iffy.

For runway though, I give it 6/10.

>>10414051
haha, sorry. I meant to post a different picture. You can rate it for laughs I guess.

>>10414007
2/10 Looks straight out of a sci fi movie, pants are awful, jacket is bad.
Maybe 6/10 if you intend to wear it on comic con.

>>10414051
10/10.

Probably the only one in the whole thread a normal person wouldn't either cringe at, or assume your an extremely feminine male by "trying" to pull off.

>>10414051
>>10414007
I mean yeah, that's just an editorial so it's obviously styled with looks in mind rather than practicality of wear.

Nowhere did OP specify that the outfit had to be daily wear clothing.

>>10414060
Can't rate out of ten without seeing the bottom. I'll rate out of six because I can see the top half and a bit of the pants. Pre-distressing on the pants is bad, don't like the texture of the scarf with that shirt and why is he wearing a crew neck under a button up shirt? Coat is nice though and the scarf looks comfy.
2/6

>>10414071
>Coat is nice though and the scarf looks comfy.
that's why I liked it tbh

and I pretty much agree with everything else you've said lol, guess I have to start paying more attention :(

ill do fit under this.

>>10414071
that's not a julius jacket you fuccboi

>>10414093
He said it was when he posted the fit. Who can I even trust anymore???

>>10414087
what makes you think that's a 10/10 fit?
what do you see in it?

>>10414097
....do you not know who this is?

because hes clearly said that its a DRKSDHW jacket you dumb faggot holy shit why do you keep reposting this with the wrong filename