[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 65 KB, 1280x1024, 14408605173250.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10391413 No.10391413 [Reply] [Original]

Hey /fa/. I'm looking for brands list sorted by tier. Can you help me with it? Something like related pic, but there are many brands added to shit tier by mistake for sure.

>> No.10391453

Oh God Barbour is not God tier

Toys McCoy and Real McCoy are
And white mountaineering
And visvim and nanamica
But not Barbour

>> No.10391492

>>10391413
>needing people to rate brands so you know what to buy for your +1 interneet points rather than just buying products you love
massive faggot

>> No.10391510

Jesus I just realized
> Wolverine
> Top Tier

This is from >>>/r/eddit

>> No.10391522

>>10391413
damn, this is a shit list

>> No.10391548

>>10391453
old barbour jackets are god. I agree that they aren't as good now though. I love my ashby jacket.

>> No.10391554

>>10391413
There's so much wrong with that tier list that it gives me a small headache.

>> No.10391555

>GOD TIER
>our legacy
stopped reading there

dumb list

>> No.10391561

Shitpost - the picture.

Fresh in everybody, Burberry is the same as kr3w.

>> No.10391562

>>10391555
>hating on our legacy
I bet you can't even afford it. Jog back to school, little boy.

>> No.10391577

>>10391555
out of everything on this fucking shit list that's what you point out?

>> No.10391589
File: 1.20 MB, 1642x2855, v7n9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10391589

>>10391554
I realized I was biting my lip as I read.

Reminded me of when I first saw pic related.

>> No.10391591

>H&M is mid
>GAP is low

>> No.10391600

>>10391591
That was my biggest grievance. H&M is shit tier and you know it OP.

>> No.10391609

what the FUCK is with 4chan and charts. there's nothing wrong with getting a couple recommendations but if you need an entire chart to blindly follow you're a retard

/mu/ really suffers from this too.

>> No.10391610

>>10391492

There are literally a billion clothing brands available to consumers in 2015. No one has enough time or money to investigate all of them on their own.

>> No.10391614

>>10391589
eh, could be worse

>> No.10391618

>>10391413
>our legacy god tier
>ray-ban, alpha industries, cp company in top tier
>supreme in shit tier below OBEY and mall brands
>commes des "carcons"

seriously who made this it's downright embarassing

>> No.10391619

Gap has higher quality than H&M anon.

Couple that with their sales and you have a good place to cop basics.

>> No.10391620

>>10391589
>catch22 low tier
>ayn rand being taken seriously
is this some sort of weird /lit/ cringe thread

>> No.10391633

>>10391562
>calls others little boy
>wears our legacy

>>10391577
first thing is saw

>> No.10391644

>>10391633
Our legacy sweatshsirts and tees are god tier. Have you even felt one before? go back to H&M poorboy. These brands are for the real men.

>> No.10391656

>>10391644
>thinks our legacy is expense
and no, their tees are shit, sweatshirts are ok, but their shirts are good. OL isn't "god tier" though, not even close. you've clearly never handled any actual designer clothing

>> No.10391657

>>10391614
No, see, if it was worse, it'd just be blatantly goofy and wouldn't bother anyone. It's perfectly made to annoy people of all types of literary sensibilities.

>>10391620
That's basically the /lit/ version of OP's pic.

>> No.10391660

Do you guys have any pictures with a list of web stores? With price range and description would be +1

>> No.10391669

>>10391413
>lv, rl, d&g, armani, burberry, and prada in shit tier

what do you think the chances are that the broke college student that wrote this has handled even a single one of these brands? or even a tenth of the ones on this list

>all those shit tier "minimalist" brands in the top iters

lmfao

>> No.10391674

>>10391562
holy shit this is embarrasing, this is like people making fun of your honda civic and you then scream and shit yourself while calling them poor

>> No.10391677

>>10391669
>apc
>cps
>opening ceremony
>our legacy
>april77
>acne
it was most likely either
a: someone from hypebeast
b: teenager from /fa/

>> No.10391681

>>10391413
>fred perry and ben sherman
>shit

trashman.jpg

>> No.10391692

>>10391677
all good brands.
Don't even understand the hate.

>> No.10391702
File: 431 KB, 1466x1102, brandhatelove.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10391702

Post your brand love/hate charts? I've ran across a few brands/designers I like from those threads.

For reference the hate section is more just memeing out. If I dig hard enough I could probably find pieces I like from those brands/designers. I do generally dislike their design decisions and market audience though.

>> No.10391703

>>10391609
Wait what
How long have you been lurking, fam
This entire thread is annihilating OPs pic, not glorifying it or even discussing it
And the only people who ask for infographics are high schoolers and cross posters

>> No.10391706

>>10391702
>LOVE
>New Balance

kekk

>> No.10391707
File: 68 KB, 590x958, jej.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10391707

anyone know what brand pic related is

>> No.10391724
File: 161 KB, 800x1200, Acne-Studios_fw15_fy1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10391724

>>10391692
>apc
boring trash
>cps
boring, shitty ripoffs of other peoples shoes with obnoxious branding
>opening ceremony
retards who let fucking yoko ono collab with them
>our legacy
boring trash
>april77
gay looking low tier skinny jeans
>acne
LOL

>> No.10391732

>>10391692
here's the thing, those brands are bait. those "better than average, not quite high end" brands are made for people who can't quite afford designer but are interested in fashion, who? teenagers and hypebeasts working wage. they trick you into thinking they're "good" by putting an unreasonable price tag for a shit item. people are impressionable. now, everybody wants to make capital so of course they're gonna sell it for an unremarkably higher price than what it cost to make, they're making fools out of their consumers. sure, it's better than h&m's $2 clothes but "quality" brands? "good" brands? nah

>> No.10391737

fred perry is decent how is shit tier lmao smh fam

>> No.10391740

>>10391724
You are trying way too hard it's almost as bad as OPs chart

>> No.10391746

>>10391413
>yoox
>shit tier

Triggered

Literally the best place to get dirt cheap legit designer stuff outside of yahoo Japan

>> No.10391750

>>10391413
This is the worst tier list lol.
>H&M not trash tier
LOL

>> No.10391754

>>10391740
holy shit youre stupid, all those brands are fucking trash, either ripoffs of better brands or plain old boring. all shit quality and marked up. opening ceremony is the only one that is passable

>> No.10391756

I'll just throw out a few brands that I like a lot
R8
Paraboot
North Face Purple Label
Trickers
Barracuta
Moncler
Ralph Lauren
Cockpit U.S.A.
Topo Designs
Yoshida Porter / B Mark Yoshida
Oak Street Bootmakers

>> No.10391757

>>10391732
Tell me some "good" "quality" brands that come at the same price then.
I think the quality in those brands are more than worth the price I pay for them.
Why do people keep mentioning hypebeast? Oh no, another fashion site talks about a brand so I must hate it. Grow up.

>> No.10391771

>>10391732
>>10391692
>>10391757
before you say "oh you just hate those brands blah blah blah they're popular, you're contrarian blah"

no. I hate slp, I fucking HATE slp and hedi, but there's no denying that the cuts, material, and design for saint laurent isn't brillliant. same goes for raf and rick and yy and all those designers namedropped everyday on every fashion forum

>> No.10391776

>>10391610
So? You don't need to look for a billion brands. Fuck, you shouldn't be following brands. Buy things you like and that work, not what others tell you to or you're a fucking sheep

>> No.10391778

>>10391754
Like I said to the other guy...name brands in the similar price range in better quality.
And rip off? They are basic designs. How is that ripping off. Shut up.
Do you walk around dressed like a raf Owens fag?

>> No.10391779
File: 40 KB, 584x650, PrUBqGe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10391779

>>10391724
>gay looking
>actual statement on a cambodian fashion board

>> No.10391788

>>10391757
for retail? literally anything is a better deal at that price range
>>10391771
slps cuts are horrible (almost every pair of pants gives cameltoe) and their material is fairly bad for the price youre paying. designs are either gaudy trash or just ripoffs of old dior stuff.

>> No.10391795

>>10391779
>thinks looking like a faggot is fashionable

LOL holy shit

>> No.10391799

>>10391778
april77 and acne are both ripoffs of old dior stuff, common projects are extremely blatant ripoffs that youd have to be a complete retard not to see

>> No.10391802

>>10391799
>complaining about 'rip offs' in the context of fashion design

hi you must be new here

>> No.10391804

>>10391788
That's not naming stuff anon. That's you dodging my question.

>> No.10391810

>>10391799
Rip offs? Hahaha is this a new buzzword? You are fucking stupid.

>> No.10391813

>>10391795
masculinity is so fragile

>> No.10391816

>>10391788
are they classic skinnies? they're low rise homie, have to wear them lower or get them tailored

>> No.10391825

>>10391802
>>10391810
hahaha holy shit you guys are fucking stupid, there are many original brands in fashion, there are many shitty ripoffs aimed at stupid teenagers that dont know any better (you)
>>10391804
anything, literally anything. those brands are based on hype, the quality is complete shit for what youre paying. patagonia, cp company, stone island, any outdoorsy brand will be much better quality for a cheaper price.

>> No.10391833

>>10391724
>boring trash
>but OC is also bad
lol wat

what brand is considered exciting

>> No.10391848
File: 1.03 MB, 852x1280, julius_maw10_301.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10391848

>>10391833
many

>> No.10391853

>>10391848
brands like julius is few fag :^)

>> No.10391863
File: 91 KB, 852x1280, 43.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10391863

>>10391853
again in english?

>> No.10391867

>>10391863
我可以拉斷腐乳太FAG圖片

>> No.10391875
File: 745 KB, 853x1280, jul_m_ss12_020.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10391875

>>10391867
>I can pull off the bean curd too FAG Photos

epic

>> No.10391880

>>10391875
yes post most sufu julius photos so many different brands 我可以拉斷腐乳太

>> No.10391885

>>10391413
this is really bad...im talkin really bad

>> No.10391895

>>10391825
>stone island

dropped. you obviously don't know what you're talking about foh

>> No.10392533

>>10391413
how the actual fuck is herschel on the top tier? their backpacks break so fast it's not even funny

>> No.10392544

who the fuck made that garbage ass list
embarrassing

>> No.10392544,1 [INTERNAL] 

How the fuck did H&M make mid tier classification?!?

>> No.10393064

>>10392544
im gonna edit the bottom to say /fa 2015 and start spamming it everywhere

>> No.10393069

>>10393064
If I don't see this as a thread everyday with the standalone image imma be disappointed

>> No.10393108

>>10391413
gtfo with this list

>> No.10393146

>>10391413
Im interested to know how dockers can be top and mid tier simultaneously.
Im more interested why so much (albeit foreseeable/not surprised) hate on 'classic' fashion houses.

>> No.10393221

>>10391589
>great gatsby god-tier
now i know this is bait

>> No.10393225

>red wing top tier
>converse mid tier
now this is what I call bait

>> No.10393272

>>10391813
you should post about it on twitter and get lots of retweets

>> No.10393300

>>10393146
Because this list was made by some heritage workwear/minimalism reddit fag that saves his pennies to cop second hand norse projects on grailed. Look at the list of eshops, where is ssense, mrporter etc? He probably has never owned a single designer garment in his life.

I mean seriously,
>Top tier: April77, Nudie
>Shit tier: Raf Simons, Alexander McQueen
this has to be bait.

>> No.10393316

god richard owen
shit every other brand
ftfy

>> No.10393323

>>10391589

Lol, tai pei

>> No.10393333

>>10391707
its that fucking dolphin one
o yea its pink dolphin just remembered mid-way through this post and im still typing

>> No.10393359

>>10391620
/lit/ loves Ayn Rand. She was all the board talked about for its first two weeks of existence.

>> No.10393407

>god tier
learning to pattern, cut, and sew your own clothes

>top tier
haute couture
bespoke old-world tailoring
carol christian poell

>high tier
visvim
kapital
junya
yohji
rei

>mid tier
rick
raf
slp

other contemporary designers

somewhere between mid tier and low tier exist design houses like our legacy, apc, acne

>low tier
sandro
uniqlo
cos

shit tier
h&m
zara
f21

>> No.10393500

>>10391707
pink dolphin

>> No.10393506
File: 588 KB, 500x650, jacket.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10393506

anybody know what brand this jacket is?

>> No.10393514
File: 77 KB, 1280x897, JULIUS-fw2019.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10393514

>>10391875
>julius
>literally pseudo-avantgarde garbage
let me guess, you also love the virdi-anne and soloist because of their edgy designs. What a fucking parody

>> No.10393526

>>10391413
>dockers is in top and mid
>dockers isn't in shit

>> No.10393565

>>10393407
entry level pleb

>> No.10393571

>>10393514
dont lump in takahiromiyashita with julius and the viridi anne. He's actually a talented designer, and is well respected within the fashion community

>> No.10393621

>>10393565
Oh God he put REI on the list and didn't even mention Snow Peak

>> No.10393629

>>10391413
>i need other strangers opinion om what a buy with my earned money.
What a drone

>> No.10393673

>>10393571
so is tatsuro horikawa

>> No.10393679

>>10393673
he is, but julius definitely occasionally falls into the the trap of trying too hard (and failing) to be edgy and avant garde

>> No.10393682

>>10391610
lol this guy actually responded and defended it

>> No.10393683

imo acne should be god

>> No.10393684

>>10391413
>caring this much about brands
The jew shills propaganda is working so well

>> No.10394654

>>10393621
>looks at a list including junya watanabe and yohji yamamoto
>sees "rei"
>thinks it means "REI" the outdoor-sport store

Lmfao m8 pls leave this board

>> No.10394663

>>10393359
lit is full of commies unfortunately

not that i like rand

>> No.10394698

>>10391413
>top
>cdg
>acne

Top meme, yes.

Also love the shit bracket. Everything that is somewhat expensive is shit. The guy who made this doesnt even go through the hassle and differs between different brand labels. Ralph Lauren simply is Ralph Lauren. Black, Purple, Blue label dont exist. Its all the same shit, eh? Jesus christ this shit is bad.

Also
>H&M in mid but C&A in shit tier

>> No.10394775

>>10394654
Who gives a shit about fashion designers
Only a few brands have consistently good design anyway (Van, Porter, White Mountaineering, Briefing, Brooks Brothers Black Fleece)

>> No.10394971

>>10394775
>Who gives a shit about fashion designers

wrong board m8.

would you go to /lit/ and say "who gives a fuck about authors"

>> No.10395038

Anyone who categorizes anything as "God-tier" should delete themselves

>> No.10395088
File: 33 KB, 625x626, 1442595338897.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10395088

>>10391589
>Catch 22 and Ulysses low tier

>> No.10395089

>>10391756
how do you not include nanamica if you like TNFPL

>> No.10395099

>>10395089
My bad I do like Nanamica but I was just throwing out a few brands

>> No.10395123

>low: palladium

triggered