[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 36 KB, 762x1100, 1442177857390.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10386638 No.10386638 [Reply] [Original]

Bought some matte ones.
Get some inspo in here

>> No.10386642

just go to pinterest bud

>> No.10386664

>>10386638
Where are these from?

>> No.10386672

>>10386664
Zalando. But do not buy them.
I sent mine back. Cheap ass quality, even lower than H&M standard, kind of Primark-tier for 60€...

Not recommending them at all. Save your money for better ones.

If still interested, here:
https://www.zalando.de/pier-one-stiefelette-black-pi912da02-q11.html

>> No.10386807

Check story et fall and Paul smith, those two are great. Getting some story et fall tan ones asap

>> No.10386900

Chelseas are overplayed... it's a big circlejerk nowadays

>> No.10386912

Where do cop slim Chelseas? Should I go for black suede or black leather?

>> No.10386931
File: 17 KB, 300x300, 1433872295057.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10386931

I just copped a pair of Loake brown suede chelseas and I was wondering what kind of colour of jeans would go best with the brown suede? I'm having trouble picking between some palewave shit, black acne raws or some APC shit.

>> No.10386932
File: 28 KB, 455x475, 378396_mrp_fr_l.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10386932

>>10386900
I really don't think that something like chelsea boots can ever be 'overplayed', much like chukkas or tennis shoes

>> No.10386940

>>10386932
Chukka or tennis shoe no, but chelsea boots are fucking meme tbh, get over them.
Especially those cheap ones, fucking disgusting

>> No.10386941

Never wear chelsea boots unless u wanna look like a cocksmoker in leather socks

>> No.10387153
File: 229 KB, 717x880, back-to-reddit.jpg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10387153

>>10386932
>le timeless
>le classic

>> No.10387738

>>10387153
>they like what I don't like. Better restate what they said in a dumb way and assume they're a redditor!