/fa/ - Fashion

>>10267341
street: undercoverism or raf
mens: valentino
lounge: trove or beams+
sports: arctyrex veilance

>>10267349
street: Rick Owens
mens: Rick Owens
lounge: Rick Owens
sports: Rick Owens X Addidas

Raf for all

>>10267349
R u Asian

>>10267341

Streetwear: Saint Laurent
Menswear: Prada
Loungewear: Wouldn't know what would fit in here
Underwear: Calvin Klein
Sportswear: Adidas

>>10267429
>Prada

R u srs

miu miu for everything

>>10267341
Is it just me or are designers not even trying to make attractive clothing anymore? WTF is this supposed to be? Concentration camp chic? This looks like the shit they made people in Auschwitz wear. If this is the best you have to offer us in regards to fashion no thank you.

>>10267454

why not?

Streetwear: raf 99
Menswear: Helmut Lang
Loungewear: apc
Underwear: armani? lol not picky or sorry
Sportswear: nike

this is hard btw

>>10267535
Dude there are plenty of designers still making great pieces but I agree some have kind of 'fallen off' you could say. That's also just to my taste.

>>10267559
lang is not menswear, why 99 for raf? do you only own one raf piece that happens to be from 99?

>>10267559
Your current /fa/ pseudo fashion expert at work
This sub has gone to shit

Streetwear: Undercover
Menswear: Margiela makes some menswear right?
Loungewear: Rick Owens
Underwear: Rick Owens
Sportswear: Nike

>>10267595
im deifnitenly not an expert i just look for what i like and i liked a lot from that collection

>>10267595
Ur cool buddi

Anderson & Sheppard + John Lobb
Anderson & Sheppard + John Lobb
Anderson & Sheppard + John Lobb
Anderson & Sheppard + John Lobb
Anderson & Sheppard + John Lobb

>>10267603
ss or aw??

Streetwear: rick owens
Menswear: givenchy
Loungewear: givenchy
Underwear: supreme
Sportswear: nike

>>10267624
AW 'kinetic winter' was pretty clean but very colorful

>>10267341
>Streetwear:
ce
>Menswear:
i dont dress in suits
>Loungewear:
acne/norse projects
>Underwear:
shimapan
>Sportswear:
acronym

>>10267341
Streetwear: Boris Bidjan Saberi (specifically the 11 line)
Menswear: Dior Homme
Loungewear: Loopwheeler
Underwear: Honestly don't care
Sportswear: ACRNM

H&M
Hugo Boss
I don't wear loungewear
C&K
Adidas

>>10267341

>Streetwear: McQ by Alexander McQueen/Givenchy(I can't pick)
>Menswear: Margiela
>Loungewear: ???
>Underwear: PRL(I've been wearing it forever.)
>Sportswear: lol

>>10267538
I'll tell you why he doesn't like the idea of wearing Prada; it's too mainstream for him.

Streetwear: raf
Menswear: geller
Loungewear: geller
Underwear: Stacy Adams fight me
Sportswear: Adidas including y-3

Streetwear: Rick
Menswear: CCP
Loungewear: JJVE/Issey/Yohji
Underwear: I don't care
Sportswear: Aitor x Umbro

The first 3 are almost all interchangeable though

Streetwear: OG Lang
Menswear: Thom Browne
Loungewear: Dunno.
Underwear: Sunspel
Sportswear: Gyak

streetwear: julius
Menswear: thom browne, or Lanvin
Loungewear: neighborhood
Sportwear"Y-3

>>10267535

Then get the fuck outta this board

I swear, all these fags posting about nothing but sneakers, 'is this effay?' and 'what haircut should i get' have fucked up this board completely

Street: APC
Mens: APC
Lounge: APC
Under: APC
Sports: APC

>>10268115
Actually it's more the fact that Prada's clothing is tired, incredibly boring, and poorly constructed.

It's one of those brands solely surviving on the prestige of its name. Back in the 80s or 90s, I would have thought his answer was legit.

Jun Takahashi

Undercover

Gyakusou

F.C. Real Bristol

>>10268223
I disagree.

The idiots who think everyone who doesn't dress like a runway model are morons and shit on everything "normal" or "basic" are ruining this board.

High fashion isn't for everyone. People can be "into fashion" and only wear fast fashion brands. Stop being a pretentious snob.

I will say though, the person you're responding to is pretty ignorant to not know that runway/lookbooks = how you wear the clothing irl

>>10268363
Meant to say do not equal

>>10268363
You can enjoy high fashion as an art without wearing the goods sure , but that's the same as being into fine dining but only eating mcdonalds.
You can know everything in a book about the history of Raf Simons but to not want to wear or to have never touched a piece is going to limit your enjoyment and knowledge a ton.
If you want to wear a t shirt and jeans every day for the rest of your life please do so , it doesn't affect my life and I wont judge you for it but for you to lurk and post on a fashion board and post pics of yourself in a t-shirt for the sole purpose of showing us what you wore today (which is meant to be for interesting outfits) is once again akin to going on a food site , claiming Michelle Roux Jr is your fav chef , talking about how amazing his dishes are and how much you love fine dining then posting your microwaved burger in a 'What did you eat/cook' thread.
To talk shit about all the people who come to this site who just don't want to look offensive is a dick move but it comes out of frustration.
Some of us actually want to talk about the art that is fashion and those of you that cannot contribute because , lets face it , you don't actually care about fashion as a whole , ruin it for the rest of us.
Why are you in this thread if you like fast fashion?

>>10268244
you must be fun at parties :^)

Streetwear: Undercover
Menswear: Thom Browne
Loungewear: Givenchy
Underwear: Calvin Klein
Sportswear: Adidas

Streetwear: YY, CCP, RO
Menswear: YY, CCP, RO
Loungewear: YY, RO
Underwear: lol
Sportswear: Y-3, RO ADIDAS

Streetwear: APC
Menswear: Margiela
Loungewear: T by Alexander Wang
Underwear: Calvin Klein
Sportswear: Theory+

Streetwear: Visvim
Menswear: Ermenegildo Zegna
Loungewear: Uniqlo
Underwear: hammerthor/sunspel
Sportswear: Adidas (inc. collabs)

>>10267341
>Raf
>Thom Browne
>A. Wang
>CK I guess
>Adidas and their collabs

>>10268345
Dude ur off ur rocker a lot of the old house brands, prada and Burberry prosum especially are still doing great things

>>10268546
Prosum makes really cool stuff.

Prada is for the tasteless newly moneyed

Streetwear: Rick Owens
Menswear: Thom Browne
Loungewear: Sunspel
Underwear: Sunspel
Sportswear: Y-3

>Streetwear: Rick Owems
>Menswear: Raf Simsons
>Loungewear: Rick Owens
>Underwear: Raf Simons
>Sportswear: usually what im dressed in

>>10268391
I'm not even saying I only wear fast fashion. I'm knowledgable about fashion on all levels and enjoy discussing it. I own a few Damir Doma pieces and would love to analyze his runway shows with likeminded people.

That said, I understand that not everyone "gets" high fashion. I also understand that a lot of the people who claim to "get" runway shows on /fa/ are actually just pretentious and lack any deep understanding of their purpose.

I'm sick of skeletal fuccbois deriding anyone who criticizes avant garde clothing as an uncultured, knuckle-dragging moron (as you have by claiming that I am comparable to someone who only eats McDonald's and microwave dinners).

You can't post anything on /fa/ and expect a good discussion because of both sides of this "what is fashion." Those who few fashion as only wearing high fashion and avant garde styles deride any thread about more minimal, classic clothing. This is done to the point of parody (comments critiquing anyone for not wearing raf and Rick Owens have become memes). Likewise, people who think all runway and avant garde clothing is useless also deride discussion, and I can get that's it's frustrating to have to explain to these people what these clothes are for. That said, we'd be much better off with a more tolerant and understanding community.

For example, you can't post on /fa/ about looking to J.crew for casual trousers without being criticized for dressing like a pleb, even though top menswear bloggers and journalists always mix in fast fashion brands with high fashion clothing. The concept that anything that isn't high fashion is garbage and something only complete slobs wear is obnoxious and extremely pretentious. for fucks sake, someone said they thought Damir's sweater looked weird and unwearable, and you respond by claiming I must live like an uncultured idiot because I defended him. Grow up. People involved in the actual fashion industry are not this arrogant.

Streetwear: White Mountaineering
Menswear: Brioni
Loungewear: Reigning Champ
Underwear: Thorlo's (I'd freeball for the rest of my life if it meant I could keep wearing their socks
Sportswear: Tracksmith

>>10268564
>Prosum makes really cool stuff.
This.

>>10268602
>we'd be much better off with a more tolerant and understanding community.
I agree. Also, in order to improve this board, there should be WAYWT for pure inspiration. WAYWT is just filled with those who has no experience/insight in fashion and therefore usually look like fucking retards. There should be a WAYWT where the more experienced members of this board could post for the newfags to get some inspiration.

rick owens rick owens usually what i'm dressed in

>>10268677
Droptrip detected

>>10268602
Lol I wasn't personally attacking you , the -you- in my post is an amalgamation of all the plebs that post on this board.
You missed my point entirely , I don't give a fuck if you mix 'fast fashion' with 'high fashion' and I wasn't replying to that Damir Doma thing either. (He's a hack though.)
My point is that if you only come here to dress basic and don't get or care to learn about high fashion then don't comment on runway shows because no one cares about you and you just derail discussions.
Again , if you want to look inoffensive then do so but don't start praising h&m when you know fuck all.
Also it's fine to mix basic pieces with designer pieces BUT only when the pieces are well made along with ethically made.
Don't fucking wear made in china nylon shirts with your Damir jumper because you know that's a stupid thing to do. It's an insult to the designer , it doesn't look good and it's just proof that you don't give a fuck about fashion.
But if your J.Crew trousers are made from 100% wool and are manafactured somewhere half decent like portugal then yeah throw them in your fit as long as you don't justify it as some sort of wicked sick formula of fast x high fashion.
It's not pretentious to say fast fashion is shit , people say it's shit and call you a pleb because SOME PEOPLE GENUIINELY LIKE FASHION.
To use my previous analogy , if you walk into a michilin star place and ask for a mcdonalds milshake with your dinner they wont praise you for not caring about certain 'unofficial' fashion rules like no fast fashion.
They'll call you a dickhead for disrespecting the art.
Get it?

>>10267341
street: undercover
menswear: loro piana
lounge: rc
underwear: idk whatever techy brand is making some space age shit that massages my balls
sportswear: veilance

>>10268694
No, not really.

>>10268708
No, you're still pretentious.

You can care about fashion and mixed clothing anyway you like. Tom Ford has come out saying that he wears Hanes T-shirts and pairs them with designer pieces. You are just pretentious.

This is not equivalent to going to a 5-star and ordering a McDonald's milkshake. This is equivalent to the 5-star restaurant cutting costs by buying cheap salt and other wholesale to use in their high-quality, artisanal dishes, because experts realize that this doesn't make a difference in the final product, the meal (or in the case of fashion, the outfit).

>>10267341
Nike

>>10268729
Tom Ford is also a massive cunt , what's your point?
I really don't think fashion is for you tbh , why are you here if you can't grasp my simple argument?
Keep wearing your zara clothes with your Damir Doma (Silent I bet) and pretending it doesn't matter because you know it does or you wouldn't be this upset.
Also I don't think you know what pretentious means.
I'm here defending an art form while you're crying about people getting annoyed that you're cheap and trying to to justify fast fashion.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm I wonder which one of us is the dickhead here.
Btw cheap salt will kill you. Buy sea salt 8)

>Ctrl+f
>Aesics
>0 results
Literally the worst subrettit tbh.

>>10268791
Pretentious: Attempting to impress by affecting greater importance or merit than is actually possessed.

>>10268835
Who am I trying to impress and do you actually think i'm making fashion into a bigger thing than it is?
If so then you really aren't meant for fashion. If you don't like it then why are you here?

>>10268843
I love fashion. I hate pretentious assholes like you that try to turn it into something so arbitrarily elitist.

I bet you've never read Deluxe or Overdressed.

>>10268363
Please stop coming here, you're the type of person who ruins this board

Streetwear: Kanye West
Menswear: Calvin Klein
Loungewear: Raf Simons
Underwear: Versace
Sportswear: Yohji

It might sound basic but These would be my choice.

>plebs ITT
SLP is all I need

>>10268867
>I've read a couple biased books so I have uncovered the scam that is high fashion!
>Btw I love fashion
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight
Some brands don't try anymore and we know. Buying a brand new Raf piece made in portugal for $500 or whatever is stupid.
Buying an archival Raf piece made in Belgium for the same price isn't.
Thinking high fashion designers don't use better materials is stupid.
Thinking fast fashion is just as good as designer clothing is even more ridiculous.
Being retarded enough to call me of all people pretentious when I actually agree with you (sorta) proves you're just spouting whatever that book said without understanding it.
Fuck right off already.

>>10268980
Lol your analysis of that book is completely wrong. Of course it's biased you moron, everything is, and it doesn't pretend to be unbiased. I'm not calling all people pretentious, I'm calling you pretentious because you are

>>10268980
you two are annoying and your argument is going nowhere
some people can't afford to pay premium for a superior product; so they justify their bargain bin wardrobe by saying "I'm no elitist there's no reason to charge more than 20 bucks for a shirt and that's all I'm gonna say on the matter.....have you even SEEN that post about the 500 dollar mom jeans? that shit's just a stupid cash grab, man"

people's outfit choices change as they age; let that guy get a fucking job where he can afford to buy better clothes and that mindset will totally change

Streetwear: Kazuyuki Kumagi
Menswear: Thom Browne
Loungewear: Jan Jan Van Essche
Underwear: ?
Sportswear: ACRONYM

>>10269007
I work as a lawyer and my partner is a consultant. We make enough money to wear whatever we want. I've done my research and I don't see the point in avoiding cheaper basics that I can pair with nicer items when the effect is the same. I have friends in fashion and am well read on this topic and feel it's pretentious to think otherwise.

Streetwear: Saint Laurent.
Menswear: Surprise me.
Loungewear: Rick, I guess. I don't really wear loungewear.
Underwear: Eh. Surprise me.
Sportswear: Gyakusou.

>>10269028
ever worn expensive basics? acne, apc, anything japanese?

>>10269037
Yep. I don't think Acne or APC Tshirts are marginally better than J.Crew broken in Tees.

>>10269054
>damn I didn't think you'd mention broken in tees
j crew is gonna end up going out of business though so stock up dude

>>10269065
If they're smart they'll make their main stores male only and continue with their shitty outlet experiment.

Their problem is that all of their shit goes on crazy sales all the time so nothing is worth full price ever.

>>10269088
exactly; apparently they even opened some J Crew (j crew factory) bargain stores lol
the way i see it, they need to create a high-end label (in line with Ralph Lauren Black/Purple label, Brooks Brothers Red Fleece, Burberry Black Label, etc) and move some manufacturing jobs to America
cuz those sales are killing the brand, and ironically, they're the only thing keeping up foot traffic

>>10269103
Honestly a lot of their quality is shit. The only item they have that I'll swear by is their slim fit broken in tees.

Bought a pair of their trousers once and they literally fell apart in less than 6 months. I tried on one of their spring jackets and the zipper broke off when I did it up.

>>10269118
that's why I do research before buying any outerwear, man; I'm pretty proud of my collection, tbh

>>10269037
>bringing up axne and apc as examples of good expensive basics
C'mon bro

Streetwear: Rick Owens.
Menswear: Dior Homme Hedi era.
Loungewear: Whoever makes white basic shorts and t-shirts.
Underwear: Calvin Klein.
Sportswear: New Line.

>>10267535
Never come back

>>10268363
Just get out really

>>10268970
>Loungewear: Raf Simons

>>10267341
Richard Owens
Hermes
Sunsepl
Zimmerli
Acronym

>>10267341
Streetwear: slp
Menswear: slp
Loungewear: Supreme
Sportswear: Adidas

>>10267341
>Sportswear: Nike

Nike is objectively the best option for sportswear

>>10271933
I'll also add -
Streetwear: Maharishi
Menswear: Armani

>>10268564

prada still does some sick collections it's just like it is with brands like raf and rick that you don't have to go for the obvious logo shit