/fa/ - Fashion

>>13258266
>>13258526
>>13259721
>>13260264


I just copped this yesterday :^ )))

http://internet-collective.com/

>>13261140
>Ruined it with the stupid store name right on the front of the shirt

For fucks sake

>>13261140
Not to be a jerk or a shill but... come on, man. Come on.
>>13260508
>>13259449
At least I'm not doing what >>13261165 pointed out, lmao

>>13261294

come on what? mad i didnt buy a design you got off the internet off you?

>>13261162
Okay, this one got me with interest. any context?

>>13261162
I actually want to know the context to this.

>>13261315
>>13261321
What are you, cops?

>>13259500
icky and smacky

>>13261138
fuck off don't post stuff from spoopy movies

>>13261476
No just a concerned citizen

>>13257601
>el barto

>>13260694
Hey Vsauce. Michael here. Have you ever wondered what happens when someone doesn't pay me my fucking money?

What would be a good company name to photoshop into these pictures to sell as typical hype shit

>>13262716
404_NOT_FOUND

>>13261294
Yeah, I don't love your store but you're miles ahead of >>13261140

Not that you're asking for it, but if I were to give advice on your store I'd say I prefer the shirts you have that aren't just a blocked off image. ngl, >>13259449 is probably the only shirt I'm gonna buy from you, because I'm extremely picky and I'm not gonna buy a buncha shit I can't wear in public. But if this "cursed image" meme is actually gonna be anything but, I think it only works when the shirt is normal or only slightly odd at first glance, and only seems disturbing if you really look at it/know the context it came from/think about it for more than 10 seconds.

Almost nothing ITT even remotely resembles anything aesthetic or effay or even barely acceptable in public if you're anything but an edgy 14 year old with negligent parents. If someone wants to seriously pull this off as some kind of deepwebcore piece, almost invariably it will have to rely on some esoteric reference that keeps its 'cursed' nature hidden from normal people who will just post a picture of you on facebook and watch the laughing emojis roll in.

>>13259647
this is blessed as fuck image

>>13262912
I actually do appreciate constructive criticism very much, and pretty much everything you said is the same as my own thoughts at the moment. My store's been kind of a dumb hobby only really updated in my spare time, which hasn't been much until just recently. I'm not a fan of the "blocked off images" as you put it, either, but I do find it kind of humorous and there are some people who want just that, and I'm down to provide that for now as long as I've got 'em in a separate section from everything else. My schedule's started to free up a little bit more recently and I've got quite a few *actual* designs to put up over the next month or so as well as a full overhaul of the site layout itself, progress has just been hella slow due to work and other life stuff. We're getting there, though.
If you're down to shoot me an email I'd love to chat and get your opinion on some other stuff too. officialgdimp at gmail.

>>13263009
your site name?

>>13262746
This

>>13259712
I really wanna wear this

>>13263249
It's graphicdesignismypassion.com or alternatively, gdimp.com.
The full catalog of everything I've got up at the moment is here: gdimp.com/collections/all

>>13263335
top fukken kek
I'm gonna buy something from you

>>13263335
Most of these would look better in black imo

>>13261315
>>13261321
I'd assume its a horror attraction that's going a bit extreme

>>13257553
Neuroscience anon here, these look disturbingly human. Did we ever get a backstory?

>>13259453
How do you print this kind of stuff?

>>13264513

>>13257558
This reminds me of my old house in the far north of Australia. Green tree frogs love that shit.

>>13263335
i’d really consider copping from you, but print quality is a must for me: what’s your process like?

>>13261321
>>13261315
>>13264278

not horror attraction
last anon said that its a scene in some horror movie.
maybe cannibal the musical.

>>13264443
>>13264650
>>13264253
I have two print shops at my disposal with a shitton of different equipment and printing processes available but the one I use most commonly for this stuff is called Direct-To-Garment printing (or just DTG). Though this isn't entirely accurate I've heard some people refer to it as the industry equivalent of a giant home inkjet printer for fabrics, which I guess is kind of close enough. It's a big CMYK printer that shoots the ink straight into the fabric almost like a dye (rather than laying it on top of the fabric like traditional screen printing), and then the shirt gets heat cured, locking the ink in. It ends up leaving the shirt with a soft/smooth feel to where you can't even feel a difference between a blank shirt and one that's been printed on, plus it doesn't eventually crack or peel with age like screen printing does. If you take shit care of it when you wash it (using super abrasive detergents and drying on the hottest setting, for example) it can eventually start to fade a bit but it takes a long time for that to happen and isn't usually that noticeable. Pic related, I'm wearing this shirt right now, which I printed back in March 2016 and have worn quite a bit and it still looks great.
The only drawback to the process (or mine, at least) is that I can't print on darker-colored shirts. With the ink getting shot into the fabric itself rather than laid on top of it it kind of blends into the color of the shirt. There are newer models of my printer that are CMYK+white ink that print differently and can overcome this issue, but I have yet to invest in it. In that case I either switch over to traditional screen printing (which comes with all the pros/cons I'm sure everyone's already familiar with) or I outsource to a friend who has a newer DTG printer, but that of course ends up being a little more costly.

I see a couple of you ordered shirts. My local post office is closed on Saturdays so I'll send them out Monday morning.

>>13265019
Isn't this the process where you can only use blanks made of synthetic materials?

>>13265047
Nope, I can print on pretty much any fabric. The blanks I'm printing on for all of the stuff on my site at the moment (and 90% of the orders I get for my actual day job doing this stuff) are 100% preshrunk cotton, with the exception of ringer tees. Most ringers I use are usually a cotton/polyester blend of some sort IIRC. I'm not in the shop right now so I can't check the exact blend.

>>13265019
sounds cool, will def check it out, thanks for the good work

Let me know if you want to team up to create /fa/ merch. We would have to reinvest the profits back into the board though, that is kind of a dealbreaker for me.

>>13260725
/ourguy/

>>13265135
This should unironically be the /fa/ logo

>>13265730
fuck off

>>13265780
agreed

>>13257553
this shit has been around for ages dickhead