[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/fa/ - Fashion

Search:


View post   

>> No.17360768 [View]
File: 915 KB, 3380x2200, DOXA-Sub-200-1065.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17360768

>>17360725
I've often wondered why watch reviewers don't test water resistance as well. Pretty easy to take it somewhere and would put to rest some of the water resistance autism. I suspect that most watches will over perform since I dont see the gaskets that use being vastly different between watches in the same brand. I bet it more has to do with how rigorous the quality control is for particular models rather than the watch itself (dive watches with crazy depth ratings and dress chronos aside. I could see most 30, 50 and 100m watches doing much better than "survive hand washing " etc. I also wonder how prolific this is in the industry and if the old maxims on wr are obsolete
https://www.iso.org/news/2010/11/Ref1367.html

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]