/fa/ - Fashion

>>15814158
Im 32 in a short bit, but I still think accuracy of a watch and being on time as a person are good things to have. I give less of a fuck each day about the other things you mentioned, I only ever go to work and weekshopping with the old lady. Everything is closed or fucked up due to the rona, so nice clothes havent been a thing for me to look out for in quite a while. I keep good hygiene, but dont care much for a clean shave daily or a good scent as I only work with men in the same uniform for the most part.
I am at a crossroads of not giving a fuck regardless, but still wanting to maintain some order in my life (precision, for example).

>on THIS weeks episode, watch video reviewer xy is AGAIN talking about or comparing everyting under the sun to Rolex

Go fuck yourselves...

How do I go about getting a see-through caseback that would fit my watch? What do I need to measure?

Does a full SS caseback help magnetic resistance at all?

>>14969326
I know you nigger, you keep haunting me with the same pics of your piece every time I cry about modern watch diameters or bring up Heuer chronos or pic rel.
Seriously though, do you feel the thickness messes up the wearability or is it just a meme I keep telling myslef not to splooge on a USELESS THING THAT ANY 10 BUCK JAPAN SHITTER DOES BETTER?

I dont care about brand judgement or flexing/opinions. I am expecting a bunch of metal parts to make me feel happy while wanting the practicality and usability of a quartz at the same time.

Do I listen to the heart or reason?

How bout something more modern?