/fa/ - Fashion

>>9006207
maybe, last i touched the work was 3months ago. maybe things have changed but it all just looks like really bad rick rips with uninspiring treatments, i think the hit thing were these gross/slimy feeling diesel dipped denim pants or something. i have no idea who the consumer is.

i don't understand this random severe ad hominem assault, but if it makes you feel better then i'm for it.

i'm proud you've spent so much on rick, it's a good choice.
it's not that i don't think other designers exist - far from the truth, but i don't think many designers (especially the hacks behind sftm) come even close to what he does. i know nothing about ss.
in the end, this was a rick conversation so there's no need to go all 'check these people out'. should retain.

sorry if you feel offended, i just read your responses and again, felt nothing.
don't feel too chastised by it, i think we just look for different things.

if there's anything in particular you take issue with - voice it in a sensible manner, i'll try get back to it in 5hours.

i would prefer if you posted rick owens pictures. something here might feel fulfilling at least. i don't think anyone will confuse us.

>quick scan through your several -continues-
what is being discussed here. i disagree with a lot of your points
i'll green text them
>experiment with materials a little more than Rick
> same idea shown from different perspectives.
> in the way he handles his business,
>Rick is separated from other designers on the basis of believing in something

it actually just looks like you've taken what i've already posted and stretched it out, not saying too much more but enough to fill 2000characters