/fa/ - Fashion

>>15398612
the indices randomly thrown around the edge of the dial, god what were they thinking. 'they dont fit.. eh just stuff em in'. Yeah it's an iconic watch but not for me.

picrel is it for me, probably the most elegant diver ever made, yet I've seen tastelets here criticize it.

>>15370345
if you think this is ugly you're objectively wrong

>>14933948
Anything not Swiss is an easy target. Most "Swiss" too are susceptible since they are owned by huge conglomerates now who don't give a shit about secretly producing parts in Asian sweatshops. Anything without an in-house movement because reasons.

Everyone will eventually take the vintage pill and realize all modern watches are shitters regardless of quality or price. It's a frivolous "luxury" market of purposeless designs, the type of thing that women buy into but men are supposed to see beyond. Thank God most men are stupid and my quality vintage is still relatively affordable.