/fa/ - Fashion

>>14730830
>so you admit you’re in no position to call anyone bland?
Based on what logic? Because it'd be hypocritical? Sure. Does that make it not the case though?
>mostly for the worse though, as these generals prove time and time again
So what, should we stop experimenting with how we dress because sometimes it comes out looking goofy? Because risks are just soooooo scawy, evidenced by the fact that you still haven't posted your fit for us to bully?
>it’s low quality, clunky and shows you have no idea what you’re doing.
Yeah, I like the clunky look. To an extent i even kinda enjoy the brand just for the name, I won't lie. But please, show me how to do it right, o wise anonymous fashion forum shitposter.
>>14730833
Decent way to pass the time while we wait for people to post fits. Going on 10:00 in the east us and that seems to be when the activity starts dying down for the night.