/fa/ - Fashion

>>9683341
There are good replicas, and there are shit replicas.
Mine is good both externally and internally. The movement is actually lubricated properly, all of the seals have been greased, it's actually water resistant beyond the rolex spec for the datejust, the bracelet is very high quality, the AR is perfect, and the solid endlinks fit very well. Movement is accurate after regulation and other guys have determined that these datejusts run at a good amplitude from the factory.
And mine was $230. You can't judge all replicas by a single anecdote, you have to remember that they're all made by different "brands" despite having the same name on the dial.

>>9583815
I don't know what the replica market is like for clothing, but I do know for a fact that a majority of the replica market (not the shit you buy in an alleyway for 30 bucks) is very high quality, having things that one generally wouldn't expect at their price point.

>>9519021
nah, it's actually one of the worse ones. child assembly and industrial manufacturing means that automatic watches can be assembled fairly cheaply. the watch itself would cost you about 50 dollars, and you'd be overpaying.
actual nice fakes start around $250 and have ETA clone movements.

2nd for fake rolex

third for fake rolex