/fa/ - Fashion

w-what do you think?

>>6788034
mk is for side bitches
are you calling me a side bitch?

Today, I was wondering about the role culture plays into fashion. The way we as humans and as animals use clothes as a social tool when dealing with each other. I thought about the way future generations will look back on today's fashion and imagine them seeing us as just another archetype. When you strip it all of context it becomes clear to see what is going on: it is just animals using fabrics and symbols (read: logos) to influence each other psychologically (whether intentional or not). Each piece of an outfit shares a history in our supreme genetic code, from the mocassins that young tumblr girls have appropriated, to the bomber jackets that are trending with the youth, etcetera, etcetera. Even things that are not so obvious are still huge distinctions. Sneakers as casual wear. It's totally norm now, but soon it will be looked back on in the future = and people will say "People actually wore active wear so casually? How sloppy" Or maybe they might in a different way. It doesnt really matter, it will probably even have a revival at some point, wouldnt be surprising. The point I'm trying to make is that a lot of people who are new to this board (or probably not) seem to have a problem with really understanding the way fashion works and how it applies to them. McQueen said it best: "It's all a game."

>>6433733
before anymore aggressive response: i support your stance

>>6308303
i just said in >>6308228
that i dont care about what he's arguing about
i dont care about anyone except NATALIE!!!!1

>>6308294
yoooooooooooooooouuuuuuuu
>what does fashion, mean to YOU?
i already explained it in
>>6307278
>>6307758
but of course no one on this board reads that and would rather focus on off topic conversation!
theyd rather devolve into prmitive ego battles

just like i mentioned in
>6307878

its okay though

>>6235995
i know thats why its so enchanting
she looks hollow but very sweet
very sexy
i have weird taste