/fa/ - Fashion

>>13870227

>They do not care about you or your opinion.

Of course they care about people's opinions. If they didn't their wouldn't be a market for clickbait articles about "Why you shouldn't judge X for Y in 2018" or "Lets unpack why we look at X because of Y" or "10 things women with X are tired of hearing". Hair color. Weight. Lifestyle choices. They care. You care. The only reason why you made such a passive aggressive post was because you care at least to some degree and that's fine. Lets have a conversation on the internet about it.

>Women who dye their hair do it for one reason only: Because they think it's pretty.

Women dye their hair for many reasons. They may think it's pretty like you said or they may indeed be trying to make some sort of "punk rock" statement about free expression or diversity or whatever. Then there are women like pic related, who simply go through many different hair color changes and haircuts in quick succession to get as much attention as possible. After all, like you said, women get crazy amount of attention from men, and for women who are hungry for attention, uglifying yourself is one way to do it especially if you can't compete with higher status women. Any attention is good attention and believe me even this stinking borderline hobo of a woman still gets plenty of flattering attention along with the bad from desperate, lonely and indiscriminate men.

>Why would they care about cutting out a large portion of men that they would feel uncomfortable around in the first place? Why do you think your evaluation of a woman's hair factors into her decisions at all?

Because they aren't cutting out neckbeards and NEETS. How many high status men do you see walking around with pic related? "HMMMMMM I'm a 35 year old guy who has worked his ass off to make six figures a year while taking care of my body, I sure with I could get locked down with some girl with a neon green bowl cut". That's not reality.