/fa/ - Fashion

>>9369247
sorry, you're the one that's been talking in circles. yet again you have dismal reading comprehension. try to read the actual words people post.

>you: this is much higher quality

nope, never once said higher quality. go ahead, ctrl+f that. i mentioned that there are colors, patterns, and fabrics that were not present in his 1999 and 2000 collections, hence not simply a replication of 1999-2000.

>me: no it isnt, heres why

this didn't happen. you talked a good deal about tailoring and suiting, which are beside the point. you tried to shoehorn in the point by conflating fabric quality with suiting quality. the two aren't coupled. the only time you mentioned fabrics are twice: shetland wool, virgin wool, and the one sweater you posted, which is a blend. i replied that raf still uses shetland, virgin wool, blends, and labor-intensive pieces like the sweater you posted.

second, you discounted "one pretty coat" so im going to call fair game and discount your "one pretty sweater." by the way, that wasn't just "one pretty coat," look at the whole collection.

>oh well i wasnt even talking about that particular x i was umm heres a sleeve pattern from aw08!!

christ, youre just being purposefully dense to save face. the AW08 coat was a reply to your claim here:
>after his hiatus his suiting declined

this is a separate, independent point from the first.

you STILL havent clarified whether or not you consider outerwear like overcoats, trenches, etc. as part of 'tailoring and suiting,' which according to you has declined since his haitus.

>you dont even know what you argument was

yes, it's right here: >>9365948 the central point is
>there is more than replication here

and ive stuck to it since the beginning. you, on the other hand, have misinterpreted it throughout this thread from the beginning, carrying it into all sorts of irrelevant territory.