[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/fa/ - Fashion

Search:


View post   

>> No.8207100 [View]
File: 64 KB, 1024x579, kentwangss.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8207100

>>8207096
glad to help

>> No.8168938 [View]
File: 64 KB, 1024x579, 1396587239423.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8168938

>>8168857
>kent wang

not even once

>> No.8114126 [View]
File: 64 KB, 1024x579, kentwangss.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8114126

>>8113865
definitely not

>> No.8049145 [View]
File: 64 KB, 1024x579, kentwangss.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8049145

>>8038888
>Kent Wang

you're about to make a big mistake

>> No.7938544 [View]
File: 64 KB, 1024x579, 1391353717557.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7938544

>>7938522
Kent Wang?

>> No.7740444 [View]
File: 64 KB, 1024x579, 1388445706423.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7740444

>>7740024
its ok we all make mistakes

pic related, kent wang and the mistake of his sneakers

>> No.7717893 [View]
File: 64 KB, 1024x579, 1388445706423.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7717893

>>7717835
kent wang looks like it has down's compared to common projects

>> No.7513964 [View]
File: 64 KB, 1024x579, 1388124274552.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7513964

>>7513932
found it by just searching 'kent wang' on the archive

>> No.7489041 [View]
File: 64 KB, 1024x579, 1378941391280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7489041

>>7488970
up until those kent wang things (which look groce and weird on the foot relative to common projects, and the leather looks cheaper, see pic) there weren't any other sneakers on the market that looked like common projects achilles

show me a pair of plain open-laced white leather sneakers--no branding, no contrast stitching, no metal eyelets, no design details on the side like stripes, perforation, or panels. with the outsole stitched on and not glued like vans and H&M.

only THEN do you have a comparable design. vans authentics are fucking closed-toe three-eyelet CANVAS glued-on shit. generic plimsolls are not applicable here.

>> No.7458847 [View]
File: 64 KB, 1024x579, gB8WcWuh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7458847

Alright /fa/ I want some white leather sneakers, and I don't want to buy CPs at the moment, as I've spent so much money recently. I'm thinking of Kent Wangs, but they look a bit "clowny" in some photos, and fine in others. I feel like in size 13 they would look either fine or really bad. Any of you guys with larger feet have any experience with them?
pic related is some guy with size 9 feet from ribbit. I don't like the silhouette of them in it.

>> No.7392670 [View]
File: 64 KB, 1024x579, kentwang.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7392670

>>7392326
>kent wangs
nty

>> No.7180435 [View]
File: 64 KB, 1024x579, kentwang.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7180435

>>7179957
kent wangs are garbage
Napa Leather is 80+USD for 6 Sq ft and cp are inner lined with leather. If you calc that they use 3 to 4 sq ft per shoe in just leather alone, and then the soles are what another 40 bucks. Add contruction/labor cost and you are well over 150 USD in materials and labor. Lets say after packaging, assembly, and shipping they sell the shoes to retailers for around 220 USD. The retailers take a hit for shipping/customs and taxes. They mark them based on demand for 400+. The shoes sell fine so they keep it there. I can't imagine any other brand being able to produce a shoe with napa leather with the features CP gives. They can definitely imitate the look, but at a lower price the quality will be considerably less if they do not use Napa Leather.

>> No.7165317 [View]
File: 64 KB, 1024x579, kent.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7165317

>>7165298

>> No.7031596 [View]
File: 64 KB, 1024x579, fff.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7031596

>>7031577

mighty flattering angle imo

>> No.7005562 [View]
File: 64 KB, 1024x579, kentwang.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7005562

>>7005535
Looks bad

>> No.6883986 [View]
File: 64 KB, 1024x579, kentwang.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6883986

>>6881885
Yes get these white canvas jack purcells, and the low CDG Play is kinda overpriced since the colorway is almost identical.


>buying Kent Wang
They look like crap

>> No.6794313 [View]
File: 64 KB, 1024x579, kentwang.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6794313

Kent wangs look terrible, but might look good if you can size down 2 sizes lol

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]