/fa/ - Fashion

>>9325787
Cool, we can agree then that you think you had portrayed yourself poorly in the initial post and are instating a modification.

social norm is only active in its consideration. how is social norm nominated? is it held to a indiscriminate scale or is it by the popular opinion of different individuals (no matter its conception (television, internet, parental, reading, etc))?

Isn't to produce a facade on social standards immediately enmeshed in concerns of society. Again, society defined as the collective efforts of humans (people).

Okay - clothing as a character, like an arm, leg etc.

i think a person can emit a character without being aware of their pre-established physicality.
Presence not in contour but in occupation.

Nothing denys your awareness of someone else real/non-real gaze. Which is a prominent narative in your "epilogue" which you've reasserted, despite flaccid attempts to diminish. It can be self improvement, it can be that, but then is it self improvement to ratify social alignment?

It doesn't take long to capture the breadth of contradiction you've scattered amongst so few posts. If you read them back now - your posts in succession. Does it make sense? is it chilling?