/fa/ - Fashion

Reminder that the context of an image posted (its location, lighting, pose, filter) makes all the difference from a fit looking like utter garbage and a fit being lauded. All these poor-quality selfies are usually terrible, with terrible quality, taken in cluttered or messy rooms with too much or too little lighting and awkward stances, that diminish any merit a particular ensemble may warrant. I have seen (though I haven't saved) fits that were mediocre, however the scenery behind it (woods, outside, in the city) accentuated it and pieced together a holistic environment, as opposed to disarray; and, alternatively, good fits that looked terrible because of the reasons stated above. Fashion, as you know, is meant to accent your lifestyle or place of residence, not be the sole definition of it, so these terrible images do no justice but to be used for mockery; again, it's all in the presentation, not of the outfit itself, but of all things around it.


Pic related, a terrible fit that, due to the location and contrast of the image, I have seen several posters on /fa/ praise many times.

>>6553450
AND IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT THEN YOU'RE A FUCKING WEEABOO FOREVER ALONE AUTIST!

>>6553439
back the fuck off!?!?