/fa/ - Fashion

everything in this outfit (minus shoes/watch/socks) was thrifted

>>12396362
maybe try a work jacket/chore coat.
>>12396412
not a fan of the vest, otherwise decent
>>12396417
your shirt is the redeeming quality of this fit, those pants don't work (and neither does the shoelace belt imo)
>>12396499
i like the top layer, but i think this fit would've benefitted from a simple one-tone crewneck tee or sweater. I would personally prefer it with baggier pants + chunky sneakers (or derbies) for getting that authentic japanese streetwear vibe
>>12396670
not a fan of the shoes
>>12396700
Shoes + pants work well. I would wear a different tee tho
>>12396728
pants fit badly imo and shoes dont compliment the outfit
>>12396870
despite the hate i think this a pretty good fit objectively speaking. The jeans do fit slightly weird around ur thighs tho
>>12396947
this is great, but it would be better with a baggier/thicker sweater imo (esp those w/o the strings)
>>12397022
not horrible, but nothing unique. Ur not even that fat bro so don't worry, and the clothes actually fit ur figure well unlike a lot of other ppl here
>>12397429
guy on the left has the best outfit, middle is meh, right is alright but would be better w/ other shoes
>>12397476
u look comfortable in the clothes which is a plus. I think this would look good with a dark pair of grey/blue denim
>>12397516
lad/10 but alright otherwise. not a fan of the graphic tee tho
>>12397517
u always seem to remind me of Mikko Puttonen, which is not a bad thing, u guys got similar style. I do like the androgyny factor in ur outfits, but this outfit would benefit from different socks (they clash w/ the shirt) and maybe just plain black derbies?

>>12398442
>>12398443
i love the interior design, outfit is cool as well but its difficult to see texture details w/ the lighting
>>12398686
red stripes clash imo, otherwise good
>>12398863
can't see the shoe/pant detail too well w/ the lighting but decently unique otherwise