/fa/ - Fashion

>>17761196
Hmmm I probably won't find out for a while
>>17761202
>What drugs are you on? The viewing angle on standard LCDs is utterly trash compared to analog hands under a crystal. This is a known fact. See pic related
i can tell the time much faster on my g-shock than with any of my mechanical watches. i own both, just not battery watches with analog dials. why does a viewing angle even matter for 99.9999% of the time? so you can tell the time while you're yanking it?
>I just said there are reasons to get an analog quartz
that they are.... cheaper? your view angle argument is a big stretch to defend your position
>Happy for you but the anon you were replying to should know your case is unfortunately not common
is there a problem with the F6922 movement? sure, cheaper to replace ($50) than repair. they are durable movements that last a long time
https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/orient-caliber-f6922.5411857/
>Really? Talking about resale value of sub-$200 watches?
Quartz watches tend to lose value more quickly than mechanical, across all price ranges