/fa/ - Fashion

>>12340363

genuinely debating this: What if your race is so tied up in your land and culture? Racial pride makes a lot of sense nowadays, because the prevalence of marxism (just think of every buzzfeed article, every film) seperates people into groups based on gender, sexuality, religion but especially race.

They also make it very hard to seperate yourself from your culture: a white person will always be a part of 'white history' and 'white culture' just like an arab will always be associated with the acts of their fellow arab Muslims who act pretty poorly.

We're stuck in this. For generations, this is how we've been taught to see the world.

However, you can't deny that the narrative has been overwhelmingly negative and shaming to white people, for their collective crime of
It also fosters an 'original sin' idea that an average white guy gets some of the blame for cruel or outdated practices of historical people of the same skin colour, which is dumb - most white US families a century ago DIDN'T own a slave, they wanted to free them or were indifferent. Yet modern white children still have to feel awful for this, despite slavery, colonialism, war, and all of the barbary that comes with it was practised GLOBALLY often AFTER the whites had abolished or ended it. Yet there's no other collective guilt, no African guilt for the warlords who sold the slaves etc.

I see racial pride as a direct push back at the negative characterisation that is placed on people by merit of being part of a group that is deemed 'bad' or 'guilty' or 'privileged', especially whites. They want to celebrate and pride achievements of their nations, family and like-minded kinsmen (on battlefields, in philosophy, ethics, politics etc). Hence why you don't see any people pushing for white pride also being proud of the white communists and KKK of the past, or the Nazi war criminals and butcherous gestapo, who by any political view were evil (at least sane, non edgelord or agent provocateur).