/fa/ - Fashion

>>17918413
Issues I see:
- Case is original, but has been badly refinished at some point (this is why the caseback looks fucked)
- Crown is a replacement, but the Rolex logo being on the crown is not a red-flag at all, Tudors from this period occasionally had Rolex crowns or Tudor shield crowns.
- Dial has been pretty badly refinished, but is most likely genuine.

I'd crack the caseback to be safe, I know a lot of these vintage Tudors have had their movements replaced or frankenised with off the shelf 2824's over the years as a cost saving measure. It's probably still a nice enough watch, but if you're going for a 100% original example, this ain't it.

Here's an old pic of my 1960's Tudor with a horrendous redial that I bought back before I knew any better when I first got into watches like 15 years ago. It's a little shitter, but I still like it anyway.

Old ass picture of my Tudor to bump the thread.
>>17322874
Whether you spend 50 or 300, lizard straps always look kinda cheap and nasty if they have a shiny finish, it kinda just comes with the territory. It's an aesthetic choice and not a matter of the strap being cheap or poorly made. I expected it to be complete dogshit, but it's actually pretty nice quality in all honesty lol.

I'm just happy to finally have found a genuine teju strap for so little money after literally years of keeping my eyes peeled for one.
>>17322875
Me neither usually, but I think the fact that my watch dial is also a shiny black really ties it together for some reason. It's definitely not everyones taste, though. Shiny straps are super tacky, but I think it's pretty period appropriate for the watch and I dig it.

>>17227185
Holy based, how do you like it? It's a Cronos right? I've considered buying a San Martin myself in the past but I just struggle to pull the trigger on Changs finest timepieces. The quality looks superb for the money, though.
>>17227249
Based Tudor Chad, nice watch Anon. What year is it? I wish Tudor would do more shit like this these days.
>>17227226
Of course it is, it's a 70's watch.
>>17227300
My friend just bought the PCB-looking version of this and it looks fucking nice but I know it'd be way too big for my wrist. G-Shocks are always cool.
>>17227276
Casio.

>All these Daniel Wellingtons
Pls no. I thought you were better than this, /fa/.

Contributing with my Tudor oyster from 1960.