[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

Search:


View post   

>> No.12878045 [View]
File: 1.84 MB, 320x180, goop1.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12878045

>>12878013
>XXL sold out

>> No.12463413 [View]
File: 1.84 MB, 320x180, WX98lo1.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12463413

>>12463411
>$10k
>"expensive"

>> No.12453314 [View]
File: 1.84 MB, 320x180, WX98lo1.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12453314

>>12453241
>it's obviously all pretty subjective, but you dont actually have to have owned an item by a brand to be able to rank it lol.
Yeah you don't, but if you have never owned it then your ranking holds 0 weight. The focus on these discussions always turns to "quality". Wtf is it based off of then, your opinion despite never even owning it? pictures on the internet??? OK

I'm referring to the majority of brands in general, it's rare for something to just be released under one label. I used to work at h&m and the difference between the t-shirts and tanks under the "basics" and "divided grey" lines were like night and day. I'm sure a lot has changed since then but that's only one example. Fast fashion = automatically shit is a stale meme btw

anyway, again not differentiating between clothes/shoes/accessories is a pretty big deal. I love Acne dress shoes but I'd rather die then own any of their clothes again. I'd maybe make an exception for one of their jackets if it's dirt cheap. So would I rate Acne shit/low cause I don't like their clothes? or high cause I love their shoes. I don't know how it's possible for people to not have disparities like this for multiple brands...assuming you've dealt with their stuff before.

Unless these lists are all just for mindless shitposting, then sure it makes sense.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]