/fa/ - Fashion

>>11390676
none of the ones i posted are postmodern but modernist works of art

>>11390725
op here, in addition to what >>11390747 said, read Mondrian (the guy who made >>11390429). here's an excerpt i like:
>You will agree that if two words are sung with the same strength with the same emphasis, each weakens the other. One cannot express both natural appearance as we see it and plastic relationships, with the same determinateness. In naturalistic form, in naturalistic color and in naturalistic line, plastic relationships are veiled. To be plastically expressed determinately, relationships can be represented only through color and linein themselves.In the capriciousness of nature, form and color are weakened by curvature and by the corporeality of things. To give the means of expression of painting their full value in my earlier work, I increasingly allowed color and line to speak for themselves.

full reading: https://modernistarchitecture.wordpress.com/2010/10/17/piet-mondrian’s-“a-dialogue-on-neoplasticism”/

anon above gives a great explanation of the social function of abstract art (appeal to the experiences of everyone) and the above link goes into more theoretical aspects of how an artist ought to represent a work

>>11390783
nice anon. w2c?