/fa/ - Fashion

qasa racers are the only ones with the red sole decoration, right?

because i went to the chicago store a few weeks ago and they still had some qasas, but they had the red decoration. i wasnt familiar enough with the look of qasas at the time to know if they were regular or racers, but would I be correct to assume theyre racers if they had the red?

I was surprised they still had some because /fa/ always says they sell out so quick, so are the regular ones the only ones that sell out?

and do they sell out more slowly in actual stores as opposed to online, or will i be able to cop a pair in store without preordering?

;
_
;

w2c in the UK? Can't find it anywhere =(

>>7582226
i asked a gay friend and he said that that much skinny projects gay, rather than /fa/. so i guess if you are really masculine then ok but otherwise be careful

mein grail :')

I want some so bad and i don't even know why i do

What would you wear with these on a summers day /fa/?

Black skinny jawnz, oversized alexander wang tee is what i usually pair them with but i feel like there could are more interesting combinations to make.

Roshes would be a pretty decent option, though not super durable.

If you have some money and you're not afraid to actually put them to the test, then you want some Y-3 Qasas - provided you're going for a more techwear sort of aesthetic.

Otherwise, you want boots of some sort.

>>6600005
And on that note, I'll throw in a few things that could fall under the realm of engineered/techwear.

>>6584559

Why are these so hyped? I think that they look ridiculous.

>>6264971
somewhat small and of all types but sure

How much are they going to be?

>>6120921
hell yeah

>>6113042
>>6113034
This is 100 what I'm going for. It's not even about being obnoxious or ironic. It's about wearing shoes that you could potentially be so stoked in that you do ninja shit. This is the definition of Goof Ninja.

>>6030468
look closer, i'm not anon
and yes, i do

pic related, amazing sneakers

also on topic, dip em into latex, makeshift ccp drips

>>6016778

my appchan style doesn't color names based on email and I can still tell when you post just by your writing.

I don't always agree with what you say but I appreciate you taking the time to articulate your thoughts. it's really a joy to read quality posts.

>>5973078

>launching nukes from the moon

I'm pretty sure this would be a terrible idea, I mean couldn't you just destroy the outposts without much fear of issues like killing a ton of people or destroying the enviornment?

also there's literally no energy advantage to launching shit from the moon, because you'd have to get it there in the first place. you could have higher payload fraction FROM the moon, but you'd still have to get it to the moon.

when was this thing published? between ww2 and the mercury stuff>?